Kennedy's MAHA Report Will Not Solve Food Problem In US, Here's What Experts Believe

Food policy experts had cautiously hoped that the new health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., might finally address the nation’s poor diet and reduce reliance on ultraprocessed foods. But many expressed disappointment following Tuesday’s White House report detailing the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) commission’s plans to tackle childhood chronic disease.While the report includes promising initiatives such as offering healthier meals in schools and promoting breastfeeding, it remains vague about how these policies would be implemented or funded. The New York Times quoted Kelly Brownell, professor emeritus at Duke University’s Sanford School of Public Policy, saying, “Even if all of the initiatives in the report were put into action, the industry will not be required to change how it manipulates and markets foods that drive poor health in children.”Contrast With Previous ReportThe new report contrasts sharply with MAHA’s first report in May, which focused on identifying drivers of poor health in American children. Jerold Mande, adjunct professor of nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and former federal food policymaker, described the initial report as “revolutionary in its focus” on ultraprocessed foods and the companies producing them.“[The new report] seems more in line with food industry interests than the previous one, as if it was written to just maintain the status quo,” Mr. Mande told The New York Times. Ultraprocessed foods were mentioned only a few times, primarily in describing efforts to define them.Industry ResponseFollowing the report’s release, industry groups largely welcomed its recommendations. The Food Industry Association, representing producers and retailers, issued a statement of support, and the Consumer Brands Association called it “a very ambitious” set of policy recommendations it would help implement, The New York Times reported.The report also permits schools and federal nutrition programs to offer whole milk instead of just lower-fat options, a change long supported by the dairy industry. Marion Nestle, professor emerita of nutrition and public health at New York University, highlighted this as a key example of industry-favored policy.Limits of Voluntary Industry CooperationSo far, Mr. Kennedy has relied on voluntary cooperation from the food industry rather than mandating change. This approach has succeeded in some areas, such as reducing artificial dyes in foods. However, experts note that larger drivers of ultraprocessed food consumption, low cost, heavy marketing, and high fat, sugar, and salt content, are unlikely to be addressed without regulation.Christina Roberto, director of the Center for Food and Nutrition Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, told The New York Times, “The issues they’re focused on for food and nutrition are really spot on. But the devil is completely in the details.” She added that policies like sugary drink taxes, which have proven effective in other countries, could reduce consumption and improve health outcomes.Support for Some Proposals, Gaps in RegulationThe report also lists measures that policy experts support, such as expanding research on nutrition, improving hospital and federal program meals, scrutinizing food additives, and closing the longstanding “GRAS loophole” that allows companies to introduce new chemicals without FDA approval.Yet, experts said the report lacks clarity on how the FDA would increase oversight, particularly amid staffing and funding cuts. Jennifer Pomeranz, associate professor of public health policy at NYU, told The New York Times that even if additives like artificial dyes are removed, foods could remain high in sugar, sodium, and fat.A draft version obtained by The New York Times in August proposed “ways to lower added sugar and sodium in packaged foods,” a line removed from the final report. “You assume that food industry lobbying got that taken out,” Dr. Nestle said. She also criticized vague language suggesting that companies would police themselves to limit marketing unhealthy foods to children.Longstanding Challenges RemainExperts noted a tension between the administration’s stated goal of improving public health and its actions, such as cuts to SNAP benefits and the elimination of large-scale nutrition education programs. Many see the report as similar to past administrations’ efforts: a list of reasonable proposals without strong enforcement mechanisms.“Administration after administration, independent of the political party, has been unwilling to tackle the food industry,” Dr. Brownell told The New York Times. “As long as the industry isn’t required to change, it won’t.”

Kennedy's MAHA Report Will Not Solve Food Problem In US, Here's What Experts Believe

Quick Stories

Harvard Gut Doctor Shares Top 3 'Science-Backed' Foods That Reduce Liver Fat

Can Food Really Boost Fertility? Nutritionist Shares What To Eat When You Are Trying To Conceive

Nutritionist Explains The 5 Evening Habits That Help You Wake Up Energized

Health Conditions A-Z

Kennedy's MAHA Report Will Not Solve Food Problem In US, Here's What Experts Believe

Following Japanese Ancient Samurai Routine Could Reduce Risk Of Falls In Seniors

The Simple Exercise That Helps Regrow Brain Cells, According To Neuroscientist