Jeremy Clarkson Opens Up About His Health And Extreme Diet, ' If It’s Got More Than One Ingredient In It, Don’t Eat It.”

Updated Jan 22, 2025 | 04:00 AM IST

SummaryThe beloved ‘Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?’ host Jeremy Clarkson opens up about the major health scare he had to go through, and how it was the wake up call he needed to take his health seriously.
Credit-Getty Images

Credit-Getty Images

Jeremy Clarkson is back for another season of ‘Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?’ and he's opening up about the changes he's made to his lifestyle to improve his health following a serious health scare. The beloved show host explained how he had to go on a very strict diet because one of the arteries that supplies blood to his heart was completely blocked. Such a blockage can only be fixed with surgeries and takes a massive toll on one's body.

In an interview with the Metro, he revealed that last October, he was hospitalized due to chest tightness, which led to the discovery of a completely blocked artery. When cases like this arise, the routine surgery includes unclogging the artery and placing a stent, a small, expandable tube that's inserted into a blood vessel or duct to keep it open. It makes sure it does not happen again. This was a big wake up call for him, and he decided to take his body and health more seriously, making healthier lifestyle changes. The doctors had also told him that he was just a few days away from worsening his condition, which could have meant long-lasting damage to him.

This is often the case for many people, most of us think that nothing bad would happen to us with a slight lifestyle changes. However, when it does, it may come to us like a big shock. It could also be the alarm that we needed to remind ourselves to take better care of our health. This is what happened with Clarkson, he consulted a dietician who advised him to eliminate processed foods from his diet. "If its got more than one ingredient in it, don’t eat it" is what he was told, and he took it very seriously.

What Lifestyle Changes Did He Have To Make?

He’s swapped previous snacks like bacon for healthier alternatives such as celery and carrots. Jeremy shared that he even received notifications from his phone about eating fewer sausages and taking fewer steps, which he jokingly attributed to sitting during the show's taping. However, he emphasized that he feels much better since implementing these dietary changes and credits the health scare with giving him the necessary motivation to prioritize his wellbeing. He compared this to quitting smoking after a bout of pneumonia, stating that these experiences provide a stark realization of the need for change.

Signs Of Artery Blockage You Should Look Out For

Chest pain can be scary because it has two meaning: a blocked artery (called angina) or a heart attack. Knowing the difference is important. Angina is a symptom of an underlying heart condition that causes chest pain or discomfort. It's usually caused by a partial blockage or spasm in the arteries that supply blood to the heart. It usually happens when you're active or stressed and goes away when you rest. But the pain that causes heart attack doesn't stop even when you're resting. Angina isn't a disease itself, rather a sign that could lead to serious heart diseases.

The pain can start in your chest and spread to your arm, shoulder, jaw, or back. Other signs of blocked arteries can be dizziness, feeling weak, a fast or fluttering heartbeat, feeling sick to your stomach, sweating, and trouble breathing. Knowing these signs can help you get help quickly.

Chest Pain (Angina) vs. Heart Attack

Chest pain can signal both a blocked artery, another word for which is angina or a heart attack. The key difference is that angina pain subsides with rest, while heart attack pain persists.

Angina Pain Characteristics

Angina, a symptom of conditions like coronary artery disease, often starts in the breastbone and can spread to the left arm, shoulder, jaw, or upper back.

Other Atherosclerosis Symptoms

Besides chest pain, other signs of blocked arteries include dizziness, weakness, heart palpitations (racing or fluttering heart), nausea, sweating, and shortness of breath.

End of Article

Oncologist Reveals 5 Subtle Cervical Cancer Signs That You May Miss

Updated Jan 17, 2026 | 04:00 PM IST

SummaryDr Ninad Katdare, Consultant Surgical Oncologist, Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre, says abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain and leg swelling are some of the lesser known signs of cervical cancer that you may not notice. Cervical cancer develops in a women's cervix due to abnormal cell growth, primarily caused by persistent HPV infection
Oncologist Reveals 5 Subtle Cervical Cancer Signs That You May Miss

Credit: Canva

Wondering if abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain and leg swelling are signs of something fatal?

According to Dr Ninad Katdare, Consultant Surgical Oncologist, Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre, they may be symptoms of cervical cancer. While many may expect drastic signs such as severe pain, heavy bleeding or obvious illness, identifying certain symptoms can help with early diagnosis and treatment.

Cervical cancer develops in a women's cervix (uterus opening) due to abnormal cell growth, primarily caused by persistent HPV infection, a common infection that's passed through sexual contact.

When exposed to HPV, the body's immune system typically prevents the virus from causing damage however, in a small percentage of people, the virus can survive for years and pave the way for some cervical cells to become cancerous.

Treatment involves surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, with early detection significantly improving outcomes, though it remains a major cancer in low-income countries. Cervical cancer can also be prevented through vaccination and regular screening (Pap/HPV tests).

Dr Katdare told News18: "In its early stages, it is often more of a whisper than a shout. As a cancer surgeon who has treated hundreds of women with gynaecological cancers, I can say with confidence that recognising these subtle cues can lead to earlier diagnosis and significantly better outcomes."

He recommends looking out for these early signs:

1. Intermenstrual Bleeding

Intermenstrual bleeding occurs between regular menstrual periods, ranging from light spotting to heavier flow, often linked to hormonal shifts, ovulation or infections (cervicitis). However, according to Dr Katdare, this sign should not be ignored as it is one of the most common early warning signs of cervical cancer.

2. Changes In Vaginal Discharge

Vaginal discharge is a normal, natural fluid that cleans and protects the vagina and can vary in color (clear to white), consistency (watery to thick) and amount throughout the menstrual cycle.

But Dr Katdare warns that any sudden or abnormal changes in discharge may be a symptom of the cancer. “Because discharge issues are commonly linked to infections, many women self-medicate or delay seeking care," he said. “While infections are far more common, chronic or unusual discharge especially in older women requires thorough evaluation."

Discharge may become persistent, watery, foul-smelling, or tinged with blood or pink, brown, or rust-colored if you're suffering from this kind of cancer.

3. Persistent Pelvic Pain

Consistent pelvic pain particularly that occurs outside the menstrual cycle or during sexual intercourse should be a point of concern. According to Dr Katdare, "Pain during intercourse, or dyspareunia, is especially important. It should not be dismissed as ‘just dryness’ or an age-related change. In cervical cancer, this pain may result from inflammation or tumour growth involving the cervix and surrounding tissues."

4. Leg Swelling

Unnatural and unexplained leg swelling of one leg, particularly if it occurs on one side may suggest that the cancer is progressing and spreading in the body. “This happens due to pressure on pelvic blood vessels," explained Dr. Katdare, “and should not be ignored."

5. Urinary And Bowel Symptoms

As cervical cancer advances to higher stages, it can begin to affect nearby organs including the bladder and kidneys. Symptoms such as frequent urination, difficulty emptying the bladder, constipation, or rectal discomfort may also begin to develop.

“These symptoms are often evaluated in isolation because they don’t seem related to the cervix," said Dr Katdare, “which can delay the correct diagnosis."

Ultimately the expert advised: "“Cervical cancer does not always announce itself loudly,. Sometimes, it leaves silent clues. The sooner you listen to them, the better the outcome. If something feels ‘off,’ trust that instinct and seek medical advice. Early action can make the difference between a curable disease and a life-altering diagnosis."

End of Article

How This Chinese Medicine Can Improve Blood Flow In Angina Patients

Updated Jan 17, 2026 | 01:27 PM IST

SummaryShexiang Tongxin Dropping Pill (STDP), a Chinese traditional medicine made of artificial musk, ginseng, borneol, toad venom as well as bezoar can help ease angina pain as it helps improve blood flow and protects heart microcirculation through its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and anti-apoptotic characteristics. It has been approved by the Chinese FDA
Scientists Say This Chinese Medicine Can Improve Blood Flow

Credit: Canva

Angina, a symptom of coronary artery disease, is a type of chest pain caused by the heart muscle not getting enough oxygen-rich blood, usually due to narrowed coronary arteries from plaque buildup.

Itis often described as squeezing, pressure, or heaviness in the chest, potentially radiating to arms, neck, jaw, or back and at times, can feel like indigestion. Experiencing an angina is warning sign of heart disease, not of a heart attack.

However, Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pill (STDP), a Chinese traditional medicine that can help ease angina pain as it helps improve blood flow and protects heart microcirculation through its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and anti-apoptotic (promoting cell survival) characteristics, according to an EMJ study.

What Is Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pill?

STDP is essentially a complex herbal preparation containing ingredients like artificial musk, ginseng, borneol, toad venom as well as bezoar and has been approved for use by the Chinese FDA (now National Medical Products Administration).

In this a randomized controlled study, 200 adults with angina and coronary slow flow phenomenon were assigned to receive either STDP or a placebo. The study measured coronary blood flow using corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC).

Patients who received STDP had improved blood flow in two major coronary arteries, while those given placebo showed no improvement. The improvement with STDP was significantly greater than with placebo.

The scientists concluded that using STDP to increase blood flow in the body was beneficial with no major safety concerns reported during the trial, allowing them to conclude that this Chinese medication can help the flow of blood through the heart’s smallest blood vessels, which supply oxygen and nutrients to the heart muscle with no side-effects.

Researchers are yet to conclude how the medication works and helps the heart.

Coronary Artery Disease: The Silent Killer

Despite being as a common heart disease, coronary artery disease (CAD) develops over years and has no clear signs and symptoms apart from chest pain and a heart attack. The illness begins due to a buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances known as plaque in and on the artery walls.

Over time, this can cause narrowing or blockage of the coronary arteries and block the supply of oxygen-rich blood to heart which can lead chest pain (angina), shortness of breath and ultimately, heart attacks.

Typically, those above the age of 45, having a biological family member with heart disease, lack of sleep, smoking, consuming saturated fats along with other autoimmune diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis can increase the risk of developing CAD.

Treatment options may include medicines and surgery. Eating a nutritious diet, getting regular exercise and not smoking can help also prevent CAD and the conditions that can cause it.

Nearly one in 10 Indian adults suffer from CAD and about two million people die from the disease annually. Apart from this, about 18 to 20 million American adults aged 20 and older are also affected about the disease.

How Much You Should Exercise To Prevent CAD?

The American Health Association recommends performing at least 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity aerobic activity such as brisk walking, dancing and gardening or 75 minutes per week of vigorous aerobic activity, such as hiking, running, cycling or and playing tennis or a combination of both, preferably spread throughout the week to maintain heart health.

Moreover, regular exercise can also reduce the risk of Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, dementia and Alzheimer’s, several types of cancer. It can also help improve sleep, cognition, including memory, attention and processing speed.

Dr Hayes recommends opting for a cardiac evaluation such as an electrocardiogram, or EKG; stress test; a cardiac MRI or CT scan to generate images of your heart if you notice changes in your ability to exercise or cannot perform consistent levels of exercise.

End of Article

Fact Check: Are Fewer Childhood Vaccines Really “A Better Thing” Under the New CDC Guidelines?

Updated Jan 17, 2026 | 12:00 PM IST

SummaryFact Check examines the CDC’s decision to drop universal recommendations for six childhood vaccines under the Trump administration. While officials cite low disease rates and international alignment, experts say vaccines reduced hospitalizations, deaths and transmission. They warn bypassing scientific review and weakening guidance risks outbreaks, disparities and preventable illness nationwide health.
Fact Check: Are Fewer Childhood Vaccines Really “A Better Thing” Under the New CDC Guidelines?

Credits: Canva

In early January, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) made one of the most significant changes to childhood vaccination policy in decades. Routine vaccination is no longer universally recommended for six diseases, including rotavirus, influenza, meningococcal disease and hepatitis A. The move follows a directive from President Donald Trump’s administration to reassess vaccine schedules and align them with what officials called “international consensus.”

Supporters of the change describe it as a step toward informed consent and transparency. Many public health experts see it very differently. They argue that the science behind the decision is selective, the process breaks with long-standing norms, and the consequences may only become clear years later.

So are these vaccines actually necessary, and is removing them from compulsory recommendation a reasonable move? Health and Me ran a fact check to see whether the four vaccines removed from the CDC universal guidelines would actually be a "better thing", as the Health Secretary and long time vaccine critic Robert F Kennedy Jr says.

Read: Children Getting Fewer Vaccine May Be A 'Better Thing', Says RFK Jr, As US Struggles With Rise In Flu Activity

What Exactly Changed With The CDC Vaccination

Until recently, the CDC recommended routine childhood vaccination against 17 diseases. That number has now dropped to 11. Vaccines for rotavirus, influenza, meningococcal disease, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and COVID-19 are no longer universally recommended for all children. Instead, they fall under shared clinical decision-making, meaning parents can still opt for them after discussion with a healthcare provider.

Importantly, this does not mean the vaccines are banned or unavailable. Insurance coverage remains largely unchanged for now, and vaccines remain recommended for children at higher risk.

The larger concern raised by experts is not access, but messaging. Universal recommendations have historically been one of the strongest drivers of vaccine uptake.

Read More: CDC Vaccine Schedule: Coverage Falls From 17 to 11 Diseases For Children

A Break From the Usual Scientific Process

Traditionally, changes to the U.S. vaccine schedule go through the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a panel of independent experts who review evidence publicly over months. This time, that process was bypassed.

Instead, the decision relied on a 33-page internal assessment prepared by two political appointees. Several experts criticized both the lack of transparency and the narrow interpretation of evidence.

Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician and vaccine expert at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, described the process as federal officials making sweeping decisions behind closed doors, without public input or broad expert review.

Rotavirus: Rare Deaths, Heavy Hospital Burden

Rotavirus causes severe diarrhea and vomiting in infants and young children, often leading to dehydration. Before routine vaccination began in 2006, an estimated 55,000 to 70,000 U.S. children were hospitalized each year due to rotavirus.

The administration justified dropping the universal recommendation by emphasizing low mortality rates. However, CDC researchers previously estimated 20 to 60 deaths annually in the pre-vaccine era. Experts say focusing narrowly on death counts ignores the very real suffering and healthcare burden the virus caused.

Offit, who helped develop one of the vaccines, noted that most pediatric residents today have never seen a child hospitalized with severe rotavirus dehydration. That absence, he argues, is proof of success, not irrelevance.

Meningococcal Disease: Rare but Devastating

Meningococcal disease is uncommon, but when it strikes, it can be deadly within hours. Even with treatment, about 15 percent of patients die, and up to 20 percent suffer permanent complications such as amputations or hearing loss.

The administration cited low incidence and World Health Organization thresholds to justify removing the universal recommendation. But experts counter that low incidence is precisely what vaccination programs aim to achieve.

Dr. David Stephens of Emory University pointed out that most high-income countries still recommend meningococcal vaccines, even with similarly low disease rates. He also warned that recent U.S. data show a resurgence, with 2024 recording the highest number of cases in over a decade.

Modeling studies suggest that U.S. vaccination programs have already prevented hundreds of cases and dozens of deaths. Removing universal recommendations, experts warn, risks reversing those gains.

Influenza: The Limits of Clinical Trials

Annual flu vaccination for children has been recommended since 2008, based on evidence that children both suffer from influenza and play a major role in spreading it.

The administration argued that randomized controlled trials have not proven flu vaccines reduce hospitalizations or deaths in children. What it did not emphasize is that such trials are not designed to detect rare outcomes like death.

Dr. Mark Loeb of McMaster University explained that proving mortality benefits would require trials involving millions of children, which is not feasible. Instead, real-world observational studies are used.

Those studies consistently show that flu vaccination reduces hospitalizations in children. A 2024 review in the New England Journal of Medicine estimated a 67 percent reduction in pediatric hospital admissions. Experts say dismissing this evidence reflects a misunderstanding of how vaccine effectiveness is measured.

Also Read: RSV Vaccine Has Benefits, Reveals Study Amid CDC's Changed Guidelines On Childhood Vaccines

Hepatitis A: Protecting Others by Vaccinating Children

Hepatitis A rarely causes severe illness in young children, which is precisely why childhood vaccination works. Children often spread the virus silently to adults, who face much higher risks of liver failure and death.

Dr. Noele Nelson, a former CDC epidemiologist, explained that vaccinating children interrupts this transmission chain and provides lifelong immunity. She warned that reducing childhood vaccination could recreate the conditions that once fueled adult outbreaks.

Claims that hepatitis A vaccines lack adequate safety data were also disputed. Clinical trials and decades of post-licensure monitoring have found no unexpected safety concerns, according to Nelson and other experts.

Are These Changes Scientifically Justified?

Public health experts broadly agree that these vaccines are not perfect and that honest discussions about risks and benefits matter. Where they strongly disagree is the idea that low disease rates or ethical limits on trial design justify weakening universal recommendations.

Low incidence, experts emphasize, is not a reason to stop vaccinating. It is evidence that vaccination works.

Whether the consequences of this policy shift emerge in five years or ten, many experts fear the costs will be paid quietly, through preventable hospitalizations, outbreaks and deaths that no longer make headlines but never needed to happen in the first place.

End of Article