Robert F Kennedy Jr., the health and human services (HHS) secretary has now planned to issue guidance to encourage Americans to eat more saturated fats. This guidance, if issued, would contradict the decades of dietary recommendations and alarming experts. This has had mixed views from those in the healthcare sector. Cheryl Anderson, an American Heart Association board member and professor at the University of California, San Diego's school of public health and human longevity science told the Guardian, "My response and sort of counsel to myself was to stay calm, and let’s see what happens, because there was no indication given as to how, why, when this potential shift would occur."Anderson also added, “The recommendation around saturated fat has been one of the most consistent recommendations since the first edition of the dietary guidelines.”However, Ronald Krauss, who is a professor of pediatrics and medicine at the University of California, San Francisco has researched saturated fats. He found that saturated fats in fact, could be less harmful than previously thought. To this upcoming planned guidelines, he says, "If [Kennedy} is actually going to go out and say we should be eating more saturated fat, I think that's really the wrong message."What Does The New Research On Saturated Fats Show?Krauss's research shows that "saturated fat is relatively neutral" as compared to what scientists had believed earlier. Kennedy too has indicated that in the new guidelines, more stress will be placed to "eat saturated fats of dairy, good meat, of fresh meat and vegetables". The Hill reports that Kennedy said, "When we release those [guidelines], it will give everybody the rationale for driving it into our schools."As per Krauss's studies, reducing saturated fat intake is only helpful when you replace it with the right things. For instance, replacing saturated fats with unsaturated fats like olive oil and "polyunsaturated fats from other plant sources can really improve metabolic health and reduce heart disease risk, but that’s not saying that saturated fat is necessarily harmful". His research also focused that replacing saturated fats with sugar and carbohydrates then could increase risk of heart diseases. Krauss noted that setting strict cutoff points for saturated fat intake, such as the current 10% limit, can often feel arbitrary.Anderson, however, pointed out that regardless of the exact threshold, data clearly show a pattern: higher saturated fat consumption in a population correlates with increased cholesterol levels and greater cardiovascular disease risk.While she agrees with Krauss that what replaces saturated fat in the diet is important, Anderson disagrees that saturated fat itself is “neutral.”“In the current American diet, there’s simply too much saturated fat, and it’s not having a neutral impact on public health,” she said.Despite differing views, both Anderson and Krauss agree that future nutritional guidelines should focus less on single nutrients like saturated fat and more on overall dietary patterns. Anderson's explanation is that people do not eat nutrients, they eat foods. "When you ask someone what they had to eat, they don't tell you: 'I had fat, or I had carbohydrate, or I had protein."This is why, as per Anderson, focusing on food is more important and less confusing than focusing on the nutrients.
Email
Google
Facebook Email Google Facebook