Soon after the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th President of the United States, the country withdrew from the global health body the World Health Organization (WHO). As per the Executive Order of the White House, the "United States noticed its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2020 due to organization's mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic that arouse out of Wuhan, China, and other global health crises, its failure to adopt urgently need reforms, and its inability to demonstrate independence from the inappropriate political influence of WHO member states."

This decision, may not be the correct one for Making America Healthy Again, a counterpart of the MAGA brand of Make America Great Again. As per Dr Ashish Jha, dean of the school of public health at Brown University and former White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator, "For Americans it may not be obvious immediately what the impact will be but given the world we live in and all of the factors that are driving more disease outbreaks, America cannot fight them alone." He also said that an effective WHO is not only important to keep the world safe from diseases, but "to keep Americans safe from these diseases".

What Does It Mean To Public Health?

The US is a major sponsor of the WHO, its withdrawal means cutting off funding for aiding public health programs in developing countries.

William Schaffner, MD, professor of preventive medicine and infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville told a medical-media reporting outlet, "Viruses don’t require passports to move around the world. Our capacity to gather information and apply that information for the protection of our own population is, in part, dependent on our relationships with other countries, and that works most smoothly with the World Health Organization."

WHO is also responsible for other public health programs, especially vaccines. Each year, scientists from around the world work with health officials and determine which influenza and COVID-19 strains to include in updated versions of these shots. US, for as long as it was the member, had access to samples of these strains, which helped in vaccine development. Thus, being part of this network is critical, especially when new viruses or strain emerges.

Also Read: Kolkata-Born Jay Bhattacharya Key Candidate For US Health Agency NIH Director

The WHO also provides guidance and advices on breastfeeding, diabetes, giving up smoking, and many more, which applies across countries. While there are other non-government organizations and philanthropies that exist, no one has the trust relationships with the ministries of health in different countries as WHO.

As per Jha, at this moment around 30,000 elderly people are at high risk of influenza complications deaths annually from the flu. US' withdrawal from WHO means inaccessibility from the database and inability to make an effective vaccine. US would also lose access of a global database of health information which includes surveillance for new and existing infectious disease. Experts believe, this could make the country more vulnerable to microbial threats from around the world.

Since WHO initiates health programs, including awareness and eradication of diseases in various countries. with US withdrawing from the global health body, this will be filled in by other powerful countries, which will make the connections to countries which had been valuable to the US for over the decades. In a way, it could also hurt the public health diplomacy.

The world is also afraid that without the US membership, WHO would lose its close ties with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which is regarded as one of the world's leading public-health agencies, this would recalled many CDC researchers assigned to the WHO. Will this impact the existing health agencies in the US? This is a concern experts have expressed in the past with the nomination of RFK Jr. to head the US health department, who had openly discouraged vaccines.

Read More: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s 8 Most Controversial Health Declarations As Potential US Health Secretary

What The WHO Says?

The WHO said that it regretted the decision from its top donor country and also urged for a reconsideration. It wrote on X, formerly Twitter:

"The World Health Organization regrets the announcement that the United States of America intends to withdraw from the Organization…We hope the United States will reconsider and we look forward to engaging in constructive dialogue to maintain the partnership between the USA and WHO, for the benefit of the health and well-being of millions of people around the globe."

Read What Trump Said At His Inauguration.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently cleared and approved the at-home test for cervical cancer, possibly revolutionizing the way millions of women handle one of the most important parts of preventive health care. Created by Teal Health, the recently approved self-test device—the Teal Wand—provides an alternative, less painful method than the conventional Pap smear, seeking to make it easier, less stressful, and more accessible for cervical cancer screening.

The product, called the Teal Wand, allows women to collect vaginal swabs themselves at home—providing a potent, less painful alternative to conventional in-clinic Pap smears.

This approval represents a groundbreaking step toward breaking down long-standing barriers to screening for cervical cancer, particularly among women who find pelvic exams unpleasant, inaccessible, or culturally daunting. For them, it could be the bridge they've waited years for to early detection and timely treatment.

Cervical cancer ranks among the most preventable types of cancer owing to the existence of HPV vaccination and routine screening. However, despite increased medical capabilities, screening rates have consistently decreased since the mid-2000s. According to a 2022 study, 23% of women in 2019 were overdue for a cervical cancer screening, which was up from 14% in 2005. Almost half of all women diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States, according to the American Cancer Society, are not current on their screenings.

This alarming trend is part of the estimated 13,360 new cases of cervical cancer and 4,320 deaths projected for 2025. The intent is for this home test to turn that trend around by reaching women where they're at—literally.

How the Test Kit Work?

The Teal Wand detects human papillomavirus (HPV), the primary cause of cervical cancer, using a self-collected vaginal swab that detects high-risk strains of the virus—just as a clinician would get a sample with a Pap smear, without the office visit and speculum.

To have access to the test, patients first have to meet with a Teal Health-affiliated provider through telehealth. If they are approved, the test is mailed to their home. After the sample has been taken, it is sent to a laboratory for processing. In case the test comes back positive for high-risk HPV, Teal Health's providers coordinate follow-up diagnostic care through in-office procedures as usual.

The advantages of this home test go beyond convenience—it could shrink the equity chasm in access to health care. According to a recent JAMA Network Open report, rural women are 25% more likely to have cervical cancer and 42% more likely to die from cervical cancer than city women. Disparities frequently are explained as a result of infrequent screening and inadequate availability of gynecologic services.

By facilitating home self-screening, the Teal Wand could assist underserved and rural communities in obtaining vital early diagnoses, possibly saving thousands of lives.

Role of HPV in Cervical Cancer

HPV is a sexually transmitted disease that most commonly resolves spontaneously. But some strains are associated with cervical and other cancers. The HPV vaccine, when given prior to sexual activity, is extremely effective in preventing illness from the high-risk strains.

As of a 2025 American Cancer Society report, incidence of cervical cancer in women between the ages of 20 and 24 decreased by 65% from 2012 to 2019 due primarily to early HPV vaccination. However, not all women are sharing in this success. Rates of cervical cancer in women in their 30s and early 40s have started to creep upward once more.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) prescribes two doses of the HPV vaccine between preteens aged 11–12, although it can begin as early as age 9. Individuals having the first dose at 15 years and older need a series of three doses. The vaccine is usually prescribed up to age 26 and up to age 45 in special situations depending on personal risk.

Worldwide, cervical cancer continues to be the fourth most frequent female cancer and is responsible for 7.5% of all female cancer deaths, based on the World Health Organization (WHO). In the United States alone, there are about 200,000 women diagnosed with cervical precancer each year and over 11,000 with HPV-related cervical cancer. Unfortunately, more than 4,000 American women die from the disease each year.

Data from an 11-year study in England also supports the efficacy of early HPV vaccination and screening. The program there averted 448 cases of cervical cancer and more than 17,000 cases of precancerous lesions, highlighting the huge promise of proactive, accessible prevention strategies.

Although the Teal Wand now must be prescribed through Teal Health's telehealth platform, the business is continuing to move toward availability through additional healthcare providers. Pricing and insurance coverage are also points of interest. Because cervical cancer screening is supported by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, coverage is also highly anticipated, which would further drive accessibility.

A 42-year-old woman in Malappuram, Kerala, was admitted to a private hospital with severe symptoms resembling encephalitis. Just days later, her worst fears were confirmed — she had contracted the Nipah virus. On Thursday, the National Institute of Virology (NIV) in Pune officially verified the infection, thrusting Kerala once again into the national spotlight as it battles another outbreak of this deadly zoonotic disease.

As Health Minister Veena George heads to Malappuram to monitor the containment strategies, public health concerns are intensifying, especially given the virus’s history in the state and the high fatality rate associated with it. Here’s everything you need to know about the Nipah virus, how it spreads, and why it’s resurfacing now.

Kerala is no stranger to the Nipah virus. Since 2018, the state has witnessed five outbreaks, leading to 22 confirmed deaths. The first outbreak in 2018 was particularly catastrophic — 17 of the 18 infected individuals died, leaving public health systems scrambling for solutions. Further cases occurred in 2019, 2021, and 2023, most commonly between May and September, the region’s monsoon season, which is also marked by a surge in respiratory infections and influenza-like illnesses.

These seasonal overlaps make early diagnosis challenging, as Nipah symptoms often mimic more common illnesses. In 2023 alone, Malappuram reported two deaths linked to the virus. Of all the confirmed infections since 2018, only six individuals have survived, underscoring the virus’s high mortality rate and the need for rapid medical intervention.

How the Virus Is Contracted?

Nipah virus is a zoonotic pathogen, meaning it spreads from animals to humans. Scientific investigations from previous outbreaks, including a joint field survey by the National Institute of Virology (NIV) and the National Institute of High Security Animal Diseases (NIHSAD), found a clear link between fruit bats (commonly known as flying foxes) and human infections.

The virus strain detected in Kerala is closely related to the Bangladeshi strain, notorious for its person-to-person transmission and high mortality, estimated by experts to be up to 90% in some cases. In the 2023 outbreak, antibodies were found in fruit bats from Pandikkad village, strongly pointing to them as the source of the infection.

The consumption of contaminated fruits or exposure to bat saliva and urine on fruits is believed to be one of the primary routes of transmission in initial cases.

What is Nipah Virus?

First identified in Malaysia in 1998, Nipah virus gets its name from the village of Sungai Nipah, where the initial outbreak occurred. The virus belongs to the Henipavirus genus and has since been recognized as one of the world’s most dangerous pathogens due to its pandemic potential and high case fatality rate — estimated to range between 40% and 75%, depending on the outbreak response and healthcare access.

Early symptoms are often non-specific and include:

• Headache
• Muscle pain
• Vomiting
• Sore throat

As the disease progresses, some patients experience acute respiratory distress, neurological complications like encephalitis, seizures, and altered mental states, which may rapidly lead to coma or death.

Is the Virus Contagious and Airborne?

Yes, Nipah virus is both contagious and airborne. It spreads primarily through respiratory droplets, bodily fluids such as saliva, urine, feces, and blood, and via direct contact with infected individuals or animals.

Healthcare providers and family members caring for infected patients are particularly at risk. This is why strict infection control measures, including personal protective equipment (PPE) and isolation protocols, are crucial to preventing person-to-person spread.

Why Prevention Is Critical?

Currently, there is no specific antiviral treatment or licensed vaccine available for Nipah virus. Medical care is supportive and symptomatic, focusing on:

Hydration and rest

Medications for fever and pain (e.g., acetaminophen, ibuprofen)

Treatment for nausea, seizures, and respiratory distress

Use of inhalers or nebulizers in case of breathing difficulties

Experimental therapies, such as monoclonal antibody treatments, are under research but not yet widely accessible. Given the lack of curative options, early detection and containment remain the most effective ways to manage an outbreak.

Containment Measures Followed in Kerala

Since the first outbreak, Kerala’s public health system has developed a robust protocol to respond to Nipah cases. Isolation wards, contact tracing, and real-time epidemiological surveillance are quickly deployed. The state has also worked closely with central agencies like NIV and WHO to bolster its diagnostic and response capabilities.

With this latest case in Malappuram, authorities are already mobilizing rapid response teams to trace contacts, disinfect the patient’s surroundings, and educate the public about symptoms and preventive measures.

Although most outbreaks have been localized to South and Southeast Asia, Nipah virus is considered a global threat. The World Health Organization (WHO) includes it on the list of priority diseases for research and development, due to its potential to cause widespread epidemics and the lack of available countermeasures.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also closely monitors Nipah virus, emphasizing the importance of global health surveillance systems. As climate change, deforestation, and wildlife trade continue to increase human-animal interactions, the risk of zoonotic spillovers like Nipah is on the rise.

The emergence of a new Nipah case in Kerala is a critical reminder of the interconnectedness of human and animal health. While the virus is not currently spreading globally, the high fatality rate, airborne nature, and lack of treatment options make it essential to remain vigilant.

For residents in affected areas and globally the best approach is a combination of early reporting, awareness about transmission, and adherence to public health guidelines.

More than 1,000 measles cases have been confirmed across the United States in 2025, a saddening milestone of the nation's struggle with a disease it was officially announced as eliminated as far back as the year 2000. State and regional health agencies along with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report at least 1,002 cases so far this year—an astonishing number putting 2025 on pace to equal 2019, which was the century's worst measles year to date.

Most of these instances are a result of a fast-growing outbreak with its hub in West Texas, which has already spread to New Mexico, Oklahoma, and potentially Kansas. With underreporting anticipated and additional states preparing for increasing numbers, the true extent of this crisis may be much greater than present numbers indicate.

Measles was officially eliminated in the U.S. in 2000, thanks to extensive vaccination campaigns and strong public health infrastructure. During the past two decades, the nation experienced comparatively low case numbers—approximately 180 per year on average.

But the peace was broken in 2019, when 1,274 cases appeared during large outbreaks in New York City and surrounding communities. After a temporary hiatus during the COVID-19 pandemic, cases of measles started creeping back up again, peaking in this year's record-breaking increase.

The 2025 outbreak is particularly concerning because it implies systemic vulnerabilities in immunization coverage and public health readiness. Recent statistics show that just 4% of reported cases involved vaccinated individuals, affirming the vaccine's effectiveness but also highlighting the increasing numbers of individuals opting to forego vaccination altogether.

This resurgence is not confined to the United States. Across the Americas and parts of Europe, measles rates are rising sharply. In Canada, over 1,000 cases have been confirmed, a stunning leap from just 12 cases in 2023. Mexico has also reported over 400 confirmed cases, with additional suspected infections under investigation. In Europe, measles rates are now at their highest level in 25 years.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has raised alarms for both North and South America as high-risk areas, attributing declining vaccination levels, post-pandemic health disruption, and global mobility as main drivers for this resurgence.

Why Is Measles So Dangerous?

Measles is not an innocent childhood disease—it is extremely contagious and can result in severe complications, such as pneumonia, brain swelling (encephalitis), blindness, and even death. Three deaths—two of them children—have already been reported in the U.S. this year alone. The 2025 hospitalization rate is around 13%, highlighting the severity of the disease.

The basic reproduction number (R0) of measles—the number of individuals an infected person will, on average, transmit the virus to—is between 12 and 18, far more contagious than influenza or even COVID-19. Such high transmissibility makes vaccination not merely critical, but critical for disease control.

The present epicenter of the outbreak, Texas, has seen 702 confirmed cases in 29 counties, with 91 hospitalizations and three deaths as of May 6. What began as a localized cluster has blown up into a full-blown epidemic—illustrating just how rapidly measles can get out of hand in under-vaccinated communities.

Other states with significant outbreaks are Ohio, Montana, and Michigan, all having over three connected cases—the CDC's criteria for classifying an outbreak.

What If Herd Immunity Is No Longer Enough?

Herd immunity works because of a threshold level of the population (about 95%) getting vaccinated to safeguard those who are unable to be vaccinated because of age, allergy, or pre-existing medical conditions. The principle is quite simple: if enough individuals are immunized, the virus cannot circulate freely, and high-risk groups are still protected.

What Happens When Vaccination Rates Fall?

Current evidence indicates that this is occurring. In certain populations, immunization rates have collapsed as a result of refusal to be vaccinated and misinformation campaigns, stripping away the protective barrier that previously held back measles. The consequences are serious:

• Local outbreaks rapidly develop into regional epidemics, particularly in crowded or highly mobile populations.
• High-risk groups, such as infants, the immunocompromised, and the elderly, are put at increased risk.
• Healthcare systems get overwhelmed with avoidable diseases, sucking resources that could be used for other emergencies.
• As community immunity is lost, endemic transmission—where measles becomes perpetually present year after year—becomes an imminent possibility.

A 2025 study puts the current rate of vaccination at an estimate of 850,000 cases of measles over the next 25 years if it continues as is. With declining vaccine use, this figure could reach 11 million. They're not theoretical predictions—they're evident warnings based on facts.

Individual responsibility is not something to be substituted with herd immunity. If everyone is exempting themselves, the defense is lost. Even then, the immunized individuals stand to suffer as well due to sheer virus burden and possibility of breakthrough cases in compromised hosts.

How to Strengthen Yourself and Prevent Measles Spread?

For undoing this dismal trend, concerted action from public health officials at the earliest is paramount. This comprises:

• Public education campaigns to combat misinformation.
• School vaccination requirements and more stringent exemption policies.
• Improved surveillance and reporting systems to monitor outbreaks in real-time.
• Support for international immunization efforts, since infectious diseases do not recognize borders.

Programs such as Vaccines for Children have long assisted in keeping immunization rates high. Reinvesting in and updating these programs will be critical in avoiding future outbreaks.

The U.S. stands at a crossroads. The 2025 measles outbreak is more than a public health tale—it's an alarm call. Having a disease be "eliminated" does not equate to having won the war. In a time of international mobility, vaccine reluctance, and fractured public confidence, we have to recall that prevention is only effective if we all move together. Herd immunity used to suffice. It might not anymore.