Credits: Canva
The Trump administration is set to impose a ban on the synthetic dye industry by working to eliminate artificial food coloring from the American food supply but this isn't about politics—this is about your plate, your family's health, and a system that has let petroleum-based chemicals dictate what our food looks like for decades. Though these artificial colors enhance the appearance of foods, there is increasing concern about what they might be doing to our bodies. From lunchboxes to dessert shelves, artificial food dyes are ubiquitous—and now, they're at the center of a heated national debate.
The plan, as laid out in a media advisory by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), will be officially rolled out by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Marty Makary. This marks a major federal move in an emerging national dialogue regarding food safety and public health.
Artificial food coloring has been the target of suspicion for decades. In January, during the Biden administration, the FDA acted decisively by prohibiting Red Dye No. 3 in food, drinks, and ingestible medications based on animal studies that found the additive caused cancer. But that was just one of numerous synthetic coloring agents still widely used in the U.S. food supply—often in brightly colored processed foods, cereals, candies, and even medication.
Now, the Trump administration seems to be focusing on a wider category of petroleum-based synthetic dyes, such as Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, and Blue No. 1. They are intended to add visual attractiveness but have become more and more linked to health hazards, especially among children. With a bipartisan group of legislators demanding reform, including a recent historic food dye ban signed into law in West Virginia, the push for stronger regulation is picking up speed.
Artificial food dyes are man-made chemicals created to duplicate the natural color. Made mostly from petroleum, they are more inexpensive to manufacture and less likely to spoil in grocery stores than natural dyes. Yet, their chemical composition is a cause for concern. Chemicals such as benzidine and 4-aminobiphenyl—both of which are found in common dyes—are known carcinogens under World Health Organization classification.
According to the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), Americans are consuming five times more synthetic food dye today than in 1955. Their pervasiveness in low-nutrient, ultra-processed foods means that even consumers trying to make healthier choices may be unknowingly ingesting these chemicals.
Research shows that Red No. 3, Red No. 40, Blue No. 2, and Green No. 3 have all been linked to cancer in animal studies. Other dyes, such as Yellow No. 5 and Yellow No. 6, have been reported to induce hypersensitivity reactions and behavioral disturbances in children. U.S. and UK studies have established a high correlation between food dye intake and hyperactivity, irritability, and impaired memory performance in children—even those without a diagnosis of ADHD.
The effort to restrict food dyes is not limited to a single political party. Indeed, Republican and Democratic legislators in over 25 states are proposing or co-sponsoring bills that restrict the use of artificial food coloring. This movement has established a patchwork of state-by-state regulations that industry executives now claim need federal harmonization.
Organizations such as the National Confectioners Association and the Consumer Brands Association have recognized increasing consumer anxiety, but assert that the FDA is best suited to spearhead national food safety efforts. Yet, public confidence in these agencies has been undermined over time, especially as food dye prohibitions in nations throughout Europe are juxtaposed with more sluggish action in the U.S.
In the EU, for instance, foods with artificial dyes are required to have a warning label. Most large U.S. food companies have already reformulated products sold in European markets with natural colorants—but still sell the artificial versions in the United States.
Food dyes are categorized into two main types—natural and artificial. Although both are used to add color to foods and beverages, their sources and health effects are quite different.
These are sourced from natural food origins and plant-derived products. They are deemed safer and commonly exist in organic or low-processing foods.
Examples of natural colorings include:
Synthetic or artificial food coloring is produced from petroleum-derived chemical substances. They are commonly used in processed foods because they have a strong color, are inexpensive, and are shelf-stable.
Some common artificial dyes are:
These artificial dyes are not only used for their appearance, but to cover up processing inconsistencies or to enhance foods to appear more appealing—particularly in foods with little nutritional value such as sodas, candies, and snack foods.
While hyperactivity and behavioral problems in children tend to grab most of the headlines, artificial dyes may have broader implications. A number of dyes have been associated with immune suppression, gut irritation, and cellular toxicity. Low doses—in as little as one milligram—have been shown to cause symptoms of restlessness and insomnia in hypersensitive people.
The issue isn't just with colored candies, either. Artificially colored dyes are present in cough medicines, gummy multivitamins, sports beverages, toaster tarts, and even processed deli meats—foods where coloring may not even be readily visible to consumers.
Erythrosine, the chemical used in Red No. 3, is most controversial. Frequently found in foods such as red popsicles, toaster pastries, and some fruit drinks, it is a proven carcinogen in laboratory rats. Critics believe that ongoing use of such additives in children's foods is immoral and preventable.
Red Dye No. 3 was also implicated in causing thyroid tumors in animal tests, and it is banned in the U.S. in cosmetics—though not yet in foods until recent action by the FDA.
Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6 contain minute amounts of benzidine and 4-aminobiphenyl, both identified human carcinogens.
Several studies have identified connections between artificial dyes and children's behavioral problems:
A U.S. study in Science reported that children performed less well on memory tests after eating a combination of food dyes.
A 2007 study in The Lancet showed that children became hyperactive within an hour of eating synthetic dye combinations—even if they didn't have ADHD.
Hyperactivity and restlessness – Particularly in children who are sensitive to dyes such as Yellow No. 5.
Sleep disturbances and irritability – Even minimal doses (as little as 1 mg) can cause reactions in sensitive people.
Allergic reactions – Certain dyes have been linked with allergy-like reactions such as skin rashes and asthma worsening.
Gastrointestinal disturbances – Anecdotal evidence has connected synthetic dyes with bloating, nausea, and stomach pain in sensitive people.
Americans today consume five times more synthetic food dyes than they did in the 1950s. This cumulative exposure, particularly in children, has raised questions about long-term health effects that are still not well-studied.
Although no one responds uniformly to artificial food coloring, and in moderation is still the rule, the mounting scientific evidence—and consumer worry—have led government agencies and researchers to reassess the safety of these additives.
Fortunately, safer and natural substitutes do exist. Dyes created using beet juice, turmeric, annatto extracts, and paprika are now readily available and applied to organic and whole-food products. USDA-certified organic is a sound signifier that the product contains no artificial dyes.
However, transparency in the food industry continues to be a problem. Such labeling as "color added" or "artificial color added" usually hides the use of synthetic dyes. Consumers with an education level need to closely read ingredient panels and become familiar with dye numbers and names to make intelligent decisions.
The Trump administration's push to ban artificial food colorings is a turning point in the changing dialogue regarding food safety. As more information comes out and public awareness increases, pressure will build on regulators and manufacturers to respond.
While some scientists advise caution that further research is required to create definitive cause-and-effect relationships in humans, the evidence is piling up—and becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.
What you eat, first thing in the morning or the first meal of the day, plays a very important role for your body. This food is meant to essentially boost you for the waking hours of your body. If you have health issues like high blood sugar, cholesterol or hypertension, then you must be very careful with the foods you eat.
The British Heart Foundation (BHF) points out that not all breakfast items and foods are equally good for you. Starting your day with the right meal is crucial for both your immediate mental and physical performance, and it also sets the stage for your health in the years to come.
When you are picking breakfast options, it is very easy to stick to things that taste good or is your favorite versus what is healthy. We all need a ‘pick-me-up' breakfast or meal when the days are long. However, if you are a person who eats breakfast every day, the options need to be heathier as it could drastically affect your health.
While making healthy choices might seem obvious, even some foods marketed as 'healthy' aren't as good as others. The BHF recently ranked breakfast cereals from the least to the most healthy to help consumers.
Surprisingly, the BHF ranked granola, often considered a healthy option, as the least healthy breakfast cereal. An average serving of granola with nuts can contain a significant number of calories and fat even before adding milk. While nuts contain healthy unsaturated fats, granola can also be high in saturated fat and sugar, especially varieties with added chocolate. The BHF suggests enjoying granola as an occasional treat rather than a regular healthy breakfast.
The BHF found that sugar-frosted flakes, while perhaps a popular choice, are high in sugar and low in fiber. They also often contain added salt. While they might taste good, the BHF suggests swapping them for unsweetened options like cornflakes or puffed rice for better heart and overall health. They recommend adding fruit for natural sweetness and an extra serving towards your daily fruit intake.
High-fiber bran flakes landed in the middle of the BHF's ranking. Their high whole grain content is beneficial for digestion and heart health. However, these cereals often contain added sugar and/or salt, which makes them less ideal than the top-ranked choices.
BHF recommends considering these top three options: whole wheat cereals and biscuits, muesli with no added sugar or salt and are packed with whole grains, dried fruit, and nuts for natural sweetness, and the best breakfast- porridge.
Porridge made with low-fat milk or water is the healthiest breakfast you can choose. All porridge oats are whole grains and contain beta-glucan, a soluble fiber that can help lower cholesterol levels as part of a healthy diet. Porridge also provides fiber from the whole grains and naturally contains no added sugar or salt.
Instead of using sugar or salt to flavor your porridge, the BHF suggests adding a banana or other fruits. This not only provides extra sweetness but also counts towards your daily recommended intake of fruits and vegetables.
Credits: Canva
The US is preparing for a sweeping change in its food supply. Ever since the Trump administration has signed in, there has been a lot of changes in terms of the health sector, and now the focus is on the complete ban over petroleum-based food dyes. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have announced a detailed plan to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes and replace them with natural alternatives. The shift is to be unfolded over the next few years. It will mark a significant milestone in food regulation and public health.
The ban will be rolled out in phases. In the coming months, the FDA has planned to revoke the authorization for two synthetic dyes: Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B. By the end of 2026, six more dyes - FD&C Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Yellow No. 6, Blue No. 1, Blue No. 2, and Green No. 3 will be removed from the food supply. FD&C Red No. 3 was originally to set for removal between 2027 and 2028, however, it will be phased out sooner.
In order to make this transitional easier, the FDA will accelerate its review of natural alternatives and promptly authorize four new plant-based dyes: calcium phosphate, Galdieria extract blue, gardenia blue, and butterfly pea flower extract.
While synthetic dyes are currently FDA-approved when used correctly, there have been new concerns. Some studies have shown that these additives are related to behavioral issues in children, especially with regards to hyperactivity.
FDA Comissioner Dr Marty Makary stated that American children have long been "living in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals" and stressed the importance for cleaner food labels.
To deepen the understanding, the FDA will partner with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to study how food dyes and other additives impact children's health and development.
The Trump administration, under the banner of its health campaign “Make America Healthy Again,” has thrown its weight behind the plan. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who heads the HHS, has long criticized artificial food chemicals. He stressed the lack of transparency and research on many of these additives, stating, “Four years from now, we are going to have most of these products off the market—or clearly labeled so you know what you are buying.”
So far, food manufacturers have not been legally compelled to remove the dyes, but the government is working closely with them. Kennedy noted that industry leaders have shown a willingness to cooperate, recognizing the growing consumer demand for safer, natural ingredients.
Public health and environmental groups, such as the Environmental Working Group (EWG), have welcomed the move, calling it “long overdue.” Some states, like California and West Virginia, have already imposed restrictions on artificial dyes in school meals and packaged foods.
However, not everyone supports the change. The Consumer Brands Association has raised concerns about removing FDA-approved ingredients, urging that food policy remain rooted in scientific evidence.
Credit: Canva
White pumpkin or Ash Guard is a considerably rare vegetable which is packed with nutrients. It is rich in Vitamins A, B6, C, E and other important minerals. This makes it a perfect pick for those battling high cholesterol and heart issues. Research proves that it also acts as an antidepressant, promotes eye health, and is beneficial for people with asthma. They also help treat peptic ulcers, reduce inflammation, and have anti-ageing effects. All the aforementioned benefits are carried to its juice as well.
1. Rich in Nutrients
White pumpkin juice is a powerhouse of essential nutrients, including vitamins A and C, potassium, and iron. Vitamin A is crucial for maintaining healthy vision and supporting immune function, while vitamin C acts as a potent antioxidant, aiding in tissue repair and enhancing the immune system. Potassium helps regulate blood pressure and supports heart health, and iron is vital for oxygen transport in the blood. Incorporating white pumpkin juice into your diet can contribute to overall well-being by providing these essential nutrients. citeturn0search0
2. Powerful Antioxidants
White pumpkin juice is rich in beta-carotene, a powerful antioxidant that combats free radicals in the body. Free radicals can cause oxidative stress, leading to cellular damage and contributing to chronic diseases. By neutralising these harmful molecules, beta-carotene helps protect cells, supports overall health, and may reduce the risk of certain diseases. citeturn0search0
4. Radiant Skin
Packed with vitamins and antioxidants, white pumpkin juice promotes healthy and glowing skin. The nutrients help combat skin damage caused by environmental factors, reduce signs of ageing like wrinkles and fine lines, and improve overall skin texture and appearance. Regular intake can lead to a more youthful and radiant complexion. citeturn0search0
5. Boosts the Immune System
Rich in vitamin A, white pumpkin juice supports the immune system by enhancing the body's defense mechanisms against infections. Vitamin A also plays a role in maintaining healthy mucous membranes and skin, which serve as barriers to pathogens. Additionally, it supports vision and helps prevent eye diseases, including night blindness and age-related conditions. citeturn0search0
6. Organic Energy Enhancement
White pumpkin juice serves as a natural energy booster without the drawbacks of caffeine. Its nutrient-rich profile provides sustained energy levels throughout the day, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a refreshing and nutritious beverage to combat fatigue and enhance overall vitality. citeturn0search0
7. Reduces Inflammation
The anti-inflammatory properties of white pumpkin juice help in reducing inflammation in the body. Chronic inflammation is linked to various health issues, including arthritis and heart disease. By incorporating this juice into your diet, you may help alleviate inflammation-related symptoms and promote overall health.
To make white pumpkin juice, start by peeling and deseeding a fresh white pumpkin. Cut it into small cubes and rinse them thoroughly. Add the cubes to a blender with a little water to ease blending. Blend until smooth, then strain the mixture using a fine sieve or muslin cloth to remove pulp. For enhanced taste, you can add a pinch of black salt, a squeeze of lemon juice, or a few mint leaves before blending. Serve the juice chilled. It’s best consumed fresh to retain maximum nutrients and flavour. Avoid adding sugar to keep it healthy and natural.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited