Credits: Canva
For most people, grief arrives slowly. For survivors of suicide loss, it crashes in without warning and never quite leaves the room. Around the world, millions of people carry this quiet, complicated grief. This one is laced not only with heartbreak, but often with unanswered questions, guilt, shock, and the haunting feeling that maybe something, anything, could have been different.
International Survivors of Suicide Loss Day is more than a remembrance; it is a reminder that those left behind are still learning how to live with an absence that reshaped everything. For Harry Corin, *Amitava Kumar, writer Arianna Rebolini, and *Aastha Ganguli that reshaping began the moment they learned their loved one had chosen to leave the world.
Also Read: David Cameron, Former UK Prime Minister, Has Prostate Cancer
Their stories are different, their cultures and circumstances varied, but their grief echoes the same truth: suicide does not end a life alone. It alters the lives of everyone who loved them.
Harry Corin, who was raised in St Ives, a small town in England was only 12 when his father died by suicide. At an age when children are learning how the world works, Harry was suddenly thrown into a reality too heavy for words.
For more than a decade, through school, university, and his first jobs—he kept the truth locked inside.
It was fear that speaking about suicide would make people uncomfortable, fear that it would expose the overwhelming pain he had never processed. But the first time he spoke about it openly, something shifted.
He realized how powerful honest conversation could be, and how desperately men needed safer spaces to have them.
Now a mental health speaker and founder of a global workplace wellbeing company, Harry’s life mission is rooted in preventing others from reaching the point his father did. He believes suicide prevention begins long before a crisis, through environments where vulnerability is accepted, emotions are not dismissed, and support is offered without hesitation.
But his journey has also been shaped by the way he experiences the world. Diagnosed with ADHD in his late 20s, he finally had a lens that explained years of inner restlessness. This understanding didn’t erase the pain—but it helped him reclaim a narrative he had once buried.
Also Read: International Day for Survivors of Suicide Loss: History And Its Relevance Today
In Kolkata, many families live close, emotionally, financially, historically. This was true for *Amitava Kumar, whose beloved uncle, affectionately called 'Choto Kaka', was the youngest of seven brothers.
Amitava remembers him as charming, generous, and deeply loved by nieces and nephews. He had a thriving business and carried much of the joint family’s financial responsibilities after Amitava’s father moved to Delhi. He handled his grandparents’ medical expenses, supported siblings, and was the emotional anchor of the household.
But behind that warmth was a man whose emotional vulnerability was often exploited by friends. His generosity made him an easy target for those who took advantage of his kindness and financial success.
At home, tensions began to grow. Arguments escalated. Pressure mounted. He began drifting away from the family that adored him.
Then came the debts: quiet, creeping, and devastating.
“One day,” Amitava says, “we were dumbstruck to hear that our beloved Choto Kaka had taken his life.”
It was February 1995 when Amitava was 28, and it was the last he saw him—just a few months before his own wedding, which was to be held in May in the same year. His uncle had blessed the photo of his bride and promised to meet her soon.
The family marked his memory with a stone inscription at Brahma Mandir in Pushkar, a way of leaving his soul at the feet of the divine. Yet the void he left remains unfillable.
For New York-based writer Arianna Rebolini, grief came from a different angle, not in the heart of a close-knit family, but through a friendship that had drifted apart.
At 28, she learned that her once-inseparable college friend, Alice, had died by suicide. It was a loss wrapped in guilt. They had bonded deeply in their youth, often over their shared struggles with mental health. But adulthood had separated them—new cities, new routines, and the quiet fading that happens between even the closest friends.
“There’s a shame in realizing you weren’t there,” she says. “I wasn’t in a position to know that she needed help.”
Arianna carried the dual weight of grief and self-blame. She dreamt about Alice for years. She combed through old messages. She found a Facebook text from Alice, sent two months before her death, that she had never responded to.
“It still hurts,” she admits.
To heal, Arianna confronted the details of Alice’s final months, refusing to shy away from them, a path many survivors fear but some desperately need. As she immersed herself in Alice’s poetry and art, she found connection, closure, and eventually clarity.
Through years of writing and research, her understanding of suicide transformed. She even wrote a gutsy, riveting memoir that explores suicides, named Better: A Memory About Wanting to Die.
One of Aastha’s fondest memories is how Gauri taught her to see the world differently. “She always had another perspective,” she recalls. “I was taught to look at things one way, but she showed me there were multiple ways to understand the same moment.” Gauri listened deeply, helped people find clarity, and reminded those around her that judgment should never be the first instinct, a lesson Aastha carries with her even now.
But healing, she says, has been “up and down, not linear at all.” Three years on, the grief still lives in her bones. Music helps. Talking about Gauri helps. Sharing her story keeps her close. What hurts most is when people assume there should be a deadline for mourning. “People told me, ‘It’s been two or three years, you should move on.’ But I never will. She’ll always be a part of me.”
Aastha has also seen how people oversimplify suicide. “They think there’s one reason someone does it. But it’s never one thing, it’s a culmination of small things.” What pains her deeply is when people say someone “wasn’t strong enough.” To her, it reduces a full, complex human being to their final moment. “She was so much more than what happened in the end. It’s not about strength or weakness.”
Like many survivors, she carried guilt, wondering whether she could have done more or helped in a different way. With time, she learned that loving someone doesn’t mean you can always save them. That understanding has shaped how she supports others now. She no longer pushes people to open up; she waits, gives space, and allows them to come to her. “Helping someone isn’t one-size-fits-all. Some people need words. Some need silence. Some just need presence.”
She hopes communities learn to stop minimizing struggles and stop forcing their own solutions onto someone else’s pain. “If a person says they’re struggling, don’t judge them through your lens. Find what they need, not what you needed.”
To anyone grieving a suicide loss, her message is gentle but firm: “Don’t be afraid to say how they died. When we hide it, we create shame, and that silence can hurt others who might be feeling the same way.” Above all, she urges kindness, especially toward those who might be reaching out in unclear or complicated ways. “Even if someone says it for attention, it’s better to talk to them than dismiss them.”
Gauri had always been an advocate for mental and emotional wellbeing, and she taught Aastha how to find peace within herself. Today, Aastha tries to carry that forward. “The only thing that has changed,” she says softly, “is that now I want to spread the same message she gave me, so others can find their safe space too.”
The stories of Harry, Amitava, Arianna, Aastha reveal what most people don’t see:
Survivors of suicide loss often live with:
Their grief is not linear. It’s a spiral. Some days are survivable. Others reopen wounds that never fully healed.
Note: Names have been changed to protect identities.
Note: Information about Harry Corin has been taken from his publicly available website, harrycorin.in, and is used with consent.
Credit: iStock
The American Heart Association (AHA), in its latest update on nutrition guidance, has urged the need to eat a diet rich in vegetables and fruits, while also making a key shift to plant-based protein from meat-based protein earlier to improve heart health.
It has also emphasized the need to reduce the intake of sugar, salt and ultra-processed foods, as well as to switch to low-fat dairy.
The scientific statement, which is issued about every five years, comes amid increasing cases of high blood pressure and obesity in the US, which can potentially lead to poor health outcomes, including deaths from cardiovascular disease and other chronic conditions.
“For healthy eating to be more attainable and sustainable, we recommend people focus on their overall eating pattern rather than specific nutrients or foods. This approach is actionable, something that can be modified as people pass through different life stages, while still adhering to the nine key features,” said Alice H. Lichtenstein, volunteer chair of the scientific statement writing committee and senior scientist.
“The guidance applies to wherever you eat: at home, school, work, restaurants, or in your community. You want to strive for progress rather than perfection. Every time you choose to make a swap for a healthier alternative, you’re making a step toward a healthier life,” added Lichtenstein, who is also senior scientist at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University in Boston.
The 9 Guidelines for a heart-healthy dietary pattern include:

Also read: AHA’s New Dyslipidemia Guidelines Stress Early Screening, Lifestyle Management
The 2026 guidance for children recommends a heart‑healthy dietary pattern starting at 1 year of age. It urges families to play a significant role and become role models.
“Cardiovascular disease begins early in life; even prenatal factors can contribute to increased risk in children as they grow. So, it’s important that healthy eating patterns are adopted in childhood and continue throughout the entire lifespan,” Lichtenstein said.
“The best way to do that is for adults to role model heart-healthy eating patterns inside and outside the home,” she added.
Also read: Cardiovascular Diseases Lead As India’s Top Killer: US Cardiologist Points Out Risk Factors
While the updated guidance is specifically designed to improve cardiovascular health, it may also help improve other conditions like type 2 diabetes, kidney disease, some cancers, and brain health.
Credit: Freepik
Breast cancer treatment has evolved significantly over the past few decades, moving from radical removal approaches to more personalized and tissue-preserving techniques. Today, surgeons no longer view breast conservation surgery (BCS) and mastectomy as competing options, but as equally effective strategies chosen based on individual patient needs.
With the growing availability of reconstructive surgery in Kolkata, patients now also have better cosmetic and psychological outcomes regardless of the surgical path they choose.
When faced with a breast cancer diagnosis, understanding the available surgical options is crucial for making an informed decision. Each approach is designed to effectively treat the disease while considering the patient’s long-term health, comfort, and quality of life.
Breast conservation surgery, or lumpectomy or partial mastectomy, is a procedure that involves the removal of the tumor and a small amount of surrounding healthy tissue while preserving most of the breast.
The main objective is to remove cancer without altering the natural shape and appearance of the breast. Radiation therapy is usually administered after surgery to kill any remaining cancer cells and minimize the chances of recurrence.
Mastectomy is the removal of the whole breast tissue, and in other cases, the lymph nodes and skin around the breast. It can be done on either breast or both breasts based on the type of cancer and risk factors.
After a mastectomy, patients can choose to have breast reconstruction with the help of modern surgical procedures, such as those provided in reconstructive surgery in Kolkata, which can help to restore the shape and symmetry of the breast.
The basic distinction is the degree of tissue excision. BCS leaves the majority of the breast, but a mastectomy takes away all of it.
| Factor | Breast Conservation Surgery (BCS) | Mastectomy |
| Extent of Surgery | Removes tumor with a small margin of healthy tissue | Removes entire breast tissue |
| Invasiveness | Less invasive | More extensive surgery |
| Cosmetic Outcome | Preserves most of the natural breast shape | The breast is removed (reconstruction may be needed) |
| Recovery Time | Generally faster recovery | Longer recovery period |
| Radiation Therapy | Usually required after surgery | May or may not be required |
| Risk of Recurrence | Slightly higher local recurrence risk | Lower local recurrence risk |
| Hospital Stay | Often shorter or a day-care procedure | May require a longer hospital stay |
| Suitability | Early-stage cancer, smaller tumors | Larger tumors, multiple areas, or high-risk cases |
| Impact on Body Image | Better preservation of body image | May impact body image (can be improved with reconstruction) |
Notably, several studies indicate that both methods have equal chances of survival in the long term in early-stage breast cancer.
Not every patient is suited for the same surgical approach, as the choice largely depends on individual clinical factors. Tumor size, stage, location, and overall health all play a crucial role in determining eligibility. Understanding who can opt for which procedure helps ensure both effective treatment and optimal long-term outcomes.
Candidates for Breast Conservation Surgery
BCS is usually prescribed to patients with:
It might not apply to patients who have more than one tumor in other parts of the breast or those with advanced disease.
Candidates for Mastectomy
Mastectomy may be suggested when:
Moreover, other patients might opt to undergo mastectomy to have a sense of security or to alleviate the fear of recurrence.
The current surgical advances have greatly enhanced the results, particularly in patients who want to preserve their breasts.
Oncoplastic Surgery
Among the most remarkable developments is the oncoplastic breast surgery that involves the use of both cancer resection and plastic surgery. This enables the surgeons to excise bigger tumors without altering the shape and symmetry of the breast.
This has increased the eligibility of BCS so that more women can avoid mastectomy and still have safe control of cancer.
Improved Imaging and Targeting
Modern imaging techniques have assisted surgeons in accurately identifying tumors so that they can be fully removed without damaging normal tissue. This enhances cosmetic outcomes as well as oncological safety.
Advanced Reconstruction Methods
The emergence of reconstructive surgery in Kolkata has given patients who have undergone mastectomy the opportunity to have an immediate or delayed reconstruction with the help of implants or autologous tissue.
Reconstruction has been brought to improve psychological well-being, body image, and quality of life.
Influencing Factors of Surgical Decision-Making
The decision to use BCS or mastectomy is not only a medical choice, but a very personal one, which depends on several factors:
1. Cancer Stage and Tumor Characteristics
The main determinants include tumor size, location, and spread. BCS is more appropriate in early-stage cancers, whereas mastectomy is usually necessary in advanced cases.
2. Survival and Recurrence Outcomes
It has always been demonstrated that the survival rates are the same with BCS (including radiation) and mastectomy in the case of early-stage cancers. Nevertheless, BCS can be slightly more likely to recur locally, which can be treated.
3. Patient Preference
A major role is played by emotional and psychological factors. There are those patients who want to keep their breasts, and others opt to undergo a mastectomy to have peace of mind. Studies show fear of recurrence is a major driver for choosing mastectomy.
4. Access to Radiation Therapy
Since BCS requires post-operative radiation, access to treatment facilities can influence the decision. Patients without easy access may opt for a mastectomy.
5. Cosmetic and Quality-of-Life Concerns
BCS tends to provide superior cosmetic results and satisfaction. Nevertheless, the modern methods of reconstruction have also helped to enhance the results of mastectomy patients considerably.
Modern breast surgeons support a multidisciplinary patient-centered approach. Instead of prescribing a single solution, they consider:
Surgeons are increasingly preferring breast conservation surgery in most of the early-stage cases because of its good results and quality-of-life advantages. Nevertheless, mastectomy is necessary in more complicated or risky cases.
Conclusion
The debate between breast conservation surgery and mastectomy is no longer about which is superior, but about which is most appropriate for the individual patient. Oncoplastic techniques and reconstructive surgery in Kolkata have advanced, and patients now have a choice of safer, more personalized, and cosmetically satisfying options.
Credit: Canva
Heart failure has quietly emerged as one of India’s most serious and underestimated health challenges, driven by a rise in hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and delayed diagnosis of heart disease.
Due to a shortage of donor organs and a long waiting period before receiving the right treatment, end-stage heart failure patients in India faced a lot of difficulties a few years ago.
Today, advancements in heart transplant techniques are changing the situation from what was once an untreatable condition to a second chance at life.
Data from the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) shows a significant year-on-year rise in heart transplants, with 253 transplants done in 2024, showcasing improved organ donation awareness, better coordination between hospitals, and stronger transplant networks.
What was once considered the only option is now emerging as a life-saving solution, offering patients not just a second chance but a return to a more meaningful and active life.
A heart transplant offers hope and gives a second life to patients whose hearts no longer support the body even after the best available medical aid.
Although it is never performed instantly, it becomes necessary whenever conditions of the heart result in end-stage heart failure, where the pumping function of the heart is compromised.
Also read: Harish Rana’s Family Donated His Heart Valves And Corneas After His Death From Passive Euthanasia
When medications and modern technologies cannot supply an adequate amount of blood and oxygen to the organs, patients experience extreme breathlessness, fluid buildup, fatigue, and repeated hospitalizations, making even simple activities like walking, eating, or lying flat exhausting.
As the flow of blood continues to deteriorate, failure is also expected in other vital organs such as the kidneys and liver. It is at this point that the transplantation of the donor heart is considered the only treatment option to ensure that the blood flow is normalized.
Heart transplant is not just a surgical replacement of a failing organ, but a complete life restoration for patients with end-stage heart failure.
Its benefits include:
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited