Do Not Give Your Kids Smartphones Until They Are This Age – Study Discourages Early Smartphone Access

Being a parent can be an overwhelming task, kids running amok, household chores that take hours and ensuring the safety of everyone on the home. Combining all of these and trying to do everything at once is a herculean task, too much for a person to handle. Often in these times parents are looking for easier ways to take care of everything, starting with the child. It may seem easier to hand off your smartphone to ensure your child does not run around and stays entertained for a long time, but you could be making a big mistake that will eventually cause your child harm. 

A new study published in the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities found that kids who received a smartphone before age 13 generally had worse mental health and overall well-being as young adults. 

<h2>Early Smartphones Linked to Poorer Mental Health </h2>

Specifically, people aged 18 to 24 who got their first smartphone at age 12 or younger were more likely to experience: 

<ul><li>Suicidal thoughts</li><li>Aggression</li><li>Feeling detached from reality</li><li>Difficulty managing emotions</li><li>Low self-worth</li></ul>

<h2>Social Media's Harmful Influence </h2>

Researchers believe that getting early access to the often-toxic world of social media explains a big part of why young smartphone users had poorer mental health. When kids are very young, their minds are still developing, making them more easily affected by negative online environments. They might not have enough real-world experience to deal with what they see or experience online. Other things that contribute to these problems include cyberbullying, disrupted sleep (because they're on their phones late), and difficulties in family relationships. 

<h2>"Mind Health Quotient" Scores of 100,000 Young Adults </h2>

The study looked at data from over 100,000 young adults globally as part of the Global Mind Project. Participants completed a questionnaire to measure their Mind Health Quotient (MHQ), which assesses overall well-being. 

The results showed that young adults who got their first smartphone before their teenage years had lower MHQ scores. In general, the younger a person received their first smartphone, the worse their mental health and well-being were later on. 

For example, about 48% of girls who got a smartphone at age 5 or 6 reported suicidal thoughts, compared to 28% of those who got one at 13. Girls with early smartphone access also tended to have lower self-image, self-worth, confidence, and emotional resilience. Boys, on the other hand, were more likely to show lower stability, self-worth, and empathy. 

The study dug deeper to find out why this link exists. They found that early access to social media explained about 40% of the connection between getting a smartphone young and having worse mental health as a young adult. Researchers suggest that the way social media apps work, especially with their AI-driven recommendations, can push harmful content and make children compare their lives to seemingly perfect influencers, which can be very damaging. 

Other factors also played a role: poor family relationships accounted for 13% of the link, disrupted sleep for 12%, and cyberbullying for 10%. 

Based on these findings, researchers are urging leaders to take a "precautionary approach," similar to how alcohol and tobacco are regulated. They recommend: 

<ul><li>Restricting smartphone access for children under 13.</li><li>Making digital literacy education mandatory.</li><li>Holding companies accountable for the effects of their platforms.</li></ul>

Some countries like France, the Netherlands, Italy, and New Zealand have already banned or limited cell phone use in schools. In the U.S., several states have also passed laws to limit or ban smartphones in schools. 

While the study cannot directly prove that early smartphone access causes poorer mental health, researchers emphasize that the evidence is strong enough to warrant taking preventative action now. They point out that smartphones are not the only cause of declining mental health in young adults, but they play a significant role. 

Health Conditions A-Z

health

Parenting

Smartphones and kids

Teenagers and smartphones

do smartphones ruin mental health

smartphone and mental health

Teenage mental health

Rene Kirby, Actor, Gymnast, And Skier Born with Spina Bifida, Dies At 70; What Is This Birth Disorder?

Can A Jackfruit Get You Drunk? 3 Kerala Drivers Failed Breath Analyzer Test After Consuming This Fruit

Neil Hopper, The Cornwall Doctor Charged With Fraud For His Own Leg Amputation For Insurance Claim

How Many Times Do You Need To Wash Your Face?

Hypothyroidism Diet – What To Eat And What You Should Avoid

Stretches To Relieve Leg Pain And Numbness After Sitting For Too Long

No-Cook Healthy Meals For Lazy Days At Home

Easy Breakfast Options To Try During Calorie Deficit

How To Stop Muscle Cramps Immediately

Why You Should Go For An Anti-Inflammatory Diet

Foods To Lower Cortisol Levels In Your Body

High-Fiber Dips You Can Make At Home For The Week

Weekend Warrior Exercises To Makeup For Stressful Week

Experiencing Headaches At Word? Natural Remedies To Try

Yoga Poses That Enhance Digestion

Health Benefits of Walking Backwards

No Eggs? Egg-Alternatives You Can Add To Your Diet

Savory And Smart Ways To Add Broccoli To Your Diet

Calorie Burning Habits That Can Help You Shed Extra Pounds

Yoga Poses That Can Help With Bloating

Fiber-Rich Oatmeal Dishes You Can Have For Breakfast

Signs You Must Visit A Doctor For Your Back Pain

Avocado Meal Prep Ideas To Increase Healthy Fat In Your Diet

Arm Exercises You Can Do At Home

Quick-Office Lunches That Can Keep You Full-Longer

How Increased Screen Time Affects Children's Health

Homemade Recipe To Make Protein-Rich Pancakes With Healthy Alternatives

Push-Up Variations You Can Do At Home

Common Mistakes Running Mistakes People Make

Low-Calorie Foods That Keep You Full For Long

Yoga Poses That Help You Get Rid Of Back Pain

Natural Ways To Increase Protein In Your Diet

Managing Excessive Daytime Sleepiness – Tips To Try

How Much Protein Is Too Much?

High Fiber Indian Foods You Should Try

10 Easy Ways To Boost Daily Fiber Intake

Adding Walnut Oil To Your Diet? Benefits You Should Know

Drinks That Soothe Headaches And Migraines

Waist Exercises For More Toned Belly

This Is How Stress Affects Your Heart

Does Digital ‘Brain Rot’ Really Affect Your Health?

Dishes With Fermented Foods To Eat For Your Gut Health

Yoga Poses That Stimulate Good Bowel Health

Being a parent can be an overwhelming task, kids running amok, household chores that take hours and ensuring the safety of everyone on the home. Combining all of these and trying to do everything at once is a herculean task, too much for a person to handle. Often in these times parents are looking for easier ways to take care of everything, starting with the child. It may seem easier to hand off your smartphone to ensure your child does not run around and stays entertained for a long time, but you could be making a big mistake that will eventually cause your child harm. A new study published in the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities found that kids who received a smartphone before age 13 generally had worse mental health and overall well-being as young adults. Early Smartphones Linked to Poorer Mental Health Specifically, people aged 18 to 24 who got their first smartphone at age 12 or younger were more likely to experience: Suicidal thoughtsAggressionFeeling detached from realityDifficulty managing emotionsLow self-worthSocial Media's Harmful Influence Researchers believe that getting early access to the often-toxic world of social media explains a big part of why young smartphone users had poorer mental health. When kids are very young, their minds are still developing, making them more easily affected by negative online environments. They might not have enough real-world experience to deal with what they see or experience online. Other things that contribute to these problems include cyberbullying, disrupted sleep (because they're on their phones late), and difficulties in family relationships. "Mind Health Quotient" Scores of 100,000 Young Adults The study looked at data from over 100,000 young adults globally as part of the Global Mind Project. Participants completed a questionnaire to measure their Mind Health Quotient (MHQ), which assesses overall well-being. The results showed that young adults who got their first smartphone before their teenage years had lower MHQ scores. In general, the younger a person received their first smartphone, the worse their mental health and well-being were later on. For example, about 48% of girls who got a smartphone at age 5 or 6 reported suicidal thoughts, compared to 28% of those who got one at 13. Girls with early smartphone access also tended to have lower self-image, self-worth, confidence, and emotional resilience. Boys, on the other hand, were more likely to show lower stability, self-worth, and empathy. Contributing Factors The study dug deeper to find out why this link exists. They found that early access to social media explained about 40% of the connection between getting a smartphone young and having worse mental health as a young adult. Researchers suggest that the way social media apps work, especially with their AI-driven recommendations, can push harmful content and make children compare their lives to seemingly perfect influencers, which can be very damaging. Other factors also played a role: poor family relationships accounted for 13% of the link, disrupted sleep for 12%, and cyberbullying for 10%. Calls for Action Based on these findings, researchers are urging leaders to take a "precautionary approach," similar to how alcohol and tobacco are regulated. They recommend: Restricting smartphone access for children under 13.Making digital literacy education mandatory.Holding companies accountable for the effects of their platforms.Some countries like France, the Netherlands, Italy, and New Zealand have already banned or limited cell phone use in schools. In the U.S., several states have also passed laws to limit or ban smartphones in schools. While the study cannot directly prove that early smartphone access causes poorer mental health, researchers emphasize that the evidence is strong enough to warrant taking preventative action now. They point out that smartphones are not the only cause of declining mental health in young adults, but they play a significant role. 

do not give your kids smartphones until they are this age – study discourages early smartphone access

Health and Me

Ishita Roy

Inner Child: Kids Start Judging Their Bodies Before They Can Even Spell ‘Fat’, The Damage Can Last A Lifetime

Health & Wellness

Student Depression And Anxiety Goes Unevaluated - Why Is Mental Health Help Needed For Kids In School

student depression and anxiety goes unevaluated - why is mental health help needed for kids in school

World Brain Day: Can Your Mind Break The Body? How Chronic Anxiety Might Be Fueling Neurodegeneration

world brain day: can your mind break the body? how chronic anxiety might be fueling neurodegeneration

Is Taking Rest Really That Important for Kids? Experts Explain How Much Sleep Shapes a Child’s Brain

is taking rest really that important for kids? experts explain how much sleep shapes a child’s brain

<em><span rel="noindex">Inner Child</span>’ is Health and Me's new mental health series where we deep dive into lesser-known aspects of child psychology and how it shapes you as you grow up. Often unheard, mistaken, and misunderstood, in this series we talk about the children’s perspective and their mental health, something different than you might have read in your <span rel="noindex">parenting</span> books. After all, parenting is not just about teaching but also unlearning.</em>

A new study from Durham University has found that children as young as five years old begin to form their perception of what a "normal" body looks like based purely on visual exposure, and that this perception can be subtly, but powerfully, reshaped by what they repeatedly see around them.

Led by Professor Lynda Boothroyd from Durham's Department of Psychology, the study reveals that just like adults, children’s brains adapt quickly to the images they are exposed to. 

<strong>In the experiment, children aged 7 to 15 were shown a series of body images and asked to rate their heaviness. After viewing either thin or heavy body types repeatedly, their perception of what was “normal” shifted. </strong>

Those who saw heavier figures began rating the same bodies as lighter than they had before — indicating that their internal “model” of a normal body had recalibrated.

This shift wasn’t limited to older children. <strong>The youngest participants, seven-year-olds, too, showed the same level of perceptual flexibility as adults. </strong>

<strong>The implications are significant:</strong> it suggests that by early primary school, and likely even before, children’s views about bodies are already being shaped by their environment, including toys, cartoons, advertisements, and even family comments.

<h4>The Seeds of Self-Image: What Shapes Children Early</h4>

Dr. Sameer Malhotra, Director and Head of the Department of Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences at Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, explains that children as young as three to five years old begin internalizing messages about body image, and often in ways adults may not even notice.

“Parental language plays a huge role,” he says. “When a parent casually says, ‘I feel fat today,’ or makes dieting comments, children absorb that. Even if the comment isn’t directed at them, it registers.” Children also learn by imitation. This means they pick up patterns of behavior, tone, and attitudes from parents, siblings, peers, and media.

Toys and cartoons often carry these subtle messages too. 

<strong><em>Dolls with tiny waists, heroes with exaggerated muscles, or villains portrayed as overweight, all reinforce stereotypes.</em></strong> 

“Children's media tends to link thinness with success, beauty, or goodness,” Malhotra adds. “These associations are laid down before a child even begins formal schooling.”

<h4>Words That Stick: The Power of Casual Comments</h4>

Even offhand remarks like “Don’t eat too much, you’ll get fat” or calling someone “too skinny” can significantly influence a child's self-image. Dr. Malhotra points out that such language can link appearance to self-worth, foster guilt around food, and create anxiety about acceptance.

“Children mirror parental opinions. If they hear fat-shaming or appearance-based criticism, they begin to judge themselves and others the same way,” he explains. And these judgments don't remain in childhood, they form the blueprint for how a person thinks about their body throughout life.

While this conditioning starts young, it can also be gently undone. The <span>Durham study</span> highlights the power of simply seeing more diverse body types. According to Dr. Malhotra, both homes and schools can play a big role in broadening what “normal” looks like.

“Including books, posters, and videos that feature people of different body types — not just the slim or athletic ones — helps kids understand that bodies come in all shapes and sizes,” he says.

<strong>Modeling balanced behavior at home: </strong>Focus on eating healthy “to feel strong” rather than “to stay slim.”

Media literacy: Teach children to question what they see in TV, ads, and social media. Help them understand that not everything shown is real or ideal.

<strong>Affirming non-appearance traits: </strong>Compliment children on their creativity, kindness, strength, or curiosity, not just their looks.

<strong>Encouraging open conversations:</strong> Avoiding the topic of body image can make it more taboo. Instead, create space for kids to talk about their feelings and the pressures they may face.

One of the most effective strategies, according to Dr. Malhotra, is for parents to be mindful of their own body image talk.

“If you stand in front of the mirror criticizing your appearance, your child learns that bodies are to be judged,” he explains. “But if you focus on how your body helps you run, cook, or hug your child, that teaches gratitude and respect.”

The Durham study may have focused on how children see, but it’s what they hear and feel, especially from the adults around them, that gives those images meaning. 

In a world of filtered faces and digitally enhanced bodies, helping a child grow up with a grounded, diverse sense of beauty may start with something as simple as changing the channel — or the conversation.

inner child

child forms body perception at age 5

body image issues

parenting

durham study

Inner Child’ is Health and Me's new mental health series where we deep dive into lesser-known aspects of child psychology and how it shapes you as you grow up. Often unheard, mistaken, and misunderstood, in this series we talk about the children’s perspective and their mental health, something different than you might have read in your parenting books. After all, parenting is not just about teaching but also unlearning.A new study from Durham University has found that children as young as five years old begin to form their perception of what a "normal" body looks like based purely on visual exposure, and that this perception can be subtly, but powerfully, reshaped by what they repeatedly see around them.Led by Professor Lynda Boothroyd from Durham's Department of Psychology, the study reveals that just like adults, children’s brains adapt quickly to the images they are exposed to. In the experiment, children aged 7 to 15 were shown a series of body images and asked to rate their heaviness. After viewing either thin or heavy body types repeatedly, their perception of what was “normal” shifted. Those who saw heavier figures began rating the same bodies as lighter than they had before — indicating that their internal “model” of a normal body had recalibrated.This shift wasn’t limited to older children. The youngest participants, seven-year-olds, too, showed the same level of perceptual flexibility as adults. The implications are significant: it suggests that by early primary school, and likely even before, children’s views about bodies are already being shaped by their environment, including toys, cartoons, advertisements, and even family comments.The Seeds of Self-Image: What Shapes Children EarlyDr. Sameer Malhotra, Director and Head of the Department of Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences at Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, explains that children as young as three to five years old begin internalizing messages about body image, and often in ways adults may not even notice.“Parental language plays a huge role,” he says. “When a parent casually says, ‘I feel fat today,’ or makes dieting comments, children absorb that. Even if the comment isn’t directed at them, it registers.” Children also learn by imitation. This means they pick up patterns of behavior, tone, and attitudes from parents, siblings, peers, and media.Toys and cartoons often carry these subtle messages too. Dolls with tiny waists, heroes with exaggerated muscles, or villains portrayed as overweight, all reinforce stereotypes. “Children's media tends to link thinness with success, beauty, or goodness,” Malhotra adds. “These associations are laid down before a child even begins formal schooling.”Words That Stick: The Power of Casual CommentsEven offhand remarks like “Don’t eat too much, you’ll get fat” or calling someone “too skinny” can significantly influence a child's self-image. Dr. Malhotra points out that such language can link appearance to self-worth, foster guilt around food, and create anxiety about acceptance.“Children mirror parental opinions. If they hear fat-shaming or appearance-based criticism, they begin to judge themselves and others the same way,” he explains. And these judgments don't remain in childhood, they form the blueprint for how a person thinks about their body throughout life.What Can Be Done?While this conditioning starts young, it can also be gently undone. The Durham study highlights the power of simply seeing more diverse body types. According to Dr. Malhotra, both homes and schools can play a big role in broadening what “normal” looks like.“Including books, posters, and videos that feature people of different body types — not just the slim or athletic ones — helps kids understand that bodies come in all shapes and sizes,” he says.He recommends:Modeling balanced behavior at home: Focus on eating healthy “to feel strong” rather than “to stay slim.”Media literacy: Teach children to question what they see in TV, ads, and social media. Help them understand that not everything shown is real or ideal.Affirming non-appearance traits: Compliment children on their creativity, kindness, strength, or curiosity, not just their looks.Encouraging open conversations: Avoiding the topic of body image can make it more taboo. Instead, create space for kids to talk about their feelings and the pressures they may face.Parents: The First Role ModelsOne of the most effective strategies, according to Dr. Malhotra, is for parents to be mindful of their own body image talk.“If you stand in front of the mirror criticizing your appearance, your child learns that bodies are to be judged,” he explains. “But if you focus on how your body helps you run, cook, or hug your child, that teaches gratitude and respect.”The Durham study may have focused on how children see, but it’s what they hear and feel, especially from the adults around them, that gives those images meaning. In a world of filtered faces and digitally enhanced bodies, helping a child grow up with a grounded, diverse sense of beauty may start with something as simple as changing the channel — or the conversation.

inner child: kids start judging their bodies before they can even spell ‘fat’, the damage can last a lifetime

Tanya Dutt

Why Some Families Only Have Boys Or Girls? Science May Finally Have The 'Secret Code'

Sugar Can Have A Surprising Affect On Testosterone Levels - Does It Aid In Declining Sexual Health?

sugar can have a surprising affect on testosterone levels - does it aid in declining sexual health?

Health News

Could These Common Cancer Drugs Could Be The Key To Reversing And Treating Alzheimer’s?

could these common cancer drugs could be the key to reversing and treating alzheimer’s?

FDA Panel Questions Antidepressant Safety For Pregnant Women; Can SSRIs Harm Unborn Babies?

fda panel questions antidepressant safety for pregnant women; can ssris harm unborn babies?

Is the sex of your child really just a coin toss? For generations, we’ve accepted the idea that every pregnancy comes with an even 50-50 shot of producing a boy or a girl. But new research suggests that might not be the full story.

A study published in Science Advances challenges this long-held belief and adds a fascinating new layer to our understanding of human reproduction. Drawing from data spanning nearly 60 years and over 58,000 pregnancies, researchers found compelling evidence that the biological sex of children may sometimes run in families — and that age, genetics, and possibly other overlooked factors could nudge the odds away from that supposedly fair coin flip.

At first glance, the logic behind the 50-50 assumption seems solid. Sex in humans is determined primarily by whether the sperm that fertilizes the egg carries an X chromosome (resulting in a girl) or a Y chromosome (resulting in a boy). Since roughly half of a man’s sperm carry each chromosome, it stands to reason that the odds of having a boy or a girl should be equal — right? Not exactly.

Dr. Jorge Chavarro, a reproductive epidemiologist at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and senior author of the study, wasn’t so sure. Along with PhD student Siwen Wang and a team of collaborators, Chavarro analyzed pregnancy and birth data from the long-running Nurses' Health Study — a landmark series of investigations into women’s health dating back to 1976. They focused on a group of more than 58,000 women who had at least two children.

The team noticed something striking: far more families than expected had multiple children of the same sex — all girls or all boys — especially among women who had their first child later in life. These clusters couldn’t be explained by chance alone.

In other words, some families seemed “tipped” toward having one sex over the other — and the tilt wasn’t always subtle.

<h2>Why Age Matters But Not In the Way You Think?</h2>

One of the clearest signals in the study was maternal age. Women who had their first child after the age of 28 were about 10% more likely to have all girls or all boys than women who started their families before age 23. It’s a modest but statistically significant increase that held up even after adjusting for various other factors.

It comes down to the biology of reproduction and how it changes over time. As women age, they undergo shifts in the vaginal environment and reproductive hormones that could influence which sperm — X or Y — are more likely to reach and fertilize the egg. For instance:

The vaginal environment may become more acidic with age, and X-carrying sperm (which are slightly larger and more chemically robust) may survive better in such conditions.

The first phase of the menstrual cycle, called the follicular phase, tends to shorten with age. Some researchers believe this could create changes in cervical mucus and oviduct fluid that favor Y sperm instead.

These competing factors mean the impact of aging on sex outcome may not be uniform — it could vary depending on individual biology. But the net result is that older maternal age seems to increase the odds of having children all of the same sex.

Another eye-opening part of the study was its genetic analysis. Researchers examined genetic data from a subset of over 7,500 women and found two specific gene variants that were significantly associated with single-sex offspring.

<strong>One gene variant (located near NSUN6) was linked to having all daughters.</strong>

Another (near TSHZ1) was associated with having all sons.

These genes aren’t currently known to affect fertility or reproduction directly, and their exact roles remain unclear. But their presence suggests a biological basis for sex-skewed births in some families — an area ripe for future research.

In short, while we’ve long believed sex determination is a random roll of the dice, some people might have a “weighted coin” — without ever realizing it.

<h2>Could Behavior Be Driving the Pattern?</h2>

Some might wonder: what if this pattern is just driven by behavior? For instance, parents who have two boys might keep trying until they have a girl, leading to more same-sex siblings by default. The researchers considered this too.

To rule out this explanation, they ran an analysis excluding the last birth in each family — the one most likely to be affected by the decision to stop having more children after getting “one of each.” Even then, the same-sex clustering held strong.

That suggests something deeper is going on, rooted in biology rather than just human choice.

<h2>What This Means for Expecting Parents?</h2>

So, what should couples take away from this? First, there’s no need to overthink your chances if you’re planning to start a family. Across the entire population, the average likelihood of having a boy or a girl still hovers close to 50%. But for some individual families, those odds may be subtly skewed by age, genetics, and biological quirks we’re only beginning to understand.

Importantly, the study also highlights just how much we still don’t know about sex determination and human reproduction. It opens new avenues for exploring how maternal and paternal factors interact — and how genetic and environmental forces shape outcomes in subtle but meaningful ways.

Wang and her team hope to replicate the findings in more diverse populations and include paternal data in future analyses. Since most participants in this study were white and from the U.S., it’s not yet clear how these patterns hold across other racial, ethnic, and geographic groups.

This research doesn’t rewrite the biology of reproduction — but it does suggest that some old assumptions might be oversimplified. Sex may still be determined by the X or Y chromosome in sperm, but the journey to conception is influenced by a dynamic, personal landscape of biological factors.

What the study captures is a new lens: a shift away from the purely statistical view of childbirth toward a more personalized understanding of how life begins.

And perhaps, for families that have always wondered why they have “just boys” or “just girls,” the answer might be: it’s not just chance. It might be part of your biological story written long before the baby arrives.

baby gender prediction

sex ratio science

boy or girl baby

family genetics gender

gender bias pregnancy

why only boys

girl baby probability

Is the sex of your child really just a coin toss? For generations, we’ve accepted the idea that every pregnancy comes with an even 50-50 shot of producing a boy or a girl. But new research suggests that might not be the full story.A study published in Science Advances challenges this long-held belief and adds a fascinating new layer to our understanding of human reproduction. Drawing from data spanning nearly 60 years and over 58,000 pregnancies, researchers found compelling evidence that the biological sex of children may sometimes run in families — and that age, genetics, and possibly other overlooked factors could nudge the odds away from that supposedly fair coin flip.The 50-50 Myth?At first glance, the logic behind the 50-50 assumption seems solid. Sex in humans is determined primarily by whether the sperm that fertilizes the egg carries an X chromosome (resulting in a girl) or a Y chromosome (resulting in a boy). Since roughly half of a man’s sperm carry each chromosome, it stands to reason that the odds of having a boy or a girl should be equal — right? Not exactly.Dr. Jorge Chavarro, a reproductive epidemiologist at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and senior author of the study, wasn’t so sure. Along with PhD student Siwen Wang and a team of collaborators, Chavarro analyzed pregnancy and birth data from the long-running Nurses' Health Study — a landmark series of investigations into women’s health dating back to 1976. They focused on a group of more than 58,000 women who had at least two children.The team noticed something striking: far more families than expected had multiple children of the same sex — all girls or all boys — especially among women who had their first child later in life. These clusters couldn’t be explained by chance alone.In other words, some families seemed “tipped” toward having one sex over the other — and the tilt wasn’t always subtle.Why Age Matters But Not In the Way You Think?One of the clearest signals in the study was maternal age. Women who had their first child after the age of 28 were about 10% more likely to have all girls or all boys than women who started their families before age 23. It’s a modest but statistically significant increase that held up even after adjusting for various other factors.It comes down to the biology of reproduction and how it changes over time. As women age, they undergo shifts in the vaginal environment and reproductive hormones that could influence which sperm — X or Y — are more likely to reach and fertilize the egg. For instance:The vaginal environment may become more acidic with age, and X-carrying sperm (which are slightly larger and more chemically robust) may survive better in such conditions.The first phase of the menstrual cycle, called the follicular phase, tends to shorten with age. Some researchers believe this could create changes in cervical mucus and oviduct fluid that favor Y sperm instead.These competing factors mean the impact of aging on sex outcome may not be uniform — it could vary depending on individual biology. But the net result is that older maternal age seems to increase the odds of having children all of the same sex.Another eye-opening part of the study was its genetic analysis. Researchers examined genetic data from a subset of over 7,500 women and found two specific gene variants that were significantly associated with single-sex offspring.One gene variant (located near NSUN6) was linked to having all daughters.Another (near TSHZ1) was associated with having all sons.These genes aren’t currently known to affect fertility or reproduction directly, and their exact roles remain unclear. But their presence suggests a biological basis for sex-skewed births in some families — an area ripe for future research.In short, while we’ve long believed sex determination is a random roll of the dice, some people might have a “weighted coin” — without ever realizing it.Could Behavior Be Driving the Pattern?Some might wonder: what if this pattern is just driven by behavior? For instance, parents who have two boys might keep trying until they have a girl, leading to more same-sex siblings by default. The researchers considered this too.To rule out this explanation, they ran an analysis excluding the last birth in each family — the one most likely to be affected by the decision to stop having more children after getting “one of each.” Even then, the same-sex clustering held strong.That suggests something deeper is going on, rooted in biology rather than just human choice.What This Means for Expecting Parents?So, what should couples take away from this? First, there’s no need to overthink your chances if you’re planning to start a family. Across the entire population, the average likelihood of having a boy or a girl still hovers close to 50%. But for some individual families, those odds may be subtly skewed by age, genetics, and biological quirks we’re only beginning to understand.Importantly, the study also highlights just how much we still don’t know about sex determination and human reproduction. It opens new avenues for exploring how maternal and paternal factors interact — and how genetic and environmental forces shape outcomes in subtle but meaningful ways.Wang and her team hope to replicate the findings in more diverse populations and include paternal data in future analyses. Since most participants in this study were white and from the U.S., it’s not yet clear how these patterns hold across other racial, ethnic, and geographic groups.This research doesn’t rewrite the biology of reproduction — but it does suggest that some old assumptions might be oversimplified. Sex may still be determined by the X or Y chromosome in sperm, but the journey to conception is influenced by a dynamic, personal landscape of biological factors.What the study captures is a new lens: a shift away from the purely statistical view of childbirth toward a more personalized understanding of how life begins.And perhaps, for families that have always wondered why they have “just boys” or “just girls,” the answer might be: it’s not just chance. It might be part of your biological story written long before the baby arrives.

why some families only have boys or girls? science may finally have the 'secret code'

Russia Is Paying Pregnant Schoolgirls To Have Babies, Why Is It Unsafe?

Millions At Risk As Chikungunya Virus Threatens Global Health, Warns WHO; Can A Mosquito Bite In Monsoon Trigger Severe Symptoms?

millions at risk as chikungunya virus threatens global health, warns who; can a mosquito bite in monsoon trigger severe symptoms?

Early-On Set GI Cancer On The Rise Among Ages 50 And Below – Risk Factors Associated With Cancer In Young Adults

early-on set gi cancer on the rise among ages 50 and below – risk factors associated with cancer in young adults

In a startling attempt to reverse its plummeting birth rate, Russia has expanded its state maternity incentive to include pregnant teenage schoolgirls, offering them over 100,000 roubles (around ₹1.1 lakh) to carry pregnancies to term and raise their children. The controversial policy, rolled out in 10 regions in recent months, follows a nationwide demographic strategy initiated in March 2025 that originally applied only to adult women.

The move is aimed at addressing Russia’s birth rate crisis: in 2023, the average number of births per woman was 1.41, well below the 2.05 needed to maintain population levels. 

President Vladimir Putin has often tied Russia’s greatness to its size, in terms of both land and people, and views population growth as a marker of national strength. Ironically, the war in Ukraine, which has drained Russia’s youth through deaths and displacement, has also contributed to the demographic downturn.

However, by placing the responsibility of national recovery on teenage girls, health experts warn, the country may be plunging an already vulnerable group into serious and avoidable harm.

<h4>What the World Health Organization Says</h4>

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), adolescent pregnancies, particularly in girls aged 10–19, carry significantly higher health risks compared to adult pregnancies. These include life-threatening conditions such as eclampsia, puerperal infections, and systemic complications during childbirth. The children of teen mothers also face higher odds of low birth weight, premature birth, and neonatal complications.

Globally, <span>adolescent pregnancy</span> accounts for a troubling portion of maternal deaths. In fact, the leading causes of death among girls aged 15–19 worldwide are complications from pregnancy and childbirth.

And yet, rather than protecting schoolgirls from these outcomes, Russia’s current policy may be incentivizing them.

Medical experts, including Dr. Ekta Singh, who works at Lybrate, an Indian mobile health communication and delivery service, who is a gynaecologist with 29 years of experience, caution that teenage pregnancies can be catastrophic for both the mother and child. “Girls under 15 face higher maternal mortality,” Dr. Singh writes, noting the elevated risks of anemia, hypertension, STDs, and organ malformations in the fetus.

Additionally, mental and social consequences are deeply interwoven: many teenage mothers are forced to drop out of school, remain single, and are pushed into poverty, with little access to adequate healthcare or family support systems.

According to a 2022 review published in <em>Cureus</em>, unwanted teenage pregnancies are closely linked with stillbirths, spontaneous abortions, preterm labor, and obstructed deliveries, sometimes resulting in maternal death due to the immaturity of the pelvic structure.

Teen mothers are also less likely to access timely prenatal care, either due to shame, stigma, or sheer lack of awareness. Many don't even realize they're pregnant until the third trimester, by then, critical stages of fetal development have already passed without necessary medical supervision.

<h4>A Nation's Future on Girls’ Shoulders</h4>

While 43% of Russians reportedly support the new policy, and 40% oppose it, cites a recent survey by the <em>Russian Public Opinion Research Centre</em>. What remains alarming is the human cost of this demographic experiment. The payment, which may seem like a windfall to families struggling with poverty, could, in reality, be bait for systemic harm.

The WHO emphasizes that preventing adolescent pregnancy is essential to improving maternal and newborn health worldwide. That means better sex education, accessible contraception, and societal support to delay early pregnancies, not rewarding them.

Meanwhile, the 2022 <em>Cureus </em>study underlines how teenage pregnancies contribute to a cycle of intergenerational poverty, poor health outcomes, and educational dropouts. Babies born to teen mothers are more likely to become teen parents themselves, continuing the same pattern of vulnerability.

Paying teenage girls to have babies may temporarily raise Russia’s birth figures, but it ignores a painful truth: adolescence is not a time for forced motherhood.

russia pays schoolgirls to have kids

teen pregnancy

parenting tips

adolescent pregnancy

In a startling attempt to reverse its plummeting birth rate, Russia has expanded its state maternity incentive to include pregnant teenage schoolgirls, offering them over 100,000 roubles (around ₹1.1 lakh) to carry pregnancies to term and raise their children. The controversial policy, rolled out in 10 regions in recent months, follows a nationwide demographic strategy initiated in March 2025 that originally applied only to adult women.The move is aimed at addressing Russia’s birth rate crisis: in 2023, the average number of births per woman was 1.41, well below the 2.05 needed to maintain population levels. President Vladimir Putin has often tied Russia’s greatness to its size, in terms of both land and people, and views population growth as a marker of national strength. Ironically, the war in Ukraine, which has drained Russia’s youth through deaths and displacement, has also contributed to the demographic downturn.However, by placing the responsibility of national recovery on teenage girls, health experts warn, the country may be plunging an already vulnerable group into serious and avoidable harm.What the World Health Organization SaysAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), adolescent pregnancies, particularly in girls aged 10–19, carry significantly higher health risks compared to adult pregnancies. These include life-threatening conditions such as eclampsia, puerperal infections, and systemic complications during childbirth. The children of teen mothers also face higher odds of low birth weight, premature birth, and neonatal complications.Globally, adolescent pregnancy accounts for a troubling portion of maternal deaths. In fact, the leading causes of death among girls aged 15–19 worldwide are complications from pregnancy and childbirth.And yet, rather than protecting schoolgirls from these outcomes, Russia’s current policy may be incentivizing them.Teen Bodies, Adult ConsequencesMedical experts, including Dr. Ekta Singh, who works at Lybrate, an Indian mobile health communication and delivery service, who is a gynaecologist with 29 years of experience, caution that teenage pregnancies can be catastrophic for both the mother and child. “Girls under 15 face higher maternal mortality,” Dr. Singh writes, noting the elevated risks of anemia, hypertension, STDs, and organ malformations in the fetus.Additionally, mental and social consequences are deeply interwoven: many teenage mothers are forced to drop out of school, remain single, and are pushed into poverty, with little access to adequate healthcare or family support systems.According to a 2022 review published in Cureus, unwanted teenage pregnancies are closely linked with stillbirths, spontaneous abortions, preterm labor, and obstructed deliveries, sometimes resulting in maternal death due to the immaturity of the pelvic structure.Teen mothers are also less likely to access timely prenatal care, either due to shame, stigma, or sheer lack of awareness. Many don't even realize they're pregnant until the third trimester, by then, critical stages of fetal development have already passed without necessary medical supervision.A Nation's Future on Girls’ ShouldersWhile 43% of Russians reportedly support the new policy, and 40% oppose it, cites a recent survey by the Russian Public Opinion Research Centre. What remains alarming is the human cost of this demographic experiment. The payment, which may seem like a windfall to families struggling with poverty, could, in reality, be bait for systemic harm.The WHO emphasizes that preventing adolescent pregnancy is essential to improving maternal and newborn health worldwide. That means better sex education, accessible contraception, and societal support to delay early pregnancies, not rewarding them.Meanwhile, the 2022 Cureus study underlines how teenage pregnancies contribute to a cycle of intergenerational poverty, poor health outcomes, and educational dropouts. Babies born to teen mothers are more likely to become teen parents themselves, continuing the same pattern of vulnerability.Paying teenage girls to have babies may temporarily raise Russia’s birth figures, but it ignores a painful truth: adolescence is not a time for forced motherhood.

russia is paying pregnant schoolgirls to have babies, why is it unsafe?

About Us

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Company

Health and Me is a premium website with content written and curated to function as a handbook for all Health concerns.