They’ve survived the unthinkable—only to be left behind. Tens of thousands of people across the UK were infected with HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C after receiving contaminated blood products through the National Health Service (NHS) between the 1970s and early 1990s. Over 3,000 have died. Those who remain—living with irreversible health damage—say they are “waiting to die in limbo,” abandoned by a system that once harmed them and is now delaying their compensation.

The scandal is now one of the gravest failures in the history of public health and medical ethics in Britain. Yet even after a damning public inquiry and the announcement of a compensation package exceeding £11.8 billion, the process of justice remains painfully slow and exclusionary.

Also Read: FDA Approves New Covid Vaccine For Kids With Selective Eligibility

The infected blood scandal didn’t happen in a vacuum. Throughout the 1970s and 80s, the UK faced a growing demand for clotting agents like Factor VIII, used to treat patients with conditions such as haemophilia. But with domestic supply falling short, the NHS began importing blood plasma—mainly from the United States.

Much of that plasma came from high-risk groups, including prisoners and intravenous drug users, who were often paid to donate. These donations were frequently contaminated with hepatitis viruses and HIV.

Shockingly, UK authorities continued using these high-risk blood products for years, even after risks were known. Blood donations were not routinely screened for hepatitis C until 1991—18 months after the virus had already been identified.

What is The Human Cost Of Infected Blood Health Complications?

Over 30,000 NHS patients were exposed. Many were children. Some were subjected to medical trials without consent. The result? A generation of individuals living with chronic illnesses and systemic health complications that never should have happened.

HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C are life-altering conditions. Beyond the immediate risk of organ damage, liver failure, or immunosuppression, the emotional toll is immense. Survivors often live with persistent fatigue, neurological symptoms, chronic pain, and mental health challenges, including PTSD and anxiety. Stigma around HIV and hepatitis has also caused widespread social isolation.

Women infected through childbirth or transfusions during pregnancy face added burdens. Children of infected parents have lost caregivers. Many victims stayed silent for decades, fearing shame or professional consequences.

In 2017, the UK government finally launched a statutory inquiry into the scandal. The final report, released in May 2024, called out a pervasive cover-up by the NHS and government. The evidence was clear: thousands were knowingly exposed to risk. The response was too little, too late.

Also Read: South Asia Continues To Remain The 'Global Epicentre' Of Anemia Among Girls

Following the report, a multi-billion-pound compensation fund was announced but fast forward to mid-2025, and only 460 victims have received full compensation out of more than 2,000 invited to submit claims. Tens of thousands more are still waiting—even to be allowed to apply.

Sir Brian Langstaff, chair of the public inquiry and British judge, was blunt in a supplemental 200-page report released in July 2025. “People are being harmed further,” he said. “Obvious injustices” include:

• Exclusion of victims infected with HIV before 1982
• Unrealistic evidence requirements for psychological harm
• Lack of consultation with victims during the design of the scheme

Rather than being centered around the people it aims to serve, the scheme was built behind closed doors—mirroring the secrecy that caused the original disaster.

How Compensation Delays Are Worsening Victims' Health Conditions

Here's what many don’t grasp: delayed compensation isn’t just a bureaucratic failure—it’s a health crisis.

Many victims are now elderly or seriously ill. Without financial support, they face barriers to adequate care, end-of-life support, and medical treatments not covered by the NHS. Mental health, too, has deteriorated among survivors, many of whom feel abandoned yet again.

The current criteria for proving psychological harm require evidence from a consultant psychiatrist with long-term treatment records. But in the 1980s and 90s, such services were rarely available, especially outside major cities. For many victims, disclosing their status even to medical professionals meant risking stigma, job loss, or personal rejection.

Requiring documentation they could never have safely obtained isn’t just unfair, it’s cruel.

What Happens to the Body When In Contact With Contaminated Blood?

To understand the scale of this injustice, it’s crucial to look at what infections like HIV and hepatitis do to the body:

HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) attacks the immune system, making the body vulnerable to other infections and certain cancers. Without treatment, it progresses to AIDS. Even with antiretroviral therapy, it can cause long-term fatigue, cognitive issues, cardiovascular problems, and reduced life expectancy.

Hepatitis B and C target the liver. Chronic infection can lead to cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Many infected individuals require lifelong antiviral medication and liver monitoring.

These viruses are spread through contact with infected blood, sexual fluids, or contaminated medical tools. Even a single exposure can lead to lifelong health consequences.

Despite allocating £11.8 billion, the UK government has been slow to implement recommendations. Sir Brian’s report calls for:

• Immediate eligibility for all victims, not just those invited
• Prioritization of elderly and severely ill survivors
• Acknowledgment of the stigma that prevented early care
• Transparency and involvement of affected families in ongoing decision-making

The Infected Blood Compensation Authority has so far processed a fraction of the claims. Survivors continue to ask: if the government has known this was coming for years, why are we still waiting?

While this scandal is rooted in the UK, the message applies globally- trust in healthcare systems is fragile. Once broken, it’s hard to rebuild.

Scandals like this shake confidence in public health not just in transfusions, but in vaccines, medications, and institutional care. When victims are sidelined, when compensation is delayed, and when transparency is lacking, the public loses faith.

A decade-old clip of Fox News host Greg Gutfeld has resurfaced recently. In that video, Gutfeld can be seen fiercely defending vaccines, and calling out Donald Trump for spreading anti-vaccine rhetoric. The video that made waves is going viral again, sparking fresh debate over how the right’s stance on public health has shifted in the years since.

The resurfaced clip, originally aired on The Five in September 2015, shows Gutfeld taking direct aim at then-candidate Trump, who had linked vaccines to autism during a Republican primary debate. “This is a really bad thing to happen to the Republican Party, an anti, hysterical anti-science point of view about vaccines,” Gutfeld said at the time. “Using the anecdote with a child is destructive and it’s ignorant because it’s not science.”

He didn’t hold back, calling the claim “stupid,” “dangerous,” and “bad for Republicans.”

A Clip From the Past: Why Is It Relevant Today?

The clip was compiled and circulated by Media Matters for America this week, drawing attention to how starkly Gutfeld’s position appears to have shifted since those pre-Trump years. The timing of its resurgence is no accident: it comes as Gutfeld has recently thrown his support behind Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., one of the most prominent vaccine skeptics in American politics.

Kennedy, who was confirmed to the post earlier this year with unanimous Democratic opposition, has since pushed out top vaccine officials from federal agencies, including the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. His tenure has seen a wave of resignations from CDC scientists and a renewed push to examine debunked theories linking vaccines and autism, a position rejected by decades of research.

Gutfeld Then vs. Gutfeld Now

In 2015, Gutfeld used one of his sharpest analogies to dismantle the idea that vaccines cause autism:

“It’s a false causal argument to say because vaccines and autism symptoms appear at the same time, ergo, the vaccines cause autism,” he said. “That’s the same as saying, you know, when you have ice cream and you get sunburns in the summertime, therefore ice cream causes sunburns.”

Fast-forward to 2025, and Gutfeld is singing a different tune, reports several media outlet, in fact, his own statements echoes that of the HHS leader.

In January, during Kennedy’s confirmation process, Gutfeld praised him as “passionate,” “persuasive,” and “not woke.” While he conceded that Kennedy’s views on vaccines “seem more reliant on his gut instinct than science,” Gutfeld ultimately told viewers, “If I were in the Senate, and who’s to say I’m not?...I would vote for him. All Republicans should say yes.”

By September, his tone had grown even warmer. On The Five last week, Gutfeld defended Kennedy after a tense Senate hearing, framing Democrats as “unglued” in their criticism of the HHS secretary and presenting Kennedy’s ousting of the CDC director as justified.

“Junior says it’s time for new blood at the health agency after they failed Americans during COVID,” Gutfeld said on air, with no hint of the skepticism that once defined his coverage of vaccine conspiracies.

A New Shift, But At Health's Cost

The resurfaced clip is more than just a personal contradiction, it’s a reflection of Fox News’ broader transformation over the last decade. In 2015, the network was still somewhat divided on Trump’s rise and occasionally hosted sharp criticism of his more controversial claims. But as Trump cemented his hold over the Republican Party and conservative media, Fox News’ editorial line increasingly aligned with his agenda.

Today, vaccine skepticism is a recurring theme on the network, often framed as a matter of personal freedom rather than public health. Gutfeld’s evolution from calling vaccine misinformation “dangerous” to defending one of the country’s most prominent vaccine skeptics underscores that shift.

Why It Resonates Now

The clip’s resurgence resonates in a moment where public health policy remains politically charged. COVID-19’s aftermath, declining vaccination rates for children, and growing partisan divides over science and medicine have brought vaccine debates back into the spotlight.

For critics, Gutfeld’s change of heart exemplifies how leading conservative voices have moved from defending science to embracing figures who question it. For supporters, it shows a willingness to challenge the “establishment” health bureaucracy, even if it means revisiting debunked theories.

Fox News did not respond to a request for comment on the resurfaced clip, reported The Wrap.

Canada’s leading drug regulator is facing a growing wave of concern over the popular diabetes and weight-loss medication Ozempic, after thousands of reports of adverse effects, some of them being severe, were recorded nationwide.

A Surge in Reports

Health Canada confirmed it has received 11,707 individual reports of adverse reactions linked to drugs containing semaglutide, including Ozempic, Rybelsus, and Wegovy, since their introduction to the Canadian market seven years ago.

The agency has collected 2,706 separate reports detailing these side effects, about half coming from health professionals and half from patients, according to data obtained by Le Journal de Montréal.

Also Read: World Suicide Prevention Day 2025: Theme, History, And Significance

The reported issues range from relatively mild gastrointestinal discomfort to severe events such as poisoning, vision loss, and psychiatric disorders. Gastrointestinal complaints alone account for one-third of the reports — highlighting how common nausea, vomiting, and constipation are among users.

Patients Speak Out

For patients like Liliana Mejia, the experience was devastating.

“It was horrible,” she told Le Journal. “Everything made me want to vomit, my vision was blurred, [I was] tired and constipated for 10 days.”

She stopped using the drug after a little over a year but says she wishes she had been warned about the potential impact earlier. “I don’t think we talk about it enough,” Mejia added.

Her story mirrors that of many Canadians now speaking out about their struggles.

Also Read: Weight Loss Drugs Like Ozempic, Mounjaro And Wegovy Under Scrutiny After Deaths And Pancreatitis Reports in UK

Powerful But Not Risk-Free

Ozempic was originally designed as a treatment for type 2 diabetes but has skyrocketed in popularity due to its ability to suppress appetite, leading to rapid weight loss.

“It’s a powerful and effective drug that has many benefits, but also side effects that need to be managed,” explained Dr. Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, endocrinologist and researcher, in comments to Le Journal.

He emphasized that the reports do not necessarily prove a direct cause-and-effect relationship between Ozempic and the complications, but said that listening to patients is crucial. “It requires proper medical monitoring,” he noted, stressing that it should not be used casually or without supervision.

Psychiatric Concerns and Risky Trends

Among the most worrying findings are the psychiatric problems reported by patients, 470 cases have been logged so far. Dr. Rabasa-Lhoret said he has seen patients spiral into eating disorders such as anorexia due to overuse of the drug.

He also pointed to the unprecedented demand for Ozempic, comparing the craze to the hype around Viagra when it first launched. “Many people have started prescribing it without providing proper support to patients,” he lamented, adding that the rise of online pharmacies has made it dangerously easy to obtain the drug without adequate oversight.

Vision Loss and Rare Neuropathies

One of the most troubling side effects being investigated is non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a rare condition that can lead to permanent vision loss.

Jacques Pépin, 69, of Repentigny, Quebec, believes Ozempic played a role in the two strokes he suffered in his eyes over the past year.

“I wouldn’t have taken it if I had known,” Pépin told Le Journal.

He has now lost much of his sight and says he can no longer drive, read, or enjoy his favorite hobby — building model airplanes. “I break glasses, I have no balance,” he said, describing how the vision loss has upended his life.

Health Canada has logged 10 cases of NAION and is currently “reviewing relevant preliminary information on the potential risk.” Novo Nordisk, the drug’s manufacturer, denies a causal link, though its European labels are being updated to include NAION as a potential adverse reaction.

Balancing Benefits and Risks

Despite the concerning data, experts caution against panic. Sherbrooke endocrinologist Dr. André Carpentier told Le Journal that while the list of side effects can seem alarming, the drug’s benefits, from controlling diabetes to protecting heart and kidney health, are significant and must be weighed carefully against the risks.

“The link with Ozempic is difficult to establish beyond doubt,” Dr. Carpentier said, noting that certain complications, like sudden drops in blood sugar, can themselves trigger issues like vision problems.

Health Canada continues to collect and analyze data, and experts stress that the key is proper prescription, patient education, and close monitoring. For patients like Mejia and Pépin, however, the damage is already done, and their stories are sparking calls for more transparency about what users can expect before starting these medications.

Every year on 10th of September the world observes World Suicide Prevention Day. The day is organized by the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP) to raise awareness around the globe that suicide can be prevented.

As per the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 720,000 people die due to suicide every year and it is the third-leading cause of death among 15-29-year-olds. The WHO also provides that 73% of the global suicides occur in low-and-middle-income countries. The reasons are influenced by social, cultural, biological, psychological, and environmental factors present. As per the World Population Review's 2021 report the five countries with highest suicide rates are:

• Greenland at 59.6 per 100k population
• Guyana at 31.3 per 100k population
• Lithuania at 27.9 per 100k population
• South Korea at 25.8 per 100k population
• Russia at 24.1 per 100k population

World Suicide Prevention Day 2025 Theme

The triennial theme for 2024-2026, "Changing the Narrative on Suicide", with the call to action "Start the Conversation", reflects a significant shift in how society approaches suicide. Historically, suicide has been shrouded in silence, stigma, and fear. The goal now is to transform this narrative by encouraging open, honest discussions about mental health, suicide prevention, and the factors that contribute to suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Also Read: Is Ozempic Really Safe? Health Canada Logs Nearly 12,000 Side Secondary Effect Cases

Starting conversations, whether at home, in schools, or workplaces, we can create a supportive culture that reduces the stigma attached to mental health. Changing the narrative is also about advocating for policies that prioritize mental health, increasing access to care, and ensuring that support systems are in place for those in need. This year's theme underscores that everyone, regardless of their role, can contribute to preventing suicides simply by being willing to listen and engage in meaningful discussions.

In recent years, the conversation surrounding suicide has expanded to include a wide array of contributing factors. Issues such as relationship troubles, financial difficulties, business failures, mental health disorders, substance abuse, and health problems are frequently associated with suicidal behaviors. However, an alarming trend has emerged: an increase in suicidal thoughts among school-aged children.

The pressures placed on children, especially in academic environments, are often a significant source of mental stress. As societal expectations on performance grow, children are left grappling with overwhelming anxiety, fear of failure, and a lack of emotional outlets to express their struggles. Suicide prevention efforts must focus on this vulnerable group, ensuring they receive the emotional and psychological support they need to cope with life’s challenges.

Also Read: World Suicide Prevention Day 2025: Sleep Problems, Perfectionism, Pressure- The Overlooked Drivers Of Suicide Ideation

Suicide Prevention Day Origin And Significance

Established in 2003 by the ASP in collaboration with the WHO, World Suicide Prevention Day seeks to raise global awareness around suicide and its prevention. This annual event provides a platform to discuss strategies to reduce suicide rates, challenge misconceptions, and advocate for better mental health care.

The day’s significance lies in its mission to mobilize governments, communities, and individuals to confront the often-taboo subject of suicide. By bringing suicide prevention into public discourse, the aim is to foster a more understanding and supportive society, where mental health challenges are treated with the same urgency as physical illnesses. With each passing year, World Suicide Prevention Day serves as a call to action to break down the barriers that prevent people from seeking help when they need it most.

What Role Do We As A Society Play To Prevent Suicides?

Parents play a crucial role in suicide prevention, particularly when it comes to safeguarding the mental health of their children. Creating an open and communicative home environment where children feel comfortable expressing their emotions is essential. Harsh criticism or unrealistic academic expectations can exacerbate mental health struggles, making it imperative for parents to approach setbacks with empathy and encouragement.

Parents should also monitor their child’s daily routines, such as their diet, sleep patterns, and study habits, as these can significantly impact their emotional well-being. By ensuring a balanced and supportive lifestyle, parents can help mitigate the risks of suicidal thoughts.

Communities and educators also have a responsibility in preventing suicides. Schools should implement programs that teach children about emotional intelligence, stress management, and coping mechanisms for failure. Involving mental health professionals in schools to provide guidance and support can be a critical step in early intervention.

Changing the narrative on suicide also requires systemic change, particularly in how mental health is addressed by policymakers. Governments must prioritize mental health in their agendas, ensuring that comprehensive mental health services are accessible to all, regardless of socioeconomic status. Suicide prevention policies should focus on improving access to mental health care, increasing funding for suicide prevention programs, and supporting research on mental health issues.

Policymakers should also focus on improving mental health education, both in schools and workplaces, to foster environments where individuals feel comfortable seeking help. Suicide prevention is not just an individual responsibility but a societal one, where all stakeholders, from governments to local communities, must work together to save lives.