Credits: Canva
Your baby is growing, learning new tricks, but suddenly you see some developmental regression? Your baby who could do certain things for you is now not willing to let you go, even for a few minutes. Should this be a matter of concern? The science does not think so!
This starts around the 37th week, when the cognitive and emotional abilities develop and is progressing rapidly. This is the time when your baby is around 9 to 10 months old and is learning more skills, and the attitudes resemble those of toddler.
However, during this time, your kids emotions also come to play, and they really have no limit. There might be mood swings, jealousy, or your baby reveling against things which were otherwise smooth.
Your baby here goes through intensive cognitive and emotional development and to your baby, suddenly, a lot of things start to make sense. At this age, they will be able to categories, for instance, they would be able to tell that dogs, horses, and birds are different, but they all belong to the category of animals. Same goes for fruits, vegetables, and breads, that they are edible, when though they look different.
This is also the phase when your baby could feel jealous, when he or she sees your playing with another child, or giving attention to another baby.
This period, since the baby is experiencing a lot of things for the first time, may increase the crying and clinging tendency of your baby. Which is why your baby needs you more than ever. The signs of leap 6 are:
Your baby might scream during the night or whimper in their sleep.
Some babies also experience development regression, like not being able to stay put for a few minutes without their caregivers. However, there is nothing to get worried, it only happens because they are feeling overwhelmed by these changes.
At this phase, emotions are easily triggered. This is because your baby is also learning about this new expressions, and does not know how to balance them.
The leap 6 lasts between 3 to 6 weeks and thus makes it one of the longer leaps. This happens to all babies, though the signs and symptoms may vary. This could be a challenging period for the parents, however, it is important to deal with this phase with patience.
However, this is also the phase when you see your little one is able to stack rings and other items, explore different shapes and material, how they feel. So, even if some of it is rough, it will pass!
Yes, it does. This is when your baby sleeps less than before. They might have trouble sleeping, or take longer time to fall asleep. They could also experience night walking, and wake earlier in the morning. They could also either take shorter naps or boycott naps altogether.

Credit: iStock/Canva
Maternal vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy can be effective against severe disease and hospitalization from the SARS-CoV-2 virus in babies, according to a large study.
The study, published in the journal Pediatrics, revealed that COVID vaccination during pregnancy can protect the children against hospitalization for COVID during the first six months of life.
Also Read: COVID-19 Cicada Variant: Will It Become The Dominant Strain In The US? Know All About The Virus
Amid continuing COVID cases, babies under six months old continue to have one of the highest rates of hospitalization — one in five — due to the COVID virus in the US, as per a 2024 study.
As currently no vaccines against COVID are available for neonates and babies, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends maternal vaccination during pregnancy.
The retrospective study included 146,031 infants born in Norway between March 2021 and December 2023. Of these, 37, 013 (25 percent) were exposed to COVID-19 vaccination in utero.
The findings showed that babies exposed to the vaccine before birth were no more likely to visit the hospital for overall infections (of any kind) than those whose mothers did not get vaccinated in pregnancy.
However, infants whose mothers were vaccinated were about half as likely to visit the hospital specifically for COVID in their first two months of life compared to babies not exposed to the vaccine in utero.
Also Read: Olivia Munn Opens Up About Detecting No-Symptom Breast Cancer With Lifetime Risk Assessment Test
Among 3 to 5-month-old babies, the risk of a hospital visit for COVID was 24 percent lower in those exposed to the vaccine, but the vaccine's protection against COVID wore off by the time infants were older than 6 months.
Importantly, the mothers' vaccine also prevented the risk of other infections in children.
"There is often an increased risk for a subsequent infection after a viral infection, such as an increased risk of pneumonia after influenza infection, so we wanted to study whether protection against COVID-19 could influence the risk of other infections as well," said lead author Dr. Helena Niemi Eide, from the University of Oslo in Norway, the NPR reported.
"But we found that COVID vaccination in pregnancy protected the infant against COVID and had no apparent effect on other infections," Eide added.
Last week, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists reiterated its recommendation for COVID vaccination during pregnancy.
Despite changes in federal vaccine recommendations due to the US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s anti-vaccine stance, the ACOG urged COVID vaccination for
Also read: Bipolar Disorder: How Early Detection Can Help Prevent Serious Complications
"Accumulated safety data from millions of administered doses show no increased risk of adverse maternal, fetal, or neonatal outcomes associated with COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy,” the ACOG said.
Credits: AI-generated and iStock
When 36-year-old mom Angela Sanford, from Fort Mill, SC, went for an appointment for a Pap smear five years after she had her first child in 2008, her nurse midwife, who she has never seen before asked her a question she did not expect. "Who stitched you up after your first birth?"
Speaking to Healthline, Sanford shared that she just started crying when the nurse said, "This is not right." Sanford said that this was the first time she ever heard the term 'husband stitch'. Sanford was told that her stich was "too tight" by the hospitalist who managed her after her first delivery.
Also Read: US CDC Warns Of New Immune-Evasive COVID Variant In 23 Countries
“He gave you what some people call a husband stitch,” Sanford recalled the midwife telling her.
“I couldn’t connect in my mind why it would be called that. My midwife said, ‘They think that some men find it more pleasurable,’” she recalled. “My husband has been worried about me and fearful of hurting me. He would never have asked for this.”

During vaginal delivery, a woman undergoes perineal tears or vaginal lacerations which means tears between the vaginal opening and anus. This causes pain, and requires stitches for grades two and higher. It also takes 4 to 6 weeks to heal. Women can experience from first to fourth degree tears.
Sometimes, a surgical incision is made in the perineum during childbirth to enlarge the vaginal opening, this is called an episiotomy. However, it is not medically necessary or a routine procedure, unless it is a case of emergency.
Stiches are required in such cases that dissolves on its own. However, a 'husband stitch', also known as "daddy stitch" is an unethical practice where an extra stitch is given during the repair process that 'tightens the vagina' to increase sexual pleasure for a male partner. While it is considered a medical malpractice, it is still done to women after vaginal delivery.
Many women face difficulty after the extra stich is given to them. In Sanford's case, she felt "excruciating" pain during sex afterwards.
Read: Romanticization And The Silent Dismissal Of Women’s Pain
Stephanie Tillman, CNM, a certified nurse midwife at the University of Illinois at Chicago and blogger at The Feminist Midwife told Healthline: “The fact that there is even a practice called the husband stitch is a perfect example of the intersection of the objectification of women’s bodies and healthcare. As much as we try to remove the sexualization of women from appropriate obstetric care, of course the patriarchy is going to find its way in there."
Harkins, 37, said that she "kind of" laughed it off when an "old, crusty Army doctor" overstitched her so she could give her husband more pleasure. In many cases, doctors do it as a routine practice without even being told by anyone. “I couldn’t even process [it], but I kind of laughed, like what else do you do when someone says that? I had just had a baby. I didn’t think much about it because the whole birth experience was so traumatizing, but now that I think about it differently, the implications of that are just crazy.”

Dr Robert Barbieri, chair of obstetrics and gynecology and reproductive biology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, told the Huffington Post that doctors were taught in the 50s and 60s that "routine episiotomy was good for women".
“What they thought is that if they did a routine episiotomy, they’d have a chance to repair it and that during the repair, they could actually create a better perineum than if they hadn’t done it. The idea [was] that we could ‘tighten things up,’” explains doctor.
However, a 2005 systematic review in the Journal of the American Medical Association found no benefit to routine episiotomy use. A 2017 Cochrane review “could not identify any benefits of routine episiotomy for the baby or the mother.” In 2016, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended that clinicians “prevent and manage” delivery lacerations through strategies like massage and warm compresses rather than making cuts on the perineum. Yet, this practice still continues inside the labor rooms.
Credit: iStock
While you may be buying fast-fashion clothes that are easy on your pocket and also give your children trendy looks, a new study highlights the risk of being laced with a highly toxic ingredient: lead.
The preliminary research, based on lab tests of several shirts from different retailers in the US, found that all the samples exceeded the country’s federal regulatory lead limits.
The US Consumer Product Safety Commission currently has a 100 parts per million (ppm) lead limit for children's products like toys and clothing.
"I started to see many articles about lead in clothing from fast fashion, and I realized not too many parents knew about the issue," said Kamila Deavers, principal investigator of the study, at Marian University in the US.
Deavers began the study after her young daughter’s lab reports showed elevated levels of lead in her blood from toy coatings.
How was study conducted?
The team tested 11 shirts that spanned the rainbow—red, pink, orange, yellow, gray, and blue. All brightly colored fabrics, particularly reds and yellows, showed higher levels of lead compared to more muted tones.
"We saw that the shirts we tested were all over the allowed limit for lead of 100 ppm," said Priscila Espinoza, from Marina.
The researchers explained that some manufacturers use lead (II) acetate as an inexpensive way to help dyes stick to the materials and produce bright, long-lasting color.
The researchers found the risk is particularly higher among younger kids as they tend to playfully suck or chew their clothes during play.
"Even briefly chewing these fabrics could expose children to dangerous lead levels,” they found in the study, to be presented at the forthcoming meeting of the American Chemical Society.
According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), lead exposure can lead to behavior problems, brain and central nervous system damage, as well as other negative health effects in children.
The agency considers children under six years old to be most at risk from exposure. Even low levels of lead in the blood of children can result in:
The researchers also pointed out safer alternatives to lead-based dyeing agents that already exist. These include natural and less harmful substances such as:
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited