(Credit-Canva)
Pets are a great addition to one’s life, not only do they give people a feeling of fulfillment, but they also give them a purpose. The bond between a pet owner and a pet is unmatched, as there is an unspoken connection of love and trust. Many people opt for pets like dogs as they can be a great excuse to exercise. The dog must be taken out for walks and play sessions, allowing the pet parent to enjoy some relaxing time as well. Similarly, an anxious person, who would not enjoy the company of an energetic dog, may opt for a quiet pet with a calming presence like a cat.
While it may not seem significant to people with no pets, researchers have also found evidence on how the relationship between an owner and a pet brings affects human mental health. According to a NIH 2018 review, interacting with animals has shown to decrease cortisol levels as well as lower blood pressure. They also explain how multiple other reviews show that animals boost your mood, increase feelings of social support and reduce loneliness in people.
However, does this mean that pets play as significant role in a person’s life another human, such as their partner, would play? Study suggests they might. As per the research published in the Social Indicators Research March 2025, scientists found strong signs that the furry animals positively impact happiness. The people who conducted the study say that when it comes to whether pets make us happy, the answer is a clear and strong "yes." It seems that the companionship and love we get from our dogs and cats really do have a positive impact on how we feel about our lives.
To understand the cause-and-effect relationship, the scientists looked at a factor linked to pet ownership but not directly to happiness. For example, they used the frequency with which person watched over a neighbor’s home as their instrument. The logic was that if those who watched neighbors' homes were also happier, it suggested pet ownership (linked to neighborly behavior) was likely the cause of the increased happiness.
Researchers tried to quantify happiness in the study to understand better, they to put a value on just how much better having a dog or a cat can make us feel, using money as a way to understand it.
Their findings revealed that the emotional benefit of having a pet is comparable to receiving an annual income of up to £70,000, or approximately $92,655. This valuation places the impact of pet ownership on par with significant life choices such as getting married or living with a partner.
To determine if pet ownership truly causes increased happiness, the researchers analyzed data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study, which included survey responses across multiple years about pet ownership, personality traits, and life satisfaction. The study encompassed 2,617 responses from 769 individuals.
The results of the study strongly showed that having a cat or a dog really did lead to people feeling more satisfied with their lives. The amount of extra happiness they felt was like getting a lot of money each year. What was also interesting was that the happiness from having a pet was similar to the happiness people reported from getting married or spending time with their close friends and family, which shows how important pets can be in our lives.
According to the Mental Health Foundation UK, having a pet can really help your mind in lots of ways. They can get you moving more because dog owners often walk them. Pets are also great friends to have around, making you feel safer and like someone needs you, especially if you live alone. Just being with a pet can make you feel less worried. They listen without judging and love you no matter what, which can make you feel better about yourself. Plus, having a dog can help you meet new people when you're out and about. Taking care of a pet also gives your day a routine, which can help you feel more organized and focused. For some people, like those with ADHD, pets can even help with things like sticking to a schedule and getting their energy out. Overall, pets are pretty amazing for our mental health.
Credits: Canva
Cannabis-induced psychosis is becoming increasingly common across the UK. With stronger strains easily available and a perception that weed is harmless, doctors are seeing worrying consequences for mental health.
Psychosis is not just a medical term; it describes a mental state where someone loses touch with reality. A person in a psychotic episode may hear voices, see things that are not there, or believe unusual ideas with unshakeable certainty. Everyday surroundings feel warped, thoughts become jumbled, and behaviour can change dramatically. These episodes can last days, weeks, or longer, and while many people recover, some continue to experience symptoms for years.
Psychosis is not a condition in itself but a symptom of underlying mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or drug-induced disorders. And cannabis, once dismissed as a “soft” recreational drug, is increasingly proving to be a serious trigger.
The UK has no shortage of cannabis users. In the year to March 2024, about 2.3 million people reportedly admitted to using the drug. But while regular use has halved over the past two decades, psychiatrists are alarmed by a sharp rise in cannabis-induced psychosis cases. The problem is potent modern strains and the growing popularity of “skunk”.
Skunk is produced from unpollinated cannabis plants with naturally higher levels of THC, the psychoactive compound responsible for the drug’s “high”. Unlike traditional varieties, these turbocharged versions can push the brain into paranoia, hallucinations, and even long-term mental health conditions.
According to reports, the public health problem is deepening. There has been a visible rise in the number of people needing intensive support for psychosis as a result of cannabis use. What begins with smoking a few ‘joints’ and feeling a bit paranoid can easily escalate.
The issue is compounded by the fact that cannabis is readily available online. High-strength weed can be bought and delivered with the same ease as ordering a takeaway. For some users, that ease leads them into dangerous territory. Over time, repeated exposure to potent cannabis does not just spark temporary paranoia; it can cement itself into a chronic psychotic state.
For those caught in its grip, cannabis-induced psychosis can be terrifying. Hallucinations distort familiar environments, creating confusion and fear. Dissociation leaves people feeling detached from their own bodies or surroundings. Everyday interactions can feel hostile or threatening, and the person’s sense of what is real becomes fragile.
While these symptoms may fade once the drug wears off, for some they linger, leading to severe depression or even suicidal thoughts. Studies suggest cannabis can also trigger schizophrenia in vulnerable individuals, an illness characterised by recurring psychotic episodes, delusions, and long-term disability.
You might wonder, why is today’s cannabis so much more risky? The answer lies in THC levels. Traditional cannabis varieties contained lower amounts of this psychoactive compound, and many also carried cannabidiol (CBD), a chemical thought to counteract some of THC’s mind-altering effects. Skunk, however, has been bred to maximise THC and reduce CBD.
This results in a product that is stronger, more destabilising, and far more likely to provoke psychosis. While occasional users may brush it off as a “bad trip”, for others, the effects can be life-altering.
Despite the popular image of cannabis as a “chill” substance, psychiatrists are dealing with an entirely different reality. Hospitals and rehab centres across the UK are seeing more young people admitted with psychosis linked to cannabis. Over time, people can reach a psychotic state which would not go away, even if they stop smoking. They can become very depressed or suicidal.
The public health implications are significant. Not only do psychotic disorders put immense strain on the NHS, but they also derail lives, disrupting work, education, and relationships.
The narrative around cannabis has long been tangled. To some, it is a natural plant, a stress reliever, even a medicine. But the reality is more complicated. Yes, cannabis contains compounds with therapeutic potential, but when engineered for potency and consumed regularly, it can become a gateway to enduring mental illness.
People need to know that today’s cannabis is not the same mellow joint their parents smoked in the 1970s. It is stronger, riskier, and capable of tipping vulnerable minds into frightening psychological territory.
Credits: Canva
Inner Child is Health and Me's new mental health series where we deep dive into lesser-known aspects of child psychology and how it shapes you as you grow up. Often unheard, mistaken, and misunderstood, in this series we talk about the children’s perspective and their mental health, something different than you might have read in your parenting books. After all, parenting is not just about teaching but also unlearning.
If you have ever caught yourself saying, “I sound just like my mum,” mid-argument, you are not alone. Parents, without a manual, often pass along their own experiences to their children. Alongside love and values, children often inherit their parents’ fears, insecurities, and the scripts about how to behave. This leads to adults carrying around an inner child who is anxious, overly cautious, or forever trying to live up to expectations that were never truly theirs.
Children are natural sponges, soaking up everything their parents say, do, and even avoid. A parent terrified of failure may unknowingly raise a child who fears taking risks. A parent obsessed with appearances might instil self-consciousness in their child, even when no one is actually watching.
Psychologists call this “emotional transmission”, when unspoken anxieties and insecurities quietly seep into the child’s developing mind.
Growing up with inherited fears can shape a child’s mental blueprint. Here are some of the common effects:
Beyond mental health, parents’ fears subtly shape their child’s personality. Over time, kids adapt their behaviour to keep the peace, win approval, or simply survive emotionally.
These traits might look different on the surface, but they share a common root: a child adapting to someone else’s fears rather than exploring their own authentic path.
Phrases like “Don’t talk too much”, “Be a good boy/girl”, or “People will laugh at you” might sound harmless at the time, but they work like sticky notes on a child’s developing identity. Over time, the tags become self-fulfilling labels.
“You are shy” morphs into social anxiety.
“You are lazy” becomes an inner critic that would not shut up.
“Do not cry; be strong” hardens into emotional suppression.
What parents might intend as guidance often crystallises into lifelong labels, narrowing the space for children to discover who they actually are.
One of the ironies is that these inherited insecurities often circle back. A parent afraid of judgement may raise a child who grows into an adult terrified of criticism and who then passes the same script onto their own kids. This results in the domino effect of fears hopping across generations, disguised as “advice”.
Awareness is a powerful antidote. Recognising that some of your habits or anxieties are not actually yours but hand-me-downs can be liberating.
Here are some steps that psychologists often recommend:
At the end of the day, parents will always pass down something—good or bad. But distinguishing between the love and the fears helps adults reclaim their own narratives. By recognising the echoes of parental insecurities, we give ourselves a chance to parent our inner child with kindness rather than criticism.
(Credit-Canva)
One of the many beliefs that people hold, especially the older generation, is that the new way of living, which is highly protected and sanitized, has made kids weaker. While there are certain evolutionary changes we have developed over the past few centuries, it is arguable whether we are . However, their theory may not be far from the truth, but how do we know that? To this day, there are certain communities who enjoy a quiet living, void of modern possessions like the Amish community.
Surveys have noted that Amish children tend to have lesser allergies or asthma cases, but how?
Scientists have long known that kids who grow up on traditional farms are less likely to have asthma and allergies. This is called the "farm effect," and it seems to be caused by being around farm animals, especially cows, and the microbes (tiny living things) that are found there.
In a 2018 study, researchers from The University of Manchester and Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust studied two unique farming communities in the U.S.: the Amish and the Hutterites. Both groups have similar genes and lifestyles, but they farm in very different ways, and this seems to be the reason for their different health outcomes.
Another 2020 study done by the American College of Allergy Asthma & Immunology compared the living of Amish and Old Order Mennonite, who also have a similar style of living, with a few comparable changes.
The Amish and Hutterites both came from the same group in Europe and have similar lifestyles. They eat similar foods, have large families, and avoid many modern habits like having indoor pets or using the internet. However, their farming practices are completely different.
The Amish use old-fashioned, family-run farms with horses for work. Their barns are close to their homes, so children are around the animals and barn dust from a young age.
The Hutterites live on large, modern, industrial farms. Their barns are big and located far from their homes, so children have little contact with the animals or barn environment.
This difference in lifestyle led to a major difference in health. The study found that Amish children have a very low rate of asthma (just 5.2%), while Hutterite children have a much higher rate (21.3%). This shows that the environment, not their genes, is the most important factor in preventing asthma.
The 2020 study researchers created a survey to compare the health of these two groups. They asked families about different types of allergies they had, as well as their lifestyle and farming practices.
They found that families in both groups lived on farms and drank raw, unprocessed milk. However, the Amish families had more children on average and lived on smaller farms with fewer animals compared to the Mennonite families. The survey results showed a significant difference in health between the two groups:
The Amish families reported having a much lower rate of allergies overall. Only about 26% of Amish households had a family member with an allergy.
The Mennonite families had a much higher rate of allergies, with nearly 47% of households reporting an allergy.
One key difference is that while both the Amish and Mennonites have large families, Mennonite communities sometimes use modern technology like tractors and electricity. In contrast, the Amish stick to traditional, old-fashioned farming.
This difference in farming methods could change the types of microbes (tiny living things) found in the farm environment. Since other research has shown that these specific microbes are important for preventing allergies, the different farming practices might explain why the Amish have a much lower allergy rate.
The scientists found a key difference in the homes of the two groups: Amish homes had much more endotoxin, a type of dust from bacteria. When this dust was tested on mice, the dust from Amish homes protected the mice from developing asthma. However, dust from Hutterite homes actually made the mice's asthma worse.
This suggests that the kind of dust and microbes you are exposed to matters. The dust in Amish homes is full of "good" microbes that help a child’s immune system grow and develop correctly, preventing it from overreacting and causing asthma.
The study also looked at the children's blood and immune systems. They found that the Amish children’s immune systems were very different from the Hutterite children's. The Amish kids had a stronger innate immune system, which is the body's first defense against germs. Their immune cells were "calm" and seemed to be trained to not overreact to things that can trigger asthma.
This research strongly suggests that the farm effect works by "training" the immune system. Early exposure to a wide variety of microbes helps the body learn how to respond correctly, which in turn protects against asthma.
While these studies give us a lot of great information, there are still many questions to answer. Scientists still need to figure out exactly which microbes or substances in the farm environment are the most protective. They also need to study children at a younger age to see how their immune systems change over time.
But for now, the findings from this research confirm that growing up on a traditional farm and being exposed to its rich environment is a powerful way to protect against asthma and allergies.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited