Baking Soda (Credit: Canva)
Baking soda, scientifically known as sodium bicarbonate, is a salt that is commonly used in toothpastes, as leavening agent in cooking and to remove odour. In recent times, it has also emerged as a viral health trend with people flooding social media platforms like TikTok advocating its health benefits. While some claims are backed by preliminary research, experts have emphasised the need for scientific evidence and professional guidance.
Here are six common health claims about drinking baking soda water:
There is empirical evidence that shows that consuming baking soda boosts your health. Some studies suggest that this ingredient may enhance endurance during high-intensity activities. For instance, a 2021 study involving trained male cyclists found that sodium bicarbonate supplementation improved performance during a final all-out sprint.
Notably, baking soda's alkaline nature may temporarily ease heartburn by neutralizing stomach acid. A 2022 review highlighted its short-term benefits for reflux symptoms. However, health experts have noted that while it provides temporary relief, it should not be seen as a long-term solution. They have also discouraged frequent use with medical guidance.
Contrary to popular belief, there is no reliable evidence supporting baking soda as a weight-loss aid. Dietitians have explained that the only mechanism might be severe stomach upset reducing appetite, which is unsafe and unsustainable. Experts emphasize that healthy weight management requires balanced nutrition and regular exercise rather than quick fixes.
Research, including a recent 2024 study, suggests that sodium bicarbonate may help slow the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in certain cases. However, it’s not a universal remedy. For individuals with CKD, sodium bicarbonate may be prescribed to manage acidosis, a condition where acid builds up in the body. People without kidney disease do not benefit from taking baking soda to balance pH levels, as healthy kidneys already regulate this efficiently.
Some animal studies suggest baking soda may inhibit cancer cell growth by altering tumor pH levels. However, these findings are preliminary and lack robust human trials. Health experts have sternly warned that patients should rely on evidence-based therapies and consult their oncologist.”
A small 2018 study hinted at baking soda’s potential to reduce inflammation, but experts caution against drawing conclusions. Alkaline foods, like fruits and vegetables, are known to combat inflammation. Baking soda does not offer the same proven benefits as these whole foods.
ALSO READ: Exposure To Mold Can Lead To Neurological Symptoms: Know What They Are
Despite its purported benefits, baking soda water can pose significant health risks, especially if it is being consumed in high quantities. A single teaspoon contains approximately 1,200 mg of sodium, nearly the recommended daily limit for individuals with high blood pressure.
There are a lot of side effects associated with baking soda such as gastronomical issues like bloating and cramping, vomiting, electrolyte imbalances, hypertension and nutrient absorption issues.
ALSO READ: Bankers Turning to ADHD Drugs to Handle Work Pressure: Understanding Their Side Effects
A new study from Stanford University suggests that daylight saving time isn't just an inconvenience; it could actually be bad for our health. The research shows that our twice-a-year routine of changing the clocks disrupts our bodies' natural rhythms, which can lead to serious health issues. This is a big deal because it provides the first real scientific evidence that this time-switching practice has a biological cost.
According to the Sleep Foundation, daylight saving time (DST) has been an official practice in most of the United States since 1966. Only a few places, like Hawaii and parts of Arizona, don't follow it. The routine is simple: on the second Sunday in March, we set our clocks forward by one hour, losing an hour of sleep. Then, on the first Sunday in November, we set them back, gaining that hour of sleep. This is why many people remember it as "Spring Forward, Fall Back."
According to the study, if the U.S. got rid of daylight saving time and stayed on standard time all year, it could prevent thousands of strokes and significantly reduce obesity. The researchers, using mathematical models and data, estimated that this single change could prevent 300,000 strokes and lead to 2.6 million fewer people with obesity every year. This adds to what we already know about the negative effects of the time change, such as a spike in heart attacks and car crashes in the days after we lose an hour of sleep in the spring.
Our body's internal clock is heavily influenced by light. When the clocks change, the amount of natural light we get in the morning and evening shifts. This can throw off our sleep-wake cycle, making it harder to feel alert in the morning and sleepy at night.
The “spring forward” change is particularly hard on us. One study found that on the Monday after the time change, the average person gets 40 minutes less sleep. This lack of sleep can build up over time, affecting our mood and increasing the risk of accidents.
While the "fall back" change in November can give us an extra hour of sleep, some people still struggle to adjust to the new schedule. For most people, the effects fade after a few days, but some studies suggest that others never fully adjust, leading to ongoing health problems.
The core problem lies in our body's internal clock, or circadian rhythm. Think of it as the conductor of an orchestra, directing all your body's processes. When it's working well, everything is in sync. But when it's thrown off, like by getting light at the wrong time of day, your body's systems can become disorganized.
This can weaken your immune system, mess with your sleep, and increase your risk for diseases like stroke and obesity. The study found that switching between standard and daylight saving time is the worst thing we can do for our body clock, much worse than staying on either time year-round. It's a bit like having the conductor suddenly change the tempo for no reason—the whole orchestra, or in this case, your body, gets thrown off.
Credits: Canva
India’s top health research body has suggested that new antibiotics launched in the country should only be made available through select hospital pharmacies. The advice comes amid rising fears of misuse, overuse, and growing resistance to even the most critical ‘last-resort’ antibiotics.
In a recent paper published in the Journal of Global Health, ICMR’s antimicrobial resistance (AMR) division, along with other researchers, warned that while new antimicrobials bring hope, past experience shows resistance often develops quickly.
ICMR’s surveillance data paints a worrying picture. Klebsiella pneumoniae, a common hospital bug, is now 62.3% resistant to carbapenem (a powerful antibiotic used as a last line of defense). E. coli has also grown tougher, with its resistance to key drugs like imipenem and piperacillin-tazobactam rising sharply in the last six years.
ALSO READ: Congo Ebola Outbreak Caused By The Zaire Strain So Far Has 28 Deaths, Confirms WHO
According to the Global Research on Antimicrobial Resistance (GRAM) project, between 3 and 10.4 lakh people in India died in 2019 due to bacterial AMR. Six superbugs which are E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae were linked to more than 2.14 lakh deaths that year alone.
One area where India has shown stronger regulatory control is tuberculosis treatment, where strict monitoring of drug use has helped maintain effectiveness for longer. Experts say a similar model is needed for all new antibiotics.
ALSO READ: Why 1 In 6 U.S. Parents Are Rejecting Vaccine Recommendations
In India, antimicrobials have traditionally been available through retail pharmacies and hospital formularies. While this approach makes drugs easily accessible, it does little to prevent misuse. With treatment options for multidrug-resistant infections running out fast, it has become essential to explore every possible way to curb the improper use of newer antibiotics. In this context, ICMR’s new recommendation to restrict sales could prove to be a useful step.
Credits: Canva
A 47-year-old autorickshaw driver from Royapettah, who had received a full course of vaccination after being bitten by a stray dog in July 2025, died of rabies at the Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital (RGGGH). He is the 22nd person to succumb to the disease in Tamil Nadu this year.
His death has left experts asking a difficult question, if protocols were followed, why are people still dying? Public health specialists suggest this may not just be a failure of administration, but a sign that India’s long-standing rabies protocol itself needs re-examination.
“Rabies infects mammals, including dogs, cats, livestock and wildlife. It spreads to people through saliva, usually by bites, scratches, or direct contact with mucous membranes such as the eyes, mouth, or open wounds. Once symptoms appear, rabies is virtually 100% fatal,” explains Dr. Surrinder Kumar, MBBS, General Physician.
ALSO READ: Bird Flu In US: Are Cats Spreading A Deadly Disease?
For those unversed, Rabies immunoglobulin is a medication made up of antibodies against the rabies virus. It is used to prevent rabies following exposure.
According to Dr Surrinder, the main reasons are:
ALSO READ: Why 1 In 6 U.S. Parents Are Rejecting Vaccine Recommendations
Alongside immunoglobulin, at least five separate rabies vaccine doses are necessary. These, Dr. Shaswath says, are not without side effects, as “every time people take the vaccine, they get fever.” While cities are able to conduct mass vaccination campaigns, rural areas face significant challenges in this regard.
He further stresses that rabies is not confined to dog bites alone. The virus can also spread from other animals, and in rare cases even from humans, if infected saliva comes in contact with open wounds or mucous membranes. “A bite isn’t always necessary,” he warns.
Dr. Ranjeet Singh, Professor and Head of General Medicine at NIIMS Medical College and Hospital, echoes the same concerns. He emphasises that rabies deaths in India do not reflect a failure of the vaccine itself. Instead, the main reasons are late treatment, lack of awareness, incomplete vaccination, shortage of immunoglobulin, and limited access in rural areas.
India follows the WHO-approved five-dose rabies vaccine protocol, with immunoglobulin recommended for severe (Category III) bites. But the bigger question, they say, is whether the protocol assumes ideal conditions, which is immediate wound washing, uninterrupted cold chain storage, and trained professionals administering injections at the wound site. In reality, these conditions are not always met.
To end rabies deaths in India, awareness must go hand in hand with medical access. Every bite, no matter how small, needs immediate action: wash, vaccinate, and if severe, take immunoglobulin.
“Rabies is 100% preventable but 100% fatal if ignored. No bite should ever be taken lightly. The key is simple, wash, vaccinate, and complete the course,” concludes Dr. Surrinder Kumar.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited