Internet Rediscovers A Traditional 'Ghost Flower' Which Could Heal Pain And Anxiety

Updated Nov 8, 2025 | 10:01 AM IST

SummaryThe ghost flower, a rare non-photosynthetic plant, is gaining online popularity as a natural remedy for pain and anxiety. While traditional healers once used it, scientific evidence remains scarce. Its fragile forest-dependent ecology raises conservation concerns as increased foraging, digital misinformation, and growing demand intersect with limited research and ethical harvesting challenges.
Internet Rediscovers A Traditional 'Ghost Flower' Which Could Heal Pain And Anxiety

Credits: Wikimedia Commons

Internet is a great tool of discovery. Many things which have been forgotten before are now resurfacing on the internet, and on this list is an ancient ghost flower. Deep within cool, shaded forests, the ghost flower (Monotropa uniflora) stands out as something almost ethereal, a pale, waxy bloom that seems to glow against the dark soil. Why is it called a ghost flower? The answer lies in its food making process, which is not photosynthesis. The plant rather relies on fungi for energy and surrounding trees for the source of its nutrients.

For centuries, traditional healers have turned to this unusual plant for easing pain, calming anxiety, and relieving convulsions. Yet despite its long herbal history, the chemistry behind the ghost flower remains largely unknown. Now, a new study in Economic Botany reveals how this rare, chlorophyll-free species has resurfaced online as a trending curiosity and a self-medication remedy. Its digital revival, however, brings ecological and ethical concerns, especially as demand grows amid a fragile forest ecosystem.

A Plant That Lives Without Sunlight

Ghost flowers challenge our basic understanding of plant biology. As a mycoheterotroph, the plant parasite fungi connected to tree roots, essentially tapping into an underground nutrient-sharing network. Because this relationship is so precise and delicate, ghost flowers cannot be cultivated, potted, or farmed in controlled environments.

Every plant used for tinctures, research, or foraging comes directly from the wild. Found mostly in damp, shaded forest patches, they depend entirely on healthy ecosystems to survive. This makes them biologically exceptional, but also highly vulnerable.

From Ancient Medicine to Social Media Buzz

Indigenous communities across North America, including the Cherokee and Cree, traditionally used ghost flower preparations to treat pain, inflammation, convulsions, and even certain nervous conditions. Later, 19th-century Eclectic physicians described it as both sedative and antispasmodic. But with the rise of modern pharmaceuticals, it gradually disappeared from mainstream medical literature.

Its return has not come through herbalists or formal practitioners but through social media. According to the Economic Botany study, most modern users discover the plant on digital platforms where it is often labelled a “nervine”, a substance believed to soothe the nervous system. Short videos, blogs, and online forums have transformed this once-obscure woodland plant into a trending wellness fascination, blending folklore with digital-age curiosity.

Tinctures: The Modern Mode of Use

Today, ghost flower is almost exclusively used as tinctures—alcohol-based extracts made from the plant’s stem and bloom. Nearly 80 percent of users report turning to it for pain relief, while others use it in hopes of improving sleep or reducing stress.

Historically, the plant was also used in teas and poultices, but tinctures have become popular due to their potency and long shelf life. Anecdotal reports suggest mild calming or analgesic effects, yet experts emphasize that scientific evidence is still lacking. Most users take tiny doses, which may explain the absence of negative effects, but without chemical analysis or clinical trials, its active compounds remain unidentified.

Digital Ethnobotany: Knowledge and Misinformation

Researchers describe the ghost flower’s online revival as a form of “digital ethnobotany”, the movement of traditional plant knowledge onto the internet. While this helps preserve rare information, it can also circulate unverified claims. Many blogs repeat each other without referencing scientific data, blurring the line between fact and folklore.

Interestingly, online education has also fostered new conservation behaviors. Many foragers now follow community-generated ethical guidelines, such as harvesting only surface stems, avoiding roots, and collecting from plentiful patches. These shared norms show how digital spaces can shape grassroots sustainability practices.

Although ghost flowers are not officially endangered, they are increasingly scarce. Their presence depends on intact forests rich in fungal diversity, and they vanish quickly when moisture levels or soil conditions shift. Since they cannot be cultivated, increased interest could easily strain natural populations.

Around 80% of foragers surveyed in the study say they limit harvesting or rotate locations to avoid damaging wild patches. Even so, researchers argue that clear conservation guidelines are needed before demand grows further. Protecting forest habitats may be just as essential as studying the plant’s chemistry.

What Scientists Still Hope to Discover

Laboratory research on ghost flowers is limited. Their tissues are difficult to preserve, and isolating the fungi they depend on adds another layer of complexity. Early screenings suggest trace alkaloids and glycosides—compounds often linked to neurological or anti-inflammatory effects, but the findings remain incomplete.

Scientists hope that future work, including genome sequencing and mapping fungal partnerships, may reveal how non-photosynthetic plants adapt metabolically. These insights could deepen our understanding of symbiosis, nutrient transfer, and perhaps uncover novel compounds for future drug discovery.

End of Article

TrumpRx Deal For Lowering Popular Weight Loss Drugs Is Not Flawless, People May End Up Paying More, Say Experts

Updated Nov 9, 2025 | 01:18 PM IST

SummaryTrump touted a new TrumpRx deal promising obesity drugs like Wegovy and Zepbound for about $250 monthly, but experts warn the plan is unclear, includes unapproved products, and only discounts low doses. Since effective treatment needs higher doses, patients may ultimately pay far more than advertised in the long run, too.
TrumpRx Deal For Lowering Popular Weight Loss Drugs Is Not Flawless, People May End Up Paying More, Say Experts

Credits: AP

"Did I do a good job? Do you think Biden could have done this? I don't think so," said President Donald Trump to the reporters assembled at the Oval Office after he made the announcement that he had secured a deal to slash the price of obesity drugs. His website, TrumpRx, will offer the sale of drugs like Wegovy and Zepbound, for only around $250 a month, which is a fraction of their current retail price which is more than $1,000.

While it is a breakthrough, as many private insurances do not cover obesity drugs, and often forces people to pay for these injections out of pocket, experts point out that this system is not entirely flawless.

Also Read: TrumpRx Lowered Prices Of Popular Weight Loss Drugs; What More Does Trump's New Medical Website Offer?

TrumpRx Is Not Flawless

Drug policy experts say that while the administration has promised drugs at a cheaper rate, some of these discounts have not been approved yet by the Food and Drug Administration. The problem is that the lower prices for people paying out of pocket would only apply to the lowest doses of the drugs, however, the deal does not expand Medicare coverage to people seeking treatment for weight loss alone.

Juliette Cubanski, who is the deputy director of Medicare policy program at KFF, said, and as is reported in NBC News, "It’s a situation where we have more questions than answers. Based on what we didn’t hear, that suggests to me that there’s a lot that the administration itself hasn’t even ironed out as of yet. It just feels a little bit too squishy right now."

Art Caplan, also reported in NBC News, who is the head of the division of medical ethics at NYU Grossman School of Medicine in New York City, said, "It’s just murky as to how this will take shape, how the programs will work. You can’t really tell from what’s going on.”

Are There Unapproved Drugs On The List?

Several drugs and forms of drugs included in the deal are actually not approved by the FDA. These include oral versions of weight loss drugs, and Eli Lilly's new multidose injection pens. In fact, Lawrence Gostin, director of the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University said that the administration has made premature promises because the lower prices cannot take effect until the products are on the market. "It is reckless to negotiate pricing deals on products which the FDA have not yet approved as safe and effective. The administration is getting way out ahead of its own safety agency.”

The list includes:

  • Oral weight loss pills by Wegovy
  • Oral weight loss pills by Novo Nordisk
  • Multidose version of Zepbound

Prices Are Low, But People May End Up Paying More

While the White House did say that both the pills and injection pens will be available for discounted prices for those who pay out of pocket, policy makers say that they may end up paying more.

The starting doses of weight loss pill will cost $149 per month, and the shots will cost around $350 for a month's supply. The price of the injection is further expected to fall to about $259 within two years. However, when people start with the drugs, they start with the lowest dose that allows the body to get used to the drug, However, over the course of time, the dose increases to be effective for weight loss. For Wegovy, the highest doses are five, for Zepbound, it is six, and the most weight loss has seen with the highest doses.

Officials said the starting dose of GLP-1 pills will cost $149 per month, though they didn’t clarify pricing for higher doses.

For injections, the White House offered only a “weighted average” estimate of $350 a month. Lilly later specified that Zepbound will start at $299 for the lowest dose, rising to $449 for higher ones. Novo Nordisk didn’t confirm dose-based pricing and said it will share updated cost details in the coming weeks.

All of this means patients using TrumpRx could ultimately pay significantly more than the administration’s headline prices, especially since most people don’t remain on the lowest dose for long, Caplan noted.

End of Article

Davina McCall Reveals Breast Cancer Surgery A Year After Her Brain Tumor Surgery

Updated Nov 9, 2025 | 10:49 AM IST

SummaryDavina McCall revealed she has early stage breast cancer, discovered after finding a small lump that persisted despite a recent clear mammogram. She underwent a lumpectomy and will have brief radiotherapy. McCall, now feeling more positive, urged women to check their breasts regularly and not delay ultrasounds, especially with dense breast tissue.
Davina McCall Reveals Breast Cancer Surgery A Year After Her Brain Tumor Surgery

Credits: Wikimedia Commons

TV presenter Davina McCall revealed that she had breast cancer, almost a year after she had undergone a surgery to remove her brain tumor. In a video that she posted on her Instagram, she revealed that she was "very angry" when she found out the news, however, she is in a "much more positive place" after she has undergone another surgery three weeks ago to remove the tumor from her breast.

How Did She Realize She Had Breast Cancer?

She said that she found a lump a few weeks ago, however, it came and went back, so she continued to do her work. "I found a lump a few weeks ago. It came and went but then I was working on The Masked Singer and Lorraine, the TV show, and Lorraine Kelly had put signs on the backs of all the doors saying 'check your breasts' and every time I went for a wee, I did that," she said.

She continued: "It was still there, and then one morning I saw myself in the mirror and thought 'I'm going to get that looked at'. I had a biopsy. I found out it was indeed breast cancer and I had it taken out in a lumpectomy nearly three weeks ago."

McCall, who is now 58, says that the lump was "very, very small" and was discovered at an early stage. "I am so relieved to have had it removed and to know that it hasn't spread. My lymph nodes were clear, I didn't have any removed, and all I'm going to do now is have five days of radiotherapy in January as kind of an insurance policy," she said.

"It's been a lot. I was very angry when I found out, but I let go of that, and I feel in a much more positive place now. "I think my message is: get checked if you're worried. Check yourself regularly. If you are due a mammogram, then get it done," she said.

Dense Breast And Mammogram

She also revealed that it was only in August that she got her mammogram done, however, she has dense breasts, and so nothing was detected. "I have dense breasts and I had a mammogram in August, and I was postponing the ultrasound; I just couldn't find time to do it. Don't do that. Get the ultrasound."

Difference Between Breast Ultrasound And A Mammogram

Breast Ultrasound: A breast ultrasound uses sound waves that reflect off the breast tissue to create detailed images of the breast. There is no radiation involved.

Mammogram: A mammogram is an X-ray of the breast. A mammogram is an X-ray of the breast. A diagnostic mammogram focuses more closely on the area(s) of concern. We will get more X-ray views of the concerning area. We perform a diagnostic mammogram any time a patient comes in with symptoms of breast cancer or after an abnormal screening mammogram.

As per the MD Anderson Cancer Center, normal breast tissue and cancerous tissue, both appear white on a mammogram, this is when an ultrasound can help us see small cancers that may be hiding amongst normal breast tissue. This is especially true for women with dense breasts, which means they have more glandular tissue and less fat in their breasts.

However, the MD Anderson Cancer Center mentions that ultrasound is not recommended as a replacement for a mammogram. "Screening mammograms detect about 4 to 6 cases of breast cancer per 1,000 women. When a breast ultrasound is done on top of that, we detect about 2 to 3 more cases. So, breast ultrasound is a valuable screening tool we use in addition to a mammogram," it notes.

End of Article

Can GLP-1 Weight Loss Drugs Help Long COVID Patients Recover?

Updated Nov 9, 2025 | 12:00 AM IST

SummaryScientists are exploring whether a diabetes and obesity drug could help relieve the lingering symptoms of long COVID, such as fatigue, brain fog, and joint pain. Early reports show that many patients using the medication experienced noticeable improvement, sparking new research into its potential to restore energy and reduce inflammation linked to the condition.
glp1 medicines long covid

Credits: Canva

Fatigue, joint pain, headaches, and cognitive issues often described as “brain fog” are among the lingering effects many people experience long after recovering from COVID-19. This condition, known as long COVID, can persist for months or even years—and so far, there’s no proven treatment. But researchers are now exploring an unexpected source of hope: a diabetes and obesity drug called tirzepatide.

What Is Tirzepatide?

Tirzepatide is a prescription injectable medication primarily used to manage type 2 diabetes and support chronic weight management in adults who are obese or overweight with a related condition. It is sold under two brand names: Mounjaro, used for diabetes, and Zepbound, approved for weight loss.

Can Weight Loss Drugs Help Long COVID Patients Recover?

In a recent survey led by Dr. Julia Moore Vogel, a program director at Scripps Research, patients with long COVID who were prescribed tirzepatide reported striking results. Between 60% and 90% of participants said their symptoms improved.

“I was expecting only about 30% to show improvement,” Vogel said. “If it’s truly between 60% and 90%, that would be remarkable.”

Encouraged by these early findings, Vogel and her team have launched a clinical trial at Scripps Research to test the drug’s potential benefits more rigorously. The trial, currently a quarter of the way through recruitment, aims to enroll 1,000 participants with long COVID. Half will receive tirzepatide, while the other half will take a placebo.

A Drug with Far-Reaching Effects

Tirzepatide, developed by Eli Lilly, belongs to a class of drugs known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, already popular for their effectiveness in treating obesity and type 2 diabetes. According to Dr. Eric Topol, co-director of the Scripps clinical trial and founder of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, this class of medications could have much broader applications.

“When I say potent, I mean across multiple systems,” Topol explained. “Not just weight loss, but also benefits for the heart, liver, kidneys, migraine headaches, even rheumatoid arthritis and addiction.”

Eli Lilly is supplying the drug for the study, while the project is being funded by the Schmidt Institute for Long COVID (SILC).

A First-of-Its-Kind Virtual Trial

According to Dr. John Redd, CEO of SILC, the Scripps study is breaking new ground with its fully remote trial design.

“This is the first long COVID clinical trial that allows patients to participate entirely from home,” Redd said. “Medication is shipped directly to participants, and all assessments are conducted virtually. It opens the door for patients across the U.S. to take part.”

Off-Label Use and Access Challenges

While tirzepatide is already FDA-approved for diabetes and weight loss, its use for long COVID remains experimental. Vogel noted that “off-label” use of approved drugs is common in medicine, but coverage barriers can limit access.

“The challenge for many patients will be insurance,” she explained. “Companies will likely require stronger data before agreeing to cover such an expensive medication.”

A Researcher with Personal Stakes

For Vogel, this research is deeply personal. She has lived with long COVID for five years, an experience that has left her largely homebound, as per KPBS News,

“No treatment I’ve tried has helped,” she shared. “When I saw that 60 to 90 percent of people reported improvement on tirzepatide, I was blown away. I really hope the data confirms it.”

The Scripps team is also studying body-monitor data to track how patients’ symptoms change over time, hoping to gain clearer insights into how and why tirzepatide might work.

Though it’s still early, the findings have offered a glimmer of optimism for millions struggling with the long-term effects of COVID-19. If tirzepatide’s promise holds true, it could mark a significant step toward understanding and treating one of the pandemic’s most stubborn mysteries.

End of Article