Health and Me

Ishita Roy

Joe Biden Is Diagnosed With Aggressive Prostate Cancer: All That You Need To Know

Joe Biden Diagnosed With Aggressive Prostate Cancer

Former US President Joe Biden's office confirmed on Sunday that he has been diagnosed with <span>prostate <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/health/cancer">cancer</a></span>. Earlier, a small <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/health-wellness/joe-biden-diagnosed-with-nodule-in-prostate-gland-article-151638178" data-type="tilCustomLink">nodule was found in his prostate gland</a>, however, not much had been revealed about his medical evaluation.

It was last week when Biden went to see the doctors after urinary symptoms and prostate nodule was found. He was then diagnosed with prostate <span>cancer</span> on Friday, and the cancer cells have spread to the bone.

“While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management," his office said. "The President and his family are reviewing treatment options with his physicians.”

<h4>How Is the Aggressiveness Of Prostate Cancer Graded?</h4>

The aggressiveness of prostate cancers is graded on the basis of Gleason scores. These scores range between 2 to 10, with 8,9,and 10 behaving more aggressively. Biden's office confirmed that his score was 9, suggesting that his cancer is the most aggressive.

The <span>Gleason score</span> works on the basis of the lower scores indicating slower growth and spread, and higher scores suggesting more aggressive disease.

Like Biden's cancer cells have spread to his bones, it is common for prostate cancer to spread to other parts of the body, especially to bones. Metastasized cancer is more difficult to treat than localized cancer because it's challenging for medication to reach every tumor and eliminate the disease entirely.

However, in cases like President Biden’s, where prostate cancer relies on hormones to grow, treatments that block or reduce hormone levels can be effective in targeting the tumors.

Dr Matthew Smith of Massachusetts General Brigham Cancer Center told the US News, "It is very treatable, but not curable. Most men in this situation would be treated with drugs and would not be advised to have either surgery or radiation therapy."

At the age of 82, Biden's health has been a topic of concern. During his presidency, he had a 'cancerous' skin lesion removed from his chest. In February 2023, the White House in a statement said that the skin tissue was removed and after biopsy it was revealed to be cancerous.

<h4>How Common Is Prostate Cancer In Men?</h4>

As per the American Cancer Society, about 1 in 8 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime. The National Institutes of Health notes that 50% of men between 70 to 80 years of age also showed histological evidence of malignancy.

While it is not clear what causes prostate cancer, healthcare professional have often found that age, obesity and a family history of prostate cancer could increase the chances of being diagnosed with it.

<h4>What Happens In Prostate Cancer?</h4>

As per Urology Care Foundation, prostate cancer develops when abnormal cells form and grow in the prostate gland. Not all abnormal growths, also called tumors, are cancerous. Some are benign growth and are not life threatening. They also do not spread to nearby tissue or other parts of the body.

Whereas cancerous growths can spread to nearby organs and tissues, as in the case of Biden.

<h4>What Have Been The Reaction On Biden's Diagnosis?</h4>

The current US President and a long time opponent Donald Trump posted on social media that he was saddened by the news and "we wish Joe a fast and successful recovery."

Kamala Harris also posted on social media that she was keeping him and in her family's "hearts and prayers during this time." She wrote: "Joe is a fighter — and I know he will face this challenge with the same strength, resilience, and optimism that have always defined his life and leadership."

Health Conditions A-Z

health

Joe Biden prostate cancer

metastasis

gleason score

health news

health news usa

Joe Biden Announces Cancer

Joe Biden Cancer

Cancer

Prostate Cancer

Joe biden diagnosed with prostate cancer

This Man Ate Mangoes At 67 And It Triggered A Gout Attack

Plastic Pieces Prompt Recall Of Popular Ice Cream Brand

Health News

10 Dumbbell Exercise Variations For Upper-Body Strength

A Parent’s Guide To Pets: Important Points To Consider For Your Child’s Health

Food Anxiety Is Real – How Your Food Intake Affects Your Anxiety

World Osteoporosis Month: Ways To Strengthen Your Bones

Brain Exercises To Keep You Cognitively Sharp

Easy Recipes To Make When You Don’t Wish To Cook

Physical Signs Of High Cortisol

9 Healthy Plant-Based Protein Rich Dishes To Try

What Happens When You Have Low Blood Pressure?

Throw These Toxic Bathroom Items Away To Protect Your Health

This Is What Cricket Superstar Virat Kohli Eats In A Day

Signs You Are Experiencing Sensory Overload

Shoulder Exercises You Should Do For Defined Shoulders

Best Foods To Eat When You Are Fasting

​Ghee For Ayurveda: Why It Should Be A Part Of Your Diet​

Symptoms Of Ovarian Cancer You Should Know

Yoga Poses That Can Build Core Strength

Biotin-Rich Foods You Should Add To Your Diet

Unexpected Physical Signs Of Stress

Simple And Affective Guide To Stop A Panic Attack

Signs Of Heat Exhaustion In Children

10 Heart Symptoms You Shouldn't Ignore

Lower Your Cholesterol With These Foods

Food Myths You Should Stop Believing

Work Stressing You Out? Tips To Handle Toxic Workspaces

Looking To Gain Weight? High-Calorie Healthy Foods To Try

​Pomegranates Are A Must For Summer, Here’s Why​

​How Does Being A Night Owl Change Your Brain​

​Can Nightlights Affect Your Child’s Sleep​

How To Decide Whether You Should Do Cardio Or Strength Training?

Enjoying Hobbies As An Adult Is More Important Than You Realize

Screentime Matters For Parents Too, Here's How It Causes Issues

Why Should We Discard Expired Prescription Drugs?

Perks Of Having Home Plants For Your Health

Signs You Are Dealing With Depleted Mother Syndrome

Protein-Rich Fruit Smoothies You Must Try

Ways You Can Reach Out To Someone In A Mental Health Crisis

These Things Are Causing You To Lose Sleep

10 Healthy Soups That Support Weight Loss

Easy Lunch Ideas For People With Type 2 Diabetes

Former US President Joe Biden's office confirmed on Sunday that he has been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Earlier, a small nodule was found in his prostate gland, however, not much had been revealed about his medical evaluation.It was last week when Biden went to see the doctors after urinary symptoms and prostate nodule was found. He was then diagnosed with prostate cancer on Friday, and the cancer cells have spread to the bone.“While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management," his office said. "The President and his family are reviewing treatment options with his physicians.”How Is the Aggressiveness Of Prostate Cancer Graded?The aggressiveness of prostate cancers is graded on the basis of Gleason scores. These scores range between 2 to 10, with 8,9,and 10 behaving more aggressively. Biden's office confirmed that his score was 9, suggesting that his cancer is the most aggressive.The Gleason score works on the basis of the lower scores indicating slower growth and spread, and higher scores suggesting more aggressive disease.Like Biden's cancer cells have spread to his bones, it is common for prostate cancer to spread to other parts of the body, especially to bones. Metastasized cancer is more difficult to treat than localized cancer because it's challenging for medication to reach every tumor and eliminate the disease entirely.However, in cases like President Biden’s, where prostate cancer relies on hormones to grow, treatments that block or reduce hormone levels can be effective in targeting the tumors.Dr Matthew Smith of Massachusetts General Brigham Cancer Center told the US News, "It is very treatable, but not curable. Most men in this situation would be treated with drugs and would not be advised to have either surgery or radiation therapy."At the age of 82, Biden's health has been a topic of concern. During his presidency, he had a 'cancerous' skin lesion removed from his chest. In February 2023, the White House in a statement said that the skin tissue was removed and after biopsy it was revealed to be cancerous.How Common Is Prostate Cancer In Men?As per the American Cancer Society, about 1 in 8 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime. The National Institutes of Health notes that 50% of men between 70 to 80 years of age also showed histological evidence of malignancy.While it is not clear what causes prostate cancer, healthcare professional have often found that age, obesity and a family history of prostate cancer could increase the chances of being diagnosed with it.What Happens In Prostate Cancer?As per Urology Care Foundation, prostate cancer develops when abnormal cells form and grow in the prostate gland. Not all abnormal growths, also called tumors, are cancerous. Some are benign growth and are not life threatening. They also do not spread to nearby tissue or other parts of the body.Whereas cancerous growths can spread to nearby organs and tissues, as in the case of Biden.What Have Been The Reaction On Biden's Diagnosis?The current US President and a long time opponent Donald Trump posted on social media that he was saddened by the news and "we wish Joe a fast and successful recovery."Kamala Harris also posted on social media that she was keeping him and in her family's "hearts and prayers during this time." She wrote: "Joe is a fighter — and I know he will face this challenge with the same strength, resilience, and optimism that have always defined his life and leadership."

joe biden is diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer: all that you need to know

Tanya Dutt

Food Recalls, Labelling And Transparency- Will This Make America Healthy Again?

Nutrition

plastic pieces prompt recall of popular ice cream brand

Parenting

'I Am A Nutritionist- These Are 4 Diet Non-Negotiables For My Son's Health'

'i am a nutritionist- these are 4 diet non-negotiables for my son's health'

Health & Wellness

Salt, Stress And Screens: The New Triggers Of High Blood Pressure

salt, stress and screens: the new triggers of high blood pressure

Tropical Fruit Helps You 'Get A Good Night's Sleep' When Eaten Regularly

this tropical fruit can be your best bet for healthy sleep

As the American public grows increasingly health-conscious, a crucial question looms large: are our food systems transparent and safe enough to protect us from long-term disease? With growing awareness of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), harmful food additives, and chemical-laden packaging, the conversation around food recalls, labelling, and transparency has never been more critical. The latest scientific evidence paints a sobering picture food safety in the U.S. may be less about bacterial contamination and more about everyday chemical exposure.

So, will greater transparency and tighter regulations around food ingredients and packaging finally steer America toward a healthier path? Let’s take a closer look at the problem and what it will take to fix it.

The foods we consume daily are often far from natural. Ultra-processed foods—ready meals, packaged snacks, sauces, candies, and sodas are typically manufactured using artificial colorings, preservatives, stabilizers, and sweeteners. But recent findings go beyond nutritional shortcomings, pointing to a far more insidious threat: toxic synthetic chemicals leaching into food from packaging and processing equipment.

A study published in Nature Medicine revealed that UPFs may be contaminated with thousands of harmful substances, including bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, microplastics, and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also known as "forever chemicals." These chemicals are linked to cancer, infertility, asthma, obesity, birth defects, and even neurodevelopmental disorders like autism.

Worryingly, many of these chemicals enter food not because they’re ingredients but through the packaging or industrial equipment used during manufacturing. “The more processed a food is, the greater its burden of synthetic chemicals,” the study authors warned.

<h2>Is Eco-Friendly Packaging A False Promise?</h2>

There’s been a push toward environmentally friendly packaging solutions, such as recycled plastic and paperboard. However, this trend may carry unintended health consequences.

Researchers from the Food Packaging Forum Foundation in Switzerland caution that recycling plastics intensifies chemical concentrations. Their review suggests that reused or recycled packaging materials often leach more toxins into food—particularly when food is stored long-term or reheated in its packaging, as is common with ready-to-eat meals.

Black plastic kitchen utensils and takeaway containers have been found to contain fireproofing chemicals, which are linked to a host of chronic health problems. The notion that eco-friendly automatically means health-friendly is now being called into question.

<h2>What is Loophole That Keeps Dangerous Additives on Shelves?</h2>

One of the most glaring issues in food safety regulation lies in the GRAS loophole—a 1958 amendment that permits food manufacturers to bypass FDA safety approval if an ingredient is "Generally Recognized As Safe."

Originally intended for common kitchen ingredients like salt and pepper, the GRAS clause has been exploited by big food corporations. Since 1997, nearly 1,000 food additives have entered the U.S. market without FDA oversight. Even more alarming, the majority of safety evaluations for GRAS substances are conducted by in-house scientists or consultants hired by food manufacturers, creating a significant conflict of interest.

Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has initiated a move to phase out petroleum-based dyes. Yet critics argue this should only be the beginning. To restore consumer trust and protect public health, the FDA must urgently revisit and regulate the GRAS pathway.

<h2>Microplastics in Our Blood and Brains</h2>

Plastic is now omnipresent—not just in our oceans but in our bodies. Recent research found that 98% of Americans have PFASs in their bloodstream, while microplastics have been detected in the lungs, brain, placenta, and arteries.

In a 2024 study, Dr. Sanjay Rajagopalan from Case Western Reserve University found that microplastics in arteries were closely associated with an increased risk of heart attacks and strokes. "The particles looked quite nasty," he explained. “Jagged, sharp-edged—very similar to cholesterol plaques.”

These findings are a chilling reminder that food packaging is not a trivial matter. It's a public health issue that affects all demographics, regardless of diet, location, or socioeconomic status.

<h2>Can Transparency and Recalls Turn the Tide?</h2>

Increased transparency in food labeling—clearly indicating not only nutritional information but chemical exposure levels—would empower consumers to make better decisions. The introduction of food recalls based on chemical contamination, not just bacterial outbreaks, would also serve as a meaningful deterrent to negligent manufacturers.

Currently, food recalls are reactive rather than preventive. Most happen after illnesses or lawsuits, rather than proactive regulation. But if the U.S. food industry prioritized chemical transparency, third-party testing, and label disclosures, it could reduce chronic disease risk and restore consumer confidence.

Fixing this systemic issue won't be easy, but the road to national health recovery is clear. Reforming outdated laws like GRAS, holding manufacturers accountable, banning high-risk chemicals in food packaging, and mandating clearer food labels are essential steps.

Moreover, public health campaigns must educate people on the hidden dangers of ultra-processed foods—not just their calories and sugar but their chemical load. In a food economy dominated by speed, shelf life, and profit margins, these changes will require strong political will, corporate responsibility, and consumer demand.

As the scientific evidence mounts, one truth becomes undeniable: what’s in our food—and what surrounds it—matters. America’s health crisis isn’t just a problem of portion size or poor choices. It’s a structural issue rooted in loopholes, lax oversight, and a lack of transparency.

diet & nutrition

rfk food safety

robert f kennedy jr fda

food recalls usa

chemical food packaging

ultra-processed foods health risk

pfas in food

bpa health effects

As the American public grows increasingly health-conscious, a crucial question looms large: are our food systems transparent and safe enough to protect us from long-term disease? With growing awareness of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), harmful food additives, and chemical-laden packaging, the conversation around food recalls, labelling, and transparency has never been more critical. The latest scientific evidence paints a sobering picture food safety in the U.S. may be less about bacterial contamination and more about everyday chemical exposure.So, will greater transparency and tighter regulations around food ingredients and packaging finally steer America toward a healthier path? Let’s take a closer look at the problem and what it will take to fix it.The foods we consume daily are often far from natural. Ultra-processed foods—ready meals, packaged snacks, sauces, candies, and sodas are typically manufactured using artificial colorings, preservatives, stabilizers, and sweeteners. But recent findings go beyond nutritional shortcomings, pointing to a far more insidious threat: toxic synthetic chemicals leaching into food from packaging and processing equipment.A study published in Nature Medicine revealed that UPFs may be contaminated with thousands of harmful substances, including bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, microplastics, and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also known as "forever chemicals." These chemicals are linked to cancer, infertility, asthma, obesity, birth defects, and even neurodevelopmental disorders like autism.Worryingly, many of these chemicals enter food not because they’re ingredients but through the packaging or industrial equipment used during manufacturing. “The more processed a food is, the greater its burden of synthetic chemicals,” the study authors warned.Is Eco-Friendly Packaging A False Promise?There’s been a push toward environmentally friendly packaging solutions, such as recycled plastic and paperboard. However, this trend may carry unintended health consequences.Researchers from the Food Packaging Forum Foundation in Switzerland caution that recycling plastics intensifies chemical concentrations. Their review suggests that reused or recycled packaging materials often leach more toxins into food—particularly when food is stored long-term or reheated in its packaging, as is common with ready-to-eat meals.Black plastic kitchen utensils and takeaway containers have been found to contain fireproofing chemicals, which are linked to a host of chronic health problems. The notion that eco-friendly automatically means health-friendly is now being called into question.What is Loophole That Keeps Dangerous Additives on Shelves?One of the most glaring issues in food safety regulation lies in the GRAS loophole—a 1958 amendment that permits food manufacturers to bypass FDA safety approval if an ingredient is "Generally Recognized As Safe."Originally intended for common kitchen ingredients like salt and pepper, the GRAS clause has been exploited by big food corporations. Since 1997, nearly 1,000 food additives have entered the U.S. market without FDA oversight. Even more alarming, the majority of safety evaluations for GRAS substances are conducted by in-house scientists or consultants hired by food manufacturers, creating a significant conflict of interest.Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has initiated a move to phase out petroleum-based dyes. Yet critics argue this should only be the beginning. To restore consumer trust and protect public health, the FDA must urgently revisit and regulate the GRAS pathway.Microplastics in Our Blood and BrainsPlastic is now omnipresent—not just in our oceans but in our bodies. Recent research found that 98% of Americans have PFASs in their bloodstream, while microplastics have been detected in the lungs, brain, placenta, and arteries.In a 2024 study, Dr. Sanjay Rajagopalan from Case Western Reserve University found that microplastics in arteries were closely associated with an increased risk of heart attacks and strokes. "The particles looked quite nasty," he explained. “Jagged, sharp-edged—very similar to cholesterol plaques.”These findings are a chilling reminder that food packaging is not a trivial matter. It's a public health issue that affects all demographics, regardless of diet, location, or socioeconomic status.Can Transparency and Recalls Turn the Tide?Increased transparency in food labeling—clearly indicating not only nutritional information but chemical exposure levels—would empower consumers to make better decisions. The introduction of food recalls based on chemical contamination, not just bacterial outbreaks, would also serve as a meaningful deterrent to negligent manufacturers.Currently, food recalls are reactive rather than preventive. Most happen after illnesses or lawsuits, rather than proactive regulation. But if the U.S. food industry prioritized chemical transparency, third-party testing, and label disclosures, it could reduce chronic disease risk and restore consumer confidence.Fixing this systemic issue won't be easy, but the road to national health recovery is clear. Reforming outdated laws like GRAS, holding manufacturers accountable, banning high-risk chemicals in food packaging, and mandating clearer food labels are essential steps.Moreover, public health campaigns must educate people on the hidden dangers of ultra-processed foods—not just their calories and sugar but their chemical load. In a food economy dominated by speed, shelf life, and profit margins, these changes will require strong political will, corporate responsibility, and consumer demand.As the scientific evidence mounts, one truth becomes undeniable: what’s in our food—and what surrounds it—matters. America’s health crisis isn’t just a problem of portion size or poor choices. It’s a structural issue rooted in loopholes, lax oversight, and a lack of transparency.

food recalls, labelling and transparency- will this make america healthy again?

Unexpected Type 2 Diabetes 'Cure' Found In The Brain, Could This Be The Link In Treatment?

Fitness

What Is The 2-Per-20-Sitting-Walking Rule That Helps Lower Your Sugar?

what is the 2-per-20-sitting-walking rule that helps lower your sugar?

Children As Young As 10 Could Show Signs Of Heart Diseases- Look Out For This Factor

children as young as 10 could show signs of heart diseases- look out for this factor

Want To Become Fitter And Leaner By Summer End? Nutritionist Shares What To Add, Skip And Swap

want to become fitter and leaner by summer end? nutritionist shares what to add, skip and swap

Why Weight Loss Injections May Work Better for Women?

why weight loss injections may work better for women?

For years, type 2 <span>diabetes</span> has been viewed as a metabolic disorder rooted in lifestyle habits, obesity, and insulin resistance. But a new study, released in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, is challenging that underlying wisdom. In a stunning reversal, researchers have discovered that certain neurons in the brain specifically Agouti-related peptide (AgRP) neurons in the hypothalamus could play an important role in the onset and resolution of type 2 diabetes.

This finding opens the door to an innovative treatment strategy- conditioning the brain to control blood sugar levels, perhaps without changing weight or food consumption. It's a breakthrough that can reimagine how the global medical community treats this chronic illness that plagues more than 400 million people around the world.

Up to this point, the brain was not thought to play a central role in type 2 diabetes pathology. However, investigators at UW Medicine have demonstrated that a hyperactive population of neurons, <span>AgRP neurons</span> found in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus disproportionately contribute to driving hyperglycemia (elevated blood glucose).

Dr. Michael Schwartz, lead author on the study and a leading endocrinologist at the University of Washington, said, "These neurons are having an outsized impact in hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes." His researchers silenced the talking capability of AgRP neurons with viral genetics—namely, they introduced tetanus toxin to keep these neurons from talking to nearby cells. The findings were nothing short of revolutionary: blood glucose levels normalized for months in diabetic mice, even without adjustments in body weight or food consumption.

This finding contradicts the long-held dogma that weight gain and insulin resistance are the central causes of type 2 diabetes. Lifestyle and genetics are still major players, of course, but the brain's regulatory role in glucose metabolism is also proving to be a major if not central component of the puzzle.

The scientists observed additional modifications in the mice after AgRP neuron repression:

<ul><li>Lower plasma insulin levels, indicating higher insulin sensitivity</li><li>Higher liver glycogen, reflecting more effective glucose storage</li><li>Lower corticosterone (mouse equivalent of cortisol), which could indicate reduced physiological stress</li><li>Higher lactate levels, potentially increasing hepatic glucose uptake</li></ul>

These indicators as a whole indicate systemic restoration of glucose metabolism—initiated not by a pancreas-directed or weight-loss intervention, but by a brain-mediated one.

<h2>How This Research Relates to Ozempic?</h2>

Surprisingly, today's diabetes medications such as GLP-1 receptor agonists like the blockbuster medications Ozempic and Wegovy—are also known to suppress AgRP neurons. Dr. Schwartz theorizes that these brain-targeting actions may be a partial explanation for their glucose-lowering effects, independent of their well-characterized effect on weight loss.

The degree to which this effect underlies the antidiabetic action of these drugs is unknown," Schwartz said. But the link raises tantalizing possibilities: might stimulating or duplicating this brain suppression be a new, more effective route to remission from diabetes?

<h2>What Implications It Has For Humans?</h2>

Although models in animals are not always a good predictor of human outcomes, the repeatability across several mouse studies is encouraging. An earlier study by Schwartz's group had demonstrated that infusing the brain peptide FGF1 directly into the hypothalamus also resulted in diabetes remission—a response that was again linked to the suppression of AgRP neuron activity.

If the same mechanisms exist in humans, neuromodulation or precision-targeted drugs that quiet particular brain circuits could be future treatment—potentially presenting a backup for patients who have difficulty with lifestyle interventions or develop drug resistance.

<h2>Is Brain-Targeted Diabetes Therapies the New Treatment?</h2>

There are more questions than answers. Why do AgRP neurons get hyperactive in the first place? Can their activity be selectively and safely reduced in human beings? And could this be achieved without impacting other vital functions of the brain?

Dr. Schwartz points out that the study breaks with conventional thinking on diabetes and requires further investigation into the neurobiology of metabolic illness. "This could be a paradigm shift in how we approach and treat type 2 diabetes," he says.

The long-term aim is to translate this brain-based strategy from the bench to the bedside. Successful, it could not only transform diabetes care—it could also lead to greater interest in how the brain controls whole-body metabolism, with the potential for breakthroughs for other diseases linked to metabolic dysregulation.

With millions living with type 2 diabetes globally, the potential of a brain-based treatment framework is staggering. Learning that a few thousand neurons have the power to control blood sugar levels separate from weight loss may change the way the disease is treated, possibly putting an end to the suffering of patients who have long been battling traditional treatments.

As science continues to advance, the neurobiology of metabolism could become the new frontier in international diabetes management. The mind-body connection, it seems, might be more literal and potent than we ever envisioned.

diabetes

type 2 diabetes cure

agrp neurons

brain and diabetes link

diabetes remission study

hypothalamus and blood sugar

new diabetes treatment

fgf1 diabetes research

For years, type 2 diabetes has been viewed as a metabolic disorder rooted in lifestyle habits, obesity, and insulin resistance. But a new study, released in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, is challenging that underlying wisdom. In a stunning reversal, researchers have discovered that certain neurons in the brain specifically Agouti-related peptide (AgRP) neurons in the hypothalamus could play an important role in the onset and resolution of type 2 diabetes.This finding opens the door to an innovative treatment strategy- conditioning the brain to control blood sugar levels, perhaps without changing weight or food consumption. It's a breakthrough that can reimagine how the global medical community treats this chronic illness that plagues more than 400 million people around the world.Up to this point, the brain was not thought to play a central role in type 2 diabetes pathology. However, investigators at UW Medicine have demonstrated that a hyperactive population of neurons, AgRP neurons found in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus disproportionately contribute to driving hyperglycemia (elevated blood glucose).Dr. Michael Schwartz, lead author on the study and a leading endocrinologist at the University of Washington, said, "These neurons are having an outsized impact in hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes." His researchers silenced the talking capability of AgRP neurons with viral genetics—namely, they introduced tetanus toxin to keep these neurons from talking to nearby cells. The findings were nothing short of revolutionary: blood glucose levels normalized for months in diabetic mice, even without adjustments in body weight or food consumption.This finding contradicts the long-held dogma that weight gain and insulin resistance are the central causes of type 2 diabetes. Lifestyle and genetics are still major players, of course, but the brain's regulatory role in glucose metabolism is also proving to be a major if not central component of the puzzle.The scientists observed additional modifications in the mice after AgRP neuron repression:Lower plasma insulin levels, indicating higher insulin sensitivityHigher liver glycogen, reflecting more effective glucose storageLower corticosterone (mouse equivalent of cortisol), which could indicate reduced physiological stressHigher lactate levels, potentially increasing hepatic glucose uptakeThese indicators as a whole indicate systemic restoration of glucose metabolism—initiated not by a pancreas-directed or weight-loss intervention, but by a brain-mediated one.How This Research Relates to Ozempic?Surprisingly, today's diabetes medications such as GLP-1 receptor agonists like the blockbuster medications Ozempic and Wegovy—are also known to suppress AgRP neurons. Dr. Schwartz theorizes that these brain-targeting actions may be a partial explanation for their glucose-lowering effects, independent of their well-characterized effect on weight loss.The degree to which this effect underlies the antidiabetic action of these drugs is unknown," Schwartz said. But the link raises tantalizing possibilities: might stimulating or duplicating this brain suppression be a new, more effective route to remission from diabetes?What Implications It Has For Humans?Although models in animals are not always a good predictor of human outcomes, the repeatability across several mouse studies is encouraging. An earlier study by Schwartz's group had demonstrated that infusing the brain peptide FGF1 directly into the hypothalamus also resulted in diabetes remission—a response that was again linked to the suppression of AgRP neuron activity.If the same mechanisms exist in humans, neuromodulation or precision-targeted drugs that quiet particular brain circuits could be future treatment—potentially presenting a backup for patients who have difficulty with lifestyle interventions or develop drug resistance.Is Brain-Targeted Diabetes Therapies the New Treatment?There are more questions than answers. Why do AgRP neurons get hyperactive in the first place? Can their activity be selectively and safely reduced in human beings? And could this be achieved without impacting other vital functions of the brain?Dr. Schwartz points out that the study breaks with conventional thinking on diabetes and requires further investigation into the neurobiology of metabolic illness. "This could be a paradigm shift in how we approach and treat type 2 diabetes," he says.The long-term aim is to translate this brain-based strategy from the bench to the bedside. Successful, it could not only transform diabetes care—it could also lead to greater interest in how the brain controls whole-body metabolism, with the potential for breakthroughs for other diseases linked to metabolic dysregulation.With millions living with type 2 diabetes globally, the potential of a brain-based treatment framework is staggering. Learning that a few thousand neurons have the power to control blood sugar levels separate from weight loss may change the way the disease is treated, possibly putting an end to the suffering of patients who have long been battling traditional treatments.As science continues to advance, the neurobiology of metabolism could become the new frontier in international diabetes management. The mind-body connection, it seems, might be more literal and potent than we ever envisioned.

unexpected type 2 diabetes 'cure' found in the brain, could this be the link in treatment?

Riya Baibhawi

US Measles Cases Exceed 1,020 as RFK Jr Downplays Outbreaks

As Covid-19 Cases Spike In Hong Kong, Singapore; Is The Next Pandemic Wave Starting In Asia?

as covid-19 cases spike in hong; singapore, is the next pandemic wave starting in asia?

First-Ever Acne Vaccine Enters Clinical Trials; Could Clear Skin Be Just One Shot Away?

first-ever acne vaccine enters clinical trials; could clear skin be just one shot away?

Meet 'Doctor Peyo' - The Therapy Horse Who Is Changing End-of-Life Care

meet 'doctor peyo' - the therapy horse who is changing end-of-life care

United States (US) is witnessing a concerning surge in <span>measles</span> cases, with more than 1,000 reported so far since the beginning of 2025. This is only the second time since the disease was declared eliminated in America 25 years ago that the number of cases has risen this high. A widespread outbreak spanning at least 30 American states continues to escalate, placing the country on course for what could become the worst year for measles since 2000. 

On Friday, at least 1024 cases of the disease were reported of the highly contagious disease. In 2024, the total number of cases reported were 285. Cases have been reported by 30 states, and there have been 14 outbreaks. Most cases—947 out of the total 1024—are outbreak associated. Meanwhile, the vaccination status of 96% of all cases is classified as "unvaccinated or unknown."

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has continuously downplayed the outbreak. After the death of a 6-year-old boy in February, Kennedy said the child’s death was "not unusual." "We have measles outbreaks every year,” he said at the time." But this spread is unlike others the US has previously seen, becoming the second-highest case count in 25 years. After facing criticism, Kennedy slightly walked back his comments after attending the funeral of an 8-year-old Texas girl who died from measles at the start of April. 

Ever since then, Kennedy Jr has continued to downplay the disease. In April, he baselessly claimed that the <span>measles vaccine</span> "contains a lot of aborted fetus debris and DNA particles. He then went on a TV appearance to tell parents to "Do your research" on vaccines, without specifying any information sources. In the latest development, he asked people not to follow his medical advice. 

US health secretary Kennedy Jr refused to say whether he would vaccinate his children if he had to choose today, and defended Republicans’ proposal to cut healthcare to fund tax cut extensions.  “What I would say is my opinions about vaccines are irrelevant … I don’t want to seem like I’m being evasive, but I don’t think people should be taking advice, medical advice, from me."

mEASLES

us MEASLES OUTBREAK

US MEASLES

RFK JR

mEASLES VACCINE

United States (US) is witnessing a concerning surge in measles cases, with more than 1,000 reported so far since the beginning of 2025. This is only the second time since the disease was declared eliminated in America 25 years ago that the number of cases has risen this high. A widespread outbreak spanning at least 30 American states continues to escalate, placing the country on course for what could become the worst year for measles since 2000. On Friday, at least 1024 cases of the disease were reported of the highly contagious disease. In 2024, the total number of cases reported were 285. Cases have been reported by 30 states, and there have been 14 outbreaks. Most cases—947 out of the total 1024—are outbreak associated. Meanwhile, the vaccination status of 96% of all cases is classified as "unvaccinated or unknown."Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has continuously downplayed the outbreak. After the death of a 6-year-old boy in February, Kennedy said the child’s death was "not unusual." "We have measles outbreaks every year,” he said at the time." But this spread is unlike others the US has previously seen, becoming the second-highest case count in 25 years. After facing criticism, Kennedy slightly walked back his comments after attending the funeral of an 8-year-old Texas girl who died from measles at the start of April. Ever since then, Kennedy Jr has continued to downplay the disease. In April, he baselessly claimed that the measles vaccine "contains a lot of aborted fetus debris and DNA particles. He then went on a TV appearance to tell parents to "Do your research" on vaccines, without specifying any information sources. In the latest development, he asked people not to follow his medical advice. US health secretary Kennedy Jr refused to say whether he would vaccinate his children if he had to choose today, and defended Republicans’ proposal to cut healthcare to fund tax cut extensions.  “What I would say is my opinions about vaccines are irrelevant … I don’t want to seem like I’m being evasive, but I don’t think people should be taking advice, medical advice, from me."

us measles cases exceed 1,020 as rfk jr downplays outbreaks

About Us

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Company

Health and Me is a premium website with content written and curated to function as a handbook for all Health concerns.

Joe Biden Is Diagnosed With Aggressive Prostate Cancer: All That You Need To Know

Quick Stories

Food Recalls, Labelling And Transparency- Will This Make America Healthy Again?

Unexpected Type 2 Diabetes 'Cure' Found In The Brain, Could This Be The Link In Treatment?

US Measles Cases Exceed 1,020 as RFK Jr Downplays Outbreaks

Health Conditions A-Z

This Man Ate Mangoes At 67 And It Triggered A Gout Attack

Plastic Pieces Prompt Recall Of Popular Ice Cream Brand

Joe Biden Is Diagnosed With Aggressive Prostate Cancer: All That You Need To Know