A car seat is one of the most important gear you purchase when you become a new parent. This is because it has the potential to actually save your child's life, and how else can you bring your baby back home from the hospital if not in a car seat?

However, you must ensure that the car seat you buy is rear-facing, not forward-facing. As per the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), children should remain in a rear-facing car seat for as long as possible, until they reach the highest weight or height allowed by their seat. Previously, the guidelines were for children till the age 2, however, the latest recommendation removes any specific age milestone so parents would keep their child rear-facing longer, as long as their car seat weight and height allows them. This also ensures that the babies are put in front-facing car seats only when they know how to hold their heads up.

Why Front-face car seats could be lethal?

Children under the age of 2, or up until their height and weight allows must not be kept in the front-facing car seats, or if at all, it should only be for 2 hours, writes Dr Sermed Mezher, award-winning doctor and academic author in UK who makes health content on Instagram.

The reason is that extended time in a car seat can place strain on their developing spine and restrict their ability to move freely, which is important for their growth. Such a position could also "compress their chest and reduce oxygen levels, increasing the risk of breathing difficulties," he writes.

While car seats are designed for safety, they are not designed for prolonged use outside of car. To protect a child's health and development, parent should take breaks during long journeys, allowing the child to stretch, move, and change position.

How to get the right Car Seat for your baby?

There are two kinds of car seats for infants. They are the infant-only and convertible car seats.

The infant only car seat can be used when your baby weighs 20 to 22 pounds or their head is within 1 inch of the top of the seat. They are lighter in weight and are designed to be portable.

Many parents also prefer the convenience of an infant car seat because it can be removed from the car without having to unstrap and wake the baby when asleep. The base remains strapped into the vehicle and the carrier comes out of the base. Infant-only seats also click onto a stroller base.

Convertible are also an option, but they fit small newborns better. It is always best to opt for a rear-facing up until your child is big enough to hold their head high or at least 30 pounds and outgrows out of the rear-facing car seat.

What to do once you have bought the car seater?

Schedule an appointment with a certified child passenger safety technician who can safely install the car seat in your vehicle. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) maintains a directory of inspection stations to ensure that car seat is installed safely.

When fitting your baby in the car seat, ensure that harness straps fit on their body and use the lowest harness slot for a newborn infant. Ensure to keep the straps below your baby's shoulders for the rear-facing position.

Ensure your baby wears clothes that keep their leg free, and avoid any puffy, bulky or winter jackets when in car seat.

A habit that all parents hate could improve children's mental health. What is this? A new study published in The Journal of Affective Disorders is challenging one of the most common weekend arguments between parents and teenagers. Letting teens sleep in on weekends, something many parents see as laziness or poor discipline, may actually protect their mental health and lower the risk of depression.

The research was conducted by scientists from the University of Oregon and the State University of New York Upstate Medical University. They analyzed data from more than 1,000 young people between the ages of 16 and 24. Participants reported their usual sleep and wake times during the week and on weekends, including how much extra sleep they got by sleeping in on non-school days.

What Did The Study Find?

The findings were striking. Teens and young adults who allowed themselves to catch up on sleep over the weekend were significantly less likely to report symptoms of depression. In fact, those who slept in had a 41 per cent lower risk of depression compared to peers who stuck to the same early wake-up routine even on weekends.

This may sound counterintuitive to parents who believe that waking up early every day builds discipline and mental toughness. But researchers say adolescent biology tells a very different story. During puberty, the body’s internal clock shifts, making teens naturally inclined to fall asleep later at night and wake up later in the morning.

“Instead of being a morning lark, you’re going to become more of a night owl,” Melynda Casement, associate professor at the University of Oregon and co-author of the study, explained in a conversation with ScienceDaily. She added that this shift toward later bedtimes often lasts until around the ages of 18 to 20 before gradually stabilizing.

Why Does This Problem Arise?

The problem is that school schedules and daily responsibilities do not adapt to this biological change. Early school start times, homework, coaching classes, extracurricular activities, social commitments and even part-time jobs mean many teens are forced to wake up before their bodies are ready. Over time, this leads to what experts call “sleep debt”.

Casement points out that teenagers ideally need eight to ten hours of sleep each night, but most fail to get enough during the week. This chronic sleep deprivation has been closely linked to low mood, emotional regulation issues and a higher risk of depression. Weekend sleep, she says, can help offset some of that damage.

“It’s normal for teens to be night owls,” Casement notes. Allowing them to catch up on sleep over the weekend, especially when weekday schedules make adequate rest impossible, may offer meaningful mental health protection.

The study adds to a growing body of evidence supporting this idea. A 2025 meta-analysis of 10 studies found that weekend catch-up sleep was associated with a 20 per cent lower risk of depression. Taken together, the research suggests that sleeping in is not simply teenage rebellion or laziness, but a coping mechanism for an exhausting weekly routine.

At a time when concerns about adolescent mental health are rising globally, those extra hours of weekend sleep may be doing more good than parents realize. Sometimes, letting your teen sleep in might be one battle worth losing.

Not too long ago, in 2000, 1.6 million girls were missing from the number given at the natural sex ratio at birth, 26 years later, the number is at 200,000, and it is still falling. What has changed? The Economist reported that more and more parents are now preferring girl child over boys.

Earlier, parents were desperate for a boy, or did not just want a large family. In fact, in China, people would routinely terminate females. The practice of aborting girls is now becoming less common. The natural ratio is about 105 boy babies for every 100 girls. This is also because boys are more likely to die young, which could lead to rough parity at reproductive age. Sex ratio at birth has become more even across Asia. In 2006, China reported the peak of 117.8 boys per 100 girls, which went down to 109.8 in 2025. India too fell from 109.6 in 2010 to 106.8. In South Korea, in 1990, it was 115.7, which has now come back to normal.

Why Is There A Shift In Baby Preference?

There was a sexist tradition that believed that men mattered more. This came from the expectation that daughters will grow up and serve her husband's family. This is why parents preferred baby boys who would look after them in old age. Another idea is of dowry, to marry off a woman, the parents needed to have a stronger financial and economic backing, so the dowry could be paid at the time of her marriage. This is why many families did not want girl child. While these sexist ideas have not completely vanished, there are evidences that they are slowly fading away.

Secondly, this selective abortion has become a weapon against men, as it has led to lifelong bachelorhood. In China, they are known as "bare branches", and they were the ones who resented it intensely. Their anger also had wider social consequences. Large numbers of young, unmarried men are more likely to fuel instability and violence. Studies across several Asian countries have linked distorted sex ratios to higher rates of rape, violent crime in China, stricter policing to control unrest, and even greater risks of civil conflict or war elsewhere.

In India, especially in Haryana, bride buying, a controversial practice was found as a substitute for the lack of girls to marry the sons. These brides were purchased from backward economic background, which often led to exploitation.

As son preference declines, many societies are becoming safer.

At the same time, a subtle shift toward preferring daughters is emerging in some regions. This trend is far less extreme: parents are not eliminating boys, nor does any major country show a surplus of girls. Instead, the preference appears in attitudes and behavior. In Japan, couples wanting just one child tend to favour girls. Globally, parents often want both sexes, but in the US and Scandinavia, couples with sons are more likely to have additional children, suggesting a desire for daughters. Adoption data show families willing to pay more for girls, and where sex selection through IVF is legal, more women are choosing female embryos.

What Makes Parents Prefer Girl Child?

People are preferring girls for all sorts of reasons, which are:

• Some thing they are easier to bring up
• Some cherish what they see as "feminine" traits
• Some think that daughters are better at looking after elderly parents

The emerging preference for daughters also mirrors growing anxiety about how boys are faring. Boys have long been more likely to run into trouble, globally, 93% of the prison population is male. In many countries, they are also falling behind girls in education. In wealthier nations, 54% of young women hold a tertiary degree, compared with 41% of young men. While men remain overrepresented at the very top, in boardrooms, they are also increasingly overrepresented at the bottom, disengaged, isolated, and angry.

These trends have put boys’ struggles on governments’ radar. Because boys tend to mature later, some experts argue for starting them a year later in school. Others suggest more male teachers, especially in primary education, where they are scarce, to provide role models. Stronger vocational training could also steer boys toward careers traditionally avoided by men, such as nursing. Supporting struggling boys does not mean disadvantaging girls, just as giving glasses to someone with poor eyesight does not harm those with perfect vision.

Looking ahead, technology will give parents more choices. Some will be widely accepted, such as editing genes to prevent severe inherited diseases. But expanding access to sex-selection technologies raises harder questions. Couples undergoing fertility treatment can already choose sperm or embryos by sex, and as these methods become cheaper, their use may spread. Even more concerning, early blood tests can reveal an embryo’s sex within weeks, potentially enabling sex-selective abortions through medication, even among parents who conceive naturally.

After Australia's social media ban for children under 16, New York is also considering a mental health warning for the young social media users. Social media platforms with infinite scrolling, auto play and algorithmic feeds will now be required to display warning labels about the harm to young users' mental health. This is under a new law, announced New York Governor Kathy Hochul.

“Keeping New Yorkers safe has been my top priority since taking office, and that includes protecting our kids from the potential harms of social media features that encourage excessive use,” Hochul said in a statement. This law aims to create a warning on platforms that offer "addictive feeds" auto play or infinite scrolls and applied to conduct occurring partly or wholly in New York. This however does not work for users when used outside the state. Hochul also compared the social media warning labels with products like tobacco, where there are labels like the risk of cancer on the packaging itself.

Not just this, but even India could be considering brining in a social media ban for teens.

What Is Happening In India With Teen Ban On Social Media?

While hearing a write petition, the Madras High Court asked the Union Government to look for possibilities in passing a legislation similar to the ban of under 16s using social media in Australia. The petition was to emphasize on the awareness of the stakeholders and parental windows in the device that could control the menace of pornographic material which is easily accessible to children. The court asked Centre to order internet provider service companies to provide a 'Parental Window' to prevent children from accessing such content.

The Madurai Bench of Justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan told the authorities of child rights to accelerate this matter. The bench also noted that children could only be prevented from consuming such content only if there is a parental control app on the device. Judges also noted that parents have a higher responsibility in this, as children are highly vulnerable to such content.

What Is Happening In Australia?

To protect the mental health of children, Australia is now banning several social media apps, which include: Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube, Reddit, and streaming platforms Kick and Twitch. YouTube Kids, Google Classroom and WhatsApp are not covered under this rule as they do not fit those criteria. While anyone under 16 will be still able to watch most of the content without logging in, however, they cannot have an account on it. Critics are urging the government to widen the ban to include online gaming platforms such as Roblox and Discord, which are currently not covered.

Read: Australia Social Media Ban Explained: Why Government Plans to Restrict Accounts of Under-16s

The government says that it will also reduce the negative impact of social media's "design features that encourage [young people] to spend more time on screens, while also serving up content that can harm their health and wellbeing". A government study which was commissioned in 2025 found that 96% of children aged 10 to 15 used social media, and that seven out of 10 of them were exposed to harmful content. These content were misogynistic and violent in its nature, furthermore, content promoted eating disorders and suicide.

Children and parents will not be punished for infringing the ban, instead, social media companies will face fines of up to A$49.5m, which is equivalent of US$32m for serious or repeated breaches.