Credits: Canva
According to the American Cancer Society, colorectal cancer, which includes colon and rectal cancer is common in the US among women. 1 in every 25 women in the US have developed it in their lifetime. It is the third most common cancer in women.
Despite the impact, many women still miss its early warning signs. Most often these symptoms are mistaken for digestive issues or menopause. However understanding the risks, symptoms and importance of early screening could be life-saving.
The common warning signs include: bloating, fatigue, or changes in bowel habits. However, such issues are common with gut issues and even menopause related changes. Experts also share that it is more common for a woman to not pay attention to such changes as they are common during stress or hormonal changes. This could however lead to a delay in detection. While both, in men and women, colon cancer is common, women may be more likely to overlook symptoms.
The earlier one detects the cancer, the more treatment options are available. This could also include minimally invasive surgical techniques that lead to better outcomes and faster recovery. It also has a higher chance of cure.
Symptoms can be subtle first, but if something feels like, experts recommend to not to ignore it. As even small changes in bowel habits or unexplained weight loss warrant a discussion with your doctor. This is how early identification improves colon cancer survival chances. The United States Preventative Services Task Force also advises routine screening beginning at age 45.
While it is ideal that everyone must get the screening done, those with a family history, inflammatory bowel illness, or genetic risk factors, should consult their doctors about screening soon.
Experts point out that most patients, approximately 70%, will not have any symptoms early in the disease, which highlights the importance of screening prior to the onset of symptoms.
As per the Colorectal Cancer Alliance, each year, about 150,000 Americans are diagnosed with colorectal cancer, with more than 50,000 people dying from it. 1 in 24 people in the US are diagnosed with colorectal cancer in their lifetime, with the average age being 66 in both men and women. It is one of the most common cancers in the US, and is the 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths.
Credit: Canva
India has seen a significant rise in the cancer burden, with the cases rising to 1,569,793 in 2025, the government has informed the Parliament.
From more than 1.4 million in 2021, the cancer cases in the country rose to over 144,000 in the last five years, revealed Prataprao Jadhav, Union Minister of State for Health, in a written reply in the Rajya Sabha.
The increase in cases has been consistent:
Similarly, cancer deaths also increased in the country -- 868,588 in 2025 from 789,202 in 2021.
The country reported about 15,000 cancer -related deaths each year:
Jadhav informed that bigger states with large populations have seen a major increase in cancer cases and deaths consistently in the last five years.
States with the highest estimated cancer cases in 2025 include:
Uttar Pradesh - 226,125
Bihar - 118,136 cases
West Bengal - 121,639 cases
Maharashtra - 130,465 cases
Rajasthan - 80,628 cases
States with the highest estimated cancer deaths in 2025 include:
Uttar Pradesh - 125,184 deaths
Bihar - 65,571 deaths
West Bengal - 67,093 deaths
Maharashtra - 71,696 deaths
Rajasthan - 44,402 deaths
Major reasons for the rise in cancer burden include:
“The review provides a critical analysis of the current evidence, summarizing the association of water contamination, including industrial waste, pesticides, and heavy metals, with rectal and colorectal cancer,” Jadhav stated in the Upper House of the Parliament.
Jadhav further informed that the government is tackling the growing burden by expanding cancer care infrastructure across the country.
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has implemented the Strengthening of Tertiary Care Cancer Facilities Scheme, which has approved:
Other high-quality comprehensive cancer care facilities in the country include:
Credit: Butantan Institute
A new vaccine that targets the mosquito-borne dengue has proven to be over 80 percent effective in preventing the risk of severe disease for up to five years, according to a recent study conducted by Brazilian researchers.
The study, published in the journal Nature Medicine, confirmed that the tetravalent dengue vaccine -- Butantan-DV -- developed by the Butantan Institute in São Paulo, prevents hospitalizations and offers broader protection against all four dengue serotypes.
“This vaccine is establishing itself as a very important tool in the fight against dengue in Brazil, with the potential to contribute to reducing the circulation of the virus, in addition to individual protection,” said Fernanda Boulos, the institute’s medical director of clinical trials.
The phase 3 clinical trial, conducted from February 2016 to July 2019, involved 16,235 participants between the ages of 2 and 59.
The researchers compared individuals who received a single dose of the vaccine (10,259) with those who were administered a placebo (5,976).
The Butantan-DV vaccine is tetravalent and offers protection against the four known serotypes: DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, and DENV-4.
The vaccine uses live viruses that have been “weakened” (attenuated) in a laboratory.
Once administered, the vaccine controls replication of these attenuated viruses in the body -- a process which induces the immune system to produce neutralizing antibodies specific to each of the four serotypes.
The vaccines create immunity specific to each serotype to enable the body to recognize and neutralize each variant individually.
The Butantan-DV vaccine was approved by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) on November 26, 2025, for use by the Brazilian population aged 12 to 59.
The country's Ministry of Health has
Also read: Why Is Dengue Fever on the Rise Despite Vaccines?
Dengue is transmitted through infected mosquitoes, primarily the species Aedes aegypti.
Common Symptoms include:
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about half of the world's population is now at risk of dengue.
It estimates that:
The two main authorized vaccines in the world against dengue are Dengvaxia and Qdenga.
These vaccines are designed to protect against all four serotypes of the virus, with a focus on reducing severe disease and hospitalizations.
Credit: iStock
The recent decision by the Supreme Court of India allowing withdrawal of life support for a 32-year-old man in an irreversible permanent vegetative state is an important development in patient-centered healthcare.
The order follows the principles established in the landmark Common Cause v. Union of India, which recognized passive euthanasia and affirmed that individuals have the right to die with dignity. From the perspective of a critical care specialist, this decision supports ethical medical practice while protecting the dignity and rights of patients.
In modern intensive care units (ICUs), doctors use advanced technologies such as ventilators, feeding tubes, dialysis machines, and strong medications to sustain life during serious illness. These treatments are extremely valuable when there is a reasonable chance of recovery.
However, in some medical conditions—particularly severe brain injuries—patients may enter a permanent vegetative state. In this condition, the patient’s body may continue functioning with medical support, but the brain has lost the ability to produce consciousness or awareness. The patient cannot communicate, recognize loved ones, or interact with the environment, and medical science currently has no effective treatment to reverse this condition.
From a medical standpoint, continuing life support in such cases may only prolong biological survival without any possibility of recovery or meaningful quality of life. The Supreme Court’s decision acknowledges this difficult reality and allows withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment when doctors confirm that recovery is medically impossible. This approach respects the patient’s dignity and avoids unnecessary prolongation of suffering.
One of the key benefits of this judgment is the recognition of dignity at the end of life. The Court has interpreted the right to life under the Constitution of India to include the right to die with dignity. In practical terms, this means that patients should not be forced to remain on life-support machines when such treatment no longer benefits them.
Medicine should focus not only on prolonging life but also on ensuring that patients are treated with respect, comfort, and compassion during their final stages of life.
The decision also supports patient autonomy, which is a core principle of ethical medical care. Individuals have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and medical treatment. The recognition of living wills or advance directives allows patients to express their wishes in advance regarding life-prolonging treatments. This ensures that medical decisions align with the patient’s values and preferences, even if the patient is no longer able to communicate.
Also read: Harish Rana Case Highlights Why Planning For A Living Will Is Important
Another important benefit is the support it provides to families. Families often experience deep emotional stress when a loved one remains in a permanent vegetative state for a long period. They may struggle with uncertainty about whether continuing life support is truly helping the patient.
The Supreme Court’s framework provides a clear and compassionate process for decision-making involving medical boards and proper documentation. This helps families make informed choices in consultation with doctors while ensuring that the decision is ethically and legally sound.
The ruling also offers legal clarity for doctors and hospitals. In the past, physicians sometimes feared legal consequences if life support was withdrawn, even in medically futile situations.
The guidelines established under the Common Cause judgment create a structured and transparent process for making such decisions. This allows doctors to practice responsible and ethical medicine without unnecessary legal concerns.
Also read: Passive Euthanasia: Harish Rana’s Case May Reshape End-of-life Protocols, Say Experts
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s order is a compassionate step forward in Indian healthcare. From a critical care perspective, it respects patient dignity, supports family decision-making, provides legal clarity for doctors, and encourages thoughtful end-of-life care.
Most importantly, it reminds us that the true goal of medicine is not merely to extend life at all costs, but to ensure that every patient is treated with dignity, humanity, and respect throughout all stages of life.
Also read: Harish Rana Case Brings Spotlight On How Passive Euthanasia Has Evolved Over The Years
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited