Hepatitis B Vaccination Timeline For Children Under Review Without Scientific Data, Says Former CDC Director Susan Monarez

Updated Sep 18, 2025 | 07:03 AM IST

SummaryVaccines have long been one of the greatest tools for protecting children’s health. As debates unfold, and the revelation by the former CDC Director Susan Monarez at the Senate hearing points that the stakes are not just about timing, they’re about whether preventable diseases stay in the past, or whether they return to threaten a new generation. Read on to know what the debate is all about.
Hepatitis B Vaccination Timeline For Children Under Review Without Scientific Data, Says Former CDC Director Susan Monarez

Credits: Canva and Reuters

The US childhood vaccination schedule has become the center of a heated debate and much attention is being drawn towards it after a Senate hearing revealed the possible changes to when critical shots like the hepatitis B vaccine are given. Susan Monarez, former director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions hearing said that she was fired in August for refusing two demands by Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, which were: fire career agency officials and sign off vaccine recommendations without seeing any data.

“He said if I was unwilling to do both, I should resign,” she said. “I responded that I could not pre-approve recommendations without reviewing the evidence, and I had no basis to fire scientific experts.”

At stake is not just the timeline of immunization, but also health and safety of millions of children who rely on vaccines to protect them from life-threatening diseases.

“The concern is Robert F Kennedy [Jr.] is going to make America sicker again,” said Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass. “They’re going to send us towards more disease, more death and more despair in our nation.”

Why Does Vaccine Schedule Matter?

The CDC, through its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), sets the recommended vaccine schedule for children. While not mandatory, these guidelines strongly influence what health insurers cover and how doctors across the country advise parents.

For decades, the schedule has ensured that children are vaccinated against highly contagious diseases at the ages when they are most vulnerable. Changes to this timeline are not simply administrative, they have direct consequences on whether children remain protected against illnesses that once caused widespread suffering and death.

Debate Around The Hepatitis B Vaccine

One of the most debated issues that has risen is the hepatitis vaccine. It is from 1991 that the CDC recommended that babies must receive the first dose within 24 hours of birth, followed by additional doses at one month and between six to eighteen months.

This timing is not arbitrary. Hepatitis B is a viral infection that attacks the liver and can lead to cirrhosis, cancer, and lifelong health complications. Critically, the risk of developing chronic hepatitis B depends on the age at which a person is infected. Babies infected at birth have up to a 90% chance of developing chronic infection. Adults, by comparison, have only about a 5% chance.

Because many mothers are unaware they carry the virus, the birth dose serves as a crucial safeguard. It blocks transmission at the earliest stage, preventing lifelong illness and premature deaths.

So, What Could Change?

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., the committee’s chair, asked Monarez if Kennedy had told her he was going to change the childhood vaccination schedule. “He said that the childhood vaccine schedule would be changing starting in September, and I needed to be on board with it,” Monarez said.

What is being proposed contradicts the CDC recommendation of hepatitis shot being the first one for a child to receive within 24 hours of being born. Testimony at the Senate hearing suggested that the vaccine schedule could be revised to delay the first dose of the hepatitis B shot until age 4. Former CDC officials raised alarms that this proposal was not based on scientific data but rather political direction.

If implemented, such a shift would mean babies could go unprotected during the period when they are most at risk of contracting hepatitis B from their mothers or close contacts. Experts warned this would undo decades of progress in reducing infant infections, from 20,000 cases annually before 1991 to fewer than 20 per year today.

Risks of Delaying Vaccination

Delaying hepatitis B vaccination could open the door to a resurgence of preventable infections. Even if mothers are screened during pregnancy, screening isn’t perfect, and some may acquire the infection late in pregnancy or go undiagnosed. Without the immediate protection of the birth dose, babies would be vulnerable.

Moreover, shifting vaccines later in childhood carries another risk: missed doses. Studies show that adherence to vaccines is highest in infancy, when routine well-baby visits are frequent. Delaying could mean some children never get fully vaccinated at all.

The consequences are not minor. Untreated hepatitis B leads to chronic infection in most infants, setting them on a path toward liver damage, cirrhosis, and cancer later in life.

Concerns for Childhood Immunization

The hepatitis B vaccine isn’t the only one under review. The same advisory panel is expected to revisit recommendations for measles, chickenpox, and the updated COVID-19 shot.

Also Read: US Health Officials To Examine Covid Vaccine Effects In Pregnant Women And Kids

Critics worry that altering the established childhood schedule without thorough scientific review could destabilize public trust and increase preventable outbreaks.

The controversy comes at a time when confidence in public health agencies is already slipping. According to a recent KFF poll, trust in the CDC dropped from 63% in 2023 to 57% in 2025. Changes seen as politically motivated, rather than evidence-driven, could erode that trust even further.

Why Science-Based Decisions Are Essential

Experts stress that vaccination decisions should be grounded in data, not politics. The success of public health in the U.S., from reducing measles deaths to nearly eliminating mother-to-child hepatitis B transmission—has hinged on science-led policymaking.

Sen. Bill Cassidy, a gastroenterologist, reminded lawmakers that the hepatitis B vaccine transformed infant health in America: “Before 1991, as many as 20,000 babies were infected with hepatitis B each year. Now, fewer than 20 babies annually get the virus from their mother.”

Such achievements highlight the life-saving role of evidence-based vaccination. Undoing or weakening these protections without compelling scientific justification risks reversing decades of progress.

What Comes Next?

The ACIP meeting will be pivotal in determining the future of the childhood vaccine schedule. If changes are recommended, they could reshape how millions of American children are immunized. However, for many experts, the principle remains clear: any adjustments must be backed by rigorous data and public health expertise.

End of Article

Sonia Gandhi Under Treatment for Systemic Infection, Responding Well: Doctors

Updated Mar 26, 2026 | 11:30 AM IST

SummaryThe Rajya Sabha MP was admitted to the Sir Ganga Ram Hospital with mild illness and is stable. The hospital stated that she is undergoing antibiotic treatment for systemic infection, and is responding well.
Sonia Gandhi Under Treatment for Systemic Infection, Responding Well: Doctors

Credit: SoniaGandhi/X

Sonia Gandhi, Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson, is under treatment for systemic infection, said the doctors treating her at the private hospital in Delhi, today.

The Rajya Sabha MP was admitted to the Sir Ganga Ram Hospital on March 24, 2026. As per initial reports, she was feeling unwell due to the change in weather and has been put under observation.

"Sonia Gandhi has been admitted to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital on 24th March night for fever. As per Dr. Ajay Swaroop, Chairman of SGRH, she is undergoing treatment with antibiotics for systemic infection,” the hospital said in a statement.

She "is showing response to treatment", it added.

Earlier, the hospital noted that the doctors are conducting further investigations to check for possible infection in the stomach and urinary tract.

Also Read: COVID Variant BA.3.2 Spreads To 23 Countries: Is The Variant Under Monitoring A Cause Of Worry?

What Is A Systemic Infection?

Systemic infection occurs in the bloodstream and affects the entire body, rather than a single organ or body part.

It occurs when pathogens like bacteria, viruses, or fungi enter the bloodstream and travel to multiple organs and tissues.

These infections can be life-threatening and common symptoms include:

  • high fever,
  • fatigue,
  • rapid heart rate,
  • confusion.
They often require rapid, comprehensive medical treatment, such as systemic antibiotics or antivirals.

Earlier this year, in January, Sonia Gandhi was admitted to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital after she suffered respiratory discomfort.

Did Delhi Pollution Make Sonia Gandhi Sick?

Due to an increase in population during the peak winter season in Delhi, the 79-year-old Parliamentarian had been regular with hospital visits and check-ups. Hospital source, while speaking to the news agency PTI, said that "it is a routine admission".

According to reports, she had complained of some respiratory discomfort. Once her medical examination was done, it was found that "her bronchial asthma had been mildly exacerbated", confirmed Dr. Swaroop.

A hospital source told PTI that this is due to the combined effects of cold weather and pollution.

As a precautionary measure, she was admitted to the hospital for further observation and treatment. The physicians who were treating her made a decision on her discharge based on her clinical progress.

Sonia Gandhi's Health History

On June 7, 2025, she was admitted to the Indira Gandhi Medical College and Hospital (IGMC) in Shimla for a routine medical check-up. She was also later discharged after her medical examination.

As per Naresh Chauhan, Principal Advisor (Media) to the Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister, she was brought in due to minor health concerns. However, he said that after being put under observation by doctors to assess her condition, she was stable.

Dr. Aman Chauhan, Deputy Medical Superintendent at IGMC, said, "Her blood pressure was slightly on the higher side, but there is nothing serious. No additional tests were conducted; only routine investigations were carried out. She was not given any special medical advice because everything was perfectly fine."

In the same month, on June 15, she was admitted to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital again under the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology for a stomach-related issue. Before that, she was again in the Delhi hospital on June 9 for a medical check-up.

End of Article

COVID Variant BA.3.2 Spreads To 23 Countries: Is The Variant Under Monitoring A Cause Of Worry?

Updated Mar 26, 2026 | 11:23 AM IST

SummaryThe US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has raised concerns about BA.3.2 — touted as a highly mutated variant of COVID. BA.3.2 has already been reported in at least 23 countries, including 25 states in America.
COVID Variant BA.3.2 Spreads To 23 Countries: Is The Variant Under Monitoring A Cause Of Worry?

Credit: Canva

The emergence of the COVID variant BA.3.2, linked to the Omicron variant lineage, has once again stirred public anxiety, reviving memories of the devastating global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The variant is particularly concerning as it provides no immune protection to people with previous infection or even vaccination.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has raised concerns about BA.3.2 — touted as a highly mutated variant of COVID. BA.3.2 has already been reported in at least 23 countries, including 25 states in America.

Also Read: US CDC Warns Of New Immune-Evasive COVID Variant In 23 Countries

The BA.3.2 variant was first identified in a respiratory sample in South Africa in November 2024.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has designated BA.3.2 as a Variant Under Monitoring (VUM). It means the variant may be not that dangerous yet, it may have concerning mutations.

However, the "BA.3.2 has not shown a sustained growth advantage over any other cocirculating variant, and no data indicate increased severity, hospitalizations, or deaths associated with this variant", according to the WHO's Initial Risk Evaluation Report in December 2025.

"Overall, available evidence suggests that BA.3.2 poses low additional public health risk compared with other circulating Omicron descendant lineages," it added.

What Is The BA.3.2 Variant?

BA.3.2 is a descendant of the Omicron BA.3 lineage. It is genetically distinct from the previously circulating JN.1 lineages (including LP.8.1 and XFG).

BA.3.2 comprises two major branches, BA.3.2.1 and BA.3.2.2. BA.3.2.2 also has substitutions like: K356T, A575S, R681H, and R1162P, the CDC report said.

What makes the BA.3.2 variant special is the “70 to 75 substitutions and deletions in the gene sequence of its spike protein”, revealed the CDC’s latest Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

Also Read: 'Husband Stitch': A Medical Necessity Or Just A Tool To Objectify Women's Bodies?

“BA.3.2 represents a new lineage of SARS-CoV-2, genetically distinct from the JN.1 lineages (including LP.8.1 and XFG) that have circulated in the US since January 2024,” said the CDC researchers.

“BA.3.2 mutations in the spike protein have the potential to reduce protection from a previous infection or vaccination,” they added.

The first BA.3.2 lineage sequence was detected in a respiratory sample collected on November 22, 2024, in South Africa from a boy aged 5 years.

It was then identified in 2025, in Mozambique (March), the Netherlands (April), and Germany (April). It began to increase in September 2025, with the highest number of detections reported during the week beginning December 7, 2025.

As of February 11, 2026, BA.3.2 had been detected in at least 23 countries.

Between November 2025 and January 2026, the weekly BA.3.2 detections increased and reached approximately 30 percent of sequences reported in three European countries (Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands).

The CDC reported that BA.3.2 has appeared in wastewater and clinical samples in 25 states. The states include California, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Wyoming.

Surveillance shows that the variant is present in both urban and rural areas, but the full extent may be larger than reported because not all states have strong genomic testing programs.

BA.3.2 A Variant Under Monitoring

According to the WHO, BA.3.2 demonstrates antigenic drift and reduced neutralization in vitro from previously infected or vaccinated individuals.

However, the global health body noted that currently approved COVID-19 vaccines are expected to continue providing protection against severe disease.

Despite immune evasion, phenotypic data suggest BA.3.2 has reduced infectivity.

End of Article

Liverpool Legend John Toshack Diagnosed With 'Terrible Disease' Dementia

Updated Mar 26, 2026 | 02:00 AM IST

SummaryJohn Toshack's memory of his glory days remains intact, but his short-term memory is more affected. His son Cameron said that his father has "good days and bad days".
Liverpool Legend John Toshack Diagnosed With 'Terrible Disease' Dementia

Credit: FAWales/X

John Toshack, the Wales and Liverpool legend, has been diagnosed with dementia, his son Cameron has confirmed to the media.

After a glittering playing career with Liverpool, the now 77-year-old Toshack went on to manage several leading clubs across Europe, including Real Madrid, Real Sociedad, and Besiktas.

His son and ex-Leeds United assistant Cameron, now coaching in Thailand, told the Daily Mail that his father has "good days and bad days".

"It's a terrible disease," he added.

Cameron noted that while his father's memory of his glory days remains intact, his short-term memory is more affected. And his father often tends to forget matters they spoke about in short periods.

"It’s the short-term memory where we’re seeing it – I speak to him most days, and if we chat in the afternoon, he might not remember that we also spoke in the morning," the report said.

"But if I ask him about the Liverpool days, or Sociedad or Madrid, the detail is amazing; his memory was so clear".

Meanwhile, Football Association of Wales in a post on social media platform X shared: "Our thoughts are with former

@Cymru player and manager John Toshack and his family following his recent diagnosis".

What Is Dementia?

Dementia is an umbrella term used to describe a significant decline in mental function that is serious enough to affect everyday life. It commonly impacts memory, thinking, and reasoning skills.

Dementia itself is not a single disease but a collection of symptoms caused by underlying conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia.

Common signs include memory problems, confusion, difficulty finding words, changes in mood or behaviour, and trouble completing familiar tasks.

These symptoms usually worsen over time and are not considered a normal part of ageing. Although there is no cure, treatment options can help manage symptoms, and early diagnosis plays an important role in care planning.

Alzheimer’s Disease: The Leading Cause of Dementia

Alzheimer's disease is one of the most common forms of dementia and mostly affects adults over the age of 65.

About 8.8 million Indians aged 60 and above are estimated to be living with Alzheimer's disease. Over seven million people in the US, 65 and older, live with the condition, and over 100,00 die from it annually.

Alzheimer's disease is believed to be caused by the development of toxic amyloid and beta proteins in the brain, which can accumulate in the brain and damage cells responsible for memory.

Amyloid protein molecules stick together in brain cells, forming clumps called plaques. At the same time, tau proteins twist together in fiber-like strands called tangles. The plaques and tangles block the brain's neurons from sending electrical and chemical signals back and forth.

Over time, this disruption causes permanent damage in the brain that leads to Alzheimer's disease and dementia, causing patients to lose their ability to speak, care for themselves, or even respond to the world around them.

While there is no clear cause of Alzheimer's disease, experts believe it can develop due to genetic mutations and lifestyle choices, such as physical inactivity, unhealthy diet, and social isolation.

Early symptoms of Alzheimer's disease include forgetting recent events or conversations. Over time, Alzheimer's disease leads to serious memory loss and affects a person's ability to do everyday tasks.

There is no cure for this progressive brain disorder, and in advanced stages, loss of brain function can cause dehydration, poor nutrition, or infection. These complications can result in death.

End of Article