Health and Me

Ishita Roy

Scott Swift, Taylor Swift's Dad Underwent A Quintuple Bypass Heart Surgery, Here's What We Know About It So Far

Scott Swift, Pop Singer Taylor Swift's Dad Underwent A Quintuple Bypass Heart Surgery After A Stress Test, Here's What We Know About It So Far

Scott Swift, Taylor Swift's dad recommends everyone to take stress test

Scott Swift, Taylor Swift's dad undergoes quintuple bypass surgery

<span>Scott Swift</span>, 73, pop singer <span>Taylor Swift</span>'s dad just underwent a quintuple <span>bypass surgery</span>, revealed Taylor during one of the episodes of Travis Kelce and Jason Kelce's New Heights podcast. 

She also shared that she had moved in with her dad earlier this year to take care of him for a speedy recovery. She noted that her father has been full of gratitude after the surgery. "He was the loveliest patient ever. He just kept saying thank you over and over again."

<h2>Why Did Scott Swift Need A Surgery?</h2>

Taylor called the surgery "really intense" and said that her dad's heart always had a healthy ECG or electrocardiogram. He also ensures to get it every year to remain a step ahead of any physical ailments. However, five hard blockages were found in his heart during a resting stress test. 

"He's been telling all his friends, 'You need to get the stress test,' because that's what's actually preventative. If you can find that earlier, you don't have to have a bypass surgery," she said.

<h4>Taylor confirmed that her father is doing "incredibly well" and that his humor has helped him go through during the hard times. It still is very much intact in him.</h4>

She shares that he did not know how many blockages he's had, on being told that he underwent a quintuple bypass, which means five blockages, he also joked about it. "Well, you see, I come from a very competitive family," he told Taylor.

As per the National Institute of Health (NIH), US, it is a form of physical test that typically utilizes electrocardiography along with blood pressure monitoring and exercise, which involves a treadmill or bicycle. 

However, in a resting stress test, the assessment happens when the heart muscle is at rest after stress. This stress helps in identifying areas of reduced blood flow like ischemia or damage to the heart muscle, which can indicate conditions like coronary artery disease. 

The test involves injecting a radioactive tracer into the bloodstream, then using a special camera to take images of the heart at rest and after stress.

As per Johns Hopkins Medicine, bypass surgery or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is a procedure used to treat coronary artery disease. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the narrowing of the coronary arteries. These are the blood vessels that supply oxygen and nutrients to the heart muscle. CAD is caused by a build-up of fatty material within the walls of the arteries. This buildup narrows the inside of the arteries, limiting the supply of oxygen-rich blood to the heart muscle.

One way to treat the blocked or narrowed arteries is to bypass the blocked portion of the coronary artery with a piece of a healthy blood vessel from elsewhere in your body. Blood vessels, or grafts, used for the bypass procedure may be pieces of a vein from your leg or an artery in your chest. An artery from your wrist may also be used.

<strong>ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/health-wellness/4-rare-heart-diseases-that-are-becoming-common-by-each-passing-day-article-152383714" data-type="tilCustomLink">4 Rare Heart Diseases That Are Becoming Common By Each Passing Day</a></strong>

This surgery is done to treat a blockage or narrowing of one or more of the coronary arteries. It can restore the blood supply to your heart muscle when nonsurgical procedures are not a choice.

<h2>More Updates From The Swift Family</h2>

In addition to Scott, Taylor shared that her mom Andrea Swift, too, under a procedure. “My mom just got a new knee,” Taylor shared. “She’s doing great. She’s scampering around. We’re not quite at scampering yet, but she’s doing great.”

She noted that her parents are her best friends. 

<h4>"It was actually one of the most special things that's ever happened to me, spending all that time with them this summer. You have those long talks that you don't have when it's a small, concentrated period of time.”</h4>

Health Conditions A-Z

health

scott swift

scott swift bypass surgery

taylor swift dad

health news

taylor swift

bypass surgery

taylor swift moves in with dad

heart health

knee surgery

taylor swift family health

Can THIS Naturally Occurring Element Treat Alzheimer's

Man Falls Ill After Seeking ChatGPT Advice on Cutting Salt

Health News

Foods People With IBS Should Avoid

Exercises To Improve Digestion

Easy Work Lunches You Can Make In The Morning

Hunger Vs Craving: Difference Explained In 60 seconds

These Things Can Cause Your Heart To Age Faster

High Carb Foods That Are Actually Healthy

Superfoods That Support Your Gut Health

Immune-Boosting Foods To Have During Rainy Season

Potato Based Dishes You For Week-Long Meal Prep

Weight Loss Dishes With Fruits You Should Try

Stress Vs. Anxiety: Difference Explained In 60 seconds

Can You Get Heatstroke In Monsoon?

You’re Not Lazy! Women Do Need More Sleep Than Men

How To Ditch Daytime Sleepiness In Office?

Common Mistakes People Make While Eating Flaxseeds

Toddlers In India Are Missing Development Milestones: Study

Yoga Poses You Should Do For Back Pain

Healthy Brunch Ideas For A Lazy Weekend Meal

Balancing Exercises You Should Do For Stability

How Much Can Food Affect Menstruation?

What Should Fitness Look Like For A 13-18 Year Old

Food For Diabetes: What Should A Diabetic Diet Contain

You Don’t Always Need Weights For Strength Training

Feel Sleepy After Lunches - Light And Healthy Office Lunches

Positive Thinking Practice – How Does It Help You?

MIND Diet – Is This A Healthy Diet Or Another Trend?

Yoga Prop Essentials To Improve Your Exercise Session

Should Potatoes Be The Part Of A Healthy Diet?

Best And Worst Foods To Lower Blood Pressure

Low-Impact Cardio Workouts You Should Try

10 Healthy Pasta Salad Dressing For Weight Loss

Breathing Exercise You Should Do To Relieve Stress

Headache vs. Migraine: Difference Explained In 60 Seconds

How Many Times Do You Need To Wash Your Face?

Hypothyroidism Diet – What To Eat And What You Should Avoid

Stretches To Relieve Leg Pain And Numbness After Sitting For Too Long

No-Cook Healthy Meals For Lazy Days At Home

Easy Breakfast Options To Try During Calorie Deficit

How To Stop Muscle Cramps Immediately

Scott Swift, 73, pop singer Taylor Swift's dad just underwent a quintuple bypass surgery, revealed Taylor during one of the episodes of Travis Kelce and Jason Kelce's New Heights podcast. She also shared that she had moved in with her dad earlier this year to take care of him for a speedy recovery. She noted that her father has been full of gratitude after the surgery. "He was the loveliest patient ever. He just kept saying thank you over and over again."Why Did Scott Swift Need A Surgery?Taylor called the surgery "really intense" and said that her dad's heart always had a healthy ECG or electrocardiogram. He also ensures to get it every year to remain a step ahead of any physical ailments. However, five hard blockages were found in his heart during a resting stress test. "He's been telling all his friends, 'You need to get the stress test,' because that's what's actually preventative. If you can find that earlier, you don't have to have a bypass surgery," she said.Taylor confirmed that her father is doing "incredibly well" and that his humor has helped him go through during the hard times. It still is very much intact in him.She shares that he did not know how many blockages he's had, on being told that he underwent a quintuple bypass, which means five blockages, he also joked about it. "Well, you see, I come from a very competitive family," he told Taylor.What Is A Stress Test?      As per the National Institute of Health (NIH), US, it is a form of physical test that typically utilizes electrocardiography along with blood pressure monitoring and exercise, which involves a treadmill or bicycle. However, in a resting stress test, the assessment happens when the heart muscle is at rest after stress. This stress helps in identifying areas of reduced blood flow like ischemia or damage to the heart muscle, which can indicate conditions like coronary artery disease. The test involves injecting a radioactive tracer into the bloodstream, then using a special camera to take images of the heart at rest and after stress.What Is A Bypass Surgery?      As per Johns Hopkins Medicine, bypass surgery or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is a procedure used to treat coronary artery disease. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the narrowing of the coronary arteries. These are the blood vessels that supply oxygen and nutrients to the heart muscle. CAD is caused by a build-up of fatty material within the walls of the arteries. This buildup narrows the inside of the arteries, limiting the supply of oxygen-rich blood to the heart muscle.How Does It Work? One way to treat the blocked or narrowed arteries is to bypass the blocked portion of the coronary artery with a piece of a healthy blood vessel from elsewhere in your body. Blood vessels, or grafts, used for the bypass procedure may be pieces of a vein from your leg or an artery in your chest. An artery from your wrist may also be used.ALSO READ: 4 Rare Heart Diseases That Are Becoming Common By Each Passing DayThis surgery is done to treat a blockage or narrowing of one or more of the coronary arteries. It can restore the blood supply to your heart muscle when nonsurgical procedures are not a choice.More Updates From The Swift FamilyIn addition to Scott, Taylor shared that her mom Andrea Swift, too, under a procedure. “My mom just got a new knee,” Taylor shared. “She’s doing great. She’s scampering around. We’re not quite at scampering yet, but she’s doing great.”She noted that her parents are her best friends. "It was actually one of the most special things that's ever happened to me, spending all that time with them this summer. You have those long talks that you don't have when it's a small, concentrated period of time.”

scott swift, pop singer taylor swift's dad underwent a quintuple bypass heart surgery after a stress test, here's what we know about it so far

FDA Confirms Resolution of Nationwide IV Saline Shortage

FDA Vaccination Chief Vinay Prasad Returns To Job Within Days After Quitting Under Pressure, Who Is He?

fda vaccination chief vinay prasad returns to job within days after quitting under pressure, who is he?

FDA Approves First-Ever Migraine Prevention Drug For Kids And Teens

fda approves first-ever migraine prevention drug for kids and teens

Health & Wellness

can this naturally occurring element treat alzheimer's

The ‘Make America Healthy Again’ Report Is Releasing Soon: 5 Big Things It Might Reveal

the ‘make america healthy again’ report is releasing soon: 5 big things it might reveal

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that the nationwide shortage of sodium chloride 0.9 percent intravenous (IV) saline solution, which is a critical medical supply used in hospitals and emergency care, has officially come to an end. The resolution marks a significant milestone in stabilizing the supply of one of the most essential tools in patient care.

<h4>Collaborative Effort to Restore Supply</h4>

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H., credited the resolution of the shortage to a coordinated effort between the FDA, the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), and industry partners. According to Makary, this multi-agency and cross-sector collaboration allowed for rapid action to address the supply gap that had strained healthcare facilities across the country.

To overcome the shortage, the FDA and its partners implemented several urgent measures. These included enabling the temporary import of IV saline solutions from approved international sources, expediting the review process for domestic manufacturing expansions, and extending expiry dates for existing products after rigorous safety assessments. This combination of strategies helped boost production capacity and prevent supply chain bottlenecks.

<h4>Impact on Hospitals and Patient Care</h4>

Sodium chloride 0.9 percent IV saline is used for hydration, administering medications, and treating dehydration and other critical conditions. The shortage, which had persisted for months, forced hospitals to ration supplies and find alternative solutions. Medical professionals often had to adjust treatment protocols or use smaller IV bags to stretch resources, a situation that placed additional strain on already burdened healthcare systems.

Now, with supplies back to normal levels, the FDA has confirmed that the product will be removed from its official Drug Shortage Database. Facilities are being advised to return to using FDA-approved products whenever available.

<strong>ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/nutrition/the-truth-about-iv-drips-are-they-better-than-food-or-supplements-article-152197678" data-type="tilCustomLink">The Truth About IV Drips: Are They Better Than Food Or Supplements?</a></strong>

<h4>Ongoing Efforts to Prevent Future Shortages</h4>

While celebrating the resolution, the FDA emphasized that its work to secure medical product availability is far from over. Makary stressed that the agency remains committed to addressing other ongoing shortages, including those affecting certain IV fluids.

“The FDA remains focused on doing all we can to help mitigate shortages and prevent them from occurring,” Makary said in a statement. “We will continue working diligently to monitor supply levels, anticipate potential disruptions, and support a robust, secure, and transparent supply chain for medical products.”

The agency’s strategy involves close monitoring of manufacturer reports, collaboration with other federal agencies, and engagement with the private sector to anticipate challenges before they escalate into full-scale shortages.

Experts say the resolution of the saline shortage could serve as a model for responding to future disruptions in medical supply chains. By acting quickly, coordinating with multiple stakeholders, and making temporary regulatory adjustments, the FDA and its partners were able to restore availability without compromising patient safety.

Public health advocates note that the success also underscores the importance of maintaining diverse manufacturing sources, both domestically and internationally, to safeguard against sudden disruptions caused by disasters, supply chain issues, or unexpected surges in demand.

The FDA’s announcement brings relief to healthcare providers nationwide, who have been navigating supply constraints for essential items over the past few years. With IV saline now in stable supply, hospitals can focus more on patient care without the added stress of product scarcity.

However, the agency cautions that vigilance is essential. The FDA will continue to work with manufacturers, monitor production levels, and apply lessons learned from this shortage to strengthen the overall resilience of the nation’s medical supply system.

health news USA

us news

FDA solves IV shortage

IV solution

IV shortage

IV shortage US

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that the nationwide shortage of sodium chloride 0.9 percent intravenous (IV) saline solution, which is a critical medical supply used in hospitals and emergency care, has officially come to an end. The resolution marks a significant milestone in stabilizing the supply of one of the most essential tools in patient care.Collaborative Effort to Restore SupplyFDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H., credited the resolution of the shortage to a coordinated effort between the FDA, the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), and industry partners. According to Makary, this multi-agency and cross-sector collaboration allowed for rapid action to address the supply gap that had strained healthcare facilities across the country.To overcome the shortage, the FDA and its partners implemented several urgent measures. These included enabling the temporary import of IV saline solutions from approved international sources, expediting the review process for domestic manufacturing expansions, and extending expiry dates for existing products after rigorous safety assessments. This combination of strategies helped boost production capacity and prevent supply chain bottlenecks.Impact on Hospitals and Patient CareSodium chloride 0.9 percent IV saline is used for hydration, administering medications, and treating dehydration and other critical conditions. The shortage, which had persisted for months, forced hospitals to ration supplies and find alternative solutions. Medical professionals often had to adjust treatment protocols or use smaller IV bags to stretch resources, a situation that placed additional strain on already burdened healthcare systems.Now, with supplies back to normal levels, the FDA has confirmed that the product will be removed from its official Drug Shortage Database. Facilities are being advised to return to using FDA-approved products whenever available.ALSO READ: The Truth About IV Drips: Are They Better Than Food Or Supplements?Ongoing Efforts to Prevent Future ShortagesWhile celebrating the resolution, the FDA emphasized that its work to secure medical product availability is far from over. Makary stressed that the agency remains committed to addressing other ongoing shortages, including those affecting certain IV fluids.“The FDA remains focused on doing all we can to help mitigate shortages and prevent them from occurring,” Makary said in a statement. “We will continue working diligently to monitor supply levels, anticipate potential disruptions, and support a robust, secure, and transparent supply chain for medical products.”The agency’s strategy involves close monitoring of manufacturer reports, collaboration with other federal agencies, and engagement with the private sector to anticipate challenges before they escalate into full-scale shortages.A Model for Crisis ResponseExperts say the resolution of the saline shortage could serve as a model for responding to future disruptions in medical supply chains. By acting quickly, coordinating with multiple stakeholders, and making temporary regulatory adjustments, the FDA and its partners were able to restore availability without compromising patient safety.Public health advocates note that the success also underscores the importance of maintaining diverse manufacturing sources, both domestically and internationally, to safeguard against sudden disruptions caused by disasters, supply chain issues, or unexpected surges in demand.The FDA’s announcement brings relief to healthcare providers nationwide, who have been navigating supply constraints for essential items over the past few years. With IV saline now in stable supply, hospitals can focus more on patient care without the added stress of product scarcity.However, the agency cautions that vigilance is essential. The FDA will continue to work with manufacturers, monitor production levels, and apply lessons learned from this shortage to strengthen the overall resilience of the nation’s medical supply system.

fda confirms resolution of nationwide iv saline shortage

Tanya Dutt

What Happens When You Have 'Small Ear'? All That You Need To Know About Microtia

what happens when you have "small ear"? all that you need to know about microtia

Washington is gearing up to drop part two of its “Make America Healthy Again” agenda, and expectations are high. The first MAHA assessment, delivered to the White House this spring, framed a blunt thesis — American children are getting sicker, faster, and the drivers are mostly man-made. The follow-up “Strategy” report, due to be unveiled after it’s transmitted to the White House, is supposed to move from diagnosis to action. If you care about what kids eat, breathe, watch, and are prescribed, this matters.

Below is what the first report already established, what the new one is likely to do with it, and why the battles ahead won’t be tidy.

The White House’s MAHA Assessment was explicit: the United States faces a <span>childhood chronic disease</span> crisis and four forces are doing the heavy lifting — ultra-processed foods, cumulative chemical exposures, inactivity and chronic stress in a digital era, and over-medicalization of kids. It also laid out the machinery: an executive order created a Commission chaired by the Health and Human Services Secretary, tasked to deliver an assessment within 100 days and a strategy within 180 days, with the President’s senior health, science, and budget leaders named as members. 

A few data points stood out. The Assessment claims more than 40 percent of U.S. children have at least one chronic condition; it attributes nearly 70 percent of kids’ calories to ultra-processed foods; and it argues that regulatory gaps allow cumulative chemical exposures to stack up in ways our policies haven’t kept pace with. It also points to soaring screen time, sleep loss, and stress, and warns that a culture of “treat first, ask later” has normalized aggressive medication in pediatrics. 

That framing signals where the Strategy is headed. Let’s break it down into five likely reveals.

<h3>1) A push to de-normalize ultra-processed foods in federal programs</h3>

Expect the Strategy to take aim at ultra-processed foods (UPFs) across the programs Washington controls or influences — school meals, WIC, SNAP, and federal procurement. The Assessment spends an entire section on UPFs, arguing they displace nutrient-dense foods and expose kids to additives and sweeteners that track with obesity and metabolic disease. It cites the “nearly 70 percent” figure for children’s calories from UPFs and positions whole foods as the default standard. That sets up obvious levers: revising food specifications in school nutrition, tightening allowable additives in federally funded meals, and incentivizing regional supply chains for minimally processed foods. 

Here’s what that could look like in practice: higher reimbursement tiers for scratch-cooked menus; procurement standards that limit defined UPF categories; clearer front-of-package transparency tied to federal vending or contracting; and pilot funds for districts to install basic cooking capacity. Because the Assessment explicitly links diet quality with chronic disease trajectories, the Strategy will likely argue these are health spend-avoidance, not just nutrition line items. 

<h3>2) Chemicals: from single-substance safety to cumulative risk</h3>

Another likely pillar is an attempt to modernize how agencies evaluate environmental exposures. The Assessment flags that children are uniquely vulnerable to a growing “aggregation” of synthetic chemicals, and suggests current frameworks don’t adequately capture cumulative or mixture effects. Translation: don’t be surprised if the Strategy proposes a cross-agency effort to incorporate cumulative risk methodology, faster review cycles for chemicals common in food contact materials or school environments, and a more aggressive stance on data transparency around exposure sources. 

Politically, this is the hottest burner. Farm groups already bristled at the Assessment’s references to studies linking common pesticides with cancer and liver problems. Expect the Strategy to thread the needle: phase-ins, exemptions for certain crops, and “safer substitution” funds for growers, while still signaling a turn away from chemicals with weak pediatric safety margins. The Assessment’s section on “corporate capture” and regulatory conflicts of interest previews tougher conflict-of-interest guardrails, which could extend to advisory panels and grantmaking. 

<h3>3) Digital-age health: screen time, sleep, and movement standards with teeth</h3>

The Assessment ties a “decline of physical activity,” chronic stress, rising screen use, and sleep deprivation to worsening pediatric health. If the Strategy builds on that, look for concrete targets: daily movement minutes in schools, device-free windows for homework platforms, and funding for safe routes and after-school sport access in low-income districts. It may also propose standardizing sleep education and mental health screening in pediatric primary care tied to reimbursement, treating movement and sleep as vital signs rather than nice-to-haves. 

To avoid culture-war potholes, the Strategy will likely focus on harms that enjoy broad consensus — sleep debt, musculoskeletal issues, sedentary behavior — rather than content moderation. Still, you can expect language urging “age-appropriate design” and data-minimizing defaults for platforms used in schools.

<h3>4) Reining in over-medicalization: audit the incentives, elevate prevention</h3>

One of the Assessment’s most provocative claims is that American children are “on too much medicine,” driven in part by research, regulatory, and clinical incentives that reward treatment over prevention. That sets the stage for a Strategy that asks payers to reimburse prevention like care: nutrition counseling, family-based lifestyle interventions, metabolic screening for high-risk kids, and deprescribing reviews. Expect pilots that tie Medicaid and CHIP dollars to prevention outcomes, encourage collaborative care models, and require pediatric-specific evidence for high-volume prescribing categories. 

Don’t be surprised if the Strategy also calls for stronger disclosure and firewall rules around financial conflicts in guideline writing and clinical education, consistent with the Assessment’s “revolving door” critique. The goal is not to stigmatize necessary medicine, but to flip default settings so the first move is to address root causes when appropriate. 

<h3>5) A whole-of-government playbook — with deadlines and dashboards</h3>

The Assessment is clear about timelines: the Commission delivers an Assessment, then a Strategy. The Strategy’s credibility hinges on measurable targets, agency owners, and public reporting. Expect a “whole-of-government” matrix that assigns tasks to HHS, USDA, EPA, Education, VA, OMB, OSTP, and FDA leadership — the very roles listed in the Assessment — with 6-, 12-, and 24-month deliverables. Think: a public dashboard tracking UPF prevalence in school meals, children’s exposure biomarkers in national surveys, physical activity minutes, and antibiotic or stimulant prescribing trends in pediatrics. 

Given the White House’s emphasis on “radical transparency” in the Assessment — and its explicit statement that the Strategy must be “grounded in a common scientific basis” — the rollout may include commitment to open datasets, independent replication grants, and rapid-cycle pilots with third-party evaluation. That’s how you translate rhetoric into durable policy. 

<h2>What Could Spark The Biggest Debates And Controversies?</h2>

Two flashpoints are already visible. First, agriculture and chemical policy: any move perceived as undermining pesticide tools or vilifying mainstream farming will face hard pushback. Second, the food industry: voluntary pledges to tweak recipes won’t cut it for nutrition advocates, but mandatory standards risk court challenges and supply-chain friction. The Strategy’s reception will hinge on whether it pairs higher standards with real transition help — procurement guarantees for farmers, grants for school kitchens, and a phase-in timeline that’s realistic.

On screens and stress, expect fewer fireworks — parents, clinicians, and schools largely agree kids need more sleep and movement — but the implementation details matter. Unfunded mandates will stall; funded pilots with clear metrics can move.

<h2>How To Read The Report When It Releases?</h2>

When the Strategy drops, skip the slogans and scan for five things: specific agency actions, measurable targets, funding sources, timelines, and independent evaluation. If those are present — and aligned with the Assessment’s four drivers — you’re looking at more than a press conference.

If they’re vague, the headline risk is that the Strategy becomes another well-intended framework that fades by the next budget cycle.

The MAHA Assessment argued that kids’ health is failing not because we lack medical breakthroughs, but because daily exposures — to engineered foods, chemicals, screens, stress, and quick-fix prescribing — have outpaced our policies. The Strategy’s job is to reverse that equation with rules, incentives, and transparency that make the healthy choice the default in schools, clinics, and communities. If it delivers clear standards for food, modernized chemical risk policies, funded movement and sleep initiatives, and a rebalanced payment system that rewards prevention, it could mark a real turn.

make america healthy again

maha report

us health policy

childhood chronic disease

ultra processed foods

environmental toxins

preventive healthcare

Washington is gearing up to drop part two of its “Make America Healthy Again” agenda, and expectations are high. The first MAHA assessment, delivered to the White House this spring, framed a blunt thesis — American children are getting sicker, faster, and the drivers are mostly man-made. The follow-up “Strategy” report, due to be unveiled after it’s transmitted to the White House, is supposed to move from diagnosis to action. If you care about what kids eat, breathe, watch, and are prescribed, this matters.Below is what the first report already established, what the new one is likely to do with it, and why the battles ahead won’t be tidy.The White House’s MAHA Assessment was explicit: the United States faces a childhood chronic disease crisis and four forces are doing the heavy lifting — ultra-processed foods, cumulative chemical exposures, inactivity and chronic stress in a digital era, and over-medicalization of kids. It also laid out the machinery: an executive order created a Commission chaired by the Health and Human Services Secretary, tasked to deliver an assessment within 100 days and a strategy within 180 days, with the President’s senior health, science, and budget leaders named as members. A few data points stood out. The Assessment claims more than 40 percent of U.S. children have at least one chronic condition; it attributes nearly 70 percent of kids’ calories to ultra-processed foods; and it argues that regulatory gaps allow cumulative chemical exposures to stack up in ways our policies haven’t kept pace with. It also points to soaring screen time, sleep loss, and stress, and warns that a culture of “treat first, ask later” has normalized aggressive medication in pediatrics. The White HouseThat framing signals where the Strategy is headed. Let’s break it down into five likely reveals.1) A push to de-normalize ultra-processed foods in federal programsExpect the Strategy to take aim at ultra-processed foods (UPFs) across the programs Washington controls or influences — school meals, WIC, SNAP, and federal procurement. The Assessment spends an entire section on UPFs, arguing they displace nutrient-dense foods and expose kids to additives and sweeteners that track with obesity and metabolic disease. It cites the “nearly 70 percent” figure for children’s calories from UPFs and positions whole foods as the default standard. That sets up obvious levers: revising food specifications in school nutrition, tightening allowable additives in federally funded meals, and incentivizing regional supply chains for minimally processed foods. Here’s what that could look like in practice: higher reimbursement tiers for scratch-cooked menus; procurement standards that limit defined UPF categories; clearer front-of-package transparency tied to federal vending or contracting; and pilot funds for districts to install basic cooking capacity. Because the Assessment explicitly links diet quality with chronic disease trajectories, the Strategy will likely argue these are health spend-avoidance, not just nutrition line items. 2) Chemicals: from single-substance safety to cumulative riskAnother likely pillar is an attempt to modernize how agencies evaluate environmental exposures. The Assessment flags that children are uniquely vulnerable to a growing “aggregation” of synthetic chemicals, and suggests current frameworks don’t adequately capture cumulative or mixture effects. Translation: don’t be surprised if the Strategy proposes a cross-agency effort to incorporate cumulative risk methodology, faster review cycles for chemicals common in food contact materials or school environments, and a more aggressive stance on data transparency around exposure sources. Politically, this is the hottest burner. Farm groups already bristled at the Assessment’s references to studies linking common pesticides with cancer and liver problems. Expect the Strategy to thread the needle: phase-ins, exemptions for certain crops, and “safer substitution” funds for growers, while still signaling a turn away from chemicals with weak pediatric safety margins. The Assessment’s section on “corporate capture” and regulatory conflicts of interest previews tougher conflict-of-interest guardrails, which could extend to advisory panels and grantmaking. 3) Digital-age health: screen time, sleep, and movement standards with teethThe Assessment ties a “decline of physical activity,” chronic stress, rising screen use, and sleep deprivation to worsening pediatric health. If the Strategy builds on that, look for concrete targets: daily movement minutes in schools, device-free windows for homework platforms, and funding for safe routes and after-school sport access in low-income districts. It may also propose standardizing sleep education and mental health screening in pediatric primary care tied to reimbursement, treating movement and sleep as vital signs rather than nice-to-haves. To avoid culture-war potholes, the Strategy will likely focus on harms that enjoy broad consensus — sleep debt, musculoskeletal issues, sedentary behavior — rather than content moderation. Still, you can expect language urging “age-appropriate design” and data-minimizing defaults for platforms used in schools.4) Reining in over-medicalization: audit the incentives, elevate preventionOne of the Assessment’s most provocative claims is that American children are “on too much medicine,” driven in part by research, regulatory, and clinical incentives that reward treatment over prevention. That sets the stage for a Strategy that asks payers to reimburse prevention like care: nutrition counseling, family-based lifestyle interventions, metabolic screening for high-risk kids, and deprescribing reviews. Expect pilots that tie Medicaid and CHIP dollars to prevention outcomes, encourage collaborative care models, and require pediatric-specific evidence for high-volume prescribing categories. Don’t be surprised if the Strategy also calls for stronger disclosure and firewall rules around financial conflicts in guideline writing and clinical education, consistent with the Assessment’s “revolving door” critique. The goal is not to stigmatize necessary medicine, but to flip default settings so the first move is to address root causes when appropriate. 5) A whole-of-government playbook — with deadlines and dashboardsThe Assessment is clear about timelines: the Commission delivers an Assessment, then a Strategy. The Strategy’s credibility hinges on measurable targets, agency owners, and public reporting. Expect a “whole-of-government” matrix that assigns tasks to HHS, USDA, EPA, Education, VA, OMB, OSTP, and FDA leadership — the very roles listed in the Assessment — with 6-, 12-, and 24-month deliverables. Think: a public dashboard tracking UPF prevalence in school meals, children’s exposure biomarkers in national surveys, physical activity minutes, and antibiotic or stimulant prescribing trends in pediatrics. Given the White House’s emphasis on “radical transparency” in the Assessment — and its explicit statement that the Strategy must be “grounded in a common scientific basis” — the rollout may include commitment to open datasets, independent replication grants, and rapid-cycle pilots with third-party evaluation. That’s how you translate rhetoric into durable policy. The White HouseWhat Could Spark The Biggest Debates And Controversies?Two flashpoints are already visible. First, agriculture and chemical policy: any move perceived as undermining pesticide tools or vilifying mainstream farming will face hard pushback. Second, the food industry: voluntary pledges to tweak recipes won’t cut it for nutrition advocates, but mandatory standards risk court challenges and supply-chain friction. The Strategy’s reception will hinge on whether it pairs higher standards with real transition help — procurement guarantees for farmers, grants for school kitchens, and a phase-in timeline that’s realistic.On screens and stress, expect fewer fireworks — parents, clinicians, and schools largely agree kids need more sleep and movement — but the implementation details matter. Unfunded mandates will stall; funded pilots with clear metrics can move.How To Read The Report When It Releases?When the Strategy drops, skip the slogans and scan for five things: specific agency actions, measurable targets, funding sources, timelines, and independent evaluation. If those are present — and aligned with the Assessment’s four drivers — you’re looking at more than a press conference.If they’re vague, the headline risk is that the Strategy becomes another well-intended framework that fades by the next budget cycle.The MAHA Assessment argued that kids’ health is failing not because we lack medical breakthroughs, but because daily exposures — to engineered foods, chemicals, screens, stress, and quick-fix prescribing — have outpaced our policies. The Strategy’s job is to reverse that equation with rules, incentives, and transparency that make the healthy choice the default in schools, clinics, and communities. If it delivers clear standards for food, modernized chemical risk policies, funded movement and sleep initiatives, and a rebalanced payment system that rewards prevention, it could mark a real turn.

Over 53% Of Americans Now See Alcohol As Harmful Amid Rising Health Concerns

Pancreatic Cancer: New Study Warns How Your Alcohol Habit Could Be A Date With One Of The World’s Deadliest Cancers

pancreatic cancer: new study warns how your alcohol habit could be a date with one of the world’s deadliest cancers

Nutrition

Dietician Shares Tips To Prevent Osteoporosis, Calls It A 'Silent Thief'

dietician shares tips to prevent osteoporosis, calls it a "silent thief"

This 'Common Toilet Issue' That Happens At Night Could Be An Early Warning Sign Of Prostate Cancer

this 'common toilet issue' that happens at night could be an early warning sign of prostate cancer

Health Warning Issued By UKHSA In England As Fourth Heatwave Nears

health warning issued by ukhsa in england as fourth heatwave nears

Alcohol consumption in the United States has dropped to its lowest point in recorded history — and it’s not just because of shifting social trends. A growing body of research, changing public health advice, and generational attitudes are all fueling a nationwide reevaluation of drinking.

According to Gallup’s latest Consumption Habits survey, only 54% of American adults say they drink alcohol. That’s down from 58% in 2024, 62% in 2023, and below the previous record low of 55% in 1958. This decline is significant not just in percentage, but in cultural context — alcohol has been embedded in American social life for decades, from backyard barbecues to happy hours.

Interestingly, Gallup’s data suggests this drop isn’t being offset by other intoxicants like recreational cannabis, now legal in about half of U.S. states. Instead, it appears to be part of a deeper health-driven shift.

<h2>Why More Americans See Alcohol as a Health Risk?</h2>

For the first time since Gallup began asking the question in 2001, a majority of Americans — 53% — now believe that even moderate drinking is harmful. In 2015, that figure was just 28%. The change has been sharp, and it’s being driven largely by younger adults.

Among Americans aged 18 to 34, about two-thirds now believe that having “one or two drinks a day” carries health risks. Older adults are more cautious in their views only about half agree but that’s still a massive jump from the 20% who held this view a decade ago.

Part of the shift is fueled by stronger scientific consensus. In past decades, moderate alcohol consumption was often touted as beneficial for heart health-  a belief rooted in flawed studies that couldn’t prove cause and effect. Now, research points to the opposite: alcohol increases the risk of at least seven cancers, contributes to liver disease, and has no safe consumption threshold.

<h2>Is The Pandemic Spike Behind The Decline?</h2>

It’s worth noting that the COVID-19 pandemic briefly reversed the downward drinking trend. During lockdowns, alcohol sales spiked and “quarantine cocktails” became a social media phenomenon. But once restrictions lifted, a correction began.

Inflation and higher interest rates have also played a role, making alcohol — particularly wine and spirits — more expensive. But public health messaging has been the stronger driver, with the U.S. Surgeon General earlier this year recommending warning labels on alcohol similar to those on cigarettes.

<h2>How Drinking Habits Are Changing?</h2>

It’s not only fewer people drinking — it’s also those who drink doing so less often.

Daily drinking is at a record low: Only 24% of drinkers had alcohol in the past 24 hours, the lowest in Gallup’s history.

Longer gaps between drinks: 40% of drinkers say it’s been more than a week since their last drink.

Lower overall intake: The average number of drinks per week has fallen to 2.8 — down from 3.8 last year and far from the 5.1 weekly drinks reported in 2003.

These numbers suggest that even people who haven’t sworn off alcohol entirely are moderating their intake more than ever.

Younger generations are leading the decline, and they’re doing so for different reasons than older Americans. Gen Z and younger millennials are generally more health-conscious, less tolerant of hangovers, and more open to “sober-curious” movements that normalize abstaining from alcohol in social settings.

Meanwhile, older Americans who may have lived through decades of conflicting health advice are slower to shift their beliefs, but still moving toward more cautious views.

As Lydia Saad, Gallup’s director of social research, notes, “Older folks may be a little more hardened to the whiplash of changing recommendations. Younger adults, on the other hand, are coming into adulthood already aware of alcohol’s risks.”

The U.S. isn’t alone in rethinking alcohol. Canada recently updated its guidelines to recommend no more than two drinks per week, citing cancer risk. The UK has lowered its safe drinking limit, and Australia has taken a similar approach. These changes reflect a growing international acknowledgment that alcohol, in any amount, carries health consequences.

This global trend is further reinforced by marketing shifts- non-alcoholic beer, wine, and spirits are now mainstream products, with sales growing far faster than their alcoholic counterparts.

If Americans continue to cut back, the shift could have meaningful health benefits. Lower alcohol consumption is linked to reduced rates of heart disease, liver damage, certain cancers, and accidents. However, experts caution that public health messaging must be clear and consistent past mixed signals have slowed behavioral change.

The U.S. federal government’s current guidelines still recommend up to two drinks per day for men and one for women, but those are under review. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has hinted at “big changes” in upcoming recommendations.

While the decline in drinking may sound like a public health win, it’s not guaranteed to continue at the same pace. Social habits, economic pressures, and cultural attitudes can shift quickly as seen during the pandemic.

Still, the fact that over half of Americans now view moderate drinking as harmful marks a cultural tipping point. A behavior once considered benign, even beneficial, is now increasingly viewed as risky, much like smoking transitioned from socially accepted to widely discouraged.

For alcohol producers, hospitality businesses, and policymakers, this changing relationship with alcohol isn’t just a health trend, it’s an economic and cultural shift that will reshape how Americans celebrate, socialize, and define wellness for years to come.

The American relationship with alcohol is changing more dramatically than at any point in the past 80 years. The driving force isn’t prohibition or moralizing it’s science, awareness, and a generation less interested in raising a glass if it comes at a cost to their health.

alcohol consumption decline

moderate drinking health risks

alcohol survey

us drinking trends

alcohol and cancer risk

sober curious movement

american drinking habits

Alcohol consumption in the United States has dropped to its lowest point in recorded history — and it’s not just because of shifting social trends. A growing body of research, changing public health advice, and generational attitudes are all fueling a nationwide reevaluation of drinking.According to Gallup’s latest Consumption Habits survey, only 54% of American adults say they drink alcohol. That’s down from 58% in 2024, 62% in 2023, and below the previous record low of 55% in 1958. This decline is significant not just in percentage, but in cultural context — alcohol has been embedded in American social life for decades, from backyard barbecues to happy hours.Interestingly, Gallup’s data suggests this drop isn’t being offset by other intoxicants like recreational cannabis, now legal in about half of U.S. states. Instead, it appears to be part of a deeper health-driven shift.Why More Americans See Alcohol as a Health Risk?For the first time since Gallup began asking the question in 2001, a majority of Americans — 53% — now believe that even moderate drinking is harmful. In 2015, that figure was just 28%. The change has been sharp, and it’s being driven largely by younger adults.Among Americans aged 18 to 34, about two-thirds now believe that having “one or two drinks a day” carries health risks. Older adults are more cautious in their views only about half agree but that’s still a massive jump from the 20% who held this view a decade ago.Part of the shift is fueled by stronger scientific consensus. In past decades, moderate alcohol consumption was often touted as beneficial for heart health-  a belief rooted in flawed studies that couldn’t prove cause and effect. Now, research points to the opposite: alcohol increases the risk of at least seven cancers, contributes to liver disease, and has no safe consumption threshold.Is The Pandemic Spike Behind The Decline?It’s worth noting that the COVID-19 pandemic briefly reversed the downward drinking trend. During lockdowns, alcohol sales spiked and “quarantine cocktails” became a social media phenomenon. But once restrictions lifted, a correction began.Inflation and higher interest rates have also played a role, making alcohol — particularly wine and spirits — more expensive. But public health messaging has been the stronger driver, with the U.S. Surgeon General earlier this year recommending warning labels on alcohol similar to those on cigarettes.How Drinking Habits Are Changing?It’s not only fewer people drinking — it’s also those who drink doing so less often.Daily drinking is at a record low: Only 24% of drinkers had alcohol in the past 24 hours, the lowest in Gallup’s history.Longer gaps between drinks: 40% of drinkers say it’s been more than a week since their last drink.Lower overall intake: The average number of drinks per week has fallen to 2.8 — down from 3.8 last year and far from the 5.1 weekly drinks reported in 2003.These numbers suggest that even people who haven’t sworn off alcohol entirely are moderating their intake more than ever.Younger generations are leading the decline, and they’re doing so for different reasons than older Americans. Gen Z and younger millennials are generally more health-conscious, less tolerant of hangovers, and more open to “sober-curious” movements that normalize abstaining from alcohol in social settings.Meanwhile, older Americans who may have lived through decades of conflicting health advice are slower to shift their beliefs, but still moving toward more cautious views.As Lydia Saad, Gallup’s director of social research, notes, “Older folks may be a little more hardened to the whiplash of changing recommendations. Younger adults, on the other hand, are coming into adulthood already aware of alcohol’s risks.”The U.S. isn’t alone in rethinking alcohol. Canada recently updated its guidelines to recommend no more than two drinks per week, citing cancer risk. The UK has lowered its safe drinking limit, and Australia has taken a similar approach. These changes reflect a growing international acknowledgment that alcohol, in any amount, carries health consequences.This global trend is further reinforced by marketing shifts- non-alcoholic beer, wine, and spirits are now mainstream products, with sales growing far faster than their alcoholic counterparts.If Americans continue to cut back, the shift could have meaningful health benefits. Lower alcohol consumption is linked to reduced rates of heart disease, liver damage, certain cancers, and accidents. However, experts caution that public health messaging must be clear and consistent past mixed signals have slowed behavioral change.The U.S. federal government’s current guidelines still recommend up to two drinks per day for men and one for women, but those are under review. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has hinted at “big changes” in upcoming recommendations.While the decline in drinking may sound like a public health win, it’s not guaranteed to continue at the same pace. Social habits, economic pressures, and cultural attitudes can shift quickly as seen during the pandemic.Still, the fact that over half of Americans now view moderate drinking as harmful marks a cultural tipping point. A behavior once considered benign, even beneficial, is now increasingly viewed as risky, much like smoking transitioned from socially accepted to widely discouraged.For alcohol producers, hospitality businesses, and policymakers, this changing relationship with alcohol isn’t just a health trend, it’s an economic and cultural shift that will reshape how Americans celebrate, socialize, and define wellness for years to come.The American relationship with alcohol is changing more dramatically than at any point in the past 80 years. The driving force isn’t prohibition or moralizing it’s science, awareness, and a generation less interested in raising a glass if it comes at a cost to their health.

over 53% of americans now see alcohol as harmful amid rising health concerns

About Us

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Company

Health and Me is a premium website with content written and curated to function as a handbook for all Health concerns.

Scott Swift, Taylor Swift's Dad Underwent A Quintuple Bypass Heart Surgery, Here's What We Know About It So Far

Quick Stories

FDA Confirms Resolution of Nationwide IV Saline Shortage

Over 53% Of Americans Now See Alcohol As Harmful Amid Rising Health Concerns

The ‘Make America Healthy Again’ Report Is Releasing Soon: 5 Big Things It Might Reveal

Health Conditions A-Z

Can THIS Naturally Occurring Element Treat Alzheimer's

Scott Swift, Taylor Swift's Dad Underwent A Quintuple Bypass Heart Surgery, Here's What We Know About It So Far

Man Falls Ill After Seeking ChatGPT Advice on Cutting Salt