Image Credit: Canva
Dear future husband, before we build a life together, there's something you must know—not only about me but also about the unseen weight that women bear daily. It's not simply about being exhausted. It's not simply about occasional pain. It's about the constant juggling of responsibilities that exhausts me mentally as well as physically.
Picture this: My day begins early, before sunrise, planning meals, answering emails or texts in my head before even opening my laptop, remembering birthdays, grocery shopping lists, doctor visits, and other deadlines which are not just mine but for my ageing parents too- all while dealing with period cramps that make me want to curl up in bed. When I finally sit down at night, my brain is still racing, calculating through tomorrow's to-do list. This is my life.
It's called the mental load—the constant, invisible work of keeping life in motion. It's the emotional burden of caring, planning, and predicting needs that go unseen. And when you throw stress, fatigue, and menstrual pain into the mix, the weight is too much to bear.
So, before we walk into forever, I want you to see this, to really get it. Because love isn't about sweeping gestures—it's about being present, acknowledging my demons, and bearing the burden of life with me.
This, dear future husband, is my life. It's not all about tiredness. It's about having a mental load so overwhelming that even when I'm lying in bed, my mind is always doing math, planning, and projecting. It's about living in a world where the responsibility of making everything tick gets disproportionately placed on me. And it's about accomplishing all of this with hormonal changes, period cramps, and emotional exhaustion that society tends to minimize.
The mental load is the invisible work of managing a home and family—the planning, organizing, and remembering. It’s not just about who does the chores but about who notices when they need to be done. And more often than not, that person is me. Research confirms that women disproportionately shoulder the burden of household and emotional labor. This is not just a logistical test; it is an emotional pull that causes prolonged stress, weariness, and even conflicts between relationships.
As per Dr. Deeksha Kalra, Psychiatrist, "Most women have an unseen burden—the mental load. It's the endless planning, remembering, and worrying about everything from housework to emotional support for family members. Add stress, exhaustion, and cramps, and it becomes a heavy load. This isn't about being tired; it's about being mentally and physically exhausted, often without a break."
A study in The Journal of Marriage and Family points out that even when men and women divide physical labor in the household, women continue to bear most of the cognitive work of household management. This continued imbalance is a source of frustration and mental exhaustion, and even mundane tasks seem too much to handle.
In addition to the endless list of things to do, there is the experience of menstrual wellness. Painful menstruation is more than just a nuisance; it brings mood swings, fatigue, and physical pain that even the most mundane tasks become unbearable. Conditions such as PCOS and endometriosis also increase these challenges, creating searing pain and fatigue that many women are forced to push through.
Dr. Nishi Singh, Fertility Specialist, says, "Women bear a huge and sometimes invisible societal burden of juggling work, family, and personal responsibilities, in addition to tolerating the physical and emotional anguish and stress of period cramps. Chronic stress affects reproductive health, elevating cortisol levels, which can result in irregular periods, delayed ovulation, and even sub-fertility. Psychological stress due to lack of support can be overwhelming. Women require more than just medical treatment; they require a supportive culture within the home, workplace, and medical centers."
The truth is that reproductive health is not simply about biology. Emotional and mental well-being are just as important. Women are supposed to suffer in silence, to "get through" their discomfort, even when their bodies are crying out for rest. And when this becomes a regular cycle month after month, year after year, it results in long-term health effects, from hormonal disorders to chronic fatigue syndrome.
So, dear future husband, let me tell you this: support isn't a showy thing. It's the little things that demonstrate that you notice me. It's recognizing my invisible labor, stepping in before I must ask you to, getting that when I tell you I am tired, I am not whining.
Dr. Kalra points out, "What would be helpful? Understanding, support, and mutual responsibility. A simple acknowledgement: 'I see you, and I respect you,' can make a tremendous difference. Small gestures, like taking over chores or providing space to rest, show care and respect. Mental load is not a 'woman's problem'; it is something that profoundly affects relationships. An actual supporting partnership is being aware of the invisible struggle and attempting to lighten the load together."
A good partnership involves not only splitting tasks in deed but in mind. It involves recognizing the mental and emotional weight I bear and actively making an effort to distribute it. It involves realizing that when I am in agony during my period, I am not being dramatic—I am genuinely distressed, and I need sympathy, not contempt.
Transformation begins with awareness. It begins with looking, really looking, at what the women in your world, whether that is your mom, your sis, your wife or your child, is bearing. It's about understanding that stress, fatigue, and period pain are not minor complaints but actual obstacles to health. It's about stepping up, stepping in, and sharing the burden.
Because at the end of the day, dear husband, I don't need a helper. I need a partner. Someone who notices the burden I bear and says, "I will now add some more to that, and let’s share the load together." Because when we carry life together, both of us thrive.
Dr Deeksha Kalra is a Consultant Psychiatrist at Artemis Hospitals in India
Dr. Nishi Singh is a Fertility specialist and Head of Fertility at PRIME IVF in India.
Credits: Wikimedia Commons
The United States has signed 24 bilateral health Memoranda of Understanding or MoUs with Latin America and African countries under the Trump administration's America First Global Health Strategy.
The first agreement with Panama is described as “strengthening Western hemisphere health security”, which it added is “a priority”. Thereafter, four Latin American agreements too involve smaller grants and focus on disease surveillance. Other 20 agreements all with African countries who have been previous recipients of health grants via the now disbanded US agency for International Development or USAID and decimated US President's Emergency Funds for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).
The five-year MoUs aim to quickly shift financial responsibility for key health services to national governments. In several countries, including Kenya, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), more than half of HIV programme funding has traditionally come from donors, particularly the United States. In the DRC, for instance, at least half of the antiretroviral medicines used have been financed by the US.
The transitional Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) signed between the United States and several countries come with a major condition. They require strong investment in infectious disease surveillance systems.
The goal is to ensure that pathogen information from outbreaks is shared with the US within a week. Officials say this helps detect global threats early and protect public health.
At the same time, it gives US pharmaceutical companies early access to pathogen data, allowing them to develop vaccines, medicines and diagnostics more quickly.
The United States and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) signed their health MoU on 26 February. According to the US State Department, the agreement focuses on strengthening the country’s ability to detect and contain infectious disease outbreaks before they spread internationally.
Under the agreement:
Most of the funding will support a national integrated surveillance and outbreak response system.
The MoU also aims to modernize health data systems through electronic medical records, interoperable platforms, better trained community health workers and expanded services for HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, polio and maternal and child health.
In several cases, health agreements were preceded by deals related to natural resources.
The United States and the DRC first signed a strategic partnership on critical minerals. The deal aims to secure supplies of minerals needed for commercial and defense industries.
The DRC is one of the world’s largest sources of rare earth minerals, including cobalt and copper. China has historically dominated the purchasing and processing of these resources.
Recently, the DRC has begun opening its mineral sector to US investors. According to Reuters, the government sent Washington a shortlist of state owned assets involving:
Guinea followed a similar path. It signed a minerals MoU with the US on 5 February, followed by a health MoU on 27 February. The health agreement prioritizes strengthening laboratory networks and improving biosafety standards by 2027.
Not all countries are comfortable linking health support to access to resources or data.
In the DRC, a group of lawyers has challenged the minerals agreement in the Constitutional Court. They argue that the deal violates the constitution and undermines national sovereignty over natural resources.
Zimbabwe also withdrew from negotiations with the US over a similar agreement.
Officials said the country was asked to share biological resources and outbreak data for years without any guarantee that vaccines, treatments or diagnostics developed from that data would be available to Zimbabwe if a future crisis occurred. They also said the US did not offer reciprocal sharing of its own epidemiological data.
Kenya’s agreement with the United States has also faced legal hurdles. The country’s High Court halted the MoU after two court challenges questioned provisions that could allow the US access to patient data and pathogen information.
Zambia has also expressed reservations about its proposed health deal with Washington. The agreement stalled after the US linked the billion dollar package to cooperation in the country’s mining sector, particularly copper and cobalt.
Zambia has since asked for revisions, saying parts of the deal do not align with its national interests.
Some experts argue that these agreements reflect a broader shift in US global health policy.
Sophie Harman, professor of international politics at Queen Mary University of London, wrote in the BMJ that extraction appears to be central to the approach.
According to her analysis, the policy focuses less on improving global health outcomes and more on strengthening US economic and geopolitical interests, including competition with China.
She warns that countries entering such agreements could risk giving up resources or scientific data while gaining relatively limited health benefits.
(AI Generated)
Rare diseases may be individually uncommon, but together they represent a large and persistent care gap. More than 300 million people globally live with a rare condition, and when families and caregivers are counted, the impact touches over one billion lives. The economic burden is estimated to exceed $7 trillion each year.
In India, the challenge is compounded by geography, uneven specialist availability and the lifelong nature of many rare conditions. The question is no longer whether the system recognises the need, but whether it can deliver continuous care at scale.
For most rare disease patients, the hardest part is not always the science but the pathway to care. Diagnosis is often delayed, sometimes by years. Patients move between providers carrying incomplete records. Specialist centres are concentrated in a few large cities, forcing families to travel repeatedly for consultations that may last only minutes. This is both financially draining and clinically inefficient.
Telemedicine is beginning to ease some of this pressure. Virtual consultations allow specialists to extend their reach beyond metropolitan clusters. For families in tier two and tier three locations, this can mean earlier clinical input and fewer avoidable journeys.
Remote monitoring tools are also shifting care from episodic hospital visits to continuous oversight, which is particularly valuable for conditions that require close tracking over time.
If access is the visible challenge, data fragmentation is the structural one. Rare disease information remains scattered across hospitals, laboratories and individual case files. This weak visibility affects everything from prevalence estimates to therapy development. Policymakers struggle to size the problem accurately. Clinicians miss longitudinal patterns. Industry investment becomes harder to justify.
Digital health systems can address this by creating longitudinal patient records that follow individuals across providers. Even relatively modest steps such as strengthening diagnostic reporting or building disease registries can significantly improve coordination. For rare diseases, where patient numbers are small and widely dispersed, structured data is not a luxury. It is the backbone of effective care.
India has begun building the rails needed for this transition. The Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission is creating a national health data architecture anchored in unique health IDs and interoperable records. If applied rigorously to rare diseases, this infrastructure can support lifelong patient tracking, improve referral accuracy and give policymakers clearer visibility into disease burden.
Interoperability will determine how far this effort goes. The growing adoption of FHIR standards and API led systems is slowly allowing previously disconnected hospital platforms to exchange clinical information. For rare disease patients, whose care often spans multiple providers and years of follow up, this continuity is not technical detail. It is essential to safe treatment.
Artificial intelligence is also starting to show practical value. Globally, AI based clinical decision support tools are being used to flag potential rare disease cases hidden within routine health records. This matters because many rare conditions present with non specific symptoms and are frequently missed in early stages.
Collaborations between technology firms and pharmaceutical companies are demonstrating how electronic health record analysis, suspect patient lists and longitudinal data can help clinicians triage cases earlier for confirmatory testing. As these tools mature and integrate into routine workflows, they could significantly shorten the diagnostic odyssey that rare disease families currently endure.
At the patient level, the shift is becoming more practical and visible. Tools that let people log symptoms, get medication reminders and share updates in real time are helping them stay more consistent with treatment, while giving clinicians better insight between visits. For lifelong conditions, this kind of day to day support brings care into the flow of everyday life, where most disease management actually happens.
Federated data models add an important layer of trust. By enabling analysis across multiple small patient populations without moving sensitive personal data, they address both privacy concerns and the sample size limitations that have historically slowed rare disease research.
Progress is visible across both public and private sectors. Regulated digital health platforms are already supporting rare disease programmes in several countries. Industry collaborations are using AI to detect conditions that often go undiagnosed for years. Public genomic databases are generating new diagnoses by enabling experts to build on shared evidence.
India’s immediate task is to move beyond isolated pilots. Telemedicine networks must be tied to referral protocols and reimbursement pathways. Digital registries must be built with strong governance and patient trust. AI tools need to be embedded into everyday clinical workflows rather than remaining demonstration projects.
Poorly managed rare diseases create avoidable hospitalisations, lost productivity and long term care costs. Evidence increasingly shows that targeted investments in data systems, screening and coordinated care can reduce downstream expenditure. For low- and middle-income countries working within tight health budgets, these are not marginal gains.
India already has many of the building blocks needed to improve rare disease care, from expanding digital health infrastructure to growing AI capabilities and increasing policy focus. The real test now is disciplined execution.
Telemedicine networks must deepen their reach, patient registries need to become reliable and usable, data must move securely across systems, and clinicians should have decision support tools that fit into everyday practice. Taken together, these steps can meaningfully narrow today’s access gaps.
Digital health will not make rare diseases any less complex. But if implemented thoughtfully, it can reduce distance, shorten delays and bring much needed continuity to care journeys that are currently fragmented. For families managing lifelong conditions, that would be a tangible and much overdue shift.
(AI Generated)
In India, it is not uncommon for families to travel across cities, sometimes across states, seeking answers for symptoms that simply don’t make sense. A child who is not meeting developmental milestones. A young adult with unexplained muscle weakness. Recurrent hospital visits with no clear diagnosis.
For many, this long and frustrating search for clarity is what medicine calls the diagnostic odyssey.
Rare diseases are individually uncommon, but collectively they affect millions of people worldwide. Rare diseases affect an estimated 263–446 million people worldwide, spanning every geography, healthcare system, and socioeconomic context. India alone is estimated to have 70 million people living with rare diseases.
Importantly, although 70%–80% of rare diseases are genetic in origin, routine medical practices often consider genetic testing only after years of inconclusive evaluations.
In India, this challenge is amplified by several factors, including limited awareness of rare conditions, uneven access to specialized testing across regions, and a tendency to treat symptoms individually rather than look for a unifying cause.
A child may see a neurologist for seizures, a gastroenterologist for feeding issues, and a developmental pediatrician for delays, without anyone connecting the dots.
Studies have shown that patients and their families frequently wait years before receiving a confirmed diagnosis. Globally, rare disease diagnosis can take anywhere between 5–30 years.
In a country like India, where healthcare expenses are often paid out-of-pocket, this prolonged uncertainty can be devastating. Beyond cost, there is the psychological toll; parents wondering if they missed something and adult patients often questioning whether their symptoms are “all in their head”. During this period, families undergo repeated tests, face conflicting opinions, and bear significant emotional and financial strains.
Research shows that families experience profound emotional burden during the diagnostic odyssey, including stress, anxiety, and feelings of isolation.
In many cases, the explanation is written into a person’s DNA. Genetic disorders rarely announce themselves clearly; instead, they often mimic common illnesses. Fatigue may look like anemia, developmental delay may resemble a learning difficulty, and repeated infections might be treated as isolated events rather than part of a larger pattern. Because the symptoms overlap with more familiar conditions, doctors naturally begin by treating what appears most likely.
Most healthcare systems also follow a step-by-step diagnostic approach; rule out the common causes first, then move to less common ones if symptoms persist. While this method works well for typical illnesses, it can significantly delay answers for rare genetic conditions. Without looking directly at the genetic blueprint, the underlying cause may remain hidden, even as the visible symptoms are managed one at a time.
Today, advances in genomic technologies such as whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) allow us to examine thousands of genes simultaneously. Rather than guessing which gene might be responsible, we can comprehensively analyze a patient’s DNA to search for answers.
Evidence increasingly supports the use of genomic sequencing earlier in the diagnosis and care of rare diseases. Similarly, studies highlight how genomic testing not only provides diagnoses but also directly influences treatment decisions and long-term care planning.
In the Indian context, integrating genetic testing earlier could transform care. Instead of years of fragmented consultations, patients could receive a precise diagnosis sooner. This clarity can:
Encouragingly, awareness around rare diseases is growing in India, and conversations around early genomic testing are becoming more mainstream. As technology becomes more affordable and accessible, we have an opportunity to fundamentally change the patient journey.
No family should spend years searching for answers when science has the tools to help. By embracing genomic medicine earlier in the diagnostic pathway, we can shorten the odyssey, reduce suffering, and empower families with clarity.
Because when symptoms don’t add up, sometimes the answer lies written in our genes.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited