Small pieces of plastic, microplastics and their minute variations, nanoplastics—are appearing in some of the most unlikely locations: from the tops of mountains to the bottoms of the ocean's deepest trenches, and now, within the human body. Researchers have found these particles in lungs, placentas, blood vessels, and recently, in brain tissue, over the last decade. The results are disquieting, but the science still needs to catch up to describe precisely how these plastics are affecting us.Increasing evidence is pointing to potential connections between exposure to microplastics and cardiovascular, neurological, and metabolic health hazards. Meanwhile, other research is investigating simple solutions, such as boiling tap water, to reduce the amount of plastic we consume. Together, these two lines of scientific inquiry—identifying risks and field-testing simple solutions—are fueling a public health dialogue that can no longer be dismissed.Why Are Microplastics Everywhere?Microplastics are plastic pieces less than 5 millimeters in size, and nanoplastics measure in billionths of a meter. Microplastics can come from littered packaging, plastic clothing fibers, broken-down plastic bottles, or industrial pollutants. Once released into the environment, they become transported by wind, flow into groundwater, or accumulate in the food chain through fish, meat, and vegetables.The most headline-grabbing discovery came earlier this year when researchers reported finding microplastics in donated human brain tissue. The study, published in Nature Medicine, compared brain samples collected in 2016 with those from 2023. The later samples contained far higher concentrations, suggesting accumulation is accelerating over time. The top researcher, US toxicologist Matthew Campen, estimated that up to 10 grams of plastic—about the size of a small crayon—could be separated from one human brain.If that's correct, the implications are staggering: microplastics could be penetrating the blood-brain barrier, the body's natural protective mechanism meant to prevent unwanted substances from entering.Why Are Experts Advising Caution?Not everyone is convinced by these initial results. Toxicologists like Theodore Henry at Heriot-Watt University have called for caution, citing the fact that the evidence base is still thin and confirmation is required. Others, like chemist Oliver Jones of RMIT University, say it's not likely brains will have more microplastics than raw sewage, as some estimates suggested. Significantly, the people involved in these investigations were otherwise healthy at the time of death, and no direct proof was found to connect microplastics with disease.Nevertheless, more scientists are cautioning against holding off until they are absolutely sure. Observational studies, though not conclusive, are sounding the alarm. For example, a study in the New England Journal of Medicine associated microplastic deposits in arteries with increased risks of heart attack, stroke, and death among patients with artery disease. In animal models, microplastics have caused blood clots, disrupted cell function, and even changed gut microbiomes.The World Health Organization has concluded that evidence is still "insufficient to determine risks to human health." But as the Barcelona Institute for Global Health emphasized in a 2024 report, "policy decisions cannot wait for complete data."The sense of urgency comes from the sheer volume of plastic manufacturing. Since 2000, production has doubled and is projected to triple yet again by 2060. Each phase of the plastic lifecycle—production through disposal—emits microscopic particles that find their way into air, soil, and water. That means people are exposed all the time, usually unknowingly.It could be particularly at risk for children, pregnant women, and individuals with underlying medical conditions. Even if microplastics are not as dangerous as everyone has feared, the sheer number of people exposed across the world means it's an important public health concern.Simple Ways To Remove Microplastics From WaterAlthough the long-term health impacts are disputed, scientists are starting to find simple measures to cut down on daily exposure. A 2024 research report from Guangzhou Medical University and Jinan University in China discovered that boiling tap water prior to consumption could filter out as much as 90 percent of nanoplastics and microplastics, depending on how many minerals the water contained.This is how it goes, hard tap water (high in calcium carbonate) is boiled, and limescale is created, catching plastic pieces within. The encrusted pieces can then be strained out with as much as a stainless-steel strainer or a tea mesh. Even soft water resulted in a decrease of approximately 25 percent of plastic after boiling.The findings, reported in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, indicate that a common home practice of boiling water might be one of the most readily available protections against microplastic contamination. It's not an end-all solution but is something anyone can do without needing fancy equipment.Drinking water is just half the story. Microplastics have been found in bottled water, seafood, table salt, honey, and even fresh vegetables. Cooking in non-stick pans, reheating food in plastic containers, and eating packaged foods can all contribute to the body's plastic load.Boiling water, therefore, must be seen as a complementary approach, not a panacea. Experts suggest that it be used in combination with larger strategies, including less plastic packaging, spending on high-tech municipal filtration plants, and urging industry to change to biodegradable materials.Microplastics have come to dominate global disputes about plastic pollution. As UN member nations finalize the world's first treaty to limit plastic waste, health science has taken on a growing prominence. Policymakers are being called upon to balance precautionary action, even without conclusive evidence of harm.Activists contend that waiting for decades worth of data would be risky considering how fast plastics are piling up in the environment and in human bodies. Instead, they advocate a two-pronged strategy of drastic curtailment of plastic manufacture and real-world steps to restrict personal exposure.