Would you believe that the way you sit and stand from the floor using only your legs might determine how long you might live? That's what a recent study in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology predicts. While longevity tests for many involve complicated diagnostics or lengthy lab work, this low-aerobic test is deceptively simple yet potentially a powerful indicator of your overall health and future likelihood of death, particularly of heart-related causes.

What is the Sitting-Rising Test (SRT)?

The Sitting-Rising Test (SRT) sounds easy, sit down on the ground and stand up again, with the minimum amount of help from your hands, knees, or other appendages. But doing it successfully involves a subtle mix of balance, muscle power, flexibility, and coordination—each of which is important for healthy aging.

The participants begin in a standing position and are asked to sit cross-legged on the floor and then stand up. Points are lost each time a hand, elbow, knee, or any other part of the body is used for support. Losing balance or not being steady costs half a point. The test has a maximum score of 10 points.

How the Test Connects to Longevity?

Researchers from the Exercise Medicine Clinic in Rio de Janeiro tested 4,282 adults between 46 and 75 years of age over a 12-year duration. A majority were male, and all were given a baseline health assessment prior to being invited to respond to the SRT.

The findings were striking. Patients who scored lower on the test—0 to 4 points—had six times higher mortality from cardiovascular causes than those who scored a score of 10. Fifty percent of those with a score of zero had died within 12 years, compared with only 4% of those with a score of 10.

Notably, for each one-point lower SRT score, there was a 31% increased risk of cardiovascular disease or other natural cause death, such as cancer. In participants with an established diagnosis of coronary artery disease, death risk was three times greater if they had a low SRT score.

Cardiovascular fitness has long been associated with aerobic capacity, like VO₂ max and endurance. But according to Dr. Claudio Gil Araújo, lead author on the study, other areas of fitness—muscle strength, flexibility, balance, and body composition—are just as vital in aging well.

The SRT is unique because it simultaneously measures all these components. Unlike isolated balance or grip strength tests, the SRT reflects full-body coordination and muscular control, serving as a proxy for overall physical health.

"Although this test doesn't always specifically forecast how many years a person has left," states Dr. Araújo, "a higher score is plainly linked with a lower risk of death, so it's a useful, cost-effective test of functional fitness."

The SRT is part of a increasing arsenal of functional tests that have been found to be predictive of longevity. Research in 2022 discovered that individuals who were not able to stand on one foot for 10 seconds had almost twice the risk of dying over the next decade.

Other trendy evaluations are:

Six-minute walk test: Tests cardiovascular endurance by monitoring how far an individual can walk in six minutes.

Sit-to-stand test: Measures lower body strength and balance by recording the number of times a person can stand up from a sitting position within 30 seconds.

How Muscle and Flexibility Affect Longevity?

Why is the capacity to stand alone significant? Scientists think it has to do with a number of physiological mechanisms. Proper muscle strength and flexibility are linked to lower blood pressure, lower inflammation, healthier resting heart rate, and healthier insulin sensitivity. These combined factors decrease the risk of chronic disease, including diabetes, heart disease, and even cognitive impairment.

Before you go ahead and test the SRT, precautions need to be taken. According to Dr. Araújo, follow these:

• Only take the test if you do not have any joint pain or mobility problems.
• Utilize a soft pad or mat on a non-slippery area.
• Have someone around to help or support you if necessary.
• Wear loose clothing and remove shoes and socks.

To do it at home: Stand with one leg crossed over the other and lower yourself to the ground without holding onto anything or using knees. Then come back up in the same manner. Count your score on how many parts of your body you needed to use for support.

Like all research, this study has its limitations. All participants were recruited from a private clinic in Brazil, raising questions about generalizability across different ethnicities, economic groups, and healthcare systems. The researchers also lacked data on smoking status—an important variable in cardiovascular and cancer-related deaths.

Nevertheless, the consequences are significant. The research confirms the increasing realization that healthy aging is not only about appearance, but about preserving the type of whole-body functionality that allows individuals to be active and independent well into old age.

The SRT points to a crucial truth about health and well-being: lifespan and healthspan are not identical. Although most individuals desire to live longer, the aspiration should be to live healthier, with autonomy, mobility, and energy.

This 10-second test won't substitute annual check-ups or diagnostic tests, but it provides a shocking glimpse into how your body is aging and what you might need to improve.

Your SRT score is not set in stone. You can increase flexibility, balance, and muscle tone with strength training, yoga, Pilates, tai chi, and mobility exercises, all of which can lead to a better score—and maybe a longer, healthier lifespan.

Next time you're wondering about your long-term health, skip the palm reader and try this scientifically-proven test. It might only take a few seconds, but what you learn could last a lifetime.

Walking is said to be one of the best exercises. Not only is it an easy and accessible exercise, but it can be done anywhere and also does not need a lot of equipment. Many people aim for 10,000 steps a day as a sign of good health. But should you take one long walk, or multiple short ones? A new study has answered this question.

New research suggests that a single, longer walk each day is better for your heart than breaking up your steps into many short strolls, especially if you don't exercise regularly.

The study, published in Annals of Internal Medicine, found that walking for at least 15 minutes without stopping is ideal. This longer, steady pace, which is about 1,500 continuous steps gives your heart a much better workout.

Longer Vs Shorter Walks: Which is Better?

Researchers tracked the walking habits of over 33,500 adults in the UK who walked less than 8,000 steps a day. After tracking their health for eight years, the findings were clear:

Lower Heart Risk

People who consistently walked in longer, uninterrupted stretches had a lower risk of heart problems compared to those who only took short, quick bursts of steps.

Why Are Longer Walks Better For Health?

Even among the least active group (those walking under 5,000 steps daily), taking longer walks made a major difference. Their risk of heart disease and early death dropped significantly.

The researchers explain that most people focus only on the number of steps they take, but not the patterns. They suggests that even inactive people can boost heart health by changing their habits to walk for at least 10–15 minutes at a time.

Should People Focus More On How They Walk Or How Much?

Many people aim for 10,000 steps a day, but that number actually came from an old pedometer advertisement, not science. While experts agree more steps are generally good, this study emphasizes that how you walk matters more than just the total step count.

The researchers suggest that simple changes, like setting aside time specifically for a long walk, could make a big impact on heart health.

The NHS still recommends getting 150 minutes of moderate activity like brisk walking, each week, and ideally it should be spread out. For older adults, moving every day, even with light activity around the house, is key.

It's important to know that while the study shows a strong link between longer walks and better health, it doesn't definitively prove that walking directly causes the improvement.

However, health experts agree exercise is vital. They explain that you might find it hard at first, but it will get easier as your body adjusts. Even small improvements contribute to a healthy heart.

What Are Some Safety Tips for Walkers?

While walking is generally a safe activity, accidents can happen, especially if you like to walk alone. To stay safe while walking,

Be Visible

Wear bright, reflective clothing or carry a flashlight after dark or in dim light so drivers and others can easily spot you.

Stay Alert

Focus on your immediate surroundings; avoid distractions like your phone or headphones to always know what's happening around you, especially traffic.

Use Paths

Walk or bike only on marked paths, lanes, or sidewalks, and cross streets at designated crosswalks where vehicles are expecting pedestrians.

Dr Peter Attia, physician, and researcher known for his work in longevity medicine believes that there is a correlation between your grip strength and dementia onset risk and dementia mortality.

Dr Attia says, "My best explanation for this is that grip strength is itself a proxy for overall strength. The type of strength we are talking about here is acquired, not inherited. You had to do a bunch of work to get it, and it is the work you did that is actually what's protect your brain."

He says that women who are over 40, must be able to hand on a bar for a minute and a half, and for men, it is two minutes. The key is that you are supposed to be able to carry 75% of your weight, he says, in an interview with CBS News' 60 minutes.

Is There Any Truth In The Claim That Grip Strength Has A Correlation With Dementia?

As per a 2021 study published in journal Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, titled Grip Strength and the Risk of Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies, loss of grip strength and cognitive impairment are prevalent in the elderly, and they may share the pathogenesis in common.

The study found that poorer grip strength was in fact associated with more risk of cognitive decline and dementia. The subgroup analysis within the study also indicated that people with poorer strength had more risk of Alzheimer's disease and non-AD dementia.

But why does this happen? Lower grip strength is a marker for overall muscle mass, general health, and is linked to the health of the brain and its blood vessels. This link is also connected to other factors like vascular health, cognitive decline, and physical activity, as low grip strength can be a symptom of poor overall physical and metabolic health.

How Is Lower Grip Strength Is Linked To Dementia?

Indicator Of Overall Health: Grip strength reflects the health of entire body, this is why a lower grip strength is an indicate of lower muscle mass, and general poor health.

Vascular and brain health: Since there is a connection between muscle strength, blood flow, and brain health, thus lower grip strength is associated with a higher risk of vascular dementia and a greater volume of white matter hyperintensities in the brain.

Also Read: What Home Gym Tools Can Help You Stay Fit Without Hitting The Gym?

Poorer grip strength is associated with lower cognitive function, such as fluid intelligence and prospective memory. This suggest a link between the body's physical capabilities and the brain's cognitive abilities.

A different study published in 2022, where 40,000 participants from the UK Biobank were studied found that greater grip strength was associated with better cognitive functioning, higher life satisfaction, greater subjective well-being, and reduced depression and anxiety symptoms while controlling for numerous demographic, anthropometric, and socioeconomic cofounders.

The study also found that grey matter volume of subcortical region also correlated with better mental health and considerably mediated their relationship with grip strength.

A new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine suggests that you should choose one long walk over a few short strolls to keep your heart healthy. This is especially if you do not exercise much.

Walking for at least 15 minutes without a stop is ideal, notes the study. This means you walk for 1,500 steps in a row. This is said to give your heart a good workout. The study also notes that many people who walk 10,000 steps a day, actually follow the number that came from a Japanese pedometer advertisement, and not necessarily science, also reported by BBC. However, experts do agree that more steps are generally better for your health.

How Was The Study Conducted?

The study analyzed 33,560 adults who were aged 40 to 79 in the UK. They walked fewer than 8,000 steps a day. These people were grouped by how long their walks were and was measured with a step-counter over a week:

• Less than 5 minutes (43%)
• 5 to 10 minutes (33.5%)
• 10 to 15 minutes (15.5%)
• 15 minutes or more (8%)

The data was collected after tracking the participants for eight years. This was done by the researchers from the University of Sydney and the Universidad Europea in Spain.

What Did The Study Find?

The study found that people who walked in longer stretches had a lower risk of heart problems than those who take short strolls. Even those who are the least active, for instance, those who walk under 5,000 steps a day, longer walks make a big difference for them. The study noted that for them too, the risk of heart disease and death drop significantly.

However, the study cannot guarantee that this change is because they were already fitter to begin with. However, the researchers did study this factor including whether the person smoked, was obese or had high cholesterol.

How You Walk Matters More Than How Much You Walk

The researchers also noted that the way you walk could actually matter more than how much you walk. The answer is walk for a longer time, even if you do not walk that much overall. You could implement simple changes, including setting some time aside for a longer walk.

The Co-lead research Prom Emmanuel Stamatakis said, "We tend to place all the emphasis on the number of steps or the total amount of walking but neglect the crucial role of patterns, for example 'how' walking is done. This study shows that even people who are very physically inactive can maximise their heart health benefit by tweaking their walking patterns to walk for longer at a time, ideally for at least 10-15 minutes, when possible."

The National Health Service, UK, also recommends 150 minutes of moderate activity per week. This could be brisk walking, which could be spread out across the week. Older adults, especially those who are over 65, are recommended to try to move a little more every day, even if it is to do some household activities.

A senior cardiac nurse at the British Heart Foundation, Emily McGrath told BBS, "Exercise helps everyone live a happier and healthier life. If you have heart and circulatory disease, it can help you manage your condition and make you feel better overall. You may find it hard to be more active at first, but as time goes on it'll get easier as your body gets used to the activity. You may only notice small improvements at first, but it all adds up and counts towards keeping your heart healthy."