'Parenting Stress Reaching Dangerous Levels': US Surgeon General Warns About The New Health Hazard

Updated Aug 29, 2024 | 09:16 AM IST

SummaryThe U.S. Surgeon General warns that the stress of modern parenting poses significant mental health risks, highlighting the feelings of loneliness and powerlessness faced by parents.
Parenting health hazard

Parenting, often portrayed as a fulfilling and joyful journey, can also be a source of significant stress and emotional strain. Reflecting on my own experiences, I've felt the pressure of balancing parental responsibilities with personal well-being. This personal narrative is not unique, as recent reports highlight a growing concern over the mental health impacts of parenting. According to recent advisories from health experts, the stress associated with raising children has profound implications for parents' mental health, urging a closer examination and proactive measures.

US Surgeon General Gives's Wake-Up Call

The U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy's recent warning brings to light the significant mental health challenges faced by parents. The Surgeon General emphasized that the pressures of parenting—ranging from financial concerns to daily caregiving demands—are taking a toll on mental well-being. Dr. Murthy states, “The stress and strain of parenting are real and profound, impacting mental health and well-being in ways that we must address.” This statement underscores the severity of the issue and highlights the urgent need for targeted support and intervention.

Parenting is Hazardous to Your Health

As the warning stated by Surgeon General, the rise in parental stress is closely linked to modern societal pressures. Parents today face unprecedented demands, including managing careers, household responsibilities, and children's needs, all while navigating a landscape shaped by social media and economic uncertainties. These factors contribute to heightened levels of anxiety and depression among parents. The growing crisis discussed across various reports elaborates, “Constant exposure to idealized images and unrealistic expectations can exacerbate feelings of inadequacy and stress, leading to significant mental health challenges.”

In addition to societal pressures, digital media has intensified parental stress as well. The pervasive presence of social media creates a platform for comparing parenting styles, which often leads to feelings of inadequacy. The Journal highlights that “parents are bombarded with idealized portrayals of parenting that can contribute to stress and isolation, making it difficult to manage everyday challenges effectively.”

Impact on Mental Health

The impact of this stress on mental health is multifaceted. Chronic stress can lead to various psychological issues, including anxiety, depression, and burnout. According to the Surgeon General's report, these mental health challenges are not just a personal issue but a public health concern. The US Surgeon General emphasizes that “addressing parental stress requires a comprehensive approach that includes mental health support, community resources, and workplace policies designed to alleviate some of the burdens faced by parents.”

The strain of parenting can also affect relationships and overall family dynamics. Parents experiencing high levels of stress may struggle with maintaining healthy relationships with their partners and children, leading to a cycle of increased tension and emotional strain. This dynamic can have ripple effects throughout the family unit, affecting everyone’s mental health and well-being.

Coping Strategies and Support Systems for Parents

To address these challenges, experts advocate for several strategies aimed at reducing parental stress and supporting mental health. Building a strong support network is crucial. This network can include family members, friends, and professional counselors who provide emotional and practical assistance. The Surgeon General's report underscores the importance of creating supportive environments both at home and in the workplace. “Support systems and policies that reduce stress and promote mental health are essential in helping parents manage their responsibilities more effectively,” the report notes.

In addition to seeking support, self-care is highlighted as a critical component of managing stress. Parents are encouraged to engage in activities that promote personal well-being, such as exercise, hobbies, and relaxation techniques. The New York Times suggests that setting aside time for oneself and addressing the root causes of stress can lead to more effective coping strategies and improved mental health.

Moreover, community and workplace interventions are also vital. Policies that offer flexible work arrangements, parental leave, and access to mental health resources can significantly reduce the burden on parents. The Wall Street Journal points out that “implementing supportive policies and providing resources can help alleviate some of the pressures faced by parents, leading to better mental health outcomes.”

The ongoing dialogue about parental stress and mental health highlights the importance of collective awareness and action. It is crucial for society to recognize the significant impact that parenting stress can have on mental health and to support parents in managing these challenges. By fostering a supportive environment and advocating for resources and policies that address mental health needs, we can improve the well-being of parents and enhance their overall quality of life.

As we move forward, it is essential to give thoughtful consideration to these insights and work together to better understand and address the complexities of parenting stress. Creating a more supportive and understanding environment will benefit not only individual families but also the broader community. Let’s continue to explore these issues with empathy and dedication, striving to support the mental health of all parents and create a healthier, more balanced approach to parenting.

By coming together to address these challenges, we can ensure that the journey of parenting is not only fulfilling but also manageable and supportive.

End of Article

Maternal Vaccination During Pregnancy Can Prevent COVID-related Hospitalization In Babies: Study

Updated Mar 30, 2026 | 03:53 PM IST

SummaryAs currently no COVID vaccines are available for neonates and babies, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends maternal vaccination during pregnancy. The study shows it can protect the children against hospitalization for COVID during the first six months of life.

Credit: iStock/Canva

Maternal vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy can be effective against severe disease and hospitalization from the SARS-CoV-2 virus in babies, according to a large study.

The study, published in the journal Pediatrics, revealed that COVID vaccination during pregnancy can protect the children against hospitalization for COVID during the first six months of life.

Also Read: COVID-19 Cicada Variant: Will It Become The Dominant Strain In The US? Know All About The Virus

Amid continuing COVID cases, babies under six months old continue to have one of the highest rates of hospitalization — one in five — due to the COVID virus in the US, as per a 2024 study.

As currently no vaccines against COVID are available for neonates and babies, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends maternal vaccination during pregnancy.

Maternal COVID Vaccination Prevented Other Infections

The retrospective study included 146,031 infants born in Norway between March 2021 and December 2023. Of these, 37, 013 (25 percent) were exposed to COVID-19 vaccination in utero.

The findings showed that babies exposed to the vaccine before birth were no more likely to visit the hospital for overall infections (of any kind) than those whose mothers did not get vaccinated in pregnancy.

However, infants whose mothers were vaccinated were about half as likely to visit the hospital specifically for COVID in their first two months of life compared to babies not exposed to the vaccine in utero.

Also Read: Olivia Munn Opens Up About Detecting No-Symptom Breast Cancer With Lifetime Risk Assessment Test

Among 3 to 5-month-old babies, the risk of a hospital visit for COVID was 24 percent lower in those exposed to the vaccine, but the vaccine's protection against COVID wore off by the time infants were older than 6 months.

Importantly, the mothers' vaccine also prevented the risk of other infections in children.

"There is often an increased risk for a subsequent infection after a viral infection, such as an increased risk of pneumonia after influenza infection, so we wanted to study whether protection against COVID-19 could influence the risk of other infections as well," said lead author Dr. Helena Niemi Eide, from the University of Oslo in Norway, the NPR reported.

"But we found that COVID vaccination in pregnancy protected the infant against COVID and had no apparent effect on other infections," Eide added.

Maternal Vaccine Recommendation in the US

Last week, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists reiterated its recommendation for COVID vaccination during pregnancy.

Despite changes in federal vaccine recommendations due to the US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s anti-vaccine stance, the ACOG urged COVID vaccination for

  • people who are pregnant,
  • recently pregnant,
  • considering pregnancy,
  • lactating.
It stated that COVID-19 vaccinations should be recommended as standard preventive care for pregnant women.

Also read: Bipolar Disorder: How Early Detection Can Help Prevent Serious Complications

"Accumulated safety data from millions of administered doses show no increased risk of adverse maternal, fetal, or neonatal outcomes associated with COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy,” the ACOG said.

End of Article

'Husband Stitch': A Medical Necessity Or Just A Tool To Objectify Women's Bodies?

Updated Mar 25, 2026 | 06:46 PM IST

SummaryAngela Sanford discovered she received a “husband stitch” after childbirth, an unethical extra stitch to tighten the vagina. The practice, rooted in outdated beliefs, can cause pain and highlights ongoing objectification in women’s healthcare.
'Husband Stitch': A Medical Necessity Or Just A Tool To Objectify Women's Bodies?

Credits: AI-generated and iStock

When 36-year-old mom Angela Sanford, from Fort Mill, SC, went for an appointment for a Pap smear five years after she had her first child in 2008, her nurse midwife, who she has never seen before asked her a question she did not expect. "Who stitched you up after your first birth?"

Speaking to Healthline, Sanford shared that she just started crying when the nurse said, "This is not right." Sanford said that this was the first time she ever heard the term 'husband stitch'. Sanford was told that her stich was "too tight" by the hospitalist who managed her after her first delivery.

Also Read: US CDC Warns Of New Immune-Evasive COVID Variant In 23 Countries

“He gave you what some people call a husband stitch,” Sanford recalled the midwife telling her.

“I couldn’t connect in my mind why it would be called that. My midwife said, ‘They think that some men find it more pleasurable,’” she recalled. “My husband has been worried about me and fearful of hurting me. He would never have asked for this.”

A 'Husband Stich' - What Is It?

Degrees of Vaginal Tear

During vaginal delivery, a woman undergoes perineal tears or vaginal lacerations which means tears between the vaginal opening and anus. This causes pain, and requires stitches for grades two and higher. It also takes 4 to 6 weeks to heal. Women can experience from first to fourth degree tears.

Sometimes, a surgical incision is made in the perineum during childbirth to enlarge the vaginal opening, this is called an episiotomy. However, it is not medically necessary or a routine procedure, unless it is a case of emergency.

Stiches are required in such cases that dissolves on its own. However, a 'husband stitch', also known as "daddy stitch" is an unethical practice where an extra stitch is given during the repair process that 'tightens the vagina' to increase sexual pleasure for a male partner. While it is considered a medical malpractice, it is still done to women after vaginal delivery.

Many women face difficulty after the extra stich is given to them. In Sanford's case, she felt "excruciating" pain during sex afterwards.

Read: Romanticization And The Silent Dismissal Of Women’s Pain

When Objectifying Women's Bodies Is Made A Medical Practice

Stephanie Tillman, CNM, a certified nurse midwife at the University of Illinois at Chicago and blogger at The Feminist Midwife told Healthline: “The fact that there is even a practice called the husband stitch is a perfect example of the intersection of the objectification of women’s bodies and healthcare. As much as we try to remove the sexualization of women from appropriate obstetric care, of course the patriarchy is going to find its way in there."

Harkins, 37, said that she "kind of" laughed it off when an "old, crusty Army doctor" overstitched her so she could give her husband more pleasure. In many cases, doctors do it as a routine practice without even being told by anyone. “I couldn’t even process [it], but I kind of laughed, like what else do you do when someone says that? I had just had a baby. I didn’t think much about it because the whole birth experience was so traumatizing, but now that I think about it differently, the implications of that are just crazy.”

Episiotomy Is An Excuse For 'Husband Stitch'

'Husband Stitch': A Medical Necessity Or Just A Tool To Objectify Women's Bodies?

Dr Robert Barbieri, chair of obstetrics and gynecology and reproductive biology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, told the Huffington Post that doctors were taught in the 50s and 60s that "routine episiotomy was good for women".

“What they thought is that if they did a routine episiotomy, they’d have a chance to repair it and that during the repair, they could actually create a better perineum than if they hadn’t done it. The idea [was] that we could ‘tighten things up,’” explains doctor.

However, a 2005 systematic review in the Journal of the American Medical Association found no benefit to routine episiotomy use. A 2017 Cochrane review “could not identify any benefits of routine episiotomy for the baby or the mother.” In 2016, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended that clinicians “prevent and manage” delivery lacerations through strategies like massage and warm compresses rather than making cuts on the perineum. Yet, this practice still continues inside the labor rooms.

End of Article

Your Kids’ Fast-fashion Clothing May Be Laced With High Levels of Toxic Lead

Updated Mar 24, 2026 | 01:00 AM IST

Summary​The US Consumer Product Safety Commission currently has a 100 parts per million (ppm) lead limit for children's products like toys and clothing. But all clothes tested in the lab exceeded the safe limits, found the study.
Your Kids’ Fast-fashion Clothing May Be Laced With High Levels of Toxic Lead

Credit: iStock

While you may be buying fast-fashion clothes that are easy on your pocket and also give your children trendy looks, a new study highlights the risk of being laced with a highly toxic ingredient: lead.

The preliminary research, based on lab tests of several shirts from different retailers in the US, found that all the samples exceeded the country’s federal regulatory lead limits.

The US Consumer Product Safety Commission currently has a 100 parts per million (ppm) lead limit for children's products like toys and clothing.

"I started to see many articles about lead in clothing from fast fashion, and I realized not too many parents knew about the issue," said Kamila Deavers, principal investigator of the study, at Marian University in the US.

Deavers began the study after her young daughter’s lab reports showed elevated levels of lead in her blood from toy coatings.

How was study conducted?

The team tested 11 shirts that spanned the rainbow—red, pink, orange, yellow, gray, and blue. All brightly colored fabrics, particularly reds and yellows, showed higher levels of lead compared to more muted tones.

"We saw that the shirts we tested were all over the allowed limit for lead of 100 ppm," said Priscila Espinoza, from Marina.

The researchers explained that some manufacturers use lead (II) acetate as an inexpensive way to help dyes stick to the materials and produce bright, long-lasting color.

Children At Greater Risk

The researchers found the risk is particularly higher among younger kids as they tend to playfully suck or chew their clothes during play.

"Even briefly chewing these fabrics could expose children to dangerous lead levels,” they found in the study, to be presented at the forthcoming meeting of the American Chemical Society.

According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), lead exposure can lead to behavior problems, brain and central nervous system damage, as well as other negative health effects in children.

The agency considers children under six years old to be most at risk from exposure. Even low levels of lead in the blood of children can result in:

  • Behavior and learning problems
  • Lower IQ and Hyperactivity
  • Slowed growth
  • Hearing Problems
  • Anemia
In rare cases, ingestion of lead can cause seizures, coma, and even death.

The researchers also pointed out safer alternatives to lead-based dyeing agents that already exist. These include natural and less harmful substances such as:

  • Plant-based tannins (e.g., oak bark, pomegranate peel)
  • Rosemary
  • Alum.

End of Article