The COVID-19 pandemic was a traumatic experience for most, claiming countless lives and forcing many to suffer in isolation. The fear and disruption caused by the virus during 2020-2021 extended beyond the pandemic itself, affecting the diagnosis and treatment of other life-threatening diseases like cancer and tuberculosis. However, what if we told you that the very virus that upended our lives might hold the key to fighting cancer?
Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. During the pandemic, some doctors noticed something intriguing: cancer patients who contracted COVID-19 experienced tumor shrinkage or reduced growth. Initially, it was unclear if this was a coincidence or if there was a deeper connection.
A recent study led by researchers at the Northwestern Medicine Canning Thoracic Institute, published in The Journal of Clinical Investigation last month, sheds light on this phenomenon. This groundbreaking research could pave the way for new treatments to combat cancer, especially metastasis—the process by which cancer spreads to different parts of the body.
Dr. Ankit Bharat, chief of thoracic surgery at Northwestern University, and his team found that the SARS-CoV-2 virus influences a type of immune cell in the body called monocytes. Normally, cancer cells manipulate monocytes to shield themselves from the immune system's attack. However, the researchers discovered that the presence of the COVID-19 virus alters this behavior.
The viral RNA appears to transform monocytes into a rare type of immune cell, scientifically termed inducible nonclassical monocytes. These transformed cells can be enhanced with specific drugs to infiltrate tumors and metastatic regions. Once inside, they break down the cancer’s protective shield, enabling the body’s immune system to identify and attack the cancer cells more effectively.
This is a significant breakthrough, particularly for tackling cancer metastasis, which remains a major challenge in cancer treatment. Inside the tumors, these transformed monocytes trigger the production of natural killer cells—specialized immune cells that directly destroy cancer. The study has already shown promising results in mouse models for cancers such as melanoma, breast, and colon cancer.
The findings offer hope for innovative treatments and underscore the unexpected ways in which the virus could contribute to medical advancements. While the COVID-19 pandemic left a trail of devastation, its complex interactions with the human body might open new doors in the fight against cancer.
The COVID-19 pandemic shook the entire world, changing lives, economies, and healthcare systems. While it brought immense suffering, studies like this remind us of the hidden potential for breakthroughs through adversity. Cancer, one of the most deadly diseases affecting people across all age groups, continues to devastate lives without discrimination. This research not only unveils a fascinating connection between SARS-CoV-2 and cancer but also marks the beginning of a new hope. If utilised effectively, these findings could lead to revolutionary treatments, offering hope in the relentless fight against a disease that knows no boundaries.
Credits: Canva
As the United States experiences the worst measles outbreak in over a decade with nearly 900 reported cases across 29 states, including deaths of two children, public understanding of the disease and its prevention strategy have been highly misunderstood due to political divide. The outbreak began in West Texas and has now spread widely. This highlights not only the persistent threat of measles but also the growing influence of vaccine misinformation, which have been fueled by political figures.
Measles, a highly contagious viral disease, had been largely controlled in the U.S. thanks to the widespread use of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. However, gaps in vaccination coverage have led to a resurgence. The current outbreak, centered in Texas but extending to almost 30 states, has alarmed public health officials. Two young girls who were otherwise healthy have died as a result of measles complications.
The disease is known for its rapid transmission. A single case can lead to significant spread if vaccination rates in a community fall below the 95% threshold needed for herd immunity. Children are particularly vulnerable; although the first dose of the MMR vaccine is typically administered at 12 months, increased parental concern has led some to seek earlier vaccination during the outbreak.
As per a new survey by KKF, a nonprofit health information group, only one-third of Republican-leaning parents were aware of the current measles outbreak. This was in comparison with the two-thirds of aware Democratic parents. The survey also found and 1 in 5 Republicans believes that measles vaccine is more dangerous than the diseases itself, this is double the rate of Democrats.
These gaps in perception are not new but are deepening. About 35% of Republicans surveyed believe the discredited theory that the MMR vaccine is linked to autism—a belief held by just 10% of Democrats. While belief in this theory has not increased significantly, public awareness of the claim has grown, reflecting the impact of persistent misinformation.
Adding to the confusion is Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has long been associated with anti-vaccine rhetoric. Since taking office, he has supported an investigation into environmental contributors to autism and has floated unproven theories, such as vitamin A being a preventative measure against measles. These statements, while not outright opposing vaccines, muddy public understanding and can discourage immunization.
At a time when clear public health messaging is critical, conflicting remarks from top officials are exacerbating distrust. Advocacy organizations like Immunize.org and The Immunization Partnership warn that such mixed messaging, especially when it originates from high-ranking leaders, undermines public confidence in vaccines.
In southern states like Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Oklahoma, anti-vaccine activism has gained traction within state legislatures. Studies show that even lawmakers with medical backgrounds have not always supported public health measures, often influenced by political considerations and public pressure. Testimony from vaccine opponents at legislative hearings further amplifies misinformation, making it more difficult for facts to gain traction.
Meanwhile, healthcare providers are seeing the consequences firsthand. In California, where a 2014–15 outbreak began at Disneyland, pediatricians have treated severely ill children and taken stricter stances on accepting unvaccinated patients. These outbreaks serve as a stark reminder that the threat of measles is real and recurring.
Credits: Canva
Every year in April, IBS Awareness Month puts the spotlight on one of the world's most misunderstood and elusive gastrointestinal disorders—Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). Affecting about 10% of the world's population, IBS has puzzled physicians and researchers for years. Though its chronic and interruptive symptoms—abdominal pain and bloating on one end, constipation and diarrhea on the other—there remains no agreement on what actually triggers it. A new, daring theory is disrupting conventional wisdom by posing an unusual question- Is gravity the hidden culprit behind IBS?
Dr. Brennan Spiegel, a Cedars-Sinai Medical Center physician and researcher in Los Angeles, is leading the way to a new perspective on IBS—one that looks at the constant pull of gravity on our bodies. In the American Journal of Gastroenterology, Spiegel's theory is that IBS could be the body's failure to successfully deal with gravity.
It's an interesting concept. "We spend our whole life in gravity, are formed by it, but barely appreciate its constant effect on our body," Spiegel explained in an interview. "Each strand of our body is touched by gravity every day, from the top of our head to our gastrointestinal tract."
From a scientific perspective, this hypothesis borrows from evolutionary biology and neurophysiology. The human body over millennia has evolved complex systems—musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, neurological—to deal with the downward pull of gravity. When these systems fail, Spiegel argues, they can initiate not only gastrointestinal symptoms but also a cascade of other complaints—muscle pain, fatigue, changed mood, and more.
At its core is the connection between the gut and the brain—a widely documented characteristic of IBS. Individuals with IBS tend to experience a knotted stomach upon stress or a sensation of "butterflies" in stressful situations. Such gut feeling, as Spiegel speculates, may be attributed to the nervous system's adaptation to threats from gravity, such as the free-falling experience on a roller coaster.
"Our nervous system has mechanisms for perceiving and reacting to changes in gravity," he added. "When it flakes out or overcompensates, it may show up as IBS symptoms." This is related to another fascinating twist: the difference between individuals' reactions to gravitational stress. There are those who love roller coasters; others get nauseated or frantic—implying a continuum of what Spiegel refers to as G-force vigilance.
This might explain why IBS tends to overlap with disorders such as anxiety, depression, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue syndrome—all of which could potentially have an underlying sensitivity to gravitational stress.
Spiegel's theory also explores deeper into anatomy. The abdominal cavity houses heavy organs that need to be "suspended" effectively. Genetic predispositions—lax connective tissues, a weak diaphragm, or spinal misalignments in some—may lead to sagging or movement of organs, including the intestines. The downward movement could affect motility, lead to cramping, and result in bacterial overgrowth—all prevalent in IBS.
In addition, the hypothesis delves into serotonin's role. This mood-regulating neurotransmitter also facilitates balance, blood circulation, and the movement of intestinal contents. "Dysregulated serotonin," Spiegel explains, "could actually be a type of gravity failure," which may connect depression, IBS, and even dizziness in a common physiological cycle.
If confirmed, the gravity hypothesis has the potential to transform how we conceptualize—and treat—IBS. "The beauty of it is that it's testable," said Dr. Shelly Lu, director of the Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases at Cedars-Sinai. Unlike so many vague IBS theories, this one invites us to the possibility of targeted interventions.
This hypothesis can also assist us in better comprehending the reason why exercise, posture correction, core strengthening, and physical therapy work for most IBS sufferers. By fortifying the structural support system of the body, these strategies might decrease gravity's effect on the gut.
IBS is an individualized disease. Symptoms range widely and may include:
Its triggers are also multifactorial. Stress and some foods—dairy, citrus, beans, wheat, and carbonated beverages—may exacerbate symptoms. Although food intolerances are not the cause in every case, many individuals find significant symptom relief through diet, such as a low FODMAP diet.
IBS isn't only an intestinal affliction—it can also blow a person's life off track. Chronic patients usually suffer from complications such as hemorrhoids due to constant diarrhea or constipation, and generally decreased quality of life. Research indicates that individuals with moderate to severe IBS experience three times more work absences compared to others. The psychological price is high too—aún and depression often accompany one another in IBS, one worsening the other.
Could this be the long-lost piece to a hundred-year-old puzzle? Maybe. Although further research is necessary to establish the gravity connection, the theory is already creating new avenues for comprehension and healing.
If you have ongoing digestive problems, see a healthcare provider. IBS is a treatable condition, and treatment options can involve medication, counseling, physical therapy, or dietary changes depending on your individual symptoms.
US childhood vaccination rates have taken a disturbing decline, exacerbated by the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. It is not simply a statistic—but a warning sign of future health threats. The effects are already being seen, with measles rebounding and potentially the return of other diseases once brought under control, such as rubella and polio. A recent Stanford Medicine study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, paints a dire picture: a 10% decline in vaccination rates could result in millions of measles cases over the next 25 years.
The rising danger of preventable illness, and the reason why vaccination is key to protecting public health. From the emergence of vaccine hesitancy to the surging spread of measles.
The drop in childhood vaccinations in the U.S. has been a rising concern among health professionals. Although the disruptions brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic were a major factor, the trend of declining immunization rates is not new. For years, growing vaccine hesitancy, driven by misinformation, political controversy, and skepticism about health systems, has fueled a change in public perception, particularly among parents. Consequently, fewer kids are getting the necessary vaccines and diseases that previously were under control are now being a threat again.
The research done by a group of researchers from Stanford, together with other universities' experts, shows the risk of measles becoming endemic again in the U.S. It might occur in as little as two decades if the vaccination rate is sustained at current levels. Nevertheless, a 10 percent decline in the rate of vaccinations could make things even worse, and millions of individuals could become susceptible to infection, hospitalizations, and death.
Measles is the most infectious disease on Earth, with the potential to spread quickly through populations. Prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine in 1963, the illness was rampant throughout the U.S., affecting millions of individuals annually. Indeed, before the vaccine, an estimated 3 million to 4 million individuals were infected with the disease every year, with 400 to 500 deaths, 48,000 hospitalizations, and 1,000 instances of brain swelling (encephalitis).
As per the CDC, measles remains a lethal disease, primarily for children. It spreads via respiratory droplets when an infected person coughs or sneezes and symptoms may range from fever, cough, runny nose, and a characteristic red, blotchy rash. As the disease is vaccine-preventable with the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine, unvaccinated individuals are at the greatest risk of being infected and infecting others.
The recent study by Stanford researchers utilized large-scale epidemiological modeling to simulate how infectious diseases like measles would spread across the United States based on different levels of childhood vaccination coverage. The results are concerning. Even at current vaccination rates, the study suggests that measles could re-emerge as an endemic disease in the U.S. within the next two decades. A mere 10 percentage point reduction in vaccination coverage would accelerate this process significantly, potentially resulting in millions of measles cases in the next 25 years.
Dr. Nathan Lo, a Stanford physician and the study's senior author, underscored the seriousness of the situation. "Our nation is at a tipping point for measles to become a routine household disease again," he said. "The declining routine childhood vaccinations, coupled with increasing vaccine hesitancy, may send us to a place we were working to avoid for decades."
The problem of vaccine hesitancy has been a major contributor to the fall in immunization rates. The disinformation regarding the safety and effectiveness of vaccines has instilled fear and confusion, particularly among parents. A KFF survey published in 2025 found that more than half of adults were unsure about whether to believe assertions about the risks of the measles vaccine—assertions that have been magnified by anti-vaccine personalities, such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
This widespread misinformation has caused many to doubt the necessity of vaccines for diseases no longer perceived as a threat, like measles. But as recent outbreaks have shown, measles is hardly eradicated and still poses a lethal threat, especially to vulnerable groups like infants, immunocompromised individuals, and the unvaccinated.
Recent measles outbreaks in the U.S. are stark reminders of the risks of low vaccination levels. In 2025 alone, the nation has already seen some 800 cases of measles, the most in a single year since 2019. The largest outbreak took place in West Texas, which had over 620 cases, 64 hospitalizations, and two deaths. These outbreaks are a wake-up call that the U.S. is not immune to outbreaks of this extremely contagious disease.
According to Mathew Kiang, a study co-author, "The impact of waning vaccinations won't be sudden, but the aggregate effect could be devastating. If we do not take action now, we can expect millions of measles cases in the coming years."
Although the situation is grim, there is hope. Specialists such as Dr. Lo and Kiang propose that even slight increases in vaccination rates could make a significant difference in preventing the spread of measles and other preventable illnesses. A 5 percent boost in vaccination coverage could avert a sharp spike in cases, safeguard vulnerable populations, and ultimately save lives.
Health professionals remind parents to discuss with pediatricians the value of vaccinations and have faith in healthcare professionals' recommendations. Public health officials and policymakers also need to act to address vaccine misinformation and make sure vaccination mandates for school entry are intact.
This study's findings highlight the crucial role that vaccination plays in protecting public health. By potentially preventing millions of cases and countless fatalities, high vaccination coverage needs to be sustained. With the U.S. still struggling to deal with the consequences of declining vaccine coverage, it is vital that both the public and policymakers take proactive measures to ensure that such diseases as measles do not experience a resurgence.
The decision to vaccinate is such a simple choice, but the difference it makes can be gargantuan. It is incumbent on all of us—parents, medical practitioners, and members of society—to take our turn in safeguarding the next generation against the ruining effects of vaccine-preventable diseases. As Dr. Lo highlighted, "Increasing vaccination levels by just 5% can make a world of difference in keeping these diseases at bay."
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited