In January 2025, the Danish government finally announced an end to the use of the controversial forældrekompetenceundersøgelse (FKU), a psychometric assessment used to evaluate parental competency. After years of increasing pressure from Indigenous rights organizations, international human rights groups, and the Greenlandic government had finally paid off when the test was officially abandoned amid accusations of systemic discrimination, cultural bias, and child removals based on colonial-era assumptions.

The test, based on Western norms of psychology, became a focal point in the already complicated relationship between Denmark and its former colony, Greenland, triggering important questions regarding cultural bias, child protection, and Indigenous rights.

Also Read: Jacinda Ardern's New Book Talks About Mum's Guilt And Other Parenting Lessons Working Moms Can Benefit From

What Is the Danish Parenting Competency Test?

The FKU, or “parenting competency test,” was a psychometric assessment used by Danish child protection authorities to evaluate whether parents were fit to raise their children. In theory, the test aimed to protect children by identifying families in crisis or parents unable to provide adequate care. In practice, however, it became a tool of controversy—especially when applied to Greenlandic families.

The test assessed parents in a series of areas, such as their responses to imagined scenarios, self-concept, physical and mental well-being, outlook on life, and plans for the future. Most importantly, it was based on Western conception of good parenthood and delivered in Danish, with minimal attention to Greenlandic language, customs, or kinship systems. This incompatibility resulted in regular misinterpretations of the capacity of Greenlandic parents and sometimes led to children being taken from their parents.

Greenlandic children have traditionally been disproportionately represented in Denmark's child welfare system. Approximately 7% of Greenland-born children and 5% of children who have at least one Greenlandic parent are placed out-of-home. That's in sharp contrast to only 1% of the general Danish child population.

Also Read: Trump's Tylenol-Autism Announcement: What Pregnant Women Need to Know After FDA Warning?

The application of FKU tests, the campaigners maintain, was a contributory factor in this lopsided number. Families were regularly tested with instruments that were not culturally sensitive, and sometimes in the absence of legal or psychological support. The test to protect was then perceived by many as a means of control, tearing children away from their cultural heritage and severing family bonds.

For some families, such as 38-year-old Keira Alexandra Kronvold's, the shift is too late. Required to undergo the FKU test twice — once when giving birth to her second child and again when pregnant with her third — she was finally found "unfit" by Danish officials. Her infant was removed from her care just hours after delivery, sparking public outrage and initiating mass protests in Copenhagen and Nuuk.

Also Read: COVID Symptoms Are Different In 2025—How Long After Exposure Should You Get Tested?

In 2022, the Danish Institute for Human Rights warned of the test's application among Indigenous families. In 2023, the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples issued an official condemnation of the FKU as deeply flawed and culturally insensitive. The Danish government, even with these warning signs, only "urged municipalities" to reconsider its application.

It wasn't until January 2025 that the government, at last, declared an outright suspension of the FKU test among Greenlandic families, citing "doubts" as to its cultural sensitivity — a half-hearted recognition of what activists had been decrying as a systemic failure.

Why Are The Danish Parenting Competency Test Questions So Controversial?

Cultural Bias and Misjudgment

Greenlandic families and their supporters complained that the FKU did not consider the special cultural, linguistic, and social norms of Greenlandic Inuit society. The fact that the test is based on Danish language and Western notions of parenting resulted in Greenlandic traditional values—like communal childcare, nonverbal communication, and varying methods of discipline—frequently being misinterpreted or downgraded. Parents were even incorrectly evaluated as having cognitive impairments due to mere cultural differences in communication or problem-solving in certain instances.

Unfair Disproportionate Impact on Greenlandic Families

The effect of the FKU was drastic: 5–7% of Greenlandic-origin children in Denmark were removed from their families, as opposed to only 1% of Danish-origin children. High-profile cases, like that of Keira Alexandra Kronvold—whose infant was removed from her shortly after birth based in part on FKU findings—sparked countrywide protests in both Denmark and Greenland. For many, the incidents resonated with traumatic historical moments of forced assimilation and family disruption.

Also Read: Trump's Tylenol-Autism Claims Debunked by Medical Experts: What Doctors Actually Say About Pregnancy Safety

Human Rights and Legal Criticism

The FKU has been condemned by human rights groups, such as the Danish Institute for Human Rights and the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, for its "serious cultural biases" and its call for the abolition of the FKU. Denmark is bound under international conventions like ILO Convention No. 169 to respect and protect the cultural identity of Indigenous peoples like the Greenlanders. The critics claimed that the FKU breached these commitments by refusing to modify its standards and approach in accordance with Greenlandic conditions.

The Danish Ministry of Social Affairs currently commits to making any subsequent parental reports culturally sensitive, using Greenlandic language and culture. The government asserts it will attempt to restore confidence and provide reparative structures, including placement in Greenlandic families whenever feasible.

Greenland's Children's Minister, Dr. Aqqaluaq B. Egede, described the decision as a "necessary but tardy measure" toward justice. "We cannot restore that which is lost, but we can ensure no additional harm is caused," he told a joint press conference in Nuuk.

Denmark Parenting Test: How Does Removal From Families Impact Children?

The psychological effect of separating children from their parents is deep and lasting, as numerous studies over several decades have shown. When children are taken from their families—whether because of such highly criticized policies as Denmark's now-abandoned parenting test or other child protection measures—the effects tend to reach far beyond the initial disruption.

Attachment, the strong emotional connection that develops between a child and his or her main caregiver, is more than a whimsical notion but a vital building block for wholesome growth throughout life. Research that appeared in Current Directions in Psychological Science explains that attachment influences a child's sense of emotional security, social competence, and even stress- and adversity-coping ability in the years to come.

This attachment starts to develop even before a child is born. Myron Hofer, past director of the Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychology at Columbia University, cites that fetuses begin to develop preferred reactions to their mother's odors and sounds during pregnancy—preferences that carry on after birth. During the newborn phase, infants learn rapidly to recognize their mother's face and voice, providing the foundation of a secure attachment.

When attachment is suddenly severed, through early maternal separation, children go through a series of emotional and physiological responses. First, they go through a stage of anxious searching—calling out and searching for their attachment figure—and then they go through a stage of withdrawal and worsening responsiveness if reunification is not achieved.

Hofer's experiments with infant rats emphasized the biological basis of this trauma. He discovered that deprivation of maternal warmth, body contact, and sustenance induced distress in the young. Although artificial surrogates—warmth, tactile stimulation, and plentiful nutrition—were able to normalize a few features of their physiology, these could not substitute for the complex, higher-level behaviors in an actual mother–child relationship. Aspects of reciprocity, imitation, attunement, and play form a vital role in emotional and social development and cannot be imitated by institutional care or foster planning, regardless of good intentions.

For human children, the effects of forced separation can involve increased anxiety, attachment disorders, relationship difficulties, and even persistent mental health issues. The trauma associated with loss of family is sometimes doubled when cultural identity and language are lost as well, as was true for many Greenlandic children sent to Danish families under the FKU regime.

Are you a younger sibling in your family and you relate to other younger siblings? Do you feel some of your habits and traits match other younger siblings? Or are you the middle child and you feel that sometimes you are excluded. When you talk about it, other middle children also agree with you. If this is the case with you, then you may be interested to know the Birth Order Theory.

This theory was developed by Alfred Adler in 1964, who focused on the importance of birth order on personality development. In this theory, he says that though children may be born into the same household, their birth order greatly influence their psychological development.

As per Adler's birth order theory, a child could have certain personality traits which are as followed:

• The Oldest Child: more authoritarian, and feels powerful due to high expectations set by the parents
• The Youngest Child: treated like a spoiled baby and cannot rise above the other siblings
• The Middle Child: even tempered, but has trouble fitting in as they have always been sandwiched between the younger and the older siblings

However, for middle child, their characteristics would often get itself a term, called the Middle Child Syndrome.

What Exactly Is A Middle Child Syndrome And What Sets Them Apart From Their Younger And Older Siblings?

Middle child syndrome is the belief that middle children are excluded, ignored, and neglected because of their birth orders.

People often talk about “middle child syndrome,” the idea that the child who is neither the oldest nor the youngest develops a very particular personality. While some of this comes from family dynamics rather than science, many families do notice certain patterns.

Personality Traits

Middle children sometimes feel overshadowed by their siblings. The oldest is often seen as responsible and strong-willed, while the youngest gets extra attention for simply being the baby of the family. The middle child may end up somewhere in the middle of all this, which can make them quieter, more even tempered, and sometimes unsure of where they fit in.

Family Relationships

When it comes to parents, middle children might feel that they do not get the same level of attention as their siblings. The older child usually carries more responsibility, and the younger child often gets extra care and protection. The middle child may feel they slip through the cracks and receive less one-on-one time with their parents.

Sibling Rivalry

Feeling unseen can spark a sense of competition. Many middle children find themselves competing for attention from both parents and siblings. At the same time, they often become the peacemaker of the family simply because they are used to being in the middle of everything.

Feeling Left Out of Favoritism

When parents unintentionally favor the oldest for their achievements or the youngest for their sweetness, the middle child may feel they are no one’s first pick. They are not the trailblazer or the baby, and this can shape how they see their place in the family.

Carrying These Feelings Into Adulthood

Some people believe that these early experiences can follow middle children into adulthood. If a middle child grew up feeling overlooked, they might struggle with co dependency or constantly try to keep the peace in relationships. They may also find it difficult to believe they can be someone’s closest friend or favorite person.

Their personalities often seem muted when it is compared to the other siblings, this is because they have always blended into the background. These patterns can show up at work, in friendships, and in romantic relationships.

What Research Actually Shows

Although middle child syndrome is talked about a lot, scientific research has not clearly confirmed it. There have been studies that show some truth to the theories, while others deny. Some research suggests that middle children do feel less close to their parents or are less likely to turn to their parents when they are going through stressful times in their lives. A 2019 study showed that middle children were less likely to feel comfortable talking to their parents on topics like sex education. Though it is important to note that this is a broad topic to begin with, and could have cultural variations.

Other studies have suggested they might be less family oriented or more prone to certain perfectionistic traits. But these findings are not consistent across research. In fact, a number of large studies show no strong link between birth order and major personality traits such as extraversion, emotional stability, or agreeableness.

Some studies even contradict each other entirely. For instance, one study suggested middle children might have a higher risk of depression, while another found that oldest children were more likely to experience mental health issues.

So Does Middle Child Syndrome Exist?

With so many conflicting findings, scientists cannot say for sure. Many experts believe that personality is shaped by a mix of family environment, parenting styles, cultural background, and individual temperament. Birth order may play a small role, but it is unlikely to be the determining factor.

In short, middle child syndrome is more of a popular idea than a proven scientific fact. Each child’s experience is unique, and many different influences shape who we become.

Danish researchers were studying the use of medicines on women during and after pregnancy. What they realized is that number of women consuming Ozempic and Wegovy after childbirth has increased. As per their observation, in 2018, less than 5 prescriptions for every 10,000 women post six months of their childbirth were there. However, this number increased to 34 in mid-2022, and by mid-2024, there were 173 prescriptions.

That comes close to 2 percent of all postpartum women. Most of these women were in their 30s, had more than one child, and while many were overweight, they did not have diabetes. They also had no previous history of using GLP-1 medications.

This spike surprised researchers because the postpartum phase is usually a time when the body naturally sheds some pregnancy weight and undergoes major hormonal changes. “In a period characterized by natural weight loss and marked hormonal change, this was unexpected,” said Mette Bliddal, a pharmacologist at the University of Southern Denmark and the study’s first author, as reported by the New York Times. The findings were published in JAMA.

How Was The Study Conducted?

The analysis reviewed 382,277 pregnancies in Denmark from early 2018 through June 2024. Researchers used national health registries to track every live birth and every prescription filled for GLP-1 drugs during the postpartum period. This made it possible to see the rise in real time.

Although semaglutide, the ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy, is widely used for weight loss, its safety in the months after childbirth is still unclear. This is a time when many mothers are breastfeeding and adjusting to changing hormone levels, sleep disruptions, and recovery from pregnancy.

What We Know and Don’t Know About Breastfeeding Safety

Right now, evidence around the safety of GLP-1 drugs for breastfeeding mothers is very limited. While semaglutide has not been detected in measurable amounts in breast milk and no immediate negative effects have been seen in infants, researchers caution that long-term effects on a baby’s metabolism, growth, or pancreas remain unknown.

Major medical groups are also hesitant to give a firm recommendation. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has not released guidelines because the drugs are too new and the data isn’t strong enough. First Exposure, a Canadian research network that evaluates drug safety in pregnancy and breastfeeding, advises against using these medications while breastfeeding. They also recommend stopping them one to two months before trying to conceive.

Experts say the caution comes from the lack of solid research. GLP-1 drugs are large molecules that usually do not transfer easily into breast milk and would likely break down in a baby’s stomach. Still, the uncertainty is significant enough that researchers prefer mothers avoid them during breastfeeding.

Why Researchers Are Concerned

Another concern is that these appetite-suppressing medications could affect milk production, nutrient content, or even leave mothers dehydrated. Dr. Bliddal noted that the postpartum period is a time when “the body is working hard to regain its balance.” Without knowing how weight loss drugs interact with these processes, many specialists believe it is safer to avoid them until more is known.

Even small changes in breast milk composition could matter for infant development. Since there is no clear data on how GLP-1 drugs might alter fat content or nutrients in breast milk, researchers urge caution.

Vanessa Hudgens at the age of 36 is a mother again. She welcomed her second baby with husband Cole Tucker. The news was announced on Instagram on Saturday, where she shared a photo of herself lying in a hospital bed, holding Tucker's hand.

She wrote: "Well…. I did it. Had another baby!! What a wild ride labor is. Big shout out to all the moms. It’s truly incredible what our bodies can do ❤️."

This month itself, Catherine Paiz revealed that she was pregnant with her fourth baby at the age of 35.

These news of celebrity pregnancy after 30 spark the spotlight on late motherhood and how safe it really is?

What Does The Data Tell Us On The Trend Of Late Motherhood?

The average age of mothers in the US have continued to rise, a new report released on June 13 by the National Vital Statistic System (NVSS), provides the shift in age trends between 2016 and 2023. The study, conducted by Andrea D. Brown, Ph.D., M.P.H., and her colleagues at the National Center for Health Statistics.

The researchers found a clear increase in the mean age of mothers at the time of their first birth. In 2016, the average age of a first-time mother was 26.6 years. By 2023, this had risen to 27.5 years — nearly a full year’s difference in just seven years.

But the trend isn’t limited to first-time mothers. In Paiz's case, she is having her fourth child at 35.

Is Late Pregnancy Healthy?

The National Institute of Health (NIH), US (2022), 20% of women in the US are now having their first child after the age of 35. While it is the new trend, the NIH doctor Dr Alan Decherney, a fertility expert explains that "As women age, they are still fertile, but their odds of pregnancy are decreased because they are not making as many good eggs that will fertile and divide normally and turn out to be an embryo."

After age 30, a woman's fertility decreases ever year, notes the NIH July 2022 issue. It notes: "The number and quality of her eggs goes down until she reaches menopause."

However, experts do point out that getting pregnant in your 30s need not be a stressful affair at all times. As it is at this age when you experience more stability, and also someone you know who have a personal experience in handling one. Most important, you are more mature at this age, which you may not be in your 20s.

What Must You Keep In Mind If You Plan Pregnancy After 30?

Quit Habits: If you are a smoker, or consume alcohol, this is a good time to leave it.

Reduce Stress: While pregnancy for some can bring stress, try to find activities that help you release it.

Healthy Weight: Ensure that your weight is right, reduce your waist to bring it to a healthy range for a healthy pregnancy.

Food Habits: Stop eating junk and start eating more whole grains.

Exercise: A sedentary lifestyle can impact negatively on the child. You do not have to do HIIT, however, regular easy workouts can make both the pregnancy and delivery easy.

Dr Michelle Y Owens, professor of obstetrics and gynecology and a practicing maternal-fetal medicine specialist at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, writes for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) that "the longer your eggs have been around, the more likely they are to produce a pregnancy with a chromosome problem that can lead to a condition like Down syndrome. The risk goes up significantly after 35." However, she says, there is a good news. Now, we have tools to detect and respond to pregnancy complications early.