India's food safety regulator has proposed implementing a restriction on adding sucrose and fructose to foods for babies up to six months old. The move aims to reduce consumption of added sugars during early infancy, which is considered to be a crucial period for growth and development.The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has published a draft amendment to the Food Safety and Standards (Foods for Infant Nutrition) Regulations, 2020. The proposal was published in the Gazette of India on October 16, 2026, and announced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on October 17. Under the proposed amendment, “sucrose and fructose shall not be added in the products intended for infants up to the age of 6 months”. The FSSAI has kept the proposal open, inviting objections and suggestions within 60 days of the Gazette copies being made available. FSSAI's Proposal For Baby Foods Sucrose is the most common sugar found in many baby foods, while fructose is a naturally occurring sugar found in fruits and some other foods. Both can also be used as ingredients in certain manufactured foods products.Under the existing infant nutrition regulations, lactose and glucose polymers are the preferred carbohydrate sources. Sucrose and fructose can be added when carbohydrate sources need to be added, subject to prescribed limits.The proposed amendment would restrict that allowance for baby foods for infants up to six months. The proposal concerns the addition of these sugars to regulated infant nutrition products.Also read: The Silent Struggle Of Raising A Child With Mental Health Challenges: How Parents Can Cope With StigmaIs Added Sugar A Concern In Early Infancy?The first six months of life are important for an infant's physical growth and development. During this period, babies need nutrition that meets the requirements needed for growth, rather than ingredients added simply to increase sweetness.FSSAI says the proposed restriction aims to ensure that infant nutrition products meet these needs without unnecessary additions of sucrose and fructose. The move is also part of a measure towards wider public health efforts to curb dietary risk factors like childhood obesity and other metabolic health problems. The proposal, therefore, focuses on reducing unnecessary added sugars and strengthening nutritional standards for this age group.Also read: Childhood Fitness Linked To Lower Risk Of Depression In Adulthood: 30-Year StudyCould This Improve Infant Health?If the amendment is finalised, manufacturers will need to formulate baby food products for babies up to six months in accordance with the new restriction. The benefits of this move include:Reducing unnecessary added sugars: Infant nutrition products would no longer be permitted to contain added sucrose or fructose for this age group under the proposed rule.Supporting age-appropriate nutrition: Manufacturers would need to ensure their formulations meet infants' nutritional requirements without relying on these sugars.Strengthening preventive nutrition: The proposal forms part of wider efforts to promote healthier feeding practices from the earliest stages of life.The actual health impact will depend on how the rules are implemented and the nutritional composition of the products affected. The proposed restriction also supports established public health recommendations that promote exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months of life. For parents who cannot breastfeed or need an alternative for medical or other reasons, an appropriate infant formula can help meet a baby's nutritional needs. Parents should consult a qualified healthcare professional about feeding choices rather than preparing homemade substitutes.