The dangers of tuberculosis may seem like the thing of the past; however, its effects still remain. The World Health Organization has speculated that TB has returned to being the leading cause of death all around the world after 1.25 million people died of it in 2023. In the same year, an estimated 10.8 million people fell ill with TB with 6 million men, 3.6 women and 1.3 million children. The surprising fact is that the TB present in all these countries, is curable.

There are many factors that affect how well a country tackles TB with. A study funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has shown that better nutrition can significantly reduce tuberculosis (TB) cases and deaths. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recognized these findings and included them in its updated global guidelines for controlling the disease.

The main goal of the study was to see how giving nutritional support to people living with TB patients would affect whether they got the disease themselves.

What Are Some Factors That Can Help Cure TB?

Researchers worked with 2,800 TB patients and their families in four districts of Jharkhand, India. The study, published in the medical journal The Lancet, noted that in India, TB and poor nutrition are very common at the same time, especially among patients and in the general population.

In the study, all TB patients received food for six months. However, only the families in the "intervention group" received monthly food packages and micronutrients. The researchers followed up with all participants to see how many new TB cases appeared over time.

How Does Nutrition Impact TB?

The study, which ran from 2019 to 2021, found that giving nutritional support to families of TB patients led to a significant drop in new TB cases. This was the first study of its kind to show that nutritional help can substantially reduce the spread of TB within a household.

The study concluded that this approach, which combines medical and social support, could help speed up the fight against TB in communities where both TB and poor nutrition are big problems.

Nutrition and Tuberculosis: Why Does It Impact So Many People?

According to a 2025 study published in the Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, looked at how nutrition programs for people with tuberculosis (TB) are working in India. Researchers talked to TB patients, their family members, and healthcare providers in five different states between August 2023 and April 2024. The goal was to understand their experiences and thoughts on getting nutritional help.

Understanding Nutrition

Patients and their families understood that good nutrition is important for treating TB. However, they faced challenges in getting the right foods.

Changes in Diet

While many tried to eat more protein, they often struggled with food insecurity—meaning they didn't have enough food because they were poor.

Issues with Financial Aid

The Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) program, which gives money directly to people, had problems. Participants felt the money wasn't enough and that there were gaps in how they could access it.

Preferred Delivery Method

People preferred getting food and support directly from TB treatment centers. They were less keen on using other systems or middlemen to get their nutritional help. Based on these findings, the study suggests a few changes to improve the program:

• Provide more protein-rich food and increase the financial support to better meet people's needs.
• Fix the problems with the DBT program to make sure people can easily get the money they are given.
• Consider giving ready-to-eat food directly to patients at TB treatment centers.

Walmart has recalled certain lots of its frozen, raw shrimp sold across 13 states after federal officials detected traces of radioactive contamination. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) confirmed that the shrimp may contain Cesium-137, a radioactive isotope, and urged consumers to dispose of the affected products immediately.

What Triggered the Recall

The FDA said it asked Walmart to pull three lots of its Great Value brand frozen shrimp from store shelves after routine inspections revealed contamination. The agency detected Cesium-137 in both shipping containers and in a sample of frozen breaded shrimp imported from Indonesia.

Although the levels found were far below the FDA’s intervention threshold, officials said the recall was issued as a precaution.

The contamination was linked to products processed by P.T. Bahari Makmur Sejati, operating as BMS Foods of Indonesia. U.S. Customs and Border Protection first raised the alarm after detecting Cesium-137 in containers arriving at ports in Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, and Savannah, Georgia.

Potential Health Concerns

Cesium-137 is a byproduct of nuclear activity, including weapons testing, nuclear power plant operations, and accidents. While trace amounts of the isotope are already present in the environment, including soil and food, prolonged exposure can increase the risk of health problems.

ALSO READ: Are Power Plant Emissions Really Not Dangerous, As The EPA Claims?

“The risk from the recalled shrimp is quite low,” said Donald Schaffner, a food safety expert at Rutgers University. Still, FDA officials emphasized that minimizing unnecessary exposure is important. “If you have recently purchased raw frozen shrimp from Walmart that matches this description, throw it away,” the agency said in a statement.

What Consumers Should Look For

The recall applies specifically to Great Value brand frozen raw shrimp with the following lot codes:

• 8005540-1
• 8005538-1
• 8005539-1

All three carry best-by dates of March 15, 2027. The products were distributed in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, and West Virginia.

Customers who purchased the shrimp can return them to any Walmart store for a full refund, or simply discard them.

How the Contamination Was Found

FDA investigators collected several samples following the customs alert and discovered one contaminated batch of breaded shrimp. The containers flagged at the ports were denied entry into the U.S. But officials later learned that Walmart had received products from shipments that slipped through without triggering contamination warnings.

As a result, Walmart moved quickly to issue a recall. “As soon as we were made aware of the FDA findings, we took immediate action to remove the affected products from our stores,” a Walmart spokesperson said.

Read more news on food recalls

Why Cesium-137 Raises Red Flags

Cesium-137 has been a global concern since the mid-20th century when nuclear testing and accidents released it into the environment. Unlike naturally occurring elements, Cesium-137 is man-made and has a half-life of about 30 years, meaning it can persist in ecosystems for decades.

Ingesting contaminated food over time, even at low levels, could contribute to radiation exposure. While the FDA stressed that the amounts detected in the shrimp were well below harmful levels, experts say cumulative exposure is worth avoiding.

A Precautionary Step

The FDA said its investigation into BMS Foods of Indonesia is ongoing, with inspectors reviewing shipping and production practices. The agency also assured the public that the contamination detected does not represent a widespread risk to the U.S. food supply.

“Consumers should understand that this is not a major food safety crisis,” Schaffner noted. “It is a targeted recall, and the system worked as it should to identify, contain, and address the issue.”

What Happens Next

For now, the FDA continues to monitor imports from the supplier and will take further steps if necessary. Walmart has pledged full cooperation with regulators and stressed that customer safety is its priority.

While the health risk is considered minimal, officials say the recall underscores the importance of vigilance in food safety systems. By acting quickly, they hope to reassure consumers and prevent long-term exposure to contaminants that could pose problems over time.

Weight management and blood sugar control are two of the biggest health concerns today, often linked to lifestyle-related conditions such as diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. While diet and exercise remain the foundation for addressing them, research increasingly points to certain simple, everyday habits that may provide additional support. One such habit involves a bedtime drink that could play a small but meaningful role in promoting weight loss and stabilising blood sugar overnight.

First things first, Apple Cider Vinegar (ACV) is not your average vinegar. Good-quality apple cider vinegar comes with something called “the mother”. This “mother” is the cloudy stuff floating around at the bottom of the bottle, made up of good bacteria, proteins, and enzymes. It is where a lot of the health magic lives.

The acetic acid in vinegar slows down how fast your stomach empties and how quickly sugar gets into your bloodstream. This results in fewer blood sugar spikes, fewer cravings, and possibly, fewer late-night binge eating sessions.

Also Read: Shoppers Beware From The Radioactive Shrimp! Walmart Recalls Popular Frozen Seafood In 13 States

How Vinegar Helps In Weight Loss

ACV is not a miracle weight-loss potion that will have you waking up with abs. But studies do hint at some benefits. Drinking diluted ACV can make you feel fuller, so you do not attack breakfast. At night, it may even work quietly to improve how your body handles sugar while you snooze.

Stable blood sugar means fewer mood swings and fewer 4 pm “must eat chocolate now or will scream” moments. Some small studies even suggest acetic acid might nudge your metabolism into burning a smidge more fat and storing a little less.

The Blood Sugar Bedtime Trick

For anyone watching their blood sugar, a glass of water with a spoon or two of ACV before bed has been linked to lower fasting blood sugar the next morning. Because vinegar helps your body become more sensitive to insulin, which means your body handles the sugar it already has more efficiently.

To be clear, this does not replace medication or advice from your doctor. But as a nightly ritual, it could give your system an extra hand.

How Not to Burn Your Throat

Do not, under any circumstance, chug ACV straight from the bottle. ACV is super acidic and can wreck your teeth or irritate your throat.

Here is how to do it properly:

• Mix 1–2 teaspoons in a big glass of water (never more than that)
• Drink it about 20–30 minutes before bed
• Use a straw to save your teeth from acid erosion
• Rinse your mouth afterwards
• If it still tastes like sadness, stir in a dash of honey or cinnamon

Not Everyone’s Cup of Vinegar

If you’ve got stomach ulcers, reflux, kidney issues, or you are on meds for diabetes or heart health, double-check with your doctor before hopping on the ACV bedtime train. It can mess with certain medications or make existing issues worse.

Does sipping apple cider vinegar before bed melt away fat overnight?

No. But it can be an easy, low-effort habit that gives your body a little boost: steadier blood sugar, fewer cravings, and maybe a small push toward weight loss.

Small pieces of plastic, microplastics and their minute variations, nanoplastics—are appearing in some of the most unlikely locations: from the tops of mountains to the bottoms of the ocean's deepest trenches, and now, within the human body. Researchers have found these particles in lungs, placentas, blood vessels, and recently, in brain tissue, over the last decade. The results are disquieting, but the science still needs to catch up to describe precisely how these plastics are affecting us.

Increasing evidence is pointing to potential connections between exposure to microplastics and cardiovascular, neurological, and metabolic health hazards. Meanwhile, other research is investigating simple solutions, such as boiling tap water, to reduce the amount of plastic we consume. Together, these two lines of scientific inquiry—identifying risks and field-testing simple solutions—are fueling a public health dialogue that can no longer be dismissed.

Why Are Microplastics Everywhere?

Microplastics are plastic pieces less than 5 millimeters in size, and nanoplastics measure in billionths of a meter. Microplastics can come from littered packaging, plastic clothing fibers, broken-down plastic bottles, or industrial pollutants. Once released into the environment, they become transported by wind, flow into groundwater, or accumulate in the food chain through fish, meat, and vegetables.

The most headline-grabbing discovery came earlier this year when researchers reported finding microplastics in donated human brain tissue. The study, published in Nature Medicine, compared brain samples collected in 2016 with those from 2023. The later samples contained far higher concentrations, suggesting accumulation is accelerating over time. The top researcher, US toxicologist Matthew Campen, estimated that up to 10 grams of plastic—about the size of a small crayon—could be separated from one human brain.

If that's correct, the implications are staggering: microplastics could be penetrating the blood-brain barrier, the body's natural protective mechanism meant to prevent unwanted substances from entering.

Why Are Experts Advising Caution?

Not everyone is convinced by these initial results. Toxicologists like Theodore Henry at Heriot-Watt University have called for caution, citing the fact that the evidence base is still thin and confirmation is required. Others, like chemist Oliver Jones of RMIT University, say it's not likely brains will have more microplastics than raw sewage, as some estimates suggested. Significantly, the people involved in these investigations were otherwise healthy at the time of death, and no direct proof was found to connect microplastics with disease.

Nevertheless, more scientists are cautioning against holding off until they are absolutely sure. Observational studies, though not conclusive, are sounding the alarm. For example, a study in the New England Journal of Medicine associated microplastic deposits in arteries with increased risks of heart attack, stroke, and death among patients with artery disease. In animal models, microplastics have caused blood clots, disrupted cell function, and even changed gut microbiomes.

The World Health Organization has concluded that evidence is still "insufficient to determine risks to human health." But as the Barcelona Institute for Global Health emphasized in a 2024 report, "policy decisions cannot wait for complete data."

The sense of urgency comes from the sheer volume of plastic manufacturing. Since 2000, production has doubled and is projected to triple yet again by 2060. Each phase of the plastic lifecycle—production through disposal—emits microscopic particles that find their way into air, soil, and water. That means people are exposed all the time, usually unknowingly.

It could be particularly at risk for children, pregnant women, and individuals with underlying medical conditions. Even if microplastics are not as dangerous as everyone has feared, the sheer number of people exposed across the world means it's an important public health concern.

Simple Ways To Remove Microplastics From Water

Although the long-term health impacts are disputed, scientists are starting to find simple measures to cut down on daily exposure. A 2024 research report from Guangzhou Medical University and Jinan University in China discovered that boiling tap water prior to consumption could filter out as much as 90 percent of nanoplastics and microplastics, depending on how many minerals the water contained.

This is how it goes, hard tap water (high in calcium carbonate) is boiled, and limescale is created, catching plastic pieces within. The encrusted pieces can then be strained out with as much as a stainless-steel strainer or a tea mesh. Even soft water resulted in a decrease of approximately 25 percent of plastic after boiling.

The findings, reported in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, indicate that a common home practice of boiling water might be one of the most readily available protections against microplastic contamination. It's not an end-all solution but is something anyone can do without needing fancy equipment.

Drinking water is just half the story. Microplastics have been found in bottled water, seafood, table salt, honey, and even fresh vegetables. Cooking in non-stick pans, reheating food in plastic containers, and eating packaged foods can all contribute to the body's plastic load.

Boiling water, therefore, must be seen as a complementary approach, not a panacea. Experts suggest that it be used in combination with larger strategies, including less plastic packaging, spending on high-tech municipal filtration plants, and urging industry to change to biodegradable materials.

Microplastics have come to dominate global disputes about plastic pollution. As UN member nations finalize the world's first treaty to limit plastic waste, health science has taken on a growing prominence. Policymakers are being called upon to balance precautionary action, even without conclusive evidence of harm.

Activists contend that waiting for decades worth of data would be risky considering how fast plastics are piling up in the environment and in human bodies. Instead, they advocate a two-pronged strategy of drastic curtailment of plastic manufacture and real-world steps to restrict personal exposure.