(Credit-Olivia Bowen/Instgaram)
Vanishing Twin Syndrome: The former Love Island contestant Olivia Bowen has recently shared a pregnancy update, following her post about her struggles to grapple with the reality that she will no longer be having twins, but just one healthy young baby.
Within a few weeks of her sharing her twin pregnancy with her fans, she followed up with another post where she broke the devastating news of finding only one baby in the womb.
In the caption she said, “The crazy sickness, the biggest surprise of our lives finding out we were having twins, imagining our lives with two new babies, then the complete heartache of dealing with vanishing twin syndrome & losing one of our babies”.
However, as devastating as the news may be, it is important to note that this is a more common occurrence than people realize. The National Institute of Health, US, statistics show that half of the pregnancies with three gestational sacs go through it and 36% of twin pregnancies also experience this. But what exactly is Vanishing Twin Syndrome?
Also Read: Walking Dead Actress Kelley Mack Dies At 33 After Battling Glioma
According to the American Pregnancy Association vanishing twin syndrome was first recognized in 1945. It's what happens when one of two or more babies in a pregnancy dies in the womb. The other twin, the placenta, or the mother's body then absorbs the dead baby's tissue. This makes it look like one of the babies has "vanished."
Thanks to early ultrasounds, doctors can now spot this more often. It's believed that vanishing twin syndrome happens in about 21-30% of pregnancies with more than one baby.
Most of the time, doctors don't know exactly why vanishing twin syndrome happens. However, they've found that the baby who is lost often had chromosomal problems, while the surviving twin is usually healthy. It seems these problems are there from the very beginning of the pregnancy. Another possible cause is that the umbilical cord didn't attach correctly. The signs of a possible vanishing twin syndrome usually happen early in the first trimester. They can include:
If a twin is lost in the first three months of pregnancy, the surviving baby and the mother are usually fine. The living twin's chances of being healthy are very good.
If a twin is lost in the second or third trimester, there can be more risks for the surviving baby, including a higher chance of developing cerebral palsy. In these cases, the dead twin's body can get flattened by the pressure of the growing, healthy twin. At birth, doctors might find this flattened twin, which they call fetus compressus or fetus papyraceous.
In the past, doctors could only figure out if a twin had died by looking at the placenta after the baby was born. Now, an early ultrasound can show twins in the first trimester. A later ultrasound might then show that one of the babies is no longer there. For example, a woman might see two heartbeats at 7 weeks but only one at her next visit.
If a twin is lost in the first trimester, no special medical care is usually needed for the mother or the surviving baby. However, if the death happens in the second or third trimester, the pregnancy may be treated as high-risk.
If you are pregnant and experience bleeding, cramping, or pelvic pain, you should see a doctor. An ultrasound will help them determine if a fetus is still viable before considering any procedures.
Credits: Health and me
Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine technology saved millions during the COVID-19 pandemic. It brought unprecedented speed, precision, and adaptability that allowed shots from Pfizer and Moderna to roll out in record time. Now, that same platform is at a crossroads: scientists are leveraging its power to develop vaccines and therapies for everything from cancer to cystic fibrosis. But this week, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—a vocal critic of vaccines—announced the cancellation of $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine research targeting respiratory illnesses, igniting fierce backlash among public health leaders.
In a video posted to X on August 5, RFK Jr. revealed that BARDA (the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority) would terminate 22 mRNA vaccine projects and shift focus toward whole-virus vaccine platforms. He argued mRNA technology was “ineffective” against mutable respiratory viruses and claimed it posed more risks than benefits—a stance sharply criticized by public health experts.
Experts have been unified in raising concerns, calling the move a “huge strategic misstep,” warning it weakens the U.S. pandemic defense and labeling it “one of the most dangerous decisions in public health” that he’d ever seen. The shift, critics say, undermines preparedness and sacrifices the adaptability that made mRNA a global game-changer.
Traditional vaccines typically rely on growing whole viruses or viral proteins in eggs or cell cultures, a process that can take months—sometimes up to 18 months—to produce sufficient doses for global inoculation. mRNA bypasses this bottleneck by delivering synthetic messenger RNA into cells, instructing them to produce a harmless viral protein. This trains the immune system to recognize and fight the real virus.
The “m” in mRNA stands for “messenger,” reflecting how the molecule carries instructions. Researchers craft a synthetic snippet in the lab, inject it, and the body becomes its own vaccine factory. This rapid, flexible process gives scientists both speed and precision unmatched by older methods.
Protection from mRNA vaccines—and all vaccines, really—wanes over time. That’s due to waning immunity and virus mutations. Still, the strongest defense remains prevention of hospitalization and death. The advantage of mRNA lies in how quickly vaccines can be updated. This capability helps scientists stay a step ahead of viral drift, especially for flu and COVID variants.
mRNA isn’t just for stopping infections—it’s a Trojan horse for therapies against existing diseases. Scientists are testing mRNA-based therapeutic vaccines for cancers like pancreatic and melanoma. They’re also designing inhaled mRNA treatments for genetic disorders such as cystic fibrosis. Unlike traditional approaches, these therapies aim to teach the body to restore missing proteins or directly activate immune systems to eliminate abnormal cells.
Some of the most compelling work is happening in personalized oncology. Researchers can now sequence a patient’s tumor mutations and design mRNA that encodes those unique markers—training the immune system to attack only the cancerous cells. Moderna’s mRNA‑4157/V940, paired with pembrolizumab in melanoma trials, has shown improved recurrence-free survival. BioNTech similarly uses personalized neoantigen panels to reduce relapse.
Take flu pandemics, for example. Traditional egg-based production takes more than a year to scale—and may only reach 25% of the world’s population. mRNA platforms, however, could vaccinate nearly everyone in a similar timeframe. That speed is critical if the next pandemic emerges. Cutting off mRNA infrastructure now risks prolonging future crises.
From a policy standpoint, mRNA is not just another vaccine method—it’s a strategic asset. When new viruses emerge or existing ones mutate, response speed matters more than strength. Waiting months—or worse, years—to catch up can cost lives. Michael Osterholm and others note that global mRNA capacity could avert prolonged pandemics. Shifting resources away from it now diminishes that capability.
But it’s more than pandemic preparedness. mRNA’s adaptability has ignited a renaissance in RNA biology—from tumor vaccines to genetic therapies. Pulling back research support risks stalling a new generation of treatments already in motion. This isn’t just about one technology; it’s about whether the U.S. wants to lead—or fall behind—in a platform that’s shaping modern medicine.
Yes, COVID-19 vaccines will still be accessible despite the recent decision to cut funding for future mRNA research projects. The mRNA-based vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are already approved by the FDA and continue to be manufactured and distributed widely across the U.S. These vaccines have become a mainstay in the country’s public health strategy, and that’s not going away any time soon.
The announcement from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to cancel nearly $500 million in federal research funding impacts new and developing mRNA projects—not the existing COVID-19 vaccine programs already in place. The vaccines currently in circulation are produced by private pharmaceutical companies, and they aren’t dependent on government funding to continue manufacturing or distributing updated boosters.
Additionally, global pharmaceutical efforts to develop next-generation mRNA vaccines are still in motion. Many companies are continuing to explore and invest in mRNA platforms for not only COVID-19 but also for flu, RSV, and other infectious diseases. So while Kennedy’s move may slow down innovation in the U.S. public sector, it does not mean COVID-19 vaccines will disappear or suddenly become inaccessible.
In short, if you’re wondering whether you’ll still be able to get your annual COVID booster—yes, you will.
Credits: Canva
When it comes to your gut health, you don’t think about it much unless something goes wrong but since COVID-19, a lot more of us are concerned and worried about our gut. Doctors and researchers are now linking the virus to a surge in gut issues—and it goes far beyond a one-off stomach bug. If your digestive system feels off these days—maybe tired, unpredictable, or mysteriously unsettled—you’re not imagining it.
Here’s what researchers have uncovered: COVID-19, especially in its lingering long-COVID form, is rewriting how our gut and brain talk to each other. And that rewrite is showing up as real-world distress—in symptoms like IBS and functional dyspepsia that left pre-pandemic experts baffled.
A recent international study—reported in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology—used the Rome Foundation’s diagnostic criteria to compare two snapshots: one from 2017 and another from 2023. The result was a hard wake-up call:
And people with long COVID reported more severe gut symptoms alongside heightened anxiety and depression. This isn’t just more awareness; it’s a measurable shift.
These aren’t bland digestive symptoms. IBS and functional dyspepsia fall under disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI): an umbrella term that says our gut reacts not just to food—but to stress, mood, infection, and inflammation. That gut-brain axis is a two-way street connecting digestion, emotion, and immunity. When COVID-19 enters the picture, it seems to throw that entire system off balance.
When we talk about COVID-19, we normally picture a cough or sore throat—but GI symptoms have always been part of the story. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain—they’re not rare. Some patients experienced these as first or only symptoms. And for a significant number, those symptoms don’t resolve. One study found people who had COVID were 36% more likely than uninfected peers to develop GI disorders—ranging from ulcers and pancreatitis to IBS and acid reflux.
For those who were hospitalized, or who had more severe cases, the long-term risks jumped even further. A large Veterans Affairs cohort reported substantially higher GI risks—not just in the first year, but for at least three years post-infection.
We often talk about long COVID in terms of fatigue or brain fog. But in many cases, chronic gut issues are front and center—months or even years after the infection. Nausea, stomach pain, altered digestion (like unexpected diarrhea or constipation): these symptoms persist, even when the initial respiratory illness has passed. This persistence may come down to a few intertwined issues:
Viral Persistence – COVID can linger quietly in gut cells
Chronic Inflammation – triggering heightened gut sensitivity
Microbiome Disruption – an imbalance of gut bacteria that affects digestion and mood
Here’s a pattern worth noting, people with DGBIs often report anxiety and depression—and vice versa. The emotional distress isn’t a side effect—it may be part of the same conversation happening along the gut-brain axis. Research shows that anxiety can actually increase the risk of functional dyspepsia eightfold. After COVID, this link seems even stronger.
This isn’t about turning normal people into patients. It’s about recognizing that when COVID hits the gut, it can leave a footprint long afterward. It’s about listening to your body and knowing when something is more than just “stress.”
If you still have gut symptoms after recovering from COVID, you owe it to yourself to explore them—especially if anxiety or depression have joined the mix. A thoughtful medical workup is key, but so is understanding that many GI specialists now see these symptoms as part of chronic long COVID.
There’s no one-size-fits-all cure for post-COVID gut issues, but experts in GI health and gut-brain disorders are recommending a few key approaches. First, focus on diet and microbiome care: eating more high-fiber foods, incorporating prebiotics, staying well-hydrated, and cutting back on alcohol and red meat can help restore microbial balance. Next, address the mind-body connection—stress, anxiety, and gut dysfunction often fuel each other, so practices like cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, or meditation can play a critical role in breaking that cycle. And finally, don’t hesitate to seek clinical support. If your symptoms persist, it’s important to speak with a GI specialist who understands the complexities of long COVID, and, if needed, get connected to programs or researchers focused on gut-brain rehabilitation.
COVID changed how we think about viruses—and what they leave behind. It rewrote the narrative for our lungs, yes, but it also turned the gut into a frontline survivor. If your digestion hasn’t felt the same since then, you're not alone and you're not imagining it.
A newborn baby girl from Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, is battling a rare and dangerous tick-borne illness. After preliminary tests showed she contracted Powassan virus, baby Lily Sisco was flown to Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. The infant's mother, Tiffany Sisco, said Lily had a tick on her after a brief walk on a local bike path. "She is still fighting daily at MGH," Sisco shared on Facebook. "Although the CDC, Neurological Doctors and Nurses have no answers for long term, we remain hopeful."
Reports state that local health officials are now investigating this case, which would be only the second confirmed case of Powassan virus on Martha's Vineyard in two decades.
The Wisconsin Department of Health Services explains that powassan virus is a rare but serious illness spread to humans through the bite of an infected deer tick (also known as a black-legged tick). While uncommon, cases are most frequently found in the northeastern U.S. and the Great Lakes region. In Wisconsin, the first case was identified in 2003, and most have since occurred in the northern part of the state. Anyone can contract the virus, but those who spend more time outdoors are at higher risk.
Ticks become infected with the virus by biting an infected small mammal, like a rodent. It's not known exactly how long a tick must be attached to a person to transmit the virus, but it could be as little as 15 minutes.
The majority of human infections are caused by immature ticks called nymphs, which are about the size of a poppy seed and difficult to spot. Nymphs are most active during the spring and early summer. Adult ticks can also spread the virus but are larger and more likely to be found and removed before transmission occurs.
Because ticks can attach to any part of the body, it's crucial to check hard-to-see areas after being outdoors, such as behind the knees, in the armpits, on the scalp, and around the ears and groin.
Symptoms can appear anywhere from one week to one month after a tick bite. Many people who get the virus don't have any symptoms at all. Early signs often include fever, headache, nausea, vomiting, muscle weakness, and a stiff neck. In severe cases, the virus can lead to:
Powassan virus can be very serious, with about 10% of severe cases resulting in death. Of those who survive a severe illness, about half will have permanent or long-term neurological problems. If you experience any of these symptoms after being outdoors, you should see a doctor right away, even if you don't remember being bitten by a tick.
This has been a bad year for ticks. To stay safe, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health gives this advice:
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited