Credit: Butantan Institute
A new vaccine that targets the mosquito-borne dengue has proven to be over 80 percent effective in preventing the risk of severe disease for up to five years, according to a recent study conducted by Brazilian researchers.
The study, published in the journal Nature Medicine, confirmed that the tetravalent dengue vaccine -- Butantan-DV -- developed by the Butantan Institute in São Paulo, prevents hospitalizations and offers broader protection against all four dengue serotypes.
“This vaccine is establishing itself as a very important tool in the fight against dengue in Brazil, with the potential to contribute to reducing the circulation of the virus, in addition to individual protection,” said Fernanda Boulos, the institute’s medical director of clinical trials.
The phase 3 clinical trial, conducted from February 2016 to July 2019, involved 16,235 participants between the ages of 2 and 59.
The researchers compared individuals who received a single dose of the vaccine (10,259) with those who were administered a placebo (5,976).
The Butantan-DV vaccine is tetravalent and offers protection against the four known serotypes: DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, and DENV-4.
The vaccine uses live viruses that have been “weakened” (attenuated) in a laboratory.
Once administered, the vaccine controls replication of these attenuated viruses in the body -- a process which induces the immune system to produce neutralizing antibodies specific to each of the four serotypes.
The vaccines create immunity specific to each serotype to enable the body to recognize and neutralize each variant individually.
The Butantan-DV vaccine was approved by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) on November 26, 2025, for use by the Brazilian population aged 12 to 59.
The country's Ministry of Health has
Also read: Why Is Dengue Fever on the Rise Despite Vaccines?
Dengue is transmitted through infected mosquitoes, primarily the species Aedes aegypti.
Common Symptoms include:
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about half of the world's population is now at risk of dengue.
It estimates that:
The two main authorized vaccines in the world against dengue are Dengvaxia and Qdenga.
These vaccines are designed to protect against all four serotypes of the virus, with a focus on reducing severe disease and hospitalizations.
Credit: Canva
India has seen a significant rise in the cancer burden, with the cases rising to 1,569,793 in 2025, the government has informed the Parliament.
From more than 1.4 million in 2021, the cancer cases in the country rose to over 144,000 in the last five years, revealed Prataprao Jadhav, Union Minister of State for Health, in a written reply in the Rajya Sabha.
The increase in cases has been consistent:
Similarly, cancer deaths also increased in the country -- 868,588 in 2025 from 789,202 in 2021.
The country reported about 15,000 cancer -related deaths each year:
Jadhav informed that bigger states with large populations have seen a major increase in cancer cases and deaths consistently in the last five years.
States with the highest estimated cancer cases in 2025 include:
Uttar Pradesh - 226,125
Bihar - 118,136 cases
West Bengal - 121,639 cases
Maharashtra - 130,465 cases
Rajasthan - 80,628 cases
States with the highest estimated cancer deaths in 2025 include:
Uttar Pradesh - 125,184 deaths
Bihar - 65,571 deaths
West Bengal - 67,093 deaths
Maharashtra - 71,696 deaths
Rajasthan - 44,402 deaths
Major reasons for the rise in cancer burden include:
“The review provides a critical analysis of the current evidence, summarizing the association of water contamination, including industrial waste, pesticides, and heavy metals, with rectal and colorectal cancer,” Jadhav stated in the Upper House of the Parliament.
Jadhav further informed that the government is tackling the growing burden by expanding cancer care infrastructure across the country.
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has implemented the Strengthening of Tertiary Care Cancer Facilities Scheme, which has approved:
Other high-quality comprehensive cancer care facilities in the country include:
Credit: iStock
The recent decision by the Supreme Court of India allowing withdrawal of life support for a 32-year-old man in an irreversible permanent vegetative state is an important development in patient-centered healthcare.
The order follows the principles established in the landmark Common Cause v. Union of India, which recognized passive euthanasia and affirmed that individuals have the right to die with dignity. From the perspective of a critical care specialist, this decision supports ethical medical practice while protecting the dignity and rights of patients.
In modern intensive care units (ICUs), doctors use advanced technologies such as ventilators, feeding tubes, dialysis machines, and strong medications to sustain life during serious illness. These treatments are extremely valuable when there is a reasonable chance of recovery.
However, in some medical conditions—particularly severe brain injuries—patients may enter a permanent vegetative state. In this condition, the patient’s body may continue functioning with medical support, but the brain has lost the ability to produce consciousness or awareness. The patient cannot communicate, recognize loved ones, or interact with the environment, and medical science currently has no effective treatment to reverse this condition.
From a medical standpoint, continuing life support in such cases may only prolong biological survival without any possibility of recovery or meaningful quality of life. The Supreme Court’s decision acknowledges this difficult reality and allows withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment when doctors confirm that recovery is medically impossible. This approach respects the patient’s dignity and avoids unnecessary prolongation of suffering.
One of the key benefits of this judgment is the recognition of dignity at the end of life. The Court has interpreted the right to life under the Constitution of India to include the right to die with dignity. In practical terms, this means that patients should not be forced to remain on life-support machines when such treatment no longer benefits them.
Medicine should focus not only on prolonging life but also on ensuring that patients are treated with respect, comfort, and compassion during their final stages of life.
The decision also supports patient autonomy, which is a core principle of ethical medical care. Individuals have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and medical treatment. The recognition of living wills or advance directives allows patients to express their wishes in advance regarding life-prolonging treatments. This ensures that medical decisions align with the patient’s values and preferences, even if the patient is no longer able to communicate.
Also read: Harish Rana Case Highlights Why Planning For A Living Will Is Important
Another important benefit is the support it provides to families. Families often experience deep emotional stress when a loved one remains in a permanent vegetative state for a long period. They may struggle with uncertainty about whether continuing life support is truly helping the patient.
The Supreme Court’s framework provides a clear and compassionate process for decision-making involving medical boards and proper documentation. This helps families make informed choices in consultation with doctors while ensuring that the decision is ethically and legally sound.
The ruling also offers legal clarity for doctors and hospitals. In the past, physicians sometimes feared legal consequences if life support was withdrawn, even in medically futile situations.
The guidelines established under the Common Cause judgment create a structured and transparent process for making such decisions. This allows doctors to practice responsible and ethical medicine without unnecessary legal concerns.
Also read: Passive Euthanasia: Harish Rana’s Case May Reshape End-of-life Protocols, Say Experts
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s order is a compassionate step forward in Indian healthcare. From a critical care perspective, it respects patient dignity, supports family decision-making, provides legal clarity for doctors, and encourages thoughtful end-of-life care.
Most importantly, it reminds us that the true goal of medicine is not merely to extend life at all costs, but to ensure that every patient is treated with dignity, humanity, and respect throughout all stages of life.
Also read: Harish Rana Case Brings Spotlight On How Passive Euthanasia Has Evolved Over The Years
Credit: Canva
Amid a global increase in multidrug resistance, the World Health Organization (WHO) has released new guidelines that flags the lack of innovative antibiotics for vulnerable populations, as well as press the need for the rapid development of drugs to target three deadly bacterial infections.
The WHO's 2025 report on antibacterials in pipeline has highlighted that 90 new antibacterial agents are in preclinical or clinical development. Yet few are innovative antibiotic candidates with potential to target bacterial priority pathogens.
The WHO-developed Target Product Profiles (TPPs) call for accelerating the development of antibiotics to tackle the burden of drug-resistant bacteria in at-risk populations worldwide that lead to:
“The scientific community has developed and approved new antibiotics in recent years. This is good, but unfortunately not sufficient to catch up with evolving drug-resistant bacteria, especially against those of greatest concern,” said Dr Yvan Hutin, Director of Antimicrobial Resistance at WHO.
"We need a reliable pipeline with new antibacterial agents that are innovative, affordable, and accessible to all those who need them.”
The TPPs have been developed with extensive global consultation and also define the minimum and preferred characteristics of future antibacterials against these diseases, which specifically increase the risk of immunosuppressed people and critically ill patients. The vulnerable populations are also at risk of more deaths, prolonged hospitalizations and increased demand for intensive care that in turn strains health care systems.
The TPPs share a blueprint which:
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) occurs when germs develop the ability to defeat the drugs designed to kill them.
It is one of the 10 top global health threats, undermining the effectiveness of essential treatments and placing millions at risk of untreatable infections.
As per WHO data, AMR is an urgent global public health threat, killing at least 1.27 million people worldwide and associated with nearly 5 million deaths in 2019.
In the US alone, more than 2.8 million antimicrobial-resistant infections occur each year. More than 35,000 people die as a result, according to CDC's 2019 Antibiotic Resistance (AR) Threats Report.
The WHO in a 2025 report noted that one in six laboratory-confirmed bacterial infections causing common infections in people worldwide in 2023 were resistant to antibiotic treatments.
Between 2018 and 2023, antibiotic resistance rose in over 40 percent of the monitored antibiotics with an average annual increase of 5-15 percent.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited