Is Honey Good Or Bad For You?
Honey is often marketed as a healthier alternative to regular sugar. This is largely due to it being nutrient-dense and having a large number of antioxidants. However, while some claim that it could be a nutritious ingredient, others claim it to be a high-sugar indulgence.
Honey is a naturally sweet, syrup-like substance that bees produce from the nectar of flowering plants. The bees collect the nectar and then consume, digest, and regurgitate it inside the beehive to produce honey. This honey is stored in wax structures called honeycombs, which are gathered by humans through the practice of beekeeping. Although the nutritional value of honey
depends upon its type, a single tablespoon (21 grams) of honey typically consists of 64 calories and 17 grams of carbs with little to no fat, fiber, and protein.
High-quality honey is rich in several important antioxidants- such as phenolic acids and flavonoids. Antioxidants are compounds that help fight disease-causing free radicals, thereby reducing your risk of oxidative cell damage. Research has shown that a diet which is high in antioxidants could help an individual prevent chronic diseases as well as mental health issues.
Swapping out regular sugar for high-quality honey in your diet may improve different aspects of heart health. Numerous studies have shown that it reduces several risk factors of heart disease.
For example, one 30-day study comparing the effects of table sugar and honey in 55 people found that honey helped decrease levels of total and “bad” LDL cholesterol while increasing “good” HDL cholesterol. It was also able to lower triglyceride levels by up to 19%.
In some forms of traditional medicine, such as Ayurveda, honey is applied directly to the skin to aid wound healing. This is thought to be due to its antibacterial properties and its ability to decrease the growth of microorganisms that could cause infection.
In one small study, applying manuka honey directly to diabetic foot ulcers was as effective as conventional wound dressings and promoted healing in 97% of ulcers. Similarly, another study of 30 people showed that adding honey to wound dressings enhanced healing in about 43% of diabetic foot ulcers after three months.
While honey is high in sugar, it is still better choice than refined sugar. Processed sugar brings little to the table, while honey is high in antioxidants, including phenolic acids and flavonoids. One study also suggests that using honey instead of table sugar may decrease triglycerides as well as total and "bad" LDL cholesterol to support your heart health. However, while honey may be a better option than refined sugar, it should still be consumed in moderation to prevent adverse effects on your health.
Honey is high in sugar and calories, packing almost 64 calories into a single tablespoon. While this may not seem so much, even a few servings per day could cause calories to stack up and contribute to obesity. Honey is also high in sugar, which is digested rapidly and can cause your blood sugar levels to spike and crash — resulting in increased hunger and potential long-term weight gain.
Credits: Canva
A new study published in the Journal of Periodontology highlights that people in the UK who follow a Mediterranean-style diet may enjoy better gum health and lower levels of gum disease. Conducted by researchers at King’s College London, the findings show a link between diet, inflammation, and periodontal disease severity.
The research evaluated 200 hospital patients who were part of the King’s College London Oral, Dental and Craniofacial Biobank. Participants underwent dental examinations, provided blood samples, and completed detailed dietary questionnaires.
The analysis revealed that individuals whose diets resembled the Mediterranean pattern, rich in legumes, vegetables, fruits, and olive oil, had lower levels of gum disease and systemic inflammation. On the other hand, patients who consumed diets high in red meat and deviated from the Mediterranean model were more likely to present with severe gum disease.
Researchers also measured circulating inflammatory markers. People with less healthy diets showed higher levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP), both indicators of systemic inflammation. In contrast, those following a plant-rich diet had lower levels of these markers.
The Mediterranean diet is widely recognized for its emphasis on whole, nutrient-dense foods such as fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, nuts, and healthy fats like olive oil. It has already been associated with a reduced risk of major chronic illnesses, including heart disease, certain cancers, and neurodegenerative disorders.
According to the researchers, diet plays a significant role in human health by influencing the immune system and inflammation. This effect largely depends on the types of molecules present in food, including macronutrients, micronutrients, and phytochemicals. Plant-based diets are often rich in these components, which may contribute to reduced inflammation throughout the body.
The study’s findings add weight to the idea that gum disease should not only be treated with dental procedures but also considered in the broader context of lifestyle and diet.
Dr. Giuseppe Mainas, first author of the study and postdoctoral researcher at King’s College London, noted:
“Our findings suggest that a balanced, Mediterranean-type diet could potentially reduce gum disease and systemic inflammation. We observed that there may be a connection between periodontal disease severity, diet, and inflammation. These aspects should be holistically considered when assessing treatment for periodontitis in patients.”
Professor Luigi Nibali, lead author and Professor of Periodontology at King’s College London, emphasized the growing importance of nutrition in dental health.
“There is emerging evidence about the role that a balanced diet might have in maintaining a periodontal healthy status. Our research shows the potential effect that a nutrient-dense, plant-rich diet could play in improving the nation’s gum health. Nevertheless, more investigation is needed to develop personalized approaches to help people manage their gum health,” he said.
The research is an important step in understanding how dietary choices affect oral and systemic health. While more studies are needed to confirm the long-term effects and create practical dietary guidelines for gum health, the message is clear: what we eat may directly influence not just our heart and brain, but also the health of our gums.
(Credit- Canva)
Weight loss is never a linear process, there are highs and lows, and the process can be grueling. Although exercise is a big part of it, your diet needs to be consistent as well. However, stopping yourself from indulging in many of these unhealthy foods can be difficult. Many people even wonder whether cutting out food can help or not.
To put things in perspective, the online weight loss coach shared her own weight loss journey. Online weight loss coach Amaka has gained a following by sharing her own success story of losing 25 kg in just four months. She achieved this through a mix of methods, including intermittent fasting, strength training, and a focus on what she calls "detox drinks." Her advice is all about making sustainable changes, and she recently put together a simple, easy-to-follow guide on her social media.
The guide isn't just about what foods to avoid, but it also gives a list of smart, delicious swaps you can make instead. Amaka's goal is to help people change their eating habits without feeling like they're missing out.
Avoid: Stay away from sodas, sweetened juices, and high-calorie energy drinks, which contain a lot of sugar without any nutritional value.
Swap: Choose healthier options like water, green tea, or black coffee. You can also try making your own detox water with lemon and chia seeds for a flavorful, low-calorie drink.
Avoid: Skip fried items like french fries and fried chicken. Frying food adds a large amount of fat and calories, making them a poor choice for your waistline.
Swap: Cook your food using healthier methods. Opt for grilled, air-fried, boiled, or baked meals. This simple change can significantly reduce your calorie intake and still give you great flavor.
Avoid: Refined carbs like white bread and pasta are quickly digested and can cause sugar spikes. They don't provide the lasting energy you need.
Swap: Switch to whole-grain options, which are rich in fiber and keep you feeling full. Good choices include whole-grain bread, brown rice, oats, or nutritious sweet potatoes.
Avoid: Packaged snacks like chips and cookies are often loaded with unhealthy fats, salt, and sugar. They are designed to be addictive and offer very little in terms of nutrition.
Swap: Choose healthier, homemade alternatives. Try making your own air-popped popcorn, or snack on carrot and cucumber sticks with a little peanut butter. Greek yogurt with fruit is another great option.
Avoid: Most ice creams and desserts are packed with sugar and unhealthy fats, making them a major obstacle to weight loss.
Swap: You can still enjoy a treat by making a healthier version. Blend Greek yogurt with bananas and berries, then freeze it in small cups. You can also have a small piece of dark chocolate to satisfy your sweet cravings.
Avoid: Be mindful of high-calorie sauces and dressings like mayonnaise. They can quickly add hundreds of calories to an otherwise healthy meal.
Swap: Use low-calorie alternatives. A great swap is a dressing made with mashed avocado, olive oil, and lemon. Greek yogurt also works well as a healthy, low-fat sauce.
Avoid: Meats like sausages and hotdogs are often high in fat, sodium, and preservatives. They can be very unhealthy for your body and your weight loss goals.
Swap: Go for lean, healthy proteins. Good choices include grilled chicken, fish, turkey, and eggs. These foods provide the protein you need to build muscle and stay full without all the extra calories.
Avoid: Beer, cocktails, and shots are often high in calories and can slow down your metabolism, making it harder to lose weight.
Swap: Drink alcohol in moderation. A small glass of red wine is a better option. You can also try sparkling water with fresh lemon and mint for a refreshing, calorie-free alternative.
Credits: Canva
Food policy experts had cautiously hoped that the new health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., might finally address the nation’s poor diet and reduce reliance on ultraprocessed foods. But many expressed disappointment following Tuesday’s White House report detailing the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) commission’s plans to tackle childhood chronic disease.
While the report includes promising initiatives such as offering healthier meals in schools and promoting breastfeeding, it remains vague about how these policies would be implemented or funded. The New York Times quoted Kelly Brownell, professor emeritus at Duke University’s Sanford School of Public Policy, saying, “Even if all of the initiatives in the report were put into action, the industry will not be required to change how it manipulates and markets foods that drive poor health in children.”
The new report contrasts sharply with MAHA’s first report in May, which focused on identifying drivers of poor health in American children. Jerold Mande, adjunct professor of nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and former federal food policymaker, described the initial report as “revolutionary in its focus” on ultraprocessed foods and the companies producing them.
“[The new report] seems more in line with food industry interests than the previous one, as if it was written to just maintain the status quo,” Mr. Mande told The New York Times. Ultraprocessed foods were mentioned only a few times, primarily in describing efforts to define them.
Following the report’s release, industry groups largely welcomed its recommendations. The Food Industry Association, representing producers and retailers, issued a statement of support, and the Consumer Brands Association called it “a very ambitious” set of policy recommendations it would help implement, The New York Times reported.
The report also permits schools and federal nutrition programs to offer whole milk instead of just lower-fat options, a change long supported by the dairy industry. Marion Nestle, professor emerita of nutrition and public health at New York University, highlighted this as a key example of industry-favored policy.
So far, Mr. Kennedy has relied on voluntary cooperation from the food industry rather than mandating change. This approach has succeeded in some areas, such as reducing artificial dyes in foods. However, experts note that larger drivers of ultraprocessed food consumption, low cost, heavy marketing, and high fat, sugar, and salt content, are unlikely to be addressed without regulation.
Christina Roberto, director of the Center for Food and Nutrition Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, told The New York Times, “The issues they’re focused on for food and nutrition are really spot on. But the devil is completely in the details.” She added that policies like sugary drink taxes, which have proven effective in other countries, could reduce consumption and improve health outcomes.
The report also lists measures that policy experts support, such as expanding research on nutrition, improving hospital and federal program meals, scrutinizing food additives, and closing the longstanding “GRAS loophole” that allows companies to introduce new chemicals without FDA approval.
Yet, experts said the report lacks clarity on how the FDA would increase oversight, particularly amid staffing and funding cuts. Jennifer Pomeranz, associate professor of public health policy at NYU, told The New York Times that even if additives like artificial dyes are removed, foods could remain high in sugar, sodium, and fat.
A draft version obtained by The New York Times in August proposed “ways to lower added sugar and sodium in packaged foods,” a line removed from the final report. “You assume that food industry lobbying got that taken out,” Dr. Nestle said. She also criticized vague language suggesting that companies would police themselves to limit marketing unhealthy foods to children.
Experts noted a tension between the administration’s stated goal of improving public health and its actions, such as cuts to SNAP benefits and the elimination of large-scale nutrition education programs. Many see the report as similar to past administrations’ efforts: a list of reasonable proposals without strong enforcement mechanisms.
“Administration after administration, independent of the political party, has been unwilling to tackle the food industry,” Dr. Brownell told The New York Times. “As long as the industry isn’t required to change, it won’t.”
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited