Every year on April 2, World Autism Awareness Day is observed. This day raises awareness about autism spectrum disorder (ASD) which is a developmental brain disorder which impacts how a person perceives and socializes with others. This condition may cause problems in social interaction and communication. The condition may also include limited and repetitive patterns of behavior.

Origin of World Autism Day

It was started in 2007, when the United Nations General Assembly designated 2 April as World Autism Awareness Day. The UN worked to promote the full realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms for autistic individuals and ensured their equal participation in society.

In fact, over the years, progress has been made and driven in large by autistic advocates who have worked tirelessly to bring the lived experiences of autistic individuals to the forefront of global discussions.

The 2007 General Assembly resolution also highlighted the need to raise public awareness of autism.

Theme of World Autism Day

The theme for 2025 is "Advancing Neurodiversity and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)". This goal highlights the intersection between neurodiversity and global sustainability efforts and showcases how inclusive policies and practices can drive positive change for autistic individuals worldwide and contribute to the achievement of SDG.

This year's theme and discussion also explores at the role of neurodiversity in shaping policies that promote accessibility, equality, and innovation across multiple sectors.

Significance of World Autism Day

The day aims to foster a better understanding of autism and the importance of early diagnosis and intervention. The day also tries to promote awareness and acceptance and create a more inclusive and supportive environment for individuals with autism.

What Is Autism?

As per the American Psychiatric Association, ASD is a complex developmental condition involving persistent challenges with social communication, restricted interests and repetitive behavior. While autism is considered a lifelong condition, the need for services and supports because of these challenges varies among individuals with autism.

As per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an estimated one in 36 children have been identified with ASD.

Recent News Around Autism

Ramsey's Diagnosis: Recently, star of HBO's hit drama Bella Ramsey opened up about their autism diagnosis. They credited a crew member for recognizing the signs and symptoms.

Ramsey shared that they were diagnosed while filing the first season of the series.

“I’ve spoken a bit about neurodivergence before, but I always for some reason didn’t want to,” Ramsey admitted. “I got diagnosed with autism when I was filming season one of The Last of Us.”

While filming in Canada, a crew member who also has an autistic daughter noticed certain similarities in Ramsey's behavior and suspected that they too might be autistic. This observation was what prompted Ramsey to seek a formal psychiatric assessment, and thus leading to their diagnosis.

Ramsey also reflected on their childhood and described feeling out of place in school and finding comfort in the company of adults. They also recalled that they had experienced sensory sensitivities common among autistic individuals, such as heightened awareness of micro-expressions and body language. Ramsey also mentioned that filming in Canada's cold condition was also challenging as the heavy waterproof gear and thermals were required on the set. "It was too much stuff on my body," they shared talking about sensory discomfort.

ALSO READ: If Vaccines Don't Cause Autism-Here's What Does

CDC's Vaccine Study: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is planning to examine potential link between vaccines and autism. This has all come up in the backdrop of the claims by the now Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, who has suggested the link between vaccines and autism. This has been backed by President Trump as well.

This originated from now debunked 1998 study, which was retracted after its author, Andrew Wakefield, was found guilty of professional misconduct and barred from practicing medicine in the UK. Despite decades or research no such link could be proven, however, the claim still continues in the political and public discourse.

Kennedy, who had long been anti-vaxxer, also made numerous claims, even though studies have long debunked this theory.

Legionnaires’ disease first came to public attention in 1976 after an American Legion conference in Philadelphia led to dozens of pneumonia cases caused by a then-unknown bacteria. Scientists later identified it as Legionella, a bacteria that naturally occurs in freshwater but typically remains harmless in small quantities.

Problems arise when stagnant, warm water systems, from cooling towers to pipes, provide fertile ground for the bacteria to multiply and release into the air.

Once inhaled in contaminated mist, the bacteria can cause a dangerous form of pneumonia that kills about one in ten infected patients. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that most cases in the U.S. are linked to potable water systems.

Read: Legionnaires' Outbreak: Death Toll Increases To 6 With 111 Hospitalized, How To Spot The First Symptoms

New York’s Current Outbreak

This summer, New York City has recorded its largest outbreak in years, with more than 100 people sickened and at least five deaths. Officials have traced the source to a cluster of contaminated cooling towers in Central Harlem, including one at Harlem Hospital. Heavy July storms are believed to have filled these towers with rainwater that went untreated, allowing bacteria to spread.

The incident has already triggered lawsuits against contractors and raised questions about whether city inspections are keeping pace with the threat. Just 1,200 cooling towers were inspected in the first half of 2025, a sharp decline from 2017 when more than 5,000 were checked in the same period.

Not Just a New York Problem

While the outbreak has grabbed headlines in New York, public health researchers emphasize this is not an isolated concern. Cases of Legionnaires’ have been climbing steadily across the United States, Canada, and Europe.

Read: Unique COVID-19 Like Symptoms Of Legionnaires' Disease And How Long Does The Infection Last

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) warns that warmer temperatures and increased rainfall are making conditions across the country more favorable for Legionella.

Communities that never needed large-scale cooling systems are now installing them to combat rising heat, creating new risks. Even modern “green” buildings can unintentionally increase exposure. Low-flow plumbing systems, designed to conserve water, can allow it to sit stagnant in pipes, encouraging bacterial growth.

Climate Change Accelerates the Spread

Summers have always been peak season for Legionnaires’, but climate change is intensifying the problem. Warmer air, higher humidity, and extreme rain events are combining to create perfect breeding conditions. Flooding adds another complication, as contaminated water can more easily infiltrate public water supplies.

European health agencies have already warned that climate change is likely to expand the range of Legionnaires’ disease. In the United States, rising cases mirror these predictions, suggesting the New York outbreak may be just one of many to come.

Unequal Burden on Vulnerable Communities

As with many climate-linked health threats, low-income neighborhoods often suffer most. Poorly maintained cooling towers are more likely in underfunded housing complexes, and chronic health issues common in these areas, such as asthma or diabetes, make residents more vulnerable to severe illness.

Harlem, the center of New York’s outbreak, highlights this intersection of infrastructure neglect and health inequality. Experts caution that without stronger oversight and better maintenance of public systems, similar communities nationwide could become hotspots for future outbreaks.

What Individuals Can Do

For most people, preventing Legionnaires’ on an individual level is difficult, since the bacteria spreads through community water systems and airborne mist. Still, health officials advise paying attention to public health alerts, especially if you are over 50, smoke, or have chronic conditions that weaken the lungs or immune system.

During outbreaks, residents can consider using high-quality water filters or ensuring home cooling systems are regularly cleaned. But the most critical step remains recognizing symptoms early. Fever, cough, and shortness of breath should prompt immediate medical attention, as antibiotics are highly effective when treatment begins quickly.

A Public Health Responsibility

Experts stress that Legionnaires’ disease cannot be managed through individual vigilance alone. The real solution lies in better maintenance of large-scale water and cooling systems, more consistent inspections, and infrastructure upgrades that account for a warming world.

CT scans have become one of the most widely used diagnostic tools in modern medicine. From detecting concealed tumors to revealing deadly internal bleeding in a matter of minutes, the technology has revolutionized emergency rooms and clinics throughout the United States. But with its undeniable advantages comes a secret price tag, according to new research, one that might appear years or even decades down the road.

According to an international team of researchers led by epidemiologist Rebecca Smith-Bindman at the University of California, San Francisco, CT scans performed in 2023 alone may account for an estimated 103,000 future cancer cases in the United States. If accurate, this would represent nearly 5 percent of all new cancer diagnoses nationally.

For patients, the personal risk is low. But in terms of population, sheer numbers of CT scans—over 90 million in one year—mean that even very small risks add up to large numbers. This paradox highlights an increasingly contentious issue: how do we weigh the life-saving abilities of CT scans against their capacity to induce long-term damage?

Since 2007, CT scans in the US have increased over 30 percent annually. Now, they are nearly standard in emergency and outpatient care. For most doctors, CT scans are the quickest and best method to get detailed images of the body, with much greater clarity than regular X-rays.

But scientists warn that none of these scans are medically indicated. Without merit, scans that are ordered as safeguards or motivated by patient requests are potentially exposing tens of millions of individuals to ionizing radiation. While one scan provides the dose equivalent to about three years of natural background radiation, multiple or high-dose scans can add to this burden over years.

The new study, out in JAMA Internal Medicine, indicates that if trends hold, CT-related cancer cases will match those of other significant risk factors, such as alcohol use.

How Could Radiation From CT Scan Cause Cancer?

One of the most daunting hurdles in this argument is the doubt about how much radiation at low doses actually affects cancer risk. For many years, scientists have understood that high doses of ionizing radiation—say, that taken by atomic bomb survivors or people exposed in nuclear power plant accidents can lead to cancer.

But whether the low-level radiation from CT scans has the same effect is unresolved. Most of the evidence rests on extrapolations from past tragedies. For instance, in studies of 25,000 survivors of the Hiroshima bombings, people who received a dose of radiation equivalent to three or more CT scans had a slight but detectable increase in lifetime risk of cancer.

Converting that risk to current use of CT scans is debatable. Doses differ greatly based on the type of scan, the machine being used, the size of the patient, and the part of the body being scanned. A head scan, for example, exposes a patient to much less radiation than an abdominal or pelvic scan.

Why Its Difficult To Ignore The Life-saving Benefits of CT Scans?

Despite these concerns, doctors emphasize that CT scans remain invaluable. In some cases, they directly save lives.

A flagship national trial demonstrated that smokers and ex-smokers who had low-dose CT screening for lung cancer saw a 20 percent decline in lung cancer fatalities compared to patients who only had chest X-rays. In emergency rooms, CT scans have played an invaluable role in identifying strokes, aneurysms, and internal injuries that may otherwise have been undetected until too late.

While the results serve as a reminder of the need for caution regarding long-term exposure to radiation, this should not deter the use of CT imaging where clinically indicated," said Naomi Gibson, President of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. "In carefully selected instances, the therapeutic and diagnostic benefit of CT scans far outweighs the risks associated with radiation."

Who Is At Highest Risk?

Though adults dominate the number of CT recipients, scientists caution that children and youths might be bearing higher lifetime hazards. Their developing tissues are more vulnerable to radiation, and since they are likely to live longer, they have more years for cancers caused by radiation to emerge.

For instance, children who undergo CT scans during their infancy seem to have a greater likelihood of developing thyroid cancer at some point in the future. Women patients are particularly likely to experience additional vulnerability.

This doesn’t mean children should avoid CT imaging when necessary. In emergencies or when conditions demand precision, the benefits outweigh risks. But experts stress that pediatric CT use should be carefully weighed against alternative, radiation-free options such as MRI or ultrasound.

The new research is based on the UCSF International CT Dose Registry, which aggregates anonymous information from 143 hospitals and outpatient facilities throughout the United States. Analyzing scans performed between 2016 and 2022, researchers approximated that 93 million CT exams were conducted in 2023 on roughly 62 million patients.

From this data, they estimated the 103,000 future cancer cases attributable to CT-linked radiation. Nevertheless, authors also warn that these figures are estimates—not absolute projections. "To empirically quantify lifetime risk would require decades-long follow-up studies of very large populations," they said.

How To Use CT Scans Smartly?

Where does this leave doctors and patients, then? Experts are unanimous: CT scans can be continued, but with more discretion and precision.

Unused scans must be kept to a minimum, especially for children, pregnant women, and otherwise healthy patients who might have safer imaging options available. Physicians must also adjust scan protocols to reduce radiation doses without degrading image quality.

Public health experts contend that much of the onus too, rests with medical systems and insurers, who can institute protections, promote second opinions, and open access to lower-radiation or radiation-free technologies for diagnosis.

The truth is both sides are correct. CT scans literally save thousands of lives each year, but their explosive increase in usage raises some genuine concerns regarding future impacts. Patients, practitioners, and policymakers have an obligation to collaborate to make sure these strong tools are used carefully—safeguarding individuals in the short run without unintentionally jeopardizing them in the long run.

The United States has long been known as a uniquely challenging place to survive. But recent research paints a more alarming picture: Millennials and older Gen Z adults that is, people aged 25 to 44 are dying at rates far higher than their peers in other wealthy nations. And COVID-19, despite playing a significant part, only formed part of a much larger and more systemic issue that unfolded over decades.

Each year, approximately three million Americans pass away. Comparing U.S. mortality rates to other affluent nations uncovers a staggering fact: a quarter of those deaths might have been avoided if the U.S. mortality rate was comparable to that of its counterparts. For Millennials alone, the difference becomes staggering. Of Americans aged 25 to 44, a whopping 62 percent of deaths are "excess deaths," i.e., practically two out of every three deaths in this age group would not have happened if conditions were on par with other industrialized countries.

CDC data emphasizes that death rates in young adults, merging the 25–34 and 35–44 groups, vary between 148 and 237 deaths per 100,000 individuals each year. Of all Americans under age 65, nearly half of the deaths are excess deaths. This terrifying trend indicates an endemic, systemic issue in U.S. health, social, and economic systems.

Has COVID-19 Amplified The Pre-Existing Mortality Trends?

It would be naive to blame this crisis on COVID-19 alone, though the pandemic certainly exacerbated it. Nonelderly Americans suffered disproportionately high deaths relative to their peers in other rich countries. While COVID played a part in driving up the numbers, the American health disadvantage has been rising steadily for decades, decades before the pandemic, and continues to rise in the post-pandemic era.

A 2023 estimate found about 700,000 "missing Americans"—individuals who perished in 2023 but would have been alive had they been living in a different developed nation. This figure matches nearly to the exact number based on pre-pandemic projections, highlighting that America is more deadly by its very nature, particularly among young adults.

What Are The Systemic Factors Behind the Crisis?

Why are Millennials dying at such high rates? Experts cite a range of interrelated factors. Deindustrialization has left college-educated Americans economically exposed. Flimsy social safety nets—protecting unemployment, healthcare, and pensions—provide inadequate protection relative to other rich countries. Structural deficiencies in the U.S. health system, including underinsurance, high co-payments, and coverage gaps, compound these vulnerabilities.

In addition, lifestyle and public health issues, such as permissive gun laws, extended commuting, increasing rates of obesity and chronic disease, also contribute to mortality. For Millennials, these complicate the intersection with a variety of external stressors: job uncertainty, increasing living costs, and restricted access to quality healthcare.

The Opioid Epidemic and Mental Health Crisis

Opioid epidemic is one of the leading causes of Millennials' excess deaths. According to public health agencies, Millennial opioid overdose fatalities increased more than 500 percent between 1999 and 2017, while synthetic opioid death rates have risen by 6,000 percent. Overdose fatalities, in addition to increasing suicide, homicide, and accident rates, have added to the mortality crisis.

Pandemic stressors amplified these issues. Loss of employment, financial instability, and social isolation led to increased instances of substance use disorders and depression among young adults, compounding mortality patterns already on an upward trend.

Obesity and Chronic Disease

Obesity is another key factor. Millennials between 30 and 39 have the highest rate of obesity of any age group in the U.S., at 46.4 percent. This severely raises the risk of diabetes, heart disease, and various cancers. Although obesity is a problem across all age groups, it is most important during young adulthood, adding to mortality risks already increased by socio-economic and healthcare disparities.

Economic Disillusionment and Future Prospects

Millennials have also confronted distinct economic and social challenges. Joining adulthood amid the Great Recession, many found themselves unable to achieve financial security, homeownership, or advancement in their careers. The pandemic only added to these challenges, resulting in increased financial insecurity among young adults with restricted health-promoting resource access.

With social mobility on the decline and economic opportunity still in doubt, stress, worry, and unhealthy behaviors become amplified in a vicious cycle. Technological changes and AI-led changes in the workforce could further widen income inequality and access to care, making Millennials even more exposed.

Policy Implications and the Need for Intervention

The glaring disparity in mortality underscores the imperative for policy action. Social safety nets including Medicaid, public health initiatives, and access to affordable care need to be improved to avert more fatalities. Investing in mental health care, treatment of addiction, and preventive care among young adults is the key to halting this ominous trend.

As the Millennial and Gen Z populations approach half of the U.S. electorate, addressing their health and economic inequities is not only a moral imperative but also a political necessity. Policymakers must recognize that investing in the health and well-being of early adults is key to ensuring the country’s long-term social and economic stability.

Is An Entire Generation at Risk?

The American death crisis among Millennials and early Gen Z adults is multifaceted, multi-faceted, and seriously troubling. Between 1980 and 2023, there were nearly 14.7 million excess deaths in the United States, and early adults were disproportionately hit. From the opioid crisis to disease, economic insecurity, and systemic gaps in health care, the drivers of this crisis are complex and widespread.

Without immediate action, these trends will persist, putting Millennials and Gen Z Americans at greater risk of death than comparable peers worldwide. An intervention addressing the underlying causes access to healthcare, financial stability, public health programs, and mental health care is necessary to get young Americans not just to survive but to thrive in a nation that has long neglected to safeguard them.