Credits: Canva/AP
President Donald Trump has said he takes a daily aspirin dose that is higher than what his doctors advise and has done so for the past 25 years. He made the remarks during a wide-ranging interview with The Wall Street Journal, published on Thursday.
“They tell me aspirin helps thin the blood, and I don’t want thick blood moving through my heart,” Trump, 79, told the newspaper. “I want thin blood flowing through my heart. That sounds right, doesn’t it?”
The president takes 325 milligrams of aspirin every day, which equals one standard adult over-the-counter tablet. This amount is four times higher than the commonly recommended 81 milligram low-dose aspirin often used to help prevent heart disease.
As per NPR News, since 2022, the US Preventive Services Task Force, the country’s leading panel on disease prevention, has advised that adults over 60 should not begin taking daily aspirin to prevent heart disease if they do not already have an underlying condition. The panel also said it is reasonable for people who are already on preventive aspirin to consider stopping around the age of 75.
Aspirin belongs to the same group of drugs as ibuprofen and naproxen. At low doses, it reduces the production of a substance that helps blood clots form. The medication is widely used to treat headaches and other pain in adults. It is also taken preventively, as Trump does, by roughly one in seven older Americans.
Specialists generally recommend 81 milligrams of aspirin per day for people who need it to lower their risk of heart disease. This dose was once referred to as “baby aspirin,” though aspirin is no longer advised for regular use in children. Doctors favor the lower dose rather than Trump’s 325 milligrams because studies show there is no added benefit from taking more. A large study published in 2021 supported this conclusion.
“There is some evidence that if someone has already tolerated 325 milligrams for years, the extra risk compared to 81 milligrams is probably quite small,” says Dr Eleanor Levin, a preventive cardiologist at Stanford Medicine. “But the higher dose really isn’t necessary.”
Some people are advised to stay on low-dose aspirin for life, regardless of age. This includes patients who have had bypass surgery or a heart attack. Levin also recommends aspirin for certain people with silent coronary artery disease, where arteries are narrowed without obvious symptoms.
Trump was diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency in July. A memo released by the White House in December stated that his cardiovascular system remains in “excellent health.”
Although aspirin is considered safer than many other blood thinners, it still raises the risk of bleeding in the stomach and brain, even at low doses. These complications are uncommon and rarely fatal.
The risk of bleeding increases with age, and alcohol can raise it further. Aspirin can also cause milder bleeding issues, such as easy bruising or small cuts. Trump has experienced both, and his doctor linked these symptoms to aspirin use, according to a White House memo released in July. Levin says this is not unusual or alarming.
“This actually shows the drug is doing what it’s supposed to do,” Levin says. “As people reach their late 70s and 80s, the skin becomes thinner and more fragile. Patients often come in with bruises on their arms and don’t recall bumping into anything.”
During the Journal interview, Trump also addressed questions about his hearing and sleep, which he largely brushed off. While hearing loss becomes more common with age, aspirin can sometimes cause ringing in the ears, known as tinnitus. Its effect on sleep is less clear.
Levin says Trump’s long-term use of a higher aspirin dose is unlikely to be life-threatening, though she does not advise most patients to take more than recommended. She explains that doses above 2,400 milligrams, once used to treat arthritis, are considered high-dose aspirin and carry much greater risks.
“I’m sure his doctors have told him that,” Levin says. “There’s no need to panic.” She says her own approach is different. “We talk through the risks and benefits. We look at the evidence and the research, and my patients follow that guidance.”
Credits: Canva
The NHS has released updated guidance for people who are currently taking clonazepam, a commonly prescribed medicine that belongs to the benzodiazepine group. According to the health service, clonazepam is often used to control seizures or fits linked to epilepsy, ease involuntary muscle spasms, and help manage panic disorders. It is also prescribed in some cases for people with restless legs syndrome (RLS). NHS Inform notes that “around 1 in 10 people experience restless legs syndrome at some stage in their life.”
Explaining how the drug works, the NHS says it increases levels of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a chemical in the brain that has a calming effect. By boosting GABA, clonazepam can reduce anxiety, prevent seizures or fits, and relax tight or overactive muscles.
Clonazepam is only available on prescription and comes as tablets or a liquid. Most adults aged 18 and over can take either form. In certain cases, children as young as one month old may be prescribed clonazepam to treat epilepsy, as per NHS.
That said, there are situations where extra caution is needed. People who are due to have surgery or dental treatment, those who are pregnant, trying to conceive, or who have sleep-related conditions may be advised to stop taking the medicine. However, these are not the only groups the NHS says should be careful.
Clonazepam is not suitable for everyone. Before starting treatment, patients are advised to tell their doctor if they:
Like many medicines, clonazepam can cause side effects. Common effects, which affect more than 1 in 100 people, include disturbed sleep such as vivid dreams, feeling sleepy during the day, light-headedness, dizziness, unsteadiness, and muscle weakness.
When it comes to long-term use, the NHS warns that clonazepam can lead to withdrawal symptoms if taken for a prolonged period. Because of this risk, people who have been prescribed the drug for more than four weeks may have their dose reduced slowly when stopping treatment, rather than stopping suddenly.
The NHS also stresses that this is not a complete list of side effects. Patients are advised to read the information leaflet that comes with their medicine for full details.
Although uncommon, some people may experience serious side effects while taking clonazepam. The NHS advises contacting a doctor or calling 111 immediately if you notice:
In rare cases, clonazepam can trigger a serious allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified doctor, pharmacist, or healthcare provider before starting, stopping, or changing the dosage of any medication.
Credits: AI Generated
Every winter, people in Delhi prepare themselves for stinging eyes, tight chests and coughs that refuse to go away as thick smog blankets the city. Now, fresh research from Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) suggests there is another hidden danger in the polluted air. According to the study, Delhi’s winter smog may also be carrying antibiotic-resistant bacteria, adding to health worries in one of the most polluted cities on the planet.
The research, titled Distribution and antibiotic resistance patterns of airborne staphylococci in urban environments of Delhi, India, was published in Nature – Scientific Reports. It found disturbingly high levels of antibiotic-resistant “superbugs” in both indoor and outdoor air across the city, particularly in winter when pollution levels spike. The findings point to polluted air acting as a possible vehicle for antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which experts already consider one of the gravest global health threats.
As per Indian Express, to understand what people might be breathing in, the researchers collected air samples from a range of everyday locations across Delhi, such as:
Both indoor and outdoor air samples were taken during summer, monsoon and winter to track how bacterial levels and resistance patterns shifted with the seasons.
Across every setting, airborne bacteria levels were far above the World Health Organization’s recommended safe limit for microbial exposure. In some winter samples, bacterial counts exceeded 16,000 colony-forming units per cubic metre, which is more than 16 times higher than the WHO guideline.
What raised even greater concern was the type of bacteria detected. Many belonged to the Staphylococcus group, which includes strains linked to skin infections, pneumonia, bloodstream infections and illnesses commonly acquired in hospitals.
According to the researchers, a large share of the airborne bacteria were identified as methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS), meaning they do not respond to commonly prescribed antibiotics. Among these:
Notably, 14 out of 36 multidrug-resistant samples carried the mecA gene, a well-known marker that makes bacteria resistant to methicillin and related antibiotics.
The study showed that levels of airborne drug-resistant bacteria were highest in winter, while monsoon rains led to a sharp drop in outdoor contamination.
Researchers point to a few likely reasons:
On the other hand, rainfall during the monsoon appears to clear bioaerosols from the air, reducing bacterial concentrations outdoors.
Many healthy people may breathe in these bacteria without becoming sick. However, the risk is much higher for:
The researchers note that inhaling drug-resistant bacteria does not automatically lead to infection. Still, it raises the risk of infections that are harder to treat, especially if the bacteria manage to enter vulnerable parts of the body.
Credit: Canva
Researchers say consuming excessive short-form videos on social media may lead to 'brain rot' and cause cognitive decline, increase the risk of depression and worsen behavior in young children and adults.
Named as the 2024 Oxford University Word Of The Year, 'brain rot' is defined as the supposed deterioration of a person’s intellectual state due to overconsumption of low-quality online content such as TikTok videos, Instagram reels and YouTube Shorts.
Until now, brain rot was considered to be merely internet slang but now multiple studies show that the condition can, indeed, impact overall brain health and pave the way for neurodegenerative diseases.
According to a literature review published in Psychological Bulletin, a journal of the American Psychological Association, scientists found links between heavy consumption of such videos and increased symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and loneliness.
Additionally, the September 2025 study also found that extreme intake of short form videos (SFVs) can worsen cognitive functioning and weakening emotional control as well as regulation.
Moreover, an October 2025 study from Capella University, Minneapolis which summarized 14 studies on SFVs discovered that people who regularly watch videos, ranging between 15 to 60 seconds, were prone to developing 'TikTok Brain' and suffered from low attention spans.
The review noted, "Reports from educators and parents describe teens struggling to focus in class or during prolonged tasks, behavior changes often attributed to constant stimulation from social media scrolling."
Based on these results, Keith Robert Head, a doctoral student in social work at Capella University and study author commented, "So one of the questions that would be interesting for researchers to study is: Are these ADHD diagnoses actually ADHD, or is it an impact from the continued use of short-form video?"
James Jackson, a neuropsychologist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center told NBC News, "The narrative that the only people who are worried about this are grumpy old grandpas who are yelling at you to get off their lawn or the idea that if you’re concerned about this you’re not in step with the times, I think that’s really simplistic."
He also noted that SFVs can be useful through the opportunities it creates for learning as well as community-building and social media users should seek to maintain a balance.
“There are people that engage with short-form videos in ways that are value-added, for sure. But if their engagement is pulling them away from other, more healthy opportunities, if it is isolating them from other people, if it is creating situations where they’re less and less likely to just sit around and be bored, I think that’s a problem," he said.
She further noted that it may take many years of study to determine whether cognitive changes associated with SFVs consumption are reversible and whether they can qualify as an 'addiction'
“It might be too early to claim universal doom,” Gupta said. “The research for alcohol, cigarettes and drugs took 75 years or more to develop. But I would be surprised if, in the next five to 10 years, we do not have similar signs validating the moral panic that we have around short-form videos.”
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited