Let's just admit it, coffee is our go-to beverage when it comes to getting a quick energy boost in the morning. Of course, Chai lovers won't agree, and neither would those who consume energy drinks. However, all-in-all, for most of us, it is the caffeine shot that pulls us out of our beds, to our workplaces and makes us functional throughout the day.

But what if I told you I have a better option, and that too without any side effects? Yes! Not many know, but apples are excellent energy boosters. Apples, scientifically called Manus, are packed with copper, potassium, vitamins K & C. But besides that, they have a special type of sugar-Fructose, which leads to a steady release of energy throughout the day. Apples also have lots of fibre, which can help balance your blood sugar and give you sustained energy without blood sugar crashes. And while biting on a juicy, crunchy apple may not provide the instant spike in energy you're looking for, it may keep you charged throughout the day.

Coffee Vs Apples For Energy

Although coffee is great for boosting your energy in the morning, it can also negatively impact you. Drinking too much can make you feel jittery or anxious. It can also interfere with your sleep. Having too much caffeine can cause nervousness, anxiety, insomnia, dehydration, upset stomach and fatigue, according to the National Library of Medicine (NLM).

On the other hand, apples contain a natural sugar called fructose, which can serve as an important source of energy for your body, according to the International Food Information Council Foundation. The fructose doesn't give you the same jolt as coffee because it's not a stimulant, but it provides slow, sustained energy that also won't make you feel anxious or affect your sleep quality. If your blood sugar levels are low, eating an apple may help you wake up and feel more alert. Besides, apples are also a great source of fibre and can have lots of phytochemicals and vitamin C, according to the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Other Health Benefits Of Apples

Apples are nutrient-dense, offering fiber, vitamin C, and antioxidants like polyphenols, which contribute to their numerous health benefits. Their high fiber and water content make them filling, aiding weight loss and reducing BMI. Rich in soluble fiber, apples promote heart health by lowering cholesterol and blood pressure, while their polyphenols may reduce stroke risk. Regular apple consumption is linked to a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, likely due to quercetin’s effects. Apples support gut health by acting as a prebiotic, fostering good bacteria.

The antioxidants present in apples may help prevent certain cancers and protect the brain from oxidative stress, potentially lowering the risk of Alzheimer’s. Quercetin in apple skin may also aid in reducing asthma-related inflammation. Additionally, apples may contribute to better mental health, improved digestion, and a lower risk of GERD. While more human research is needed, apples remain a versatile and beneficial addition to a healthy.

A recent study published in the journal Nutrients has challenged long-standing perceptions about cholesterol and longevity. Conducted among nonagenarians in Sardinia’s Blue Zone, the research suggests that moderate hypercholesterolemia (where LDL-C is equal to or more than 130 mg/dL) may be associated with longer lifespans. However, this potential protective effect was not observed in individuals with excessively high cholesterol levels, particularly among women.

For decades, medical guidelines have emphasised the need to lower cholesterol levels to reduce cardiovascular disease risk. However, emerging evidence indicates that the relationship between cholesterol and health outcomes may be more nuanced, particularly in older populations. The Sardinian study, led by a team of Italian researchers, examined whether higher cholesterol levels could act as a marker of resilience in aging populations.

Known as the 'cholesterol paradox,' the phenomenon describes findings that indicate higher cholesterol levels may correlate with lower mortality rates in elderly populations. Some experts believe this could result from reverse causality, where declining cholesterol levels are a consequence of poor health rather than a cause. In this study, the researchers controlled for this by excluding participants with severe illnesses or poor self-rated health, yet the association between higher LDL-C and longer survival remained.

The study focused on a cohort of 168 nonagenarians (81 men and 87 women) from Sardinia’s Blue Zone, a region renowned for its unusually high number of long-lived residents. Data collection began in 2018 and continued until December 2024, during which 20 participants remained alive. To ensure the accuracy of their findings, the study included only those whose four grandparents were born within the Blue Zone, thereby reducing genetic variability.

Researchers assessed lipid profiles using blood samples collected after an overnight fast. Serum cholesterol levels, including total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides, were measured according to established guidelines. Participants were then categorized based on LDL-C levels, with a threshold of 130 mg/dL separating those with moderate hypercholesterolemia from those with lower levels.

The findings indicated that those with LDL-C levels above 130 mg/dL had a significantly longer median survival of 3.82 years, compared to 2.79 years among those with lower LDL-C levels. Statistical analysis revealed that moderate hypercholesterolemia was associated with a 40% lower mortality risk, even after accounting for factors such as sex, smoking status, and comorbidities. Interestingly, however, total cholesterol levels above 250 mg/dL did not confer additional survival benefits and were linked to shorter lifespans in women.

The study also highlighted lifestyle factors that may influence the cholesterol paradox. Over 85% of male participants and 69% of female participants reported engaging in physical activity at least three times per week, suggesting that exercise may play a role in mitigating the risks associated with elevated cholesterol levels.

Moreover, dietary habits emerged as another potential factor. Participants with higher LDL-C levels reported greater cereal consumption, while those with lower non-HDL cholesterol levels consumed more olive oil. However, the study did not assess dietary intake over time, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about diet’s role in the observed associations.

While these findings suggest that moderate hypercholesterolemia may not be as detrimental for very old individuals as previously thought, the researchers emphasized that the study’s limitations warrant caution. The relatively small sample size, single-point cholesterol measurement, and focus on a genetically unique population mean that the results may not be generalizable to other groups.

Nevertheless, the study raises important questions about current cholesterol management guidelines for older adults. As life expectancy continues to rise, it may be necessary to adopt more individualized approaches to cardiovascular health, considering not just cholesterol levels but also genetic, dietary, and lifestyle factors.

At 67, John, who writes his journey on journee-monidale, had always lived by the book when it came to health. Daily walks, a balanced diet, and plenty of water had kept him active and feeling well into his senior years. But last summer, a surprising dietary choice led to a painful wake-up call—his first gout attack.

The unlikely culprit? Mangoes.

For months, John had been enjoying a large mango every afternoon. He saw it as a wholesome treat—sweet, packed with vitamins, and perfect for a hot day. What he didn’t know was that the natural sugar in mangoes, called fructose, can contribute to high uric acid levels in the blood. In his case, it pushed those levels dangerously high.

According to Dr. Melissa Chen, a rheumatologist at Austin Medical Center, who he spoke to says, “Many patients are shocked to learn that certain fruits can significantly impact uric acid production. Fruits high in fructose can lead to painful gout attacks, especially in older adults with existing risks.”

What Is The Science Behind It?

The science behind it lies in how the body processes fructose. When fructose is broken down, it depletes energy in the cells and increases uric acid as a byproduct. For people with slower kidney function or a genetic tendency to store uric acid, this can be enough to trigger a gout flare.

“Think of fructose as a switch for uric acid production,” explains Dr. Sarah Thompson to John, who is a nutritionist at the New York Wellness Center. “It’s not about cutting out all fruit—it’s about knowing which ones can cause problems.”

Fruits particularly high in fructose include:

• Mangoes
• Apples
• Pears
• Watermelon
• Fruit juices and dried fruits (which are more concentrated sources)

How The Events Unfolded

John’s first attack came suddenly. At 3 AM, he was jolted awake by intense pain in his big toe—so severe, he couldn’t stand the weight of his bedsheet. Tests confirmed his uric acid had spiked to 9.2 mg/dL, well above the recommended maximum of 6 mg/dL.

Once he made the connection to his daily mango intake, John overhauled his diet. He switched to lower-fructose fruits such as:

• Strawberries, which are high in vitamin C
• Cherries, known to reduce inflammation
• Oranges, which offer vitamin C without too much fructose

He also cut out sugary drinks and started paying closer attention to “healthy” foods that might have hidden downsides.

John’s doctor called it the “health halo trap”—the idea that just because something is natural or nutritious, it can be consumed without limits. But for older adults, the body’s ability to manage uric acid declines, and even small missteps can have big consequences.

“Managing uric acid becomes more important with age,” Dr. Chen advises. “Even healthy habits need a second look when your metabolism changes.”

John now is pain-free and wiser about his food choices. His experience is a reminder: sometimes, it’s not about cutting out healthy foods, but understanding how they affect your unique body—especially as it ages.

Ice cream is something we all can make a little room for after a heavy meal. However, they may not be the safest dessert for you. Nearly 18,000 containers of ice cream and frozen yogurt have been recalled by Iowa-based Wells Enterprise due to the potential presence of plastic pieces in the products.

The voluntary recall, made public through a recently released notice by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), affects 22 flavors packaged in 3-gallon containers with "Best If Used By" dates ranging from March to October 2026.

The affected products belong to well-known brands such as Blue Bunny and Halo Top and were distributed nationwide. While no injuries have been reported yet, the recall serves as a cautionary reminder of how plastic contamination, even in small quantities, can pose health hazards.

The Invisible Threat of Plastic in Everyday Life

While this incident is related to visible pieces of plastic, a much more insidious threat lies in microplastics—tiny plastic particles smaller than five millimeters. These can make their way into the food chain, often without our knowledge.

Microplastics have been detected in everything from bottled water and sea salt to fruits, vegetables, and even human blood. One surprising source? Agriculture. A 2021 report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) revealed that agricultural soils may contain more microplastics than the oceans. This happens when plastic-coated seeds, pesticide containers, and mulch films degrade in the environment or when wastewater used as fertilizer brings in plastic particles.

Moreover, climate change has amplified farmers’ dependence on plastic tools such as tarps and greenhouse covers, which, under extreme heat or rain, break down faster and spread microplastics further into ecosystems.

Health Hazards: More Than Just an Environmental Concern

The risks of plastic exposure go far beyond environmental degradation—they extend directly to human health. For instance, microplastics have been found embedded in the fatty plaques of carotid arteries, which supply blood to the brain. A study presented at the American Heart Association’s conference revealed that these plaques contained over 50 times more microplastic content than healthy arteries. Individuals with higher concentrations were more likely to have suffered strokes or temporary vision loss due to restricted blood flow.

That’s not all. Regular use of plastic takeout containers may also contribute to cardiovascular diseases. A study published in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety found that thermal contact between hot food and plastic containers can cause chemicals to leach out. These chemicals not only disrupt gut bacteria but also inflame the circulatory system, increasing the risk of heart failure.

Everyday Exposure: Even Chewing Gum Isn’t Safe

Think you’re safe by avoiding packaged foods? Not entirely. A study presented at the American Chemical Society’s meeting found that chewing gum—whether synthetic or natural—can release around 100 microplastic particles per gram into saliva. These are then swallowed and enter the digestive system, where they may cause long-term harm.