(Credit-Canva)
Most of the kids you see today have their own iPad or smartphone and without their electronics, these kids seem lost, showing no interest in everyday life implying how dependent they are on their devices. With most of education becoming digitized, it is very easy for kids to spend most of their day looking at the screen.
A new study published in JAMA publication, brought up a concerning factor which shows that even if your child is spending a few hours on the screen, they could end up with a lifetime of glasses. This means looking at screens up close is hurting their eyes. Parents need to watch how much time their kids spend on these devices. Because screens are used for school and fun, it's hard to avoid them. But this study shows that even a little screen time can cause problems.
More kids are getting nearsighted now, because they spend most of their time looking at screens like phones and laptops. They don't play outside as much. Looking at screens all the time strains their eyes. When kids play outside, they get to look at things far away. Considering even sunlight is also good for their eyes, not playing outside and only looking at screens is making more and more kids nearsighted.
The researchers looked at 45 different studies. These studies included over 335,000 kids and young adults. This way, they could see if screen time really caused nearsightedness. By looking at many studies, they made sure their findings were accurate. They looked at kids of different ages to see how screen time affects their eyes at different stages of life.
The biggest risk of nearsightedness occured when kids used screens for one to four hours a day. After that, the risk increased more slowly. This means the first few hours are the most important. Parents should focus on limiting screen time during these early hours.
The study showed that less than one hour of screen time didn't seem to cause nearsightedness. This gives parents a guideline. It means that keeping screen time under one hour a day can help protect kids' eyes. It doesn't mean there's no risk at all, but it helps.
Here are some protective measures you can take to keep your eyes safe:
Wear sunglasses to block sun damage. Sun rays can hurt your eyes. Choose glasses that block all UV light. Wraparound styles are best. Glare-reducing lenses help too.
Use safety glasses at work or during sports. They protect your eyes from harm. Strong glasses prevent eye injuries. Talk to your doctor about special sports glasses.
Too much screen time hurts your eyes. Blue light can cause strain and headaches. Take breaks often. Blink more to keep eyes moist. Adjust your screen and lighting.
Wash your hands to stop germs. Don't share towels or makeup. Remove makeup before sleep. Clean your contacts well. Good hygiene keeps your eyes healthy.
Everyone needs eye exams. Checkups find problems early. See an eye doctor for healthy eyes. They can help you see better and keep your eyes safe.
Credits: Canva
Auto-Brewery Syndrome, also known as gut fermentation syndrome, is a rare medical condition where the digestive system produces alcohol internally. This happens when certain microorganisms—mostly yeasts like Candida or some bacteria—ferment carbohydrates in the gut, creating ethanol. The ethanol then enters the bloodstream, causing symptoms such as dizziness, disorientation, fatigue, and even slurred speech, mimicking alcohol intoxication.
ABS typically occurs when the natural balance of the gut microbiome is disrupted. This disruption can follow antibiotic use, gastrointestinal infections, or diets high in refined carbohydrates. In some cases, people with diabetes or existing gut disorders are more prone to developing the condition.
When the gut environment changes, fermentative microbes may flourish. These microbes thrive on simple carbohydrates and sugars, converting them into alcohol during digestion. While most people efficiently digest these foods without any issue, those with ABS experience a build-up of ethanol, leading to unwanted and surprising symptoms.
Bread—especially white or refined varieties—is rich in simple carbohydrates. For most people, eating bread in moderation doesn’t cause harm. In fact, whole grain bread can be beneficial due to its fibre content, which supports healthy digestion and feeds good gut bacteria.
However, when eaten in excess, particularly in its refined form, bread can contribute to an overgrowth of fermentative microbes in susceptible individuals. This can lead to symptoms like bloating, gas, discomfort, and, in rare cases like ABS, internal alcohol production.
To support gut health, many wellness experts recommend incorporating psyllium husk, or Isabgol, into your routine. Psyllium is a soluble fibre that absorbs water and forms a gel-like substance in the gut. This helps regulate bowel movements, slows down carbohydrate absorption, and may prevent the rapid fermentation of food in the intestines.
By stabilizing digestion and reducing the speed at which carbs are broken down, psyllium can help minimise gas, bloating, and the risk of ethanol build-up—making it a helpful tool for those concerned about gut health.
Managing ABS or preventing gut issues doesn't require drastic changes. Here are a few everyday habits that support better digestion:
Auto-Brewery Syndrome is an unusual and extreme case, but it highlights a powerful truth: the food we eat shapes our internal health in surprising ways. Paying attention to our gut and making mindful dietary choices can go a long way in supporting not just digestion, but overall well-being.
(Credit-Canva)
You may know about people who avoid certain foods like peanuts, berries or eggs because they are allergic to it, but what does that mean? Food allergies can happen to anyone. It is a condition where your body’s natural defenses overreact to exposure to a particular substance. The American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology explains that our body’s immune system basically mistakes food or a particular particle as an invader or a threat to your body.
This then causes your immune system to release ‘defense’ chemicals that can cause reactions like nausea, swellings, dizziness or worse, anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis is a whole-body reaction that can impair your breathing and cause a dramatic drop in blood pressure. Life-threatening reactions like such are the reason why many parents are apprehensive about introducing certain foods to their children. However, could that be the reason why children are developing more allergies?
A new study published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that some parents are waiting much longer—a year or even more. Many parents, understandably worried, might actually be preventing their children from avoiding food allergies. Experts now say that introducing tiny amounts of common allergy-causing foods like peanuts and eggs to babies as young as 4 to 6 months old can help them build a strong defense. This delay could mean their children don't get the chance to become tolerant to these foods, increasing their risk of developing allergies.
The study looked at what parents are feeding their babies and found some interesting, and perhaps concerning, trends:
Nuts: About 35% of babies hadn't eaten nuts by their first birthday.
Eggs: Similarly, around 21% of parents hadn't given their one-year-olds any egg.
Sesame: And for sesame, 16% of babies hadn't tried it by age one.
These numbers come from a survey of parents in the UK, who are part of a study tracking their children's health over time.
For many years, parents were told to avoid giving allergenic foods to babies and even during pregnancy. The idea was to prevent allergies. However, we now know that this advice might have actually made allergies more common, especially in children.
Researchers explain that studies as such are very important. Parents must update themselves regarding new food allergy guidelines. This understanding is important as if parents keep waiting to introduce these foods, it will continue to fuel the "allergy epidemic" we're seeing.
The researchers talked to nearly 400 parents involved in a project tracking children's health from birth. They found that most children did start eating common allergenic foods like eggs and nuts when they were between 6 and 9 months old. However, many parents still chose to wait longer for certain foods:
Sesame: About 26% of parents waited until their child was older than 9 months.
Fish: 25% delayed introducing fish.
Nuts: 21% waited longer for nuts.
Eggs: 11% held off on eggs.
The researchers concluded that even parents whose families had a history of allergies weren't following the updated advice. Many babies weren't exposed to nuts and eggs by their first birthday, which is a key time for building tolerance.
These findings suggest that the new guidelines about food allergies aren't reaching new parents clearly enough. Research consistently shows that introducing allergenic foods early, especially nuts and eggs, lowers the risk of developing allergies. In fact, for babies at high risk of allergies, experts even suggest introducing peanut-containing foods as early as 4 to 6 months of age. It's crucial for this message to get out so more children can benefit from these updated recommendations.
Credits: Canva
Cervical cancer is usually associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted disease that accounts for nearly all cervical cancer cases. HPV types 16 and 18 have been found to account for more than 70% of cervical cancer cases worldwide. HPV vaccination and cervical screening schemes have had a remarkable impact in lowering the incidence of HPV-associated cervical cancer, particularly in developed countries but can cervical cancer happen without HPV?
Surprisingly, yes—but only rarely. Between 5.5% and 11% of cervical cancers are HPV-negative, and these tend to be missed until advanced stages. This article discusses what we now know about HPV-negative cervical cancers, why they are difficult to diagnose, and what it all means for prevention and treatment in the future.
HPV is by far the most frequent cause of cervical cancer and is responsible for almost 99% of cases. The virus is generally transmitted through sexual contact and can remain in the body for years before resulting in abnormal cell growth in the cervix.
In nations such as Australia, where screening and vaccination programs are well organized, the majority of cervical cancer cases can be traced to HPV. Of the 900 women who develop cervical cancer annually in Australia, nearly all have been attributed to this virus. The two most lethal types of HPV—16 and 18—are accountable for as much as 80% of the cases.
However, in a small percentage of cases, no detectable HPV infection is present. These are the uncommon but important outliers that researchers and clinicians are working increasingly harder to comprehend.
HPV-negative cervical cancers occur in an estimated 5.5% to 11% of all cases worldwide. These are uncommon subtypes of adenocarcinomas, including:
In a few instances, tumors that are HPV-negative at presentation can be and were once HPV-positive, yet the virus is no longer detectable because of tumor progression or testing limitations. In any case, such cancers tend to act differently than HPV-positive tumors—and present formidable diagnostic challenges.
One of the biggest challenges to tackling HPV-negative cervical cancers is that existing screening tools—both the Pap test and the newer Cervical Screening Test (CST)—are intended to pick up HPV-associated abnormalities. Therefore, HPV-negative tumors usually go undetected early on.
Lacking an independent test that can specifically pick up these uncommon types, many women won't be diagnosed until they start noticing symptoms, including:
These symptoms usually manifest later, hence HPV-negative cervical cancers usually have a poorer prognosis. A meta-analysis of 17 studies with more than 2,800 patients revealed that the outcomes for HPV-positive cervical cancers are substantially better than those for HPV-negative cancers. Both earlier detection and biologic differences in tumor behavior are likely to be the reasons for this.
Although HPV is still the leading cause of cervical cancer, various factors can contribute to elevating one's risk, particularly in HPV-negative patients:
Smoking: Duplicates the risk of cervical cancer by subjecting cervical cells to carcinogens.
Long-term oral contraceptive use: Prolonged use can raise the risk, although risk dissipates after stopping pills.
Multiple births: Multiple full-term pregnancies can raise the vulnerability through hormonal fluctuations and prolonged exposure to HPV.
Weakened immune system: Diseases such as HIV or immunosuppressive drugs may weaken the body and make it less likely to resist infections and abnormal cell growth.
Family history: There may be a genetic component that contributes to susceptibility.
Chlamydia infection: Long-term infections caused by this bacterium may raise the risk.
Poor diet: Inadequate fruit and vegetable intake has been linked with increased cancer risk from less protective antioxidants and vitamins.
Nevertheless, risk factors above are modifiers and not primary causes. In the case of HPV-negative cervical cancer, there is no single cause, and studies on possible genetic or environmental cause are under way.
Since there is no screening test for HPV-negative cervical cancers, diagnosis typically only happens after symptoms arise. Physicians use:
By the point of discovery, the cancer is typically so advanced that the treatment becomes more complex and survival rates lower.
This delay in detection underscores a critical imperative for biomarker identification, cutting-edge imaging, and better awareness both within the healthcare community and among the general public.
Some authors believe that the rate of HPV-negative cervical cancers could be overestimated because of false negatives, i.e., cases with the presence of the virus that are not detectable at the moment of testing. This may be explained by:
This hypothesis is put forward on the grounds that the actual number of true HPV-negative cases may be less than reported, though more sophisticated diagnostic methods are required to support this.
HPV-positive or HPV-negative, there are steps to take that lower the risk of developing cervical cancer overall:
Get vaccinated: The HPV vaccine protects against the most risky types of the virus.
Go for regular screenings: Although they don't catch HPV-negative cancers, Pap and HPV tests are still important for the early detection of most.
Stop smoking: Reducing tobacco use reduces exposure to carcinogens.
Practice safe sex: Wear condoms to reduce the risk of sexually transmitted diseases.
Eat a balanced diet: Provide a nutrient-rich diet with high levels of antioxidants.
Women who have any unusual gynecological symptoms—no matter what their screening history is—should see a healthcare provider early.
Though HPV-negative cervical cancer is uncommon, it poses special detection, diagnostic, and therapeutic challenges. These instances remind us that cervical cancer is not a monolith and highlight the need for ongoing research, improved screening technologies, and heightened awareness.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited