The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is conducting a comprehensive review of infant formula ingredients. It was initiated under the guidance of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as part of his "Make America Healthy Again" agenda, pledging to overhaul the U.S. food supply.

Behind this action is a mounting concern: although infant formula is still a staple for scores of American families, the science and nutritional criteria used to produce it have not materially changed since 1998. With changing worldwide research on infant nutrition and increasingly anxious parents worrying about contaminants, additives, and ingredient disclosure, this review could not be more timely.

Roughly 75% of U.S. infants are dependent on formula for the first six months, and for nearly 40%, it is the exclusive source of nutrition, as the CDC reports. In spite of world campaigns promoting exclusive breastfeeding, infant formula has emerged as a lifeline for parents who are unable—or unwilling—to breastfeed because of medical concerns, work schedules, or personal preference.

Formula is made to imitate breast milk of human women and usually comes from cow milk or soy. According to present FDA guidelines, every infant formula product is required to have 30 nutrients essential for infants in specific proportions. Yet, the technology of infants' digestion and nutrition requirements has progressed immensely, leading experts to wonder if the standards are yet sufficient.

Why Is The Government's Pushing for Nutritional Transparency?

Secretary Kennedy's call to action comes as part of a comprehensive national effort to enhance the U.S. food supply chain. The review is happening in the face of increasing parental distrust and industry trends which indicate that existing rules might not be completely in accordance with recent worldwide research on infant feeding. This effort will take into consideration an array of factors, including:

• Nutrient content and bioavailability
• Incidence of contaminants such as heavy metals
• Variations in international nutritional standards
• Possible threats from added sugars and seed oils

There is a planned roundtable discussion where scientists, manufacturers, and policymakers will engage in a debate on infant formula in the U.S. The FDA currently invites public and expert comment until the September 11 deadline.

What Are The Ingredients in Infant Formula?

Although the current formula is deemed safe, scientists insist that modern science highlights new nutritional findings not necessarily captured by existing rules. The FDA's 30-list of essential nutrients has not changed much since the 90s—even though studies on breast milk composition have dramatically changed.

Some of the main issues under consideration are:

Iron Content: American formulas generally have more iron content than European ones. Iron is crucial but, like too much of anything, could have unexpected side effects, so a rethinking may be in order.

DHA and HMOs: Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are recent additions designed to make formula as much like human milk as possible. Yet these are not necessary in every product.

Added Sugars: Corn syrup solids and glucose are common in certain formulas and can be responsible for early weight gain. Lactose, the natural sugar found in breast milk, is a better option.

Seed Oils: Widely maligned by health activists, seed oils are nevertheless essential to matching the fatty acid profile of breast milk, according to experts.

Bridget Young, an infant nutritionist at the University of Rochester, pressed the point to examine beyond ingredient labels to consider bioavailability—how well the body can absorb and utilize these foods.

Kennedy's bill also seems to be in response to lessons gleaned from the 2022 formula shortage, when contamination of an Abbott plant caused a national shortage. Parents frantically sought to get safe food into their babies, demonstrating how weak and undiversified the U.S. formula supply chain really is.

More compatibility with global standards, analysts contend, would have alleviated the shortage by facilitating faster importation of safe foreign-made brands. Kennedy's proposal seeks to avoid such disruptions by increasing regulatory leeway and strengthening safety protocols.

Should Parents Be Worried?

Some parents have in the last few years opted for European infant formulas, deeming them to be more healthy because of variations in ingredient listings and the degree of labeling transparency.

Though European and American recipes vary in iron levels or forms of sugar, neither is inherently superior. Each is constructed within a distinct regulatory and cultural context.

Rather than advocating for one over the other, Kennedy's report aims to take the best from both worlds merging U.S. regulation with evidence-driven international nutritional research.

What Parents Need to Know Before Buying Baby Formula

While no short-term changes are being implemented to the amount or type of infant formula available on retail shelves, the review is a significant departure from the manner in which the federal government plans to regulate the nutrition of babies.

The review will take a minimum of one year and will require coordination among government, industry, pediatric nutritionists, and consumers. Abrams cautions that this cannot be a cosmetic effort: "No shortcuts are possible. No one white paper or committee report will suffice."

For the moment, health professionals are assuring parents that infant formulas available today are still safe and nutritionally adequate. But the future could bring formulas that are not only safe but even more biologically relevant and designed to the most recent science regarding infant development.

Although many people now know about mental health issues like ADHD, depression and anxiety, a lot of their information comes from social media or movies, which can misrepresent and/or show small aspects of the illness. In reality, living with ADHD is much more difficult than we imagine.

A major study from Deakin University has looked closely at how ADHD affects a child's long-term health and quality of life. While we've known a lot about how ADHD impacts school and daily tasks, this research is one of the first to track the same group of children over 13 years to see the full picture.

The study followed 4,000 Australian children aged 4 to 17 and found that a child's quality of life is influenced by more than just their ADHD symptoms.

What Are Some Negative Factors for Children With ADHD?

Some things that negatively impacted a child who had ADHD, making this more difficult for them, were:

• Being a girl
• Having other medical conditions, like autism
• Taking ADHD medication
• Having a parent with mental health issues

The researchers explained that a child’s health was more likely to be poor if they had a caregiver with a physical or mental illness or if the child themselves had another medical condition like autism. The study also noted that children on common ADHD medications had poorer health outcomes, but the researchers say this specific finding needs more research.

The research showed that Children with ADHD tended to have better health and a higher quality of life if they had two or more siblings, a strong family support system, and were physically active.

Parenting Kids With ADHD – How Well Do Parents Cope?

When it comes to treating a child with ADHD, parents' personal experiences heavily influence the choices they make. A 2022 study published in the Child Care, Health and Development journal aimed to understand what it's like for parents raising a child with ADHD and how those experiences shape their views on different treatment options. The study found two main themes from the parents' stories:

ADHD's Impact on the Family

Parents talked about how ADHD forced them to completely change their family life. They had to constantly try new things to help their child at school and felt pressure from society to make their child "fit in."

Finding the Right Treatment

Parents emphasized the challenge of finding a treatment that truly worked for their child. They wanted to find the "right fit" with doctors and treatments. They also mentioned that factors like cost and location made it hard for everyone to get the help they needed, pointing to a need for more equal access to care.

The study concluded that no matter where they lived or what their background was, parents shared very similar struggles and goals. They all want access to a comprehensive treatment plan that involves the whole family and uses different approaches, not just one type of therapy or medication. The study suggests that we need to figure out what changes in healthcare and policy are needed to make this kind of family-centered treatment more widely available.

Why We Need Better Treatment Options For Kids With ADHD

The findings from the Deakin university research highlight that a child's health is affected by a range of factors, not just ADHD itself. A more holistic approach is needed, one that also addresses a child’s emotional and social challenges, as well as the mental health of their caregivers.

This new information is a good reminder that any changes to a child's treatment plan should always be made in consultation with a medical professional

The age-old belief that verbal punishments make kids soft and that they will not understand authority without physical punishments is not true. Even though your harsh words may not leave physical bruises on your child, the verbal whiplash from it is enough to affect your child for a lifetime.

According to a new study published in the journal BMJ Open. The research found that verbal abuse in childhood can harm a person's mental health in adulthood just as much as physical abuse.

Are Kids Affected By Verbal Abuse?

The study showed that verbal abuse increased a child's likelihood of having low mental well-being as an adult by 64%, while physical abuse increased the odds by 52%. For those who experienced both types of abuse, the risk of low mental well-being was doubled.

Researchers noted that while the harm of physical abuse is often immediately obvious, the damage from verbal abuse can be just as serious and long-lasting, even if it's not as easy to spot.

While physical abuse has become less common, verbal abuse is on the rise. The study, which tracked over 20,600 children in England and Wales, found that physical abuse cases dropped from 20% in children born between 1950 and 1979 to 10% in those born after 2000. However, verbal abuse increased from 12% to almost 20% during the same time.

The study found that verbal abuse was just as damaging to a person's mental health as physical abuse. About 24% of adults who were verbally abused as children had low mental well-being, compared to 23% of those who were physically abused. This number jumped to 29% for those who suffered both. In comparison, only 16% of adults who were not abused had low mental well-being.

How Do Harsh Words From Parents Impact Children?

Adults with low mental well-being struggled with feeling optimistic, useful, or close to others. They also had a harder time dealing with problems and thinking clearly. In most cases, verbal abuse had a greater impact on these specific aspects of mental health than physical abuse did.

For instance, verbal abuse increased an adult's odds of not feeling close to others by 90%, while physical abuse increased the odds by 33%. These findings highlight that even when a person has been physically abused, adding verbal abuse can bring an additional and significant risk to their mental health.

How You Reprimand Your Child Also Matters

A 2021 study from the University of Michigan looked at how different types of discipline affect children around the world. The study found that while spanking is always harmful, even some non-physical types of punishment can have mixed results.

The research suggests that the best way to raise well-behaved children may not be through punishment at all. Researchers believed that the most positive effects come from long-term investments in a child's life, such as:

• Spending quality time with them
• Showing them that they are loved
• Listening to them and their feelings

The study also found that when parents took away privileges, children were more likely to be aggressive and have trouble getting along with other children. They recommends that parents use discipline that is appropriate for the child's age, keep communication open, and provide a stable routine.

Teen mental health has been a major conversation, especially when it comes to children and healthy development. Many of us can relate to feeling unheard, helpless and undiagnosed depressive episodes. Reports had shown a severe lack of support and proper care for teen mental health. As more and more people became aware of mental health and well-being, the lack of care and resources just for teens was also highlighted. These reports have helped build a solid foundation for children, giving them the support they require.

However, there is some better and hopeful news for teens. A new federal report suggests that fewer teenagers are experiencing major depressive episodes and suicidal thoughts.

Have Mental Health Issues Declined In Teens?

A recent report from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration found that between 2021 and 2024, there was a more than 20% decrease in teenagers (ages 12 to 17) who reported having a major depressive episode or serious suicidal thoughts, plans, and attempts. This is a positive sign after years of increasing rates.

Mental health experts are encouraged by these findings, but they caution that it's still too early to draw a full conclusion without more data. However, the report provides a first look at how youth mental health has changed since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

How and Why Things Are Improving

Experts believe that the isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic helped "open the eyes" of many adults, leading to a greater focus on youth mental health. As a result, more parents, teachers, and policymakers are more aware of mental health needs. This shift has led to an increase in programs designed to help young people, including those in schools and through telehealth services.

These programs often focus on prevention and early intervention. This means giving kids the tools to cope with difficult emotions and situations before they become a crisis. By doing this, adults are helping to normalize conversations about mental health, making it less of a taboo subject.

Challenges That Still Remain

Despite the positive trends, the report highlights that there is still a lot of work to be done.

High Rates of Depression

Over one-fifth of all teenagers still experienced at least one major depressive episode last year.

Low Treatment Rates

Only about 60% of these teens received mental health treatment. Many reported that they didn't seek help because they were afraid of what others might think, worried about privacy, or didn't believe treatment would work.

Adults Are Struggling, Too

The report found no notable improvement in mental health among adults. This is a concern, as adults who are struggling may not be able to model healthy coping skills for the children in their lives.

Vulnerable Communities

Certain groups, including children of color and those in the LGBTQ+ community, continue to face a higher risk of depression and suicide.

Experts emphasize the importance of communication between caregivers and children. Talking about mental health should be as normal as talking about other safety issues. They encourage parents to speak with their child's doctor or school counselor to learn about available resources.