Eggs (Credit: Canva)
Eggs are the most convenient superfoods available in the market. But "eggs" is a broad term and their range is vast, not only based on where they come from but also their colour and texture—ranging from chicken eggs to duck eggs to quail eggs. This article explores the age-old, omnipresent chicken eggs and compares them with social media's favourite, duck eggs, in terms of their nutritional profile. Which one is better? Let's find out.
When it comes to nutrition, duck eggs offer a more concentrated source of essential vitamins and minerals compared to chicken eggs. A 100-gram serving of duck eggs provides around 185 calories, 13 grams of protein, and 14 grams of fat, whereas chicken eggs contain about 148 calories, 12 grams of protein, and 10 grams of fat. Due to their larger size, duck eggs naturally contain more nutrients per serving.
Duck eggs are particularly rich in vitamin B12, an essential nutrient for red blood cell formation and brain health. They also have higher amounts of selenium, a powerful antioxidant that helps protect cells from damage and supports immune function. Additionally, they contain more choline, a crucial nutrient for brain function and fetal development. In contrast, while chicken eggs provide these nutrients as well, they do so in slightly lower amounts.
Despite their nutritional advantages, duck eggs have a significantly higher cholesterol content than chicken eggs. A single duck egg contains nearly double the cholesterol of a chicken egg, which might be a concern for individuals with heart disease or high cholesterol. While recent research suggests that dietary cholesterol may not be as harmful as previously thought, those with existing cardiovascular conditions should moderate their intake of duck eggs.
Omega-3 ContentAnother important distinction is the omega-3 fatty acid content. Duck eggs, particularly those from free-range or pasture-raised ducks, contain higher levels of omega-3s compared to standard chicken eggs. Omega-3 fatty acids play a crucial role in reducing inflammation, supporting heart health, and improving cognitive function. Chicken eggs, especially omega-3-enriched varieties, also offer this benefit but generally have lower omega-3 levels than duck eggs.
Egg protein is a common allergen, and individuals allergic to chicken eggs may or may not react to duck eggs. Some people find that they can tolerate duck eggs even if they are sensitive to chicken eggs, but anyone with an egg allergy should consult a healthcare provider before making the switch.
Food safety is another factor to consider. Duck eggs have a thicker shell, which makes them less porous and extends their shelf life. However, they can still carry the risk of salmonella and other bacterial infections if not stored and cooked properly. Pregnant women, young children, and immunocompromised individuals should ensure that both duck and chicken eggs are fully cooked before consumption.
Credits: AP/Canva
President Donald Trump signed a bipartisan bill on January 14 that allows schools across the United States to serve whole milk and 2% milk again, rolling back Obama-era rules that restricted school cafeterias to low-fat or fat-free options. The decision was welcomed by dairy farmers, milk industry advocates, and lawmakers from both parties, many of whom attended the signing of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act at the Oval Office. The bill had passed unanimously in both chambers of Congress toward the end of 2025.
Trump’s move followed a major shift in federal nutrition messaging earlier this month. On January 7, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. unveiled updated dietary guidance that moves away from the traditional food pyramid and places greater emphasis on full-fat dairy, protein, and what he described as “healthy fats.” While announcing the changes, Kennedy said the government was “ending the war on saturated fats,” signalling a clear departure from decades of advice that encouraged lower-fat choices.
The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act drew rare unanimous backing from lawmakers across party lines. President Donald Trump signed the legislation after sustained lobbying by dairy groups, farmers, and members of Congress who argued that schools needed more flexibility in what they serve children.
The law overturns restrictions introduced during the Obama administration, once again permitting whole and 2% milk in school meal programmes. The signing ceremony at the White House was attended by members of Congress, representatives from the dairy industry, and senior officials including Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins. Supporters described the measure as a practical step that supports children’s nutrition while also helping American farmers and giving parents more choice.
There is broad agreement that milk plays an important role in a child’s diet. Health bodies have long advised that children aged five to eight drink up to two and a half cups of milk daily, while those aged nine and older should aim for up to three cups. The disagreement has centred on whether full-fat or lower-fat versions are the better option.
Since 1990, federal dietary guidelines have recommended that children aged two and above consume skim or low-fat milk to reduce their intake of saturated fat. That position has been endorsed by organisations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association.
Megan Lott, a registered dietitian at Duke University and deputy director of Healthy Eating Research, an organisation involved in shaping guidance on beverages for school-aged children, has pointed out that low-fat and whole milk contain similar levels of key nutrients. These include protein, calcium, potassium, and vitamin D. The difference, she explained, is that lower-fat milk delivers those nutrients with fewer calories and less saturated fat.
Research has shown that high intake of saturated fat can raise cholesterol levels and, over time, increase the risk of heart disease. Extra calories can also contribute to weight gain in children, Lott said, according to The New York Times.
Experts say the healthiest milk choice depends largely on a child’s individual needs. For children over the age of two who are significantly overweight, calorie intake becomes more important. In such cases, nonfat or 1% milk may be a better option, said Dr. Abrams. For most children, however, he noted that any unsweetened, pasteurised milk is acceptable. He stressed that raw or unpasteurised milk should never be given to children because of the risk of serious food-borne infections.
Higher-fat milk may be beneficial for children who are underweight, Lott added. She recommended that parents speak to a paediatrician or dietitian to get advice tailored to their child’s health and growth needs, according to The New York Times.
Milk consumption among American children has fallen sharply over the past few decades. In its place, many children are drinking more fizzy drinks, sports drinks, and other sweetened beverages. That trend worries health experts because milk remains a key source of calcium, vitamin D, and protein. Dr. Abrams said that if bringing whole milk back into schools encourages children to drink more milk overall, it could have a positive effect on their health.
Lott, however, argued that the legislation missed an opportunity to make a bigger impact. She said removing flavoured milks from schools would have done more to improve children’s diets, as they add unnecessary sugar. That change, she noted, is backed by stronger evidence.
“There’s no reason they need chocolate milk or vanilla milk or any other flavours,” she said.
Credits: Canva
People who are trying to lose weight may be able to see progress sooner by following a simple tip backed by the NHS. The health service shares guidance for anyone aiming to improve their diet and lose weight in a safe, steady way, including those advised by their GP to slim down. On the Better Health website, the NHS has a page titled Healthy eating when trying to lose weight, which offers practical advice for everyday meals.
One of the easiest rules to put into practice is increasing the amount of fruit and vegetables in your diet. Doing so can also help people meet their five-a-day target, a guideline recommended by both the NHS and the World Health Organisation.
The NHS says fruit and vegetables should be a core part of daily eating. It explains: “When it comes to fruit and veg, eating five portions a day is the minimum you should aim for – but the more you eat the better! They are a good source of fibre, low in calories and great to snack on. Increase your intake and make it a goal to hit your five a day, every day.”
To make this easier, people are encouraged to follow what is known as the “two or more” rule. This means adding at least two portions of vegetables to every main meal. According to the NHS, aiming for two or more portions of veg at mealtimes should make up roughly half of your plate.
The World Health Organisation states that eating at least 400g of fruit and vegetables each day is linked to a lower risk of heart disease, stroke, and certain cancers. This means boosting vegetable intake can improve overall health, not just support weight loss.
Alongside fruit and vegetables, the NHS advises people trying to lose weight to include protein in every meal. Protein helps you feel full for longer and can reduce the urge to snack. Good options include eggs, fish, beans, pulses, and lean cuts of meat.
While carbohydrates do not need to be avoided entirely, the NHS recommends limiting them to no more than a third of your daily food intake. When eating carbs, wholegrain versions are encouraged where possible. Dairy products should also be chosen carefully, with low-fat and low-sugar options preferred.
For those who eat fish, the NHS advises having two portions per week, with at least one being oily fish such as salmon or trout. When cooking, oils like olive, sunflower, or rapeseed oil are recommended because they contain healthier unsaturated fats, as per The Mirror.
The NHS also highlights the importance of drinking enough fluids each day. It advises: “Drink six to eight cups of fluid a day. Water, lower-fat milk, tea, coffee, sugar-free drinks. They all count!”
Alongside food choices, the NHS stresses that portion size plays a major role in weight management. It notes: “The amount you eat is just as important as what you eat – no matter how healthy your diet is, you can still put on weight if you are eating too much. Having more calories than your body needs each day can lead to weight gain.”
In general, the recommended daily calorie intake is around 2,500kcal for men and 2,000kcal for women. For people trying to lose weight, this usually drops to about 1,900kcal for men and 1,400kcal for women.
Credit: Canva
The World Health Organization is asking countries across the world to increase taxes on sugary drinks and alcohol to reduce cases of chronic conditions such as Type 2 diabetes, obesity, heart disease and fatty liver.
In a January 13 virtual conference, WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said: "Health taxes have been shown to reduce consumption of these harmful products, helping to prevent disease and reduce the burden on health systems.
"At the same time, they generate an income stream that governments can use to invest in health, education and social protection."
According to a recent report on sugar-sweetened beverages taxes, at least 116 countries tax sugary drinks, including sodas or carbonated canned drinks, but other high-sugar products, such as 100 per cent fruit juices, sweetened milk drinks and ready-to-drink coffees and teas, escape taxation.
Additionally, another report on alcohol taxes shows that even though 167 countries levy taxes on liquor, wine and beer, alcohol has become more affordable or remained unchanged in price in most countries since 2022, as taxes do not get adjusted for inflation and income growth.
Apart from increasing the risk for diabetes and heart disease, sugary drinks can also worsen the risk for dental problems, gout, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and potential kidney/bone issues.
Due to being cheap for consumption, the harmful products are generating billions of dollars in profit for countries and corporations, alike.
However, health systems across the globe are facing mounting financial pressure from preventable noncommunicable diseases and injuries and an increase an taxes will help curb these costs , the WHO said.
Moreover, high tax rates will discourage consumers from buying such drinks and causing long-term damage to their body.
Yes, the WHO noted that when the UK implemented a tax on sugary drinks in 2018, the country saw a overall reduced sugar consumption, £338 million revenue increase in 2024 and a lower obesity rates in girls aged 10 and 11, especially in deprived communities.
“These are very important findings for preservatives that are not only widely used in the French and European markets, but also in the United States,” said senior author Mathilde Touvier, principal investigator of the NutriNet-Santé study used for the research, as per CTV News.
The cancer-focused study, published in The BMJ, examined the effects of 58 preservatives among nearly 105,000 people who were cancer-free in 2009 and followed for up to 14 years.
Sodium nitrite, commonly used in processed meats such as bacon, ham, and deli meats, was linked to a 32 percent higher risk of prostate cancer. Potassium nitrate was associated with a 22 percent increased risk of breast cancer and a 13 percent rise in overall cancer risk, results showed.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited