Image Credit: Canva
For many couples, the journey to parenthood seems straightforward. After successfully having a child, the expectation is that conceiving again will be just as smooth. However, when pregnancy doesn’t happen despite months or even years of trying, the frustration and confusion can be overwhelming. This phenomenon is known as secondary infertility, a condition that affects millions of couples worldwide.
While secondary infertility can be unexpected and emotionally taxing, it is a common challenge that many couples face. If you're struggling with secondary infertility, know that you're not alone—support and solutions are available to help you on your journey to growing your family once more.
Secondary infertility is the inability to conceive or carry a pregnancy to term after previously giving birth without fertility assistance. Unlike primary infertility, where conception has never been achieved, secondary infertility brings a unique emotional burden; many couples are caught off guard, questioning why they are suddenly facing fertility struggles when they had no issues before.
According to the Cleveland Clinic, 11% of couples trying for another child experience secondary infertility, making it just as common as primary infertility. This condition can be a result of multiple factors, ranging from physiological changes to lifestyle shifts that may have occurred since the first pregnancy.
Secondary infertility causes are very similar to those of primary infertility. However, some risk factors become more evident with age and time. The most common causes include:
One of the most important factors in secondary infertility is age. Female fertility declines after 35, where there is a marked reduction in egg quantity and quality. In men, the quality of sperms may decline after 45, which means the chances of successful fertilization are reduced.
Conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), thyroid disorders, or irregular ovulation can make conception more difficult. Even if ovulation was not an issue during the first pregnancy, hormonal shifts over time can affect reproductive function.
Scarring from a C-section, uterine infections or previous surgeries may lead to adhesions in the uterus or fallopian tubes, blocking the sperm from reaching the egg.
Male fertility is just as crucial in conception. Low sperm count, poor motility or abnormal morphology can make it difficult for fertilization to occur, especially if the male partner’s health has changed over time due to weight gain, medications, or other factors.
Significant fluctuations in weight, diet, consumption of alcohol in excess, smoking, and stress all can play a role in causing infertility issues. Either overweight or underweight will affect hormonal levels and ovulation.
Endometriosis is an implantation problem when tissue of the uterine lining forms elsewhere outside of the uterus; this leads to inflammation and scar formation, hindering implantation. Other diseases like fibroids or adenomyosis also make pregnancy difficult.
Couples should seek medical evaluation if:
A fertility specialist shall conduct blood tests, ovulation tracking, semen analysis, as well as an imaging scan of the internal organ to find a cause and possibly recommend a specific treatment course.
The main treatment for secondary infertility depends upon the cause or causes. Generally, the methods include one of the following types:
For women with irregular ovulation or hormonal imbalances, medications like Clomid or Letrozole can help stimulate egg release.
If uterine fibroids, scar tissue, or endometriosis are interfering with conception, minimally invasive surgery can improve the chances of pregnancy.
Intrauterine insemination (IUI): A process where sperm is placed directly into the uterus to improve chances of fertilization.
In vitro fertilization (IVF): Eggs are retrieved, fertilized outside the body and implanted into the uterus.
Unlike primary infertility, secondary infertility comes with unique psychological challenges. Friends and family often assume that because a couple already has children, fertility struggles shouldn’t be as distressing. This can lead to feelings of guilt, isolation, and frustration.
If you’re struggling emotionally, consider:
(Credit-Canva)
Learning how to drive is a big step of independence for children. It marks a phase where they learn responsibility, how to manage the autonomy they have gained as well as their way around different situations. There are many dangers associated with driving, hence there is a level of trust a parent must have before they let their teens drive. Whether it is others driving recklessly, difficult roads to travel in or themselves being careless. As teens are very well known for their lack of well-thought out actions, many of them find using their phones while driving normal.
A new study reveals a concerning trend: about one-fifth of the time, teenage drivers are looking at their smartphones instead of the road. This means they're not paying attention to what's in front of them or checking their mirrors.
The study, published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention, found that teen drivers spend an average of 21% of each trip focused on their phone. What's more, these weren't just quick peeks. Nearly 27% of the time, drivers were looking at their phones for two seconds or longer. This amount of time dramatically increases the chance of a car crash.
So, what are teens doing on their phones while driving? The study showed:
Distracted driving is a serious threat to public safety, especially among young drivers. When someone drives while distracted, they're not just putting themselves at risk of injury or death; they're endangering everyone else on the road.
While 35 U.S. states have laws banning all phone use for young drivers, a previous national study found that nearly 92% of teens still regularly use their smartphones for texting, talking, or playing music while driving.
For this new study, researchers asked over 1,100 teenagers about their habits and beliefs regarding smartphone use while driving.
Many young drivers actually understand that bad things can happen when they're distracted. They also know that their parents and friends wouldn't want them using their phones while driving. Teens also strongly believe they can avoid distracted driving by using features like "Do Not Disturb," hands-free modes, or phone holders. They recognize the benefits of using phone features like GPS but also understand the higher risk of accidents when distracted.
However, teens also said that their friends often drive while distracted by their phones. This suggests that more teens might be giving in to the temptation than they're willing to admit.
Researchers suggest creating messages that challenge false beliefs about using phones while driving, such as the idea that you can still be productive on your phone while in transit. To help reduce this dangerous behavior, they recommend:
(Credit-Canva)
Accidents can happen anytime and anywhere. Even if it is at school or at any other trust place. Health crisis may not seem like a big concern for school going children, however, understanding how unpredictable injuries and health concerns can be, it is important that emergency services are always ready. Many times, during these situations, a quick response is crucial, losing even moments could make or break the crisis.
However, what are the most likely health situations that can arise and how much should a school be worried about? New research reveals that U.S. schools should prioritize preparedness for three common health emergencies: brain-related crises, psychiatric/substance abuse issues, and trauma-related injuries. These three categories collectively account for approximately half of all emergency medical services (EMS) responses to schools.
A report published in the journal Pediatrics analyzed over 506,500 EMS calls to schools between 2018 and 2022, focusing on children aged 5 to 17. The study identified the following breakdown of emergency types:
The study also noted differences across age groups: elementary school students were more likely to require treatment for physical injuries (17%), while teenagers more frequently needed help for psychiatric conditions or substance abuse (18%).
Researchers emphasized the need for schools to enhance their emergency preparedness. He highlighted that timely treatment is crucial and suggested specific areas for staff training. According to US School Safety guidelines planning for emergencies must involve actions and daily routines that help create a secure school environment. These efforts can stop bad things from happening or lessen their impact if they do. Good planning also helps schools find and fix any weaknesses in their procedures and helps school staff and local emergency teams understand and handle their duties.
A key part of emergency planning is putting together a complete school emergency operations plan (EOP). This is a document that explains what students, teachers, and school staff should do before, during, and after an emergency.
Developing this plan should be a team effort. It needs a diverse group of people from the school, as well as local community partners. Schools should also plan to check, evaluate, and update their EOP regularly to keep it current and effective.
Doing training, exercises, and drills that are right for different age groups can also help schools get ready for emergencies. These activities help everyone in the school community know their roles before, during, and after an emergency. They also give people a chance to practice the steps outlined in the EOP and improve how prepared they are.
Exercises and drills should be customized to fit the specific school community, including students' ages and physical abilities. It's also important to balance these drills with the school's overall culture and atmosphere.
Schools and districts can also plan for how they'll recover from emergencies even before they happen. This can make the recovery process quicker and more effective. As part of this, school emergency management teams should have a general strategy and plan to help the school community recover academically, physically, emotionally, and financially after an emergency.
Credits: Canva
A new Swedish study has found that children born via planned Cesarean section (C-section) may face a modestly increased risk of developing acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common type of cancer in children. This revelation adds to growing concerns around the long-term health impacts of elective C-sections—especially those not medically necessary.
Researchers from Sweden's Karolinska Institutet analyzed the health records of nearly 2.5 million children born between 1982 and 1989 and again from 1999 to 2015. Among this massive cohort, about 376,000 children were born via C-section. Of those, nearly 1,500 were diagnosed with leukemia later in life.
The findings, published recently, show that the risk of developing ALL was 21% higher among children born via planned C-section compared to those born vaginally. Even more specifically, the risk of B-cell ALL—a subtype of the disease—was 29% higher in the planned C-section group.
It’s worth noting that this elevated risk was not observed in children born through emergency C-sections, suggesting that the timing and conditions of birth may play a significant role.
While the researchers were cautious about drawing definitive conclusions, they outlined several potential explanations. One key theory revolves around the lack of exposure to natural vaginal microbiota and birth canal stress during planned C-sections. Both of these factors are believed to play a role in shaping an infant’s immune system.
"C-sections are an important and often life-saving part of obstetric care. We don't want mothers to feel anxious about medically indicated C-sections," said study author Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi. "But there is reason to discuss non-medically necessary planned C-sections, especially in light of other findings linking them to increased risks of asthma, allergies, and type 1 diabetes."
Despite these findings, experts emphasize that the overall risk remains small. According to the researchers, the increased risk translates to approximately one additional case of B-cell ALL per year in Sweden. Still, in the realm of pediatric health, even a marginal uptick is worth examining—especially when linked to elective medical decisions.
Also Read: Screen Time Could Be Slowing Your Kids Down, Here's What The Study Says
Globally, C-section rates have been rising, particularly in high-income countries like the United States, where about 1 in 3 births now occur via C-section. Many of these are elective or scheduled for convenience rather than medical necessity.
ALL is a fast-growing form of blood and bone marrow cancer that primarily affects white blood cells. According to the Mayo Clinic, while its exact causes remain unclear, genetic predispositions and immune system factors may play a role. The disease is most common in children, especially between the ages of 2 and 5.
Symptoms include fatigue, frequent infections, fever, bone pain, and easy bruising or bleeding. Fortunately, thanks to advances in treatment, survival rates for childhood ALL have significantly improved in recent decades, with many children achieving full remission.
One of the more compelling areas of study focuses on the role of gut microbiota in immune system development. Babies born vaginally are exposed to beneficial bacteria from their mother's birth canal, which begin colonizing the infant's gut immediately.
Planned C-section deliveries bypass this process. Some experts theorize that this may lead to delayed immune development, leaving children more vulnerable to certain autoimmune diseases and, potentially, cancers like leukemia.
Stress exposure during birth may also be key. Emergency C-sections—often occurring after labor has begun—still subject infants to the hormonal and physiological stresses of labor, which might help "prime" the immune system in ways that scheduled C-sections do not.
Interestingly, the study noted that the increased risk of leukemia was more pronounced in boys than in girls. The reasons for this are not yet clear and warrant further investigation, but they hint at possible genetic or hormonal differences in how children respond to birth conditions.
It’s essential to emphasize that the vast majority of children born via planned C-section will not develop leukemia. The study does not advocate against C-sections when medically necessary; instead, it calls for more thoughtful consideration around elective procedures.
Healthcare providers and parents should have open conversations about the risks and benefits associated with different birth methods. As always, individual medical needs should guide delivery decisions.
Dr. Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi put it succinctly: “Fortunately, acute lymphoblastic leukemia is rare. But as our understanding of early-life exposures grows, so should our caution when it comes to non-essential medical interventions.”
Meanwhile, Dr. Mark Nordberg, a pediatric oncologist not involved in the study, says the research adds "an important piece to the puzzle" of understanding cancer risks in children. "This doesn’t mean we should panic about C-sections, but we should continue to refine how and when we use them."
Future research is expected to further explore the links between birth methods and immune-related diseases, including cancer. Larger studies across diverse populations and long-term health tracking may help isolate the variables at play.
Until then, parents and physicians should remain informed and cautious, using research like this as a tool to guide smarter, safer childbirth decisions for generations to come.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited