Credits: Canva
A convenience that has become a staple in many homes, ready-to-eat, subscription-based meal kits has come under scrutiny after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) linked certain products from Metabolic Meals to a multistate Salmonella outbreak. At least 16 individuals across 10 states have fallen ill so far, seven of whom were hospitalized, and health officials warn the numbers could be higher in the weeks ahead.
The CDC reports that at least a dozen individuals have fallen sick and seven were hospitalized after eating meal delivery kits suspected to be contaminated with Salmonella. Health officials are still tracing the exact source of contamination, but preliminary results indicate that poor handling and storage of foods could have contributed. Why this is problematic is that meal kits are promoted extensively as safe, fresh, and convenient, with many regarding them as a healthier option compared to fast food. This outbreak points to the underlying dangers associated with ready-to-eat deliveries, presenting timely questions on food safety inspections, supply chain cleanliness, and consumer education.
Also Read: Could A Daily Pill Restore Brain Function After Stroke? Scientists Test Bold New Treatment
The CDC released that the outbreak was associated with meals served during the week of July 28, with four individual types identified:
Further codes under investigation are 25199, 25202, 25203, 25204, and 25205.
Metabolic Meals, the "macro-friendly" meal service subscription company, has admitted to the problem and is working with authorities. Under a statement released by the CDC, customers who bought the affected meal types were called individually and told not to eat the products.
Salmonella is among the United States' most prevalent foodborne pathogens and causes an estimated 1.35 million infections and 26,500 hospitalizations each year, as per CDC statistics. Symptoms of infection usually manifest between six hours to six days after infection and can include:
Most people recover without medical treatment in four to seven days, but vulnerable groups—including children under five, adults over 65, and those with weakened immune systems—are at higher risk for severe illness requiring hospitalization. In rare cases, Salmonella can spread beyond the intestines, leading to life-threatening complications such as endocarditis, arterial infections, or arthritis.
Public health officials highlighted that the initial symptoms of infection tend to be sudden diarrhea, fever, and cramping. Consumers who have just consumed contaminated Metabolic Meals and experience these symptoms should immediately seek medical consultation. Warning symptoms that need immediate medical attention are:
The illnesses have been reported in California, Missouri, Georgia, Minnesota, Texas, Arkansas, Illinois, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, and Washington. The actual number of cases is probably higher, health authorities warn, as many people recover without being tested or are unaware that their illness is part of a foodborne outbreak.
To date, no deaths have been reported.
The CDC asks anyone who has contaminated meals in their fridge or freezer to dispose of them immediately or call Metabolic Meals for instructions. Affected products should not be tested "to determine if they're safe." Consumers also should:
Hand-wash, kitchen surfaces, and utensils that were in contact with the meals with hot, soapy water or a dishwasher.
Prevent cross-contamination by washing refrigerator shelves and storage containers in which the affected products were stored.
Watch for symptoms closely for as long as six days following possible exposure.
Meal kits have grown extremely popular, and they provide convenience for busy families and individuals. However, with the centralized production and shipping method, if contamination takes place at the source, thousands of meals are delivered across several states within days.
Food safety specialists point out that despite rigorous quality assurance, pathogens such as Salmonella can penetrate even during preparation, packaging, or transportation. Since these foods are ready-to-eat or need little handling, consumers tend not to cook them at high enough temperatures to destroy bacteria.
This outbreak follows in the wake of another outbreak involving Salmonella: in recent times, almost 100 cases in 14 states were traced back to contaminated eggs. The two outbreaks in rapid succession underscore the continued issues in food safety monitoring and regulation in the age of mass-produced, convenience foods.
Experts emphasize that outbreaks cannot always be prevented but that rapid detection and communication, as demonstrated by the CDC response, are essential for preventing spread and minimizing hospitalizations.
The exact point of contamination during Metabolic Meals' manufacturing process is still under investigation. Public health investigators are looking into whether the contamination occurred during raw ingredients, food handling, or packaging and distribution.
Until further information is available, the CDC still recommends against eating contaminated meals and will update information as the investigation unfolds.
Credits: iStock
It is no news that ever since the President Donald Trump's administration has signed in, transgenders have seemed to lost their rights, with their research being removed, defunded, and now the administration has changed the name of transgender health leader on her official portrait. The new name used is her head name.
The person in question is Adm. Rachel Levine, who made history in 2021 when she was sworn in as the assistant secretary for health at the Department of Health and Human Services under former President Joe Biden. Levin was nation's highest ranking and openly transgender federal official. Her portrait hands in the HHS office, along with pictures of other federal officials who have led the US Public Health Corps. However, recently, especially after the US government went on a shutdown, HHS has removed Levine's name from her portrait and replaced it with her dead name, reported NPR.
As per the GLAAD, formerly Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, a major LGBTQ media advocacy organization, the act of revealing or using a transgender person's birth name without their permission is known as deadnaming.
Adrian Shanker, a former deputy assistant secretary for health policy in the Biden administration and Levine's current spokesperson told the NPR that this act is of "bigotry against her".
“During the federal shutdown, the current leadership of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health changed Admiral Levine's photo to remove her current legal name and use a prior name," Shanker told the outlet.
As per Levine, it was a “great honor to serve in the United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps.” In a statement to The Independent, she said, "My focus has been and continues to be on public health and health equity. I am not going to comment on this type of petty action.”
While the HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon told that the agency's priority "is ensuring that the information presented internally and externally by HHS reflects gold standard science. We remain committed to reversing harmful policies enacted by Levine and ensuring that biological reality guides our approach to public health," in a statement to NPR.
Over the last year, Trump administration has rolled back many rights of transgender people.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released new definitions for 'sex,' 'man,' and 'woman', an action that has provoked widespread discussion in health, scientific and policy communities. While proponents believe the revisions bring back biological truth, opponents caution that they will weaken science and harm healthcare policies. On February 19, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. released new federal guidelines that strictly define sex as an unchanging biological category based on reproductive function. The memo claims that sex is genetically determined at birth and does not change throughout life, making it clear that biological sex cannot be altered by medical treatment or self-identification.
The government of the United States abruptly terminated at least 68 grants which were awarded to 46 institutions. This was a total of $40 million in funding. These grants were supporting research which was related to LGBTQ health, and included HIV prevention, youth suicide, cancer and bone health. While some of these funds have already been used, at least $1.36 million was withdrawn from future support. This figure is also an undercount, as estimates were available only for a portion of the cancelled grants.
A new law in South Dakota has restricted transgender people's use of communal facilities in public schools and state-owned buildings. This was implemented from July 1 2025.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) retracted references to transgender people, gender identity, and equity from its website. This change followed the executive order and a directive from the Federal Office of Personnel Management instructing agencies to eliminate taxpayer-funded programs reflecting "gender ideology". The guidelines issues on Wednesday asked to end "all agency programs that use taxpayer money to promote or reflect gender ideology", and was signed by President Trump.
Credits: iStock
According to a latest BBC report, GPs think that many people in England are being over diagnosed with mental health problems. Being stressed does not mean an illness. As per the commonly held view by family doctors, the society tends to over medicalize normal life stresses. However, the doctors are also concerned about the difficulty for the patients who actually have a mental health condition.
Earlier this week, the Health Secretary launched an independent review to understand why more people in England are seeking mental health, ADHD and autism services, and to identify where support is currently falling short.
BBC News sent a questionnaire to more than 5,000 GPs in England to understand their experiences supporting patients with mental health concerns. The 752 responses that came back show just how complicated and emotionally heavy this workload has become for many family doctors.
Of those who took part, 442 GPs said they believed over-diagnosis was a problem. Most felt mental health issues were being slightly over-diagnosed rather than significantly. At the same time, 81 GPs felt the opposite and said under-diagnosis was still a real concern.
Over-diagnosis was far from the only issue. Many GPs told us they were deeply worried about the lack of meaningful support available for patients who come to them in distress. The questionnaire included both multiple-choice questions and an open invitation to leave anonymous comments, which many used to explain their frustrations.
One of the most common sentiments was summed up by a GP who said, “Life being stressful is not an illness.” Another reflected on how much expectations have changed, noting that society seems to have forgotten that heartbreak and grief are painful but still part of normal life. Another GP argued that labels like anxiety or depression risk medicalizing everyday emotional struggles, and this could pull resources away from people facing severe and complex needs.
A small number were openly critical of certain patients, with one describing them as “dishonest and narcissistic” and taking advantage of a system that is free at the point of use.
According to NHS England, one in five adults lives with a common mental health condition. The rate is even higher among young people, where it rises to one in four for those aged 16 to 24.
GPs who responded to the questionnaire identified young adults between 19 and 34 as the age group most in need of mental health support. Some felt young people have become less resilient since the pandemic, with a stronger focus on seeking a diagnosis instead of learning coping strategies. Others disagreed and said the real problem was that services have become increasingly hesitant to assess and diagnose people when needed.
There are nearly 40,000 fully qualified GPs in England. While the responses cannot represent every doctor across the country, they do reveal clear patterns. Almost all GPs with more than five years of experience said the amount of time they now spend on mental health has risen sharply.
Earlier this year, the Health Secretary said mental health conditions were being over-diagnosed and too many people were being written off. He has since acknowledged that his comments were divisive and did not reflect the full complexity of the situation.
It is estimated that 2.5 million people in England have ADHD, including many without a formal diagnosis. Some NHS ADHD services have already stopped accepting new patients because they cannot cope with the demand. Many individuals have told the BBC just how difficult it has become to find proper assessment and care.
Overall, most GPs agreed that the system is not keeping up. Of the 752 respondents, 508 said there was rarely or never enough good quality mental health support for adults in their area. An even larger number, 640, said they were worried about getting young patients the help they need.
One GP called the state of mental health support “a national tragedy”. Another described the situation for children starkly: “A child literally needs to be holding a knife to be taken seriously and the second that knife is put down, services disengage.”
GPs were also asked whether they prescribe medication because they worry patients will not get other types of support, like talking therapies, quickly enough. The most common answer was yes, and that they do this routinely. One GP admitted they often reach for antidepressants even though they know it may only offer short-term relief and does little to prevent future episodes.
Professor Victoria Tzortziou Brown, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said family doctors face a difficult balance. Patients increasingly expect a diagnosis, yet not every emotional difficulty meets the criteria for one. She added that society needs to be careful not to medicalize the full range of normal feelings but also must avoid dismissing genuine concerns.
Fraser Olender, known from Below Deck, recently shared that he was hospitalized with a lung injury and a heart attack linked to vaping. The 33-year-old posted photos from his hospital bed and explained that the episode began with sudden chest pain and trouble breathing. He later learned that he had developed EVALI, or E-cigarette or Vaping-Associated Lung Injury, along with a coronary artery vasospasm that reduced blood flow to his heart. His experience has renewed questions about the real risks of vaping, especially for young adults who may assume it is a safer option.
Olender described being rushed to the hospital after severe chest discomfort and breathlessness. Over the next week, doctors ran tests and confirmed that he had EVALI, a condition first identified in 2019. It can include several serious complications, such as bronchiolitis obliterans and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Many patients require intensive care.
During his evaluation, doctors also found that his arteries had tightened suddenly, cutting off oxygen to part of his heart. This led to an ST-elevation myocardial infarction, a type of heart attack usually caused by a blocked artery. In his case, there was no blockage. The spasm alone was enough to trigger the event.
A coronary artery vasospasm occurs when the vessels supplying blood to the heart contract sharply. Reduced blood flow deprives the heart muscle of oxygen. When this lasts long enough, it can cause injury similar to a traditional heart attack. Vaping can contribute to these spasms by irritating blood vessels, upsetting the balance of oxygen in the lungs, and releasing chemicals that cause inflammation.
Cardiologists note that nicotine and other compounds in vape aerosols can cause the blood vessels to narrow, raise heart rate, and place stress on the heart even in otherwise healthy adults.
EVALI has been linked to a wide range of vaping products. Symptoms include shortness of breath, chest pain, gastrointestinal upset, and fatigue. The condition inflames the lungs and interferes with oxygen exchange, which increases pressure on the heart. For some people, the damage appears suddenly, even after periods of regular use without symptoms.
Olender wrote that the pain during the episode was intense and unrelenting. Multiple rounds of morphine offered little relief. He said the incident convinced him to quit vaping immediately.
He urged others to stop as well, calling the habit a needless risk. He added that soon after quitting, he noticed improvements in his skin and overall energy, something he had not expected.
Vaping is often marketed as a cleaner alternative to smoking, yet its long-term effects on the lungs and heart remain uncertain. Olender’s story highlights the need for awareness. Sudden heart complications, vessel spasms, and lung injury can occur in people with no prior health issues. Doctors continue to study the chemicals released in aerosols and how they affect blood vessels, lung tissue, and the cardiovascular system.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited