Soon after the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th President of the United States, the country withdrew from the global health body the World Health Organization (WHO). As per the Executive Order of the White House, the "United States noticed its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2020 due to organization's mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic that arouse out of Wuhan, China, and other global health crises, its failure to adopt urgently need reforms, and its inability to demonstrate independence from the inappropriate political influence of WHO member states."

This decision, may not be the correct one for Making America Healthy Again, a counterpart of the MAGA brand of Make America Great Again. As per Dr Ashish Jha, dean of the school of public health at Brown University and former White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator, "For Americans it may not be obvious immediately what the impact will be but given the world we live in and all of the factors that are driving more disease outbreaks, America cannot fight them alone." He also said that an effective WHO is not only important to keep the world safe from diseases, but "to keep Americans safe from these diseases".

What Does It Mean To Public Health?

The US is a major sponsor of the WHO, its withdrawal means cutting off funding for aiding public health programs in developing countries.

William Schaffner, MD, professor of preventive medicine and infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville told a medical-media reporting outlet, "Viruses don’t require passports to move around the world. Our capacity to gather information and apply that information for the protection of our own population is, in part, dependent on our relationships with other countries, and that works most smoothly with the World Health Organization."

WHO is also responsible for other public health programs, especially vaccines. Each year, scientists from around the world work with health officials and determine which influenza and COVID-19 strains to include in updated versions of these shots. US, for as long as it was the member, had access to samples of these strains, which helped in vaccine development. Thus, being part of this network is critical, especially when new viruses or strain emerges.

Also Read: Kolkata-Born Jay Bhattacharya Key Candidate For US Health Agency NIH Director

The WHO also provides guidance and advices on breastfeeding, diabetes, giving up smoking, and many more, which applies across countries. While there are other non-government organizations and philanthropies that exist, no one has the trust relationships with the ministries of health in different countries as WHO.

As per Jha, at this moment around 30,000 elderly people are at high risk of influenza complications deaths annually from the flu. US' withdrawal from WHO means inaccessibility from the database and inability to make an effective vaccine. US would also lose access of a global database of health information which includes surveillance for new and existing infectious disease. Experts believe, this could make the country more vulnerable to microbial threats from around the world.

Since WHO initiates health programs, including awareness and eradication of diseases in various countries. with US withdrawing from the global health body, this will be filled in by other powerful countries, which will make the connections to countries which had been valuable to the US for over the decades. In a way, it could also hurt the public health diplomacy.

The world is also afraid that without the US membership, WHO would lose its close ties with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which is regarded as one of the world's leading public-health agencies, this would recalled many CDC researchers assigned to the WHO. Will this impact the existing health agencies in the US? This is a concern experts have expressed in the past with the nomination of RFK Jr. to head the US health department, who had openly discouraged vaccines.

Read More: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s 8 Most Controversial Health Declarations As Potential US Health Secretary

What The WHO Says?

The WHO said that it regretted the decision from its top donor country and also urged for a reconsideration. It wrote on X, formerly Twitter:

"The World Health Organization regrets the announcement that the United States of America intends to withdraw from the Organization…We hope the United States will reconsider and we look forward to engaging in constructive dialogue to maintain the partnership between the USA and WHO, for the benefit of the health and well-being of millions of people around the globe."

Read What Trump Said At His Inauguration.

A landmark study titled “COVID-19 Vaccine Linked to Longer Survival in Cancer Patients” has revealed that people with advanced lung or skin cancer who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine within 100 days of starting immunotherapy lived significantly longer than those who did not. Conducted by researchers from the University of Florida (UF) and the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, the findings were presented at the 2025 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress in Berlin and mark a major step in exploring how mRNA technology could strengthen cancer treatment.

A Milestone in mRNA Research

This study represents the culmination of more than a decade of UF research on mRNA-based cancer therapies. Lead investigator Dr Elias Sayour, a pediatric oncologist at UF Health, called the findings “extraordinary,” noting that the vaccine’s immune-boosting effect could help design a universal, off-the-shelf cancer vaccine capable of enhancing immunotherapy responses.

mRNA, or messenger RNA, is a molecule that carries genetic instructions to make proteins. It forms the basis of COVID vaccines developed during the pandemic, and scientists now believe this same mechanism could be harnessed to amplify the body’s cancer-fighting abilities.

How the Study Was Conducted

Researchers analyzed medical records of over 1,000 patients with stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer or metastatic melanoma treated at MD Anderson between 2019 and 2023. Of these, 180 lung-cancer patients and 43 melanoma patients received a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine within 100 days of starting immunotherapy. Their outcomes were compared with 704 and 167 unvaccinated patients, respectively.

The results were striking. Vaccinated lung-cancer patients showed a median survival of 37.3 months, nearly double the 20.6 months observed in unvaccinated counterparts. Among melanoma patients, survival rose from 26.7 months to about 30–40 months, with several patients still alive at data cut-off — suggesting an even greater long-term benefit.

Importantly, the effect was specific to mRNA COVID vaccines; flu and pneumonia shots did not produce similar outcomes.

The Science Behind the Boost

Earlier this year, Dr Sayour’s lab discovered that to trigger a strong immune attack, targeting a single tumor protein wasn’t necessary. Instead, stimulating the immune system as if fighting a viral infection worked better. When this nonspecific mRNA vaccine was combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors — drugs that “release the brakes” on immune cells — mice showed powerful antitumor responses.

Building on this, the team theorized that the COVID mRNA vaccine might act like an immune flare, mobilizing immune cells from tumor zones to lymph nodes where cancer defense is stronger. This mechanism, Sayour explained, could make previously unresponsive cancers respond to treatment.

Implications and Next Steps

Although this is an observational study and cannot yet prove causality, experts are optimistic. UF’s Dr Duane Mitchell emphasized that while more trials are needed, such a large survival benefit “is the type of treatment effect we rarely see.”

A large-scale clinical trial through the UF-led OneFlorida+ Research Network is now planned to verify these findings across hospitals in several U.S. states.

If confirmed, the discovery could reshape how cancer is treated — turning vaccines from preventive tools into active partners in therapy. For patients battling advanced cancers, this could mean something profoundly valuable: more time and renewed hope.

Every year on October 20, World Osteoporosis Day is marked, to put the spotlight on osteoporosis. The day marks a year-long campaign, which is dedicated to raising global awareness of bone health, and the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis and related musculoskeletal diseases.

Osteoporosis is a serious condition where bones lose its density and strength, and it thus makes them fragile and more likely to break. It is often called the 'silent disease', and most people don't even realize that they have it until a fracture happens.

The most common fracture in this condition is in hip, spine, wrist, or shoulder. These fractures can result in long hospital stays, and lead to loss of independence, and reduced quality of life.

World Osteoporosis Day 2025 Theme

This year's theme is 'It's Unacceptable'.

This puts the spotlight on the persistent and preventable crisis in osteoporosis care.

This condition affects over 500 million people worldwide, and most remain severely underdiagnosed and undertreated. Up to 80% of patients with osteoporotic fractures do not receive any follow-up diagnosis or treatment.

This theme furthermore makes an effort for everyone to make noise for the silent disease.

The disease is more common among women, as 1 in 3 women, as compared to 1 in 5 men aged 50+ are prone to osteoporotic fracture in their remaining lifetime. These fractures could lead to chronic pain and disability, loss of independence, increased risk of further fractures, and even premature deaths.

Thus the theme 'It's Unacceptable', highlights that it is simply unacceptable that patients continue to receive inadequate care, and people are still not aware of the condition.

Origin Of World Osteoporosis Day

The World Osteoporosis Day was first launched in 1996 by the United Kingdom's National Osteoporosis Society, with support from the European Commission. The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), then took over the global coordination in 1997, turning it into a worldwide awareness campaign that takes place annually on October 20. The World Health Organization (WHO) also co-sponsored the event in 1998 and 1999, helping to raise its international profile.

Significance of World Osteoporosis Day 2025

Why is it important to observe a day on this, internationally? The reason is, this condition is very common, is among the most frequent health events, yet not much talked about. The IOF notes that in women osteoporotic fractures are more common than breast cancer. Women who are over the age of 45 account for more days in hospital than many other diseases, if they are osteoporotic. This comparison is done with other chronic diseases, including diabetes, myocardial infarction, and even breast cancer, notes IOF.

For men, in many countries, osteoporotic fractures account for more hospital bed days than those due to prostrate cancer.

IOF notes that osteoporosis is not prioritized in healthcare policy, and that it continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated, globally. Only 1 in 3 vertebral fractures come to clinical attention, and most spinal fractures are often diagnosed as simple 'back pain'. This is why there remains a high treatment gap. In Europe, 72% of women who are at a high risk of osteoporotic fractures do not receive treatment.

This is why awareness about this condition becomes more so important, especially when framing public policies, education campaigns, and preventative care, especially making people understand the importance of calcium and vitamin D.

Glenmark, a leading Indian drugmaker, has recalled its products in the US over manufacturing issue, confirmed the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA).

What Did The USFDA Say?

The USFDA released an Enforcement Report, which noted that the US-based unit of Glenmark Pharmaceuticals in recalling 26,928 packs of oral contraceptive medicines in the US. The company's unit based in Mahwah, New Jersey, has now recalled the affected lot of the following birth control pills:

• Viorele
• Desogestrel
• Ehinyl Estradiol

The report also noted that Ethinyl Estradiol tablets were recalled due to "failed impurities and degradation specifications". The affected drugs were produced in the company's Mumbai headquarters' Goa manufacturing facility. This is because India has the highest number of USFDA-compliant pharmaceutical plants outside of the US.

The drug firm also issued a notice for Class II nationwide recall on September 3, 2025.

What Does Class II Recall Mean?

The USFDA notes that recalls are actions taken by the firm to remove and product from the market and could be conducted by company's own initiative, or by the FDA request or order.

Class II recall means a situation in which the use of or the exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequence is remote.

What Are The Different Categories Of Recalls?

As per the USFDA, there are 5 different categories of recalls, namely:

• Class I Recall
• Class II Recall
• Class II Recall
• Market Withdrawal
• Medical Device Safety Alert

• Class I recall: a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.

• Class II recall: a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote.

• Class III recall: a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences.

• Market withdrawal: occurs when a product has a minor violation that would not be subject to FDA legal action. The firm removes the product from the market or corrects the violation. For example, a product removed from the market due to tampering, without evidence of manufacturing or distribution problems, would be a market withdrawal.

• Medical device safety alert: issued in situations where a medical device may present an unreasonable risk of substantial harm. In some case, these situations also are considered recalls.

Are There Any Other Drugs Being Recalled?

Dr Reddy's Laboratories, another major Indian drugmaker, has also recalled its muscle relaxant in the US. The company's Princeton, New Jersey-based subsidiary has recalled 571 vials of Succinylcholine Chloride Injection. The recall was initiated due to "out-of-specification results during the 6-month stability testing," according to USFDA.