What Is 'Make America Healthy Again' All About?

Updated Nov 21, 2024 | 11:58 AM IST

Summary President-elect Donald Trump's "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) campaign seeks to revolutionise U.S. health and food policies by targeting corporate influence in agriculture and healthcare. Know what it is all about...
What is 'MAHA', Make America Healthy Again, all about?

Credits: Instagram: Robert F Kennedy Jr. Casey Means, and Alex Clark

President-elect Donald Trump coined 'MAGA', the Make America Great Again movement. It is a political movement which was used heavily during the presidential campaigns in 2016 and 2024. The latest development is its conservative sub-brand 'MAHA', Make America Healthy Again, with many MAHA influencers jumping right into the campaign, re-imagining the food policies and warning Americans on what they should or should not consume.

The forefront of MAHA is Robert F Kenny Jr. (RFK Jr.), who was recently nominated by Trump as the US Health Secretary, the position that awaits Senate approval. This battle incorporates RFK Jr.'s struggle against corporate agriculture, pharmaceutical companies and medical establishments.

Background

The externalised cost of food-related, noncommunicable diseases for Americans is over $1.3 trillion per year. This is greater than the value of all groceries sold annually. The food industry is also reaping high profits dealing with ultra-processed foods, many of which are banned in many other countries.

Robyn O'Brien, Chief Operating Officer at Montcalm says that 1 in 2 American men are expected to get cancer in their lifetimes, while 1 in 3 American women can expect the same. 1 in 3 American children has four As, which stands for allergies, autism, ADHD, and asthma, along with cancer as the leading cause of death in American children.

In this backdrop, it is JFK Jr.'s MAHA who wants to "dismantle the corporate stranglehold on [read the] our government agencies that has led to widespread chronic disease, environmental degradation, and rampant public distrust...MAHA seeks to drive a transformative agenda. This includes prioritizing regenerative agriculture, preserving natural habitats, and eliminating toxins from our food, water, and air… to combat the chronic disease epidemic, which includes addressing the root causes such as poor diet, environmental toxins, and inadequate healthcare... and dismantling the corporate takeover of government agencies that are supposed to protect public health and the environment.”

How did MAHA begin?

Calley Means and Dr Casey Means, a brother-sister duo built a wellness empire by questioning some of the traditional medical expertise and vaccine mandates. Their ideas also spoke to Trump's MAHA movement.

Calley who is a former food-industry lobbyist and Casey, a Stanford-educated surgeon, have pushed for a revamp of the American food and health system. This is driven by a deep distrust of the pharmaceutical and food industries and medical theories. Drawing on this thought, JFK Jr. also mentioned both siblings as people he would recommend to Trump for "prominent roles" in his administration.

The siblings have criticised the approach that the US medical systems are taking. They say, that instead of going for a holistic look at the body's needs through nutrition, exercise and health, the current medical system is relying on medications.

Calley also called the Covid-19 vaccine mandates a "war crime", and that parents should rely on the "divine gifts of intuition and heart intelligence" rather than "blindly trusting the science".

ALSO READ: Who is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Controversial Nominee for U.S. Health Secretary?

MAHA Influencers

There are MAHA influencers other than the podcaster siblings and JFK Jr. himself. Enters Alex Clark. "Cool girl, loves health and wellness, and happens to be conservative", the 31-year-old introduces herself.

She is able to tap into those who are not politically aligned, but are worried about their kids' health. In a podcast called Realfoodology, she and Courtney Swan, a nutritionist look for chickpeas, which might "slowly poison you", as Clark believes.

These chickpeas contain glyphosate, which as per the Environmental Protection Agency has "no risks of concern to human health". The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) noted that one international organisation said that it may be a carcinogen, but no other organisation has found or said anything. But for Clark, it does not matter because she has no faith in the "three-letter-agencies".

She in her podcast Culture Apothecary promoted MAHA, discussing various issues on health and wellness, with the top discussion on motherhood as a virtuous role, daycare as dangerous and feminism as insidious.

MAHA is a big no on hormonal birth control and she too is a promoter of the idea that the women's liberation movement has done more harm than good. Aligning with Republican's anti-abortion views, this MAHA influencer is a firm believer that abortion is "never medically necessary to save the life of the mother," even if the experts disagree.

What Else MAHA Wants?

MAHA is against regular mammogram testing because it exposes women to radiation and disrupts their body's function. As per the National Cancer Institute, the benefits of undergoing regular screenings exceed the risk of skipping them.

Another thing many MAHA believers hold deeply close to is that "my body, my choice" is just an illusion created by the state. In reality, the body is controlled by medicines, which leads to autism in children. The popular belief is that the food Americans eat, controlled by the corporation is what makes them sick, and they seek medical help, which controls their brain. It is a vicious cycle and MAHA wants to break free.

MAHA does not want these government agencies to co-parent their kids. They are clear that they want a "divorce", as Clark says.

With JFK Jr. being nominated as the US Health Secretary, who could control the health agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and many more, MAHA could be a dream come true in "divorcing" the parents with the government.

End of Article

Could Covid-19 Vaccine Make Cancer Patients Live Longer?

Updated Oct 20, 2025 | 10:00 PM IST

SummaryA new study, “COVID-19 Vaccine Linked to Longer Survival in Cancer Patients,” found that people with advanced lung or skin cancer who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine within 100 days of starting immunotherapy lived significantly longer than those who didn’t. Researchers say the vaccine may enhance immune response, improving cancer survival outcomes.
Could Covid-19 Vaccine Make Cancer Patients Live Longer?

Credits: Canva

A landmark study titled “COVID-19 Vaccine Linked to Longer Survival in Cancer Patients” has revealed that people with advanced lung or skin cancer who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine within 100 days of starting immunotherapy lived significantly longer than those who did not. Conducted by researchers from the University of Florida (UF) and the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, the findings were presented at the 2025 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress in Berlin and mark a major step in exploring how mRNA technology could strengthen cancer treatment.

A Milestone in mRNA Research

This study represents the culmination of more than a decade of UF research on mRNA-based cancer therapies. Lead investigator Dr Elias Sayour, a pediatric oncologist at UF Health, called the findings “extraordinary,” noting that the vaccine’s immune-boosting effect could help design a universal, off-the-shelf cancer vaccine capable of enhancing immunotherapy responses.

mRNA, or messenger RNA, is a molecule that carries genetic instructions to make proteins. It forms the basis of COVID vaccines developed during the pandemic, and scientists now believe this same mechanism could be harnessed to amplify the body’s cancer-fighting abilities.

How the Study Was Conducted

Researchers analyzed medical records of over 1,000 patients with stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer or metastatic melanoma treated at MD Anderson between 2019 and 2023. Of these, 180 lung-cancer patients and 43 melanoma patients received a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine within 100 days of starting immunotherapy. Their outcomes were compared with 704 and 167 unvaccinated patients, respectively.

The results were striking. Vaccinated lung-cancer patients showed a median survival of 37.3 months, nearly double the 20.6 months observed in unvaccinated counterparts. Among melanoma patients, survival rose from 26.7 months to about 30–40 months, with several patients still alive at data cut-off — suggesting an even greater long-term benefit.

Importantly, the effect was specific to mRNA COVID vaccines; flu and pneumonia shots did not produce similar outcomes.

The Science Behind the Boost

Earlier this year, Dr Sayour’s lab discovered that to trigger a strong immune attack, targeting a single tumor protein wasn’t necessary. Instead, stimulating the immune system as if fighting a viral infection worked better. When this nonspecific mRNA vaccine was combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors — drugs that “release the brakes” on immune cells — mice showed powerful antitumor responses.

Building on this, the team theorized that the COVID mRNA vaccine might act like an immune flare, mobilizing immune cells from tumor zones to lymph nodes where cancer defense is stronger. This mechanism, Sayour explained, could make previously unresponsive cancers respond to treatment.

Implications and Next Steps

Although this is an observational study and cannot yet prove causality, experts are optimistic. UF’s Dr Duane Mitchell emphasized that while more trials are needed, such a large survival benefit “is the type of treatment effect we rarely see.”

A large-scale clinical trial through the UF-led OneFlorida+ Research Network is now planned to verify these findings across hospitals in several U.S. states.

If confirmed, the discovery could reshape how cancer is treated — turning vaccines from preventive tools into active partners in therapy. For patients battling advanced cancers, this could mean something profoundly valuable: more time and renewed hope.

End of Article

World Osteoporosis Day 2025: Theme, Origin, And Significance

Updated Oct 20, 2025 | 08:03 AM IST

SummaryWorld Osteoporosis Day, observed on October 20, raises awareness about bone health and the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. The 2025 theme, “It’s Unacceptable,” highlights the global crisis of underdiagnosis and poor care. Affecting over 500 million people, osteoporosis causes fragile bones, fractures, chronic pain, and loss of independence. Read on.
World Osteoporosis Day 2025: Theme, Origin, And Significance

Credits: Canva

Every year on October 20, World Osteoporosis Day is marked, to put the spotlight on osteoporosis. The day marks a year-long campaign, which is dedicated to raising global awareness of bone health, and the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis and related musculoskeletal diseases.

Osteoporosis is a serious condition where bones lose its density and strength, and it thus makes them fragile and more likely to break. It is often called the 'silent disease', and most people don't even realize that they have it until a fracture happens.

The most common fracture in this condition is in hip, spine, wrist, or shoulder. These fractures can result in long hospital stays, and lead to loss of independence, and reduced quality of life.

World Osteoporosis Day 2025 Theme

This year's theme is 'It's Unacceptable'.

This puts the spotlight on the persistent and preventable crisis in osteoporosis care.

This condition affects over 500 million people worldwide, and most remain severely underdiagnosed and undertreated. Up to 80% of patients with osteoporotic fractures do not receive any follow-up diagnosis or treatment.

This theme furthermore makes an effort for everyone to make noise for the silent disease.

The disease is more common among women, as 1 in 3 women, as compared to 1 in 5 men aged 50+ are prone to osteoporotic fracture in their remaining lifetime. These fractures could lead to chronic pain and disability, loss of independence, increased risk of further fractures, and even premature deaths.

Thus the theme 'It's Unacceptable', highlights that it is simply unacceptable that patients continue to receive inadequate care, and people are still not aware of the condition.

Origin Of World Osteoporosis Day

The World Osteoporosis Day was first launched in 1996 by the United Kingdom's National Osteoporosis Society, with support from the European Commission. The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), then took over the global coordination in 1997, turning it into a worldwide awareness campaign that takes place annually on October 20. The World Health Organization (WHO) also co-sponsored the event in 1998 and 1999, helping to raise its international profile.

Significance of World Osteoporosis Day 2025

Why is it important to observe a day on this, internationally? The reason is, this condition is very common, is among the most frequent health events, yet not much talked about. The IOF notes that in women osteoporotic fractures are more common than breast cancer. Women who are over the age of 45 account for more days in hospital than many other diseases, if they are osteoporotic. This comparison is done with other chronic diseases, including diabetes, myocardial infarction, and even breast cancer, notes IOF.

For men, in many countries, osteoporotic fractures account for more hospital bed days than those due to prostrate cancer.

IOF notes that osteoporosis is not prioritized in healthcare policy, and that it continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated, globally. Only 1 in 3 vertebral fractures come to clinical attention, and most spinal fractures are often diagnosed as simple 'back pain'. This is why there remains a high treatment gap. In Europe, 72% of women who are at a high risk of osteoporotic fractures do not receive treatment.

This is why awareness about this condition becomes more so important, especially when framing public policies, education campaigns, and preventative care, especially making people understand the importance of calcium and vitamin D.

End of Article

Glenmark Recalls Birth Control Pills In US Over Manufacturing Issues

Updated Oct 20, 2025 | 07:23 AM IST

SummaryGlenmark Pharmaceuticals has recalled 26,928 packs of oral contraceptive pills, including Viorele and Desogestrel-Ethinyl Estradiol, in the US due to failed impurity and degradation specifications, the USFDA reported. The Class II recall, initiated on September 3, 2025, indicates potential temporary health effects. Dr Reddy’s Laboratories also recalled a muscle relaxant injection.
Glenmark Recalls Birth Control Pills In US Over Manufacturing Issues

Credits: Canva

Glenmark, a leading Indian drugmaker, has recalled its products in the US over manufacturing issue, confirmed the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA).

What Did The USFDA Say?

The USFDA released an Enforcement Report, which noted that the US-based unit of Glenmark Pharmaceuticals in recalling 26,928 packs of oral contraceptive medicines in the US. The company's unit based in Mahwah, New Jersey, has now recalled the affected lot of the following birth control pills:

  • Viorele
  • Desogestrel
  • Ehinyl Estradiol

The report also noted that Ethinyl Estradiol tablets were recalled due to "failed impurities and degradation specifications". The affected drugs were produced in the company's Mumbai headquarters' Goa manufacturing facility. This is because India has the highest number of USFDA-compliant pharmaceutical plants outside of the US.

The drug firm also issued a notice for Class II nationwide recall on September 3, 2025.

What Does Class II Recall Mean?

The USFDA notes that recalls are actions taken by the firm to remove and product from the market and could be conducted by company's own initiative, or by the FDA request or order.

Class II recall means a situation in which the use of or the exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequence is remote.

What Are The Different Categories Of Recalls?

As per the USFDA, there are 5 different categories of recalls, namely:

  • Class I Recall
  • Class II Recall
  • Class II Recall
  • Market Withdrawal
  • Medical Device Safety Alert

  • Class I recall: a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.

  • Class II recall: a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote.

  • Class III recall: a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences.

  • Market withdrawal: occurs when a product has a minor violation that would not be subject to FDA legal action. The firm removes the product from the market or corrects the violation. For example, a product removed from the market due to tampering, without evidence of manufacturing or distribution problems, would be a market withdrawal.

  • Medical device safety alert: issued in situations where a medical device may present an unreasonable risk of substantial harm. In some case, these situations also are considered recalls.

Are There Any Other Drugs Being Recalled?

Dr Reddy's Laboratories, another major Indian drugmaker, has also recalled its muscle relaxant in the US. The company's Princeton, New Jersey-based subsidiary has recalled 571 vials of Succinylcholine Chloride Injection. The recall was initiated due to "out-of-specification results during the 6-month stability testing," according to USFDA.

End of Article