Credits: Health and me
The simple act of scrolling has evolved far beyond a harmless pastime. It is now a neurological cycle that changes brain chemistry, hijacks attention periods, and blurs emotional health—particularly in young and active consumers. Social media sites are not only connecting tools; they are complicated behavior patterns designed to sustain users on powerful psychological structures based on dopamine.
As studies continue to expose the biological and emotional toll of chronic online activity, mental health experts are crying foul. "Social media can create an artificial reward system," says Krisha Sanghvi, a counselling psychologist. "You may get a fleeting high when you receive likes or views, but that can quickly spiral into anxiety when the views slow down or when you compare your life to somebody else's highlight reel.
Social media is intentionally designed to activate the brain's reward system. Every swipe, like, comment, or notification triggers a microdose of dopamine, the neurotransmitter responsible for the pleasure response. Though this feedback loop itself is harmless, repeated exposure reprograms the brain in patterns that are reminiscent of addictive behavior.
The brain slowly ceases to be responsive to other, more natural sources of fulfillment. Once-enjoyable pursuits such as having meaningful conversations, reading a book, or savoring an uneventful moment—pale in comparison to the high-stimulation world of social media.
With time, spontaneous scrolling becomes an addiction. "Most clients, particularly adolescents, report a near-automatic desire to look at their phones—even in the absence of a notification," says Sanghvi. That constant checking is not driven by curiosity—it's driven by anticipation and that potentially accompanying dopamine rush. The cycle repeats, building on itself until pleasures in the real world taste dull and unimpressive.
The human brain is astonishingly adaptable. Unfortunately, that adaptability can also make us vulnerable. When constantly exposed to quick-hit content—15-second videos, flashy memes, endless reels—our brains recalibrate to prefer brief, stimulating bursts over deep, focused engagement.
This does not only affect the way we engage with information, but the way we deal with emotions as well. Activities such as reading a lengthy article, paying close attention during meetings, or sitting in contemplative silence begin to feel awkward. In Sanghvi's words, "The brain becomes restless. When you take away the phone, you're not just taking away distraction- you're taking away the source of mental pacification.
In addition, this reliance on outside stimulation undermines our capacity for emotional regulation. Endless exposure to edited perfection on the internet tempts us to seek praise and stimulation from outside ourselves. Without it, boredom—and even anxiety—may follow in short order. Eventually, individuals can lose the skills of self-calming, contemplation, or the ability to stay still without feeling emotionally disturbed.
Behind the shiny facade of selfies and jubilation is a darker reality, social media can insidiously eat away at mental health. Sites build an unrealistic reality, where edited vignettes are confused for the complete picture. That tends to trigger comparison anxiety, a contemporary mental illness that plagues millions.
"Each time we contrast our reality with someone else's online fiction, we undermine our own self-worth," according to Sanghvi. Whether the individual is a high school student looking at influencers who appear to have ideal lives or an adult browsing friends' professional achievements, the emotional outcome is typically the same: inadequacy, jealousy, and isolation.
This dynamic is especially threatening to teenagers and young adults, whose sense of self is still developing. The number of likes for a selfie can affect whether they will feel good about themselves for the rest of the day. When verification can be measured, self-esteem is transactional.
The children's and teens' brains are still being built. The prefrontal cortex the area of the brain responsible for impulse control, decision-making, and emotional regulation is still developing well into the mid-20s. During this time of heightened susceptibility, repeated digital interactions don't merely entertain they shape neural architecture.
Through synaptic pruning, the brain reinforces frequently used connections between neurons and loses those that are not. If children are continually exposed to high-speed, high-reward media, the reward circuits for patience, contemplation, and delayed gratification may be atrophied.
Just as disturbing is how social media infuses external verification into self-concept. An adolescent whose self-esteem is based on likes or comments is being conditioned to build confidence on the basis of other people's thoughts instead of internal standards.
In brief, yes. Neuroplasticity, the capacity of the brain to reorganize and rewire itself- is both a blessing and a curse. Each time we perform a repetitive task, we strengthen a certain constellation of neural pathways. Scrolling, looking for likes, and consuming bite-sized information essentially "educates" the brain to optimize for stimulation over stability.
This leads to trouble focusing, low emotional tolerance, and a degraded capacity for critical thinking. As we become accustomed to low-complexity, high-emotion content, our tolerance for nuance decreases. In this condition, even mild stressors can become overpowering, and intense focus becomes difficult.
To restore mental acuity and emotional equilibrium, most therapists now recommend a dopamine detox- a planned digital detox that gives the brain time to reboot. The aim is not to deprive of pleasure, but to restore the brain's sensitivity to everyday, uncomplicated pleasures.
"Even taking a couple of hours off every day can make a huge difference," says Sanghvi. "At first, it is uncomfortable—there's something missing. But over time, people start feeling more present, more in charge, and less reactive."
Part of this, digital hygiene—the everyday routines that maintain mental well-being in cyberspace—is crucial. Placing screen boundaries, assembling content that's uplifting, and prioritizing offline time are not merely desirable wellness tricks—they're life-saving interventions for mind and emotions.
Parents and educators are best placed to lead young people through the virtual labyrinth. That does not imply imposing tight controls, but encouraging sensitivity and moderation.
Begin by encouraging children to explain their internet feelings. Do they scroll because they are bored? Do they worry when they do not receive likes? These types of questions promote emotional awareness and self-understanding.
Adults need to model good digital behavior too. Family routines such as device-free meals, outdoor weekend trips, or screen-free times encourage being present and help normalize digital balance. And schools can weave in digital literacy teaching not only how to use technology but how to question it.
Social media isn't bad in itself—but its impact on the brain, especially via dopamine loops and comparison anxiety, is undeniable. As consumers, it's important to see how these platforms influence not only what we view, but the way we think, feel, and relate.
Rewiring mental patterns isn't merely an intellectual upgrade—it's a psychological imperative in the era of distraction. With intention, conscious habits, and the will to disconnect, we can take back our attention, regain emotional equilibrium, and safeguard our most potent resource- the mind.
Krisha Sanghvi is a Counselling Psychologist at Samarpan Recovery in India
Credit: Instagram
Amanda Peet, the Hollywood actress known for roles in Something’s Gotta Give, The Whole Nine Yards, and Jack & Jill, recently opened up about her breast cancer diagnosis and how informing her kids about her health became the toughest part for her.
In a New Yorker essay published March 21, the 54-year-old actress announced how a routine scan in August 2025 showed an unusual ultrasound result. Later, a biopsy detected a tumor that “appeared” small.
The Dirty John star found to be in stage 1 of lobular cancer that is “hormone-receptor-positive” and “HER2-negative,” making her “happier than the pre-diagnosis” stage.
It is because Hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative cancer is less aggressive and often easier to treat than more aggressive forms of breast cancer.
However, informing her children, Frances, 19, Molly, 15, and Henry, 11, about the cancer was the toughest part for her, and she had to be in the right mindset before sharing the news with them.
“They've been great,” Peet told E! News.
“I definitely had to get myself together before including them. The hard part was realizing that nothing is certain and there was going to be no perfect time to tell them,” she added.
Peet stated that between her diagnosis, she had also been navigating a series of family health crises — with both of her parents' final months in hospice care.
The Your Friends & Neighbors actress, in her essay, also noted that she would “only need a lumpectomy and radiation,” not a double mastectomy.
Also read: Jane Fallon Diagnosed With Breast Cancer, This Is How She Caught It Early
Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC) the second most common form of breast cancer, representing 5 to 15 percent of breast cancer cases.
Rather than a distinct lump, it can appear as a thickening or "fullness" rather than a tumor.
It is often difficult to detect on mammograms, thus MRI or ultrasound are more effective for detection
It is usually hormone receptor-positive.
HR+ and HER2− breast cancer is the most common subtype and is seen among 60–75 per cent of cases.
It is not two different cancers, but rather specific, defining characteristics of the same cancer type (breast cancer). It grows:
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), breast cancer screening is a proactive checkup used to find cancer before any physical signs or symptoms appear. While screening doesn’t prevent cancer, its goal is early detection, making the disease much easier to treat.
Since every person’s body and history are different, you and your doctor should engage in informed and shared decision-making. This means discussing the pros and cons to decide together if, and when, screening is right for you.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (a group of national medical experts) provides guidelines based on the latest research:
Average Risk
Women aged 40 to 74 should generally get a mammogram every two years.
High Risk
If you have a family history or other risk factors, your doctor may recommend a different schedule or additional tests.
Credit: iStock
GLP-1 receptor agonists are a modern class of medicines that have changed the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. In simple terms, they help the body respond to food more smartly. After eating, the intestine naturally sends signals that help regulate sugar and appetite levels.
GLP-1 RA medicines imitate this signal. As a result, blood sugar rises less after meals, appetite becomes more controlled, and many people feel full with smaller amounts of food. This is why these medicines are used not only for diabetes, but also for weight reduction in selected people.
These medicines are important because their benefits can go beyond sugar control alone. Studies and current diabetes guidelines show that some GLP-1 RAs can reduce body weight, improve long-term sugar levels, and lower the risk of major heart-related problems in people who have type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk.
Recent guidance also supports their use in some people with chronic kidney disease when cardiovascular risk reduction is an important goal. This does not mean every drug in the group is identical, but it means the class has become medically important for more than just lowering sugar.
For the general public, one important point is that these are not “miracle injections.”
They work best when combined with better food choices, regular walking or exercise, good sleep, and medical follow-up. They are usually started slowly because the commonest side effects are stomach-related, such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, loose motions, or a feeling of fullness.
Not everyone is suitable for them, and the decision depends on a person’s diabetes status, weight, heart or kidney disease, other medicines, and cost. Used properly, GLP-1 RAs are powerful tools that can improve health, but they should always be taken under medical supervision.
So Indian Medical Association (IMA) is planning to seek a mandate restricting prescriptions of GLP-1 drugs to certified endocrinologists/diabetologists or MD general medicine practitioners to curb indiscriminate use and safeguard patient safety as access expands, many media report in August last year about rampant misuse of GLP1 weight loss drugs by cosmetologists, physiotherapists, dermatologists, general MBBS clinicians, and even ayurveda, and other non-modern medicine practitioners.
Many MBBS, physiotherapists, and non-modern medicine practitioners are prescribing GLP1 drugs to people who neither have diabetes nor any comorbidity or acute obesity, but purely for cosmetic reasons to lose some weight that can be otherwise easily done with some lifestyle changes like exercise and diet.
It is a duty of the government to take care of it because there is a lot of misuse and misprescription that needs to be curbed immediately, because these medicines also have side effects.
We will write to the government to take necessary action to stop the misuse of the drug. We will discuss it in our meeting in the first week of April 2026.
Credit: iStock
One in four or 25 percent of adults with type-2 diabetes in India also suffer from liver fibrosis, according to an alarming study published in The Lancet Regional Health Southeast Asia journal today.
With data from more than 9,000 patients across the country, it is the largest ever real-world survey of liver fibrosis in type 2 diabetes from any low- or middle-income country.
While fatty liver disease has been touted as the most common liver condition among diabetes patients, the new study established liver fibrosis as the real danger among people with high blood sugar.
“Type 2 diabetes is closely linked to fatty liver disease (also known as MASLD). But how common is liver Fibrosis — the real danger — in Indian diabetics? Our answer: 1 in 4 has clinically significant liver fibrosis. One in 20 already has probable cirrhosis. Most had no symptoms. We propose liver fibrosis as the ‘4th major complication’ of diabetes,” said Ashish Kumar, from Ganga Ram Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (GRIPMER), from Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, in a post on social media platform X.
What Did The Study Find?
Fatty liver is typically the first and reversible stage of liver disease, where excess fat builds up in liver cells. Left untreated, it progresses to liver fibrosis, which is the excessive accumulation of scar tissue (collagen) in the liver resulting from chronic inflammation. The condition then progresses to the third and late stage, irreversible scarring (fibrosis) of the liver. The final stage is liver cancer.
The DiaFib-Liver Study included a total of 9,202 adults with type-2 diabetes patients who underwent FibroScan (VCTE) to assess liver fibrosis in routine diabetes care.
Of these:
The study suggested the urgent need to integrate fibrosis screening into national diabetes programs.
“One in four adults with type 2 diabetes in India has clinically significant liver fibrosis and one in twenty already has probable cirrhosis, establishing advanced liver disease as a 'fourth major complication' of diabetes,” said the researchers.
“The DiaFibLiver Study calls for: Fibrosis — not steatosis — as the screening target. FibroScan integration into routine diabetes care. Moving beyond ultrasound-based referral,” Jha said.
“We hope this data from India adds to the global conversation on diabetes and liver disease,” he added.
Also read: The Silent Rise of Fatty Liver Disease: How India-Specific Guidelines Can Help
The findings highlight the urgent need to:
Certain lifestyle choices can accelerate liver damage, such as:
Overeating processed or fried foods
High sugar intake (soft drinks, sweets, desserts)
Physical inactivity or prolonged sitting
Ignoring health issues like diabetes or hypertension
Crash dieting or taking unprescribed supplements.
Early screening and detection are key to prevent irreversible stages. Yet liver disease can be prevented with lifestyle changes such as:
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited