Health and Me

Aarushi Bhadury

Colon Cancer Screenings Help Catch The Deadly Disease Earlier - Is Pencil Thin Stool A Sign Or Myth?

A growing number of people under 50 are being diagnosed with colorectal cancer. <span><a href="https://www.healthandme.com/health/colon-cancer">Colon cancer</a></span> is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths for both men and women and the expected death toll from it in 2025 is about 52,900 (American Cancer Society). 

Recent research suggests that while a new push for earlier screening has led to more early-stage diagnoses, it doesn't fully explain the overall increase in cases among younger adults. The rise in diagnoses for this age group actually began in the mid-1990s and includes more advanced cancers as well. 

<h2>What Caused The Increase In Earlier <span rel="noindex"><a href="https://www.healthandme.com/health/colon-cancer">Colon Cancer</a> Diagnosis</span>? </h2>

In recent years, major health organizations like the American Cancer Society and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended age for average-risk adults to start getting screened for colorectal cancer from 50 to 45. This change has already had a positive effect. 

Two recent studies from the American Cancer Society, published in the medical journal JAMA, show that this new guideline is helping catch cancer earlier. The first study found that the number of adults ages 45 to 49 getting screened jumped from about 20% in 2019 to nearly 34% in 2023. The second study found that early-stage diagnoses in this age group increased by 50% in just one year. This means that a lot of these cancers are being found when they are easier to treat and before they become life-threatening. 

<h2>What Are The Symptoms of Colon Cancer? </h2>

Even with the new screening age, many people who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer are still too young to be eligible for screening. This is why it's so important for everyone—regardless of age—to know the warning signs and talk to a doctor about any unusual changes. The most common symptom for younger people is rectal bleeding. Other key symptoms to watch for include: 

<ul><li>A lasting change in bowel habits or the shape of your stool</li><li>Stomach cramps or pain</li><li>A loss of appetite or unexplained weight loss</li><li>Unexplained weight loss or fatigue</li></ul>

<h2><span rel="noindex">Pencil Thin Stool</span> – Symptom or Myth? </h2>

However, this idea is largely a myth. It started in the late 1800s, and while it was dismissed by experts in the mid-1900s due to a lack of evidence, it somehow found its way back into medical textbooks. 

A 2009 study published in the Digestive Diseases and Sciences journal explained that thin stool is usually just a sign of diarrhea. Because diarrhea is much more common than colon cancer, a change in stool size alone isn't a reliable warning sign. Sending patients for a colonoscopy based only on this one symptom isn't necessary. It causes patients to go through an uncomfortable and risky procedure they don't need, and it puts a strain on our healthcare system. 

 Instead of focusing on stool size, it's more important to watch for other, more authentic symptoms of colorectal cancer, such as the ones mentioned above. If you have these symptoms, you should talk to your doctor. 

<h2>How Is Colon Cancer In Men Different Than Men? </h2>

While colorectal cancer is a serious health issue for everyone, a 2015 review in World Journal of Gastroenterology shows that women over the age of 65 have a higher death rate and a lower chance of survival compared to men of the same age. This suggests that the way we approach this cancer needs to be different for women. There are several important reasons why women might have a tougher time with colorectal cancer: 

Women are more likely to get cancer on the right side of the colon, which is often a more aggressive type of tumor. Standard screening tests may not be as effective at finding these tumors early. 

The unique anatomy of the female colon can sometimes make colonoscopies more difficult, potentially leading to missed or delayed diagnoses. Additionally, social and cultural factors can sometimes cause women to put off screening appointments. 

Men and women's bodies can react differently to the same cancer treatments. Some drugs can cause side effects that are specific to the female reproductive system. Also, most studies on dietary risk factors don't consider how a man's diet might affect him differently than a woman's. 

Health Conditions A-Z

health

Colon Cancer

Colon Cancer Screenings

Colon Cancer symptoms

Colon Cancer Pencil Thin Stool

Pencil Thin Stool

Colon Cancer Diagnosis

ADHD Could Be Setting Your Child Up For Failure - Study Reveals Factors That Lower The Quality Of Life In Children With ADHD

New Study Finds Screen Time May Be Increasing Cardiovascular Risks In Kids’ Lives

Landon Dickerson Suffers From A Right Leg Injury: What Are The Common Football Injuries And How Can You Prevent It?

Health News

These Things Can Cause Your Heart To Age Faster

High Carb Foods That Are Actually Healthy

Superfoods That Support Your Gut Health

Immune-Boosting Foods To Have During Rainy Season

Potato Based Dishes You For Week-Long Meal Prep

Weight Loss Dishes With Fruits You Should Try

Stress Vs. Anxiety: Difference Explained In 60 seconds

Can You Get Heatstroke In Monsoon?

You’re Not Lazy! Women Do Need More Sleep Than Men

How To Ditch Daytime Sleepiness In Office?

Common Mistakes People Make While Eating Flaxseeds

Toddlers In India Are Missing Development Milestones: Study

Yoga Poses You Should Do For Back Pain

Healthy Brunch Ideas For A Lazy Weekend Meal

Balancing Exercises You Should Do For Stability

How Much Can Food Affect Menstruation?

What Should Fitness Look Like For A 13-18 Year Old

Food For Diabetes: What Should A Diabetic Diet Contain

You Don’t Always Need Weights For Strength Training

Feel Sleepy After Lunches - Light And Healthy Office Lunches

Positive Thinking Practice – How Does It Help You?

MIND Diet – Is This A Healthy Diet Or Another Trend?

Yoga Prop Essentials To Improve Your Exercise Session

Should Potatoes Be The Part Of A Healthy Diet?

Best And Worst Foods To Lower Blood Pressure

Low-Impact Cardio Workouts You Should Try

10 Healthy Pasta Salad Dressing For Weight Loss

Breathing Exercise You Should Do To Relieve Stress

Headache vs. Migraine: Difference Explained In 60 Seconds

How Many Times Do You Need To Wash Your Face?

Hypothyroidism Diet – What To Eat And What You Should Avoid

Stretches To Relieve Leg Pain And Numbness After Sitting For Too Long

No-Cook Healthy Meals For Lazy Days At Home

Easy Breakfast Options To Try During Calorie Deficit

How To Stop Muscle Cramps Immediately

Why You Should Go For An Anti-Inflammatory Diet

Foods To Lower Cortisol Levels In Your Body

High-Fiber Dips You Can Make At Home For The Week

Weekend Warrior Exercises To Makeup For Stressful Week

A growing number of people under 50 are being diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths for both men and women and the expected death toll from it in 2025 is about 52,900 (American Cancer Society). Recent research suggests that while a new push for earlier screening has led to more early-stage diagnoses, it doesn't fully explain the overall increase in cases among younger adults. The rise in diagnoses for this age group actually began in the mid-1990s and includes more advanced cancers as well. What Caused The Increase In Earlier Colon Cancer Diagnosis? In recent years, major health organizations like the American Cancer Society and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended age for average-risk adults to start getting screened for colorectal cancer from 50 to 45. This change has already had a positive effect. Two recent studies from the American Cancer Society, published in the medical journal JAMA, show that this new guideline is helping catch cancer earlier. The first study found that the number of adults ages 45 to 49 getting screened jumped from about 20% in 2019 to nearly 34% in 2023. The second study found that early-stage diagnoses in this age group increased by 50% in just one year. This means that a lot of these cancers are being found when they are easier to treat and before they become life-threatening. What Are The Symptoms of Colon Cancer? Even with the new screening age, many people who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer are still too young to be eligible for screening. This is why it's so important for everyone—regardless of age—to know the warning signs and talk to a doctor about any unusual changes. The most common symptom for younger people is rectal bleeding. Other key symptoms to watch for include: A lasting change in bowel habits or the shape of your stoolStomach cramps or painA loss of appetite or unexplained weight lossUnexplained weight loss or fatiguePencil Thin Stool – Symptom or Myth? However, this idea is largely a myth. It started in the late 1800s, and while it was dismissed by experts in the mid-1900s due to a lack of evidence, it somehow found its way back into medical textbooks. A 2009 study published in the Digestive Diseases and Sciences journal explained that thin stool is usually just a sign of diarrhea. Because diarrhea is much more common than colon cancer, a change in stool size alone isn't a reliable warning sign. Sending patients for a colonoscopy based only on this one symptom isn't necessary. It causes patients to go through an uncomfortable and risky procedure they don't need, and it puts a strain on our healthcare system.  Instead of focusing on stool size, it's more important to watch for other, more authentic symptoms of colorectal cancer, such as the ones mentioned above. If you have these symptoms, you should talk to your doctor. How Is Colon Cancer In Men Different Than Men? While colorectal cancer is a serious health issue for everyone, a 2015 review in World Journal of Gastroenterology shows that women over the age of 65 have a higher death rate and a lower chance of survival compared to men of the same age. This suggests that the way we approach this cancer needs to be different for women. There are several important reasons why women might have a tougher time with colorectal cancer: Tumor Location Women are more likely to get cancer on the right side of the colon, which is often a more aggressive type of tumor. Standard screening tests may not be as effective at finding these tumors early.  Anatomy and Screening The unique anatomy of the female colon can sometimes make colonoscopies more difficult, potentially leading to missed or delayed diagnoses. Additionally, social and cultural factors can sometimes cause women to put off screening appointments. Treatment and Prevention Men and women's bodies can react differently to the same cancer treatments. Some drugs can cause side effects that are specific to the female reproductive system. Also, most studies on dietary risk factors don't consider how a man's diet might affect him differently than a woman's. 

colon cancer screenings help catch the deadly disease earlier - is pencil thin stool a sign or myth?

Supriya Ramesh

Credits: Canva

Nutrition

What Happens To Your Body When You Drink Beer Every Night?

what happens to your body when you drink beer every night?

Full-Fat Milk Vs Low-Fat Milk: Norway Study Reveals Milk Type That Increases Heart Disease Risk

full-fat milk vs low-fat milk: norway study reveals milk type that increases heart disease risk

Study Finds Controlling Inflammation In Diabetics Could Treat Depression, With Approaches Differing

study finds controlling inflammation in diabetics could treat depression, with approaches differing

That time has long gone when a simple thought of daily playtime with friends filled kids with immense excitement, daydreaming of rushing home from school to play outdoor games. In this digital era, where every hand has a phone and more kids are obsessed with online games than a cricket or a football match and adolescents are <span>doomscrolling</span> like there is no tomorrow, <span>physical health</span> has taken a backseat. 

A rather concerning new study published in the <span>Journal of the American Heart Association</span> has revealed that each extra hour of leisure screen time, whether it is scrolling through social media, binge-watching cartoons, or playing virtual games, is linked to higher <span>cardiometabolic risk</span> in children and adolescents.

And this is not just about kids being “a bit inactive”. It is about blood chemistry, future heart disease risk, and the alarming way our digital age is setting up tiny bodies for big trouble later in life.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the world’s leading cause of death, but its roots are often planted early in life. Childhood markers like <span>insulin resistance</span>, <span>chronic inflammation</span>, high apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, and <span>obesity</span> can all set the stage for heart problems in adulthood.

The study, which tracked kids’ and teens’ habits alongside a comprehensive set of blood-based biomarkers, found that every extra hour of screen time raised cardiometabolic risk by about 0.08 standard deviations in children aged 6–10 and 0.13 in 18-year-old adolescents. It is significant enough to matter and enough to warrant a serious parental side-eye at that glowing rectangle in your child’s hand.

<h3>A Biological “Screen Time Fingerprint”</h3>

One of the study’s most intriguing findings was the discovery of a metabolomics signature, a set of 37 blood-based biomarkers that essentially form a biological “fingerprint” of screen time. These chemical changes in the blood were linked to metabolic shifts that predict higher cardiovascular risk.

For adolescents, the data went a step further: the fingerprint was associated with a higher predicted 10-year adult cardiovascular disease risk. In other words, by the time today’s screen-loving teens hit their late 20s, the early warning signs could already be showing up on their medical charts.

While the study is observational (meaning it does not prove cause-and-effect), it paints a compelling picture: screen time is not just stealing playtime; it is shaping kids’ metabolic futures. And the risk seems to work in a dose-dependent way. That means trimming screen time, especially in the evenings, could help nudge those biomarkers in a healthier direction.

<h3>Five Ways to Significantly Reduce Screen Time For Kids and Teens </h3>

Telling a child to “just get off your phone” is as effective as telling a cat to stop knocking things off the table. Instead, here are five slightly offbeat but surprisingly effective strategies for cutting back screen time:

 1. <strong>Hiding Wi-Fi Router </strong>

Hide the router behind a daily challenge. Want Wi-Fi? You have got to earn it by doing something active, like 20 minutes of cycling, a round of badminton, or even cleaning the house.

 <strong>2. Swapping Online Shows with Interesting Activities </strong>

Replace one streaming session with a home-made “show” of fun-filled activities. Kids get hooked on activities with time-bound tasks; they get competitive. Screen-free creativity is a cardio-friendly brain workout.

 <strong>3. Reverse Bedtime Stories</strong>

Instead of you reading to them, have them “read” or narrate a story to you. Teach them the skill of modulation and pronunciation and to make it even spicier, assign them characters for acting it out. This pulls them away from screens while boosting language skills and winding them down for earlier sleep.

 <strong>4. </strong><strong>Family Screen Swap Hour</strong>

Pick one hour each evening where everyone swaps screens for a shared activity, like board games, cooking, or a <span>walk</span> outside. The key is doing it together so no one feels singled out.

 <strong>5. The “Leave It at the Door” Rule</strong>

Phones and tablets stay outside bedrooms. Create a charging station in the hallway, and make it a family-wide ritual. Fewer late-night scrolling marathons mean better sleep and, as the study shows, potentially better <span>heart health</span>.

The research is clear that screens are shaping more than attention spans. They are etching metabolic patterns into kids’ bodies that could carry over into adulthood. While technology is here to stay, our habits do not have to be static. And a little less scrolling, a little more moving, and a bit more sleep are any day better for your general wellbeing. 

Cardiovascular Risks

heart health

physical health

doomscrolling

Journal of the American Heart Association

cardiometabolic risk

insulin resistance

chronic inflammation

obesity

walk

That time has long gone when a simple thought of daily playtime with friends filled kids with immense excitement, daydreaming of rushing home from school to play outdoor games. In this digital era, where every hand has a phone and more kids are obsessed with online games than a cricket or a football match and adolescents are doomscrolling like there is no tomorrow, physical health has taken a backseat. A rather concerning new study published in the Journal of the American Heart Association has revealed that each extra hour of leisure screen time, whether it is scrolling through social media, binge-watching cartoons, or playing virtual games, is linked to higher cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents.And this is not just about kids being “a bit inactive”. It is about blood chemistry, future heart disease risk, and the alarming way our digital age is setting up tiny bodies for big trouble later in life.Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the world’s leading cause of death, but its roots are often planted early in life. Childhood markers like insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, high apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, and obesity can all set the stage for heart problems in adulthood.The study, which tracked kids’ and teens’ habits alongside a comprehensive set of blood-based biomarkers, found that every extra hour of screen time raised cardiometabolic risk by about 0.08 standard deviations in children aged 6–10 and 0.13 in 18-year-old adolescents. It is significant enough to matter and enough to warrant a serious parental side-eye at that glowing rectangle in your child’s hand.A Biological “Screen Time Fingerprint”One of the study’s most intriguing findings was the discovery of a metabolomics signature, a set of 37 blood-based biomarkers that essentially form a biological “fingerprint” of screen time. These chemical changes in the blood were linked to metabolic shifts that predict higher cardiovascular risk.For adolescents, the data went a step further: the fingerprint was associated with a higher predicted 10-year adult cardiovascular disease risk. In other words, by the time today’s screen-loving teens hit their late 20s, the early warning signs could already be showing up on their medical charts.It Is Not All DoomscrollingWhile the study is observational (meaning it does not prove cause-and-effect), it paints a compelling picture: screen time is not just stealing playtime; it is shaping kids’ metabolic futures. And the risk seems to work in a dose-dependent way. That means trimming screen time, especially in the evenings, could help nudge those biomarkers in a healthier direction.Five Ways to Significantly Reduce Screen Time For Kids and Teens Telling a child to “just get off your phone” is as effective as telling a cat to stop knocking things off the table. Instead, here are five slightly offbeat but surprisingly effective strategies for cutting back screen time: 1. Hiding Wi-Fi Router Hide the router behind a daily challenge. Want Wi-Fi? You have got to earn it by doing something active, like 20 minutes of cycling, a round of badminton, or even cleaning the house. 2. Swapping Online Shows with Interesting Activities Replace one streaming session with a home-made “show” of fun-filled activities. Kids get hooked on activities with time-bound tasks; they get competitive. Screen-free creativity is a cardio-friendly brain workout. 3. Reverse Bedtime StoriesInstead of you reading to them, have them “read” or narrate a story to you. Teach them the skill of modulation and pronunciation and to make it even spicier, assign them characters for acting it out. This pulls them away from screens while boosting language skills and winding them down for earlier sleep. 4. Family Screen Swap HourPick one hour each evening where everyone swaps screens for a shared activity, like board games, cooking, or a walk outside. The key is doing it together so no one feels singled out. 5. The “Leave It at the Door” RulePhones and tablets stay outside bedrooms. Create a charging station in the hallway, and make it a family-wide ritual. Fewer late-night scrolling marathons mean better sleep and, as the study shows, potentially better heart health.The research is clear that screens are shaping more than attention spans. They are etching metabolic patterns into kids’ bodies that could carry over into adulthood. While technology is here to stay, our habits do not have to be static. And a little less scrolling, a little more moving, and a bit more sleep are any day better for your general wellbeing. 

new study finds screen time may be increasing cardiovascular risks in kids’ lives

Ishita Roy

Man Killed Eating Broccoli Sandwich, 9 More Rushed To Hospital, All Linked To One Street Vendor In Italy

Friendly’s Ice Cream Recall: Vanilla Bean Packs Hid Cookies & Cream with Undeclared Soy, Wheat; Know How These Allergens Can Be Life-Threatening

friendly’s ice cream recall: vanilla bean packs hid cookies & cream with undeclared soy, wheat; know how these allergens can be life-threatening

First West Nile Virus Case Confirmed In Michigan: How Does The Infection Spread Through The Body?

first west nile virus case confirmed in michigan - what is west nile and who is at risk?

Health & Wellness

Could Nitazenes Be The Next Opioid Threat Pushing Europe Toward A Public Health Crisis?

could nitazenes be the next opioid threat pushing europe toward a public health crisis?

More Than 50% Of U.S. Calories Come From Ultra-Processed Foods

more than 50% of u.s. calories come from ultra-processed foods

A 52-year-old man has died and 9 others have been hospitalized in Italy after eating a <span>broccoli</span> and sausage sandwich suspected to be contaminated with a deadly toxin. All cases have been traced back to the same street vendor on the seafront of Diamante, in the province of Cosenza.

<h4>Victim Fell Ill During Drive Home</h4>

The victim, identified as artist and musician Luigi Di Sarno, was returning from a family vacation in Calabria when he and relatives stopped at the food truck. All five family members ate the same sandwich and soon developed symptoms consistent with <span>botulism</span>.

Di Sarno reportedly began feeling unwell while driving along a highway near Lagonegro in Potenza. He pulled over in the town of Basilicata, where emergency services were called, but he died before reaching the hospital. Two of his relatives remain in serious condition.

<h4>Rare But Deadly Illness Suspected</h4>

Botulism is caused by toxins from Clostridium botulinum bacteria, which attack the nervous system, leading to breathing difficulties, muscle paralysis, and, in about 10% of cases, death. The infection is rare but can occur when certain foods, including broccoli, are improperly processed or stored.

Authorities believe <span>contaminated broccoli</span> in oil used for the sandwiches is the likely source. Local prosecutors in Paola immediately ordered all jars of broccoli in oil to be seized, along with the food truck where the meals were prepared.

<h4>Wider Health Concerns Across Italy</h4>

The outbreak has sparked nationwide concern. Just weeks earlier, eight people were hospitalized after eating contaminated guacamole at a food festival in Sardinia. Those cases were also linked to botulism.

In both incidents, Italy’s strict emergency protocol for botulism was activated. The Calabria Region’s Department of Health and Welfare confirmed that the Poison Control Centre in Pavia is the only facility authorized to manage such cases. The Ministry of Health stores the antitoxin in secure locations and distributes it solely through the Lombardy center.

The first doses of the antitoxin were sent from the Military Pharmacy in Taranto to treat initial patients. As more cases emerged, additional supplies were rushed in. Health officials have now ordered a nationwide recall of broccoli products to prevent further infections.

An autopsy will be conducted to confirm Di Sarno’s exact cause of death, though investigators say early evidence strongly points to botulism. Authorities continue to trace all potential exposure points while urging the public to avoid suspect broccoli products until the source is fully contained.

As per the World Health Organization (WHO), foodborne botulism is a serious, and fatal disease, though it is relatively rare. It is an intoxication caused by ingestion of potent neurotoxins, the botulinum toxins, which are formed in contaminated foods. 

WHO notes: "spores produced by the bacteria Clostridium botulinum are heat-resistant and exist widely in the environment, and in the absence of oxygen they germinate, grow and then excrete toxins. There are 7 distinct forms of botulinum toxin, types A–G. Four of these (types A, B, E and rarely F) cause human botulism. Types C, D and E cause illness in other mammals, birds and fish."

<ul><li>Flaccid Paralysis that can cause respiratory failure</li><li>Fatigue</li><li>Weakness</li><li>Vertigo</li><li>Difficulty in swallowing or speaking</li><li>Vomiting</li><li>Diarrhea</li><li>Constipation</li><li>Abnormal swelling</li><li>Weakness in neck and arms</li></ul>

man killed eating broccoli

botulism

health news

food news

nutrition

man in italy died by botulism

botulism in broccoli

broccoli

contaminated broccoli

health news Italy

A 52-year-old man has died and 9 others have been hospitalized in Italy after eating a broccoli and sausage sandwich suspected to be contaminated with a deadly toxin. All cases have been traced back to the same street vendor on the seafront of Diamante, in the province of Cosenza.Victim Fell Ill During Drive HomeThe victim, identified as artist and musician Luigi Di Sarno, was returning from a family vacation in Calabria when he and relatives stopped at the food truck. All five family members ate the same sandwich and soon developed symptoms consistent with botulism.Di Sarno reportedly began feeling unwell while driving along a highway near Lagonegro in Potenza. He pulled over in the town of Basilicata, where emergency services were called, but he died before reaching the hospital. Two of his relatives remain in serious condition.Rare But Deadly Illness SuspectedBotulism is caused by toxins from Clostridium botulinum bacteria, which attack the nervous system, leading to breathing difficulties, muscle paralysis, and, in about 10% of cases, death. The infection is rare but can occur when certain foods, including broccoli, are improperly processed or stored.Authorities believe contaminated broccoli in oil used for the sandwiches is the likely source. Local prosecutors in Paola immediately ordered all jars of broccoli in oil to be seized, along with the food truck where the meals were prepared.Wider Health Concerns Across ItalyThe outbreak has sparked nationwide concern. Just weeks earlier, eight people were hospitalized after eating contaminated guacamole at a food festival in Sardinia. Those cases were also linked to botulism.In both incidents, Italy’s strict emergency protocol for botulism was activated. The Calabria Region’s Department of Health and Welfare confirmed that the Poison Control Centre in Pavia is the only facility authorized to manage such cases. The Ministry of Health stores the antitoxin in secure locations and distributes it solely through the Lombardy center.The first doses of the antitoxin were sent from the Military Pharmacy in Taranto to treat initial patients. As more cases emerged, additional supplies were rushed in. Health officials have now ordered a nationwide recall of broccoli products to prevent further infections.An autopsy will be conducted to confirm Di Sarno’s exact cause of death, though investigators say early evidence strongly points to botulism. Authorities continue to trace all potential exposure points while urging the public to avoid suspect broccoli products until the source is fully contained.What Is Botulism?As per the World Health Organization (WHO), foodborne botulism is a serious, and fatal disease, though it is relatively rare. It is an intoxication caused by ingestion of potent neurotoxins, the botulinum toxins, which are formed in contaminated foods. WHO notes: "spores produced by the bacteria Clostridium botulinum are heat-resistant and exist widely in the environment, and in the absence of oxygen they germinate, grow and then excrete toxins. There are 7 distinct forms of botulinum toxin, types A–G. Four of these (types A, B, E and rarely F) cause human botulism. Types C, D and E cause illness in other mammals, birds and fish."Common SymptomsFlaccid Paralysis that can cause respiratory failureFatigueWeaknessVertigoDifficulty in swallowing or speakingVomitingDiarrheaConstipationAbnormal swellingWeakness in neck and arms

man killed eating broccoli sandwich, 9 more rushed to hospital, all linked to one street vendor in italy

US To Destroy $9.7 Million In Birth Control, The Plan Could Trigger Spike in Unsafe Abortions, Say Experts

Scientists Identify Antibodies That Can Naturally Prevent Strep A Infections In Children

scientists identify antibodies that can naturally prevent strep a infections in children

Why That Persistent Ache Might Not Be ‘Just An Injury’, Overlooked Signs That Could Signal Bone Cancer

why that persistent ache might not be ‘just an injury’, overlooked signs that could signal bone cancer

<strong><span rel="noindex">Birth Control</span> Incineration: </strong>The US government plans to incinerate more than $9.7 million worth of contraceptives funded by the United States Agency for International Development (<span>USAID</span>). The stockpile, stored in a Belgian warehouse since the Trump administration froze foreign aid and shut down USAID operations, includes birth control pills, implants, intrauterine devices (IUDs) and injectable contraceptives.

According to <em>The New York Times</em>, the destruction will cost over $160,000 in transportation and incineration fees. The medical waste is expected to be burned at a facility in France, even though many of the supplies will not expire until at least 2027, with some lasting until 2029.

<h4>State Department Defends Decision</h4>

In a statement to<em> The Hill</em>, the US State Department said it made a “preliminary decision” to destroy what it described as “abortifacient” products. However, USAID is prohibited by law from purchasing drugs or devices that induce abortions, and none of the items in the Belgian warehouse fit that description, according to T<em>he New York Times</em>.

The department also cited the Kemp-Kasten amendment, which blocks US assistance to organizations involved in coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization. Officials argued that the policy applies to non-abortifacient contraceptives if supplied to groups that fail to comply with US policy commitments.

<h4>Impact on Global Family Planning</h4>

The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) warned the move will deprive 1.4 million women and girls across Africa of access to essential reproductive care. Around 77% of the contraceptives were intended for Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Mali and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

Tanzania will lose over one million injectable contraceptives and 365,100 implants, representing about 28% of its annual need. Mali will face a shortage of 1.1 million oral contraceptives and nearly 96,000 implants. Zambia will lose 48,400 implants and 295,000 injectable doses, while Kenya will fall short of its contraceptive implant needs by more than 100,000 units.

The Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition estimates the loss will result in 362,000 unintended pregnancies, 161,000 unplanned births and tens of thousands of unsafe abortions.

<h4>Offers to Redistribute Supplies Rejected</h4>

Global health organizations, including the United Nations Population Fund and MSI Reproductive Choices, offered to take the supplies at no cost to the US taxpayer. These offers were declined. French <span>reproductive rights</span> groups have urged their government to intervene, but officials say they have no legal authority to seize the goods.

Sarah Shaw, advocacy director at MSI Reproductive Choices, called the decision “egregious,” adding, “Women are going to die because they’ve not had access to those contraceptives,” reports <em>The New York Times</em>.

<h4>Strained Health Systems in Affected Countries</h4>

Health advocates in the targeted countries say the loss of these supplies will have devastating effects. In Kenya, the Reproductive Health Network reports that long-term contraceptive stockpiles have already run out, leaving a 46% funding gap in the national family planning programme.

Nelly Munyasia, the network’s executive director, told the <em>Guardian</em>, this shortage will worsen maternal mortality rates. “Nearly one in five girls aged 15 to 19 are already pregnant or have given birth. Unsafe abortions remain among the five leading causes of maternal deaths in Kenya,” she said.

In Tanzania, the shortage is already limiting women’s choices for family planning. Dr. Bakari of Umati, an IPPF member organisation, warned that the cuts “directly impact clients’ options” and are likely to result in more unplanned pregnancies, as the <em>Guardian</em> reports.

<h4>Political and Legal Justifications</h4>

The State Department maintains the destruction is in line with US laws that prevent funding organizations providing abortion services or advocacy abroad. These rules were reinforced under the Trump administration and remain in place.

Officials claim they avoided $34.1 million in additional taxpayer costs by cancelling other pending orders. However, critics argue that burning millions of dollars’ worth of usable, in-demand contraceptives is a waste of resources that undermines global health efforts.

<h4>Uncertain Timeline for Destruction</h4>

Reports suggest the incineration was planned to begin in France by the end of July, but European governments, advocacy groups and an American congressional office have said it is unclear whether the process has started.

The decision has raised alarms in Brussels and Paris, with officials seeking ways to prevent the loss. So far, no resolution has been found.

For nearly a decade, USAID has been a critical supplier of reproductive health products in more than 30 countries, spending over $600 million on global family planning. Its sudden withdrawal from these programmes has created gaps that poorer nations are struggling to fill.

Siobhan Perkins, a former USAID procurement adviser, told to <em>The New York Times</em>, the contraceptives slated for destruction could have prevented hundreds of thousands of unintended pregnancies and saved more than 700 women’s lives.

“The guiding principle of public health should be to save lives and improve access,” she said. “Destroying these supplies does the opposite.”

birth control

birth control us

US burns birth control

usaid birth control

usaid

womens rights

reproductive rights

pregnancy

us health

Birth Control Incineration: The US government plans to incinerate more than $9.7 million worth of contraceptives funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The stockpile, stored in a Belgian warehouse since the Trump administration froze foreign aid and shut down USAID operations, includes birth control pills, implants, intrauterine devices (IUDs) and injectable contraceptives.According to The New York Times, the destruction will cost over $160,000 in transportation and incineration fees. The medical waste is expected to be burned at a facility in France, even though many of the supplies will not expire until at least 2027, with some lasting until 2029.State Department Defends DecisionIn a statement to The Hill, the US State Department said it made a “preliminary decision” to destroy what it described as “abortifacient” products. However, USAID is prohibited by law from purchasing drugs or devices that induce abortions, and none of the items in the Belgian warehouse fit that description, according to The New York Times.The department also cited the Kemp-Kasten amendment, which blocks US assistance to organizations involved in coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization. Officials argued that the policy applies to non-abortifacient contraceptives if supplied to groups that fail to comply with US policy commitments.Impact on Global Family PlanningThe International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) warned the move will deprive 1.4 million women and girls across Africa of access to essential reproductive care. Around 77% of the contraceptives were intended for Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Mali and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).Tanzania will lose over one million injectable contraceptives and 365,100 implants, representing about 28% of its annual need. Mali will face a shortage of 1.1 million oral contraceptives and nearly 96,000 implants. Zambia will lose 48,400 implants and 295,000 injectable doses, while Kenya will fall short of its contraceptive implant needs by more than 100,000 units.The Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition estimates the loss will result in 362,000 unintended pregnancies, 161,000 unplanned births and tens of thousands of unsafe abortions.Offers to Redistribute Supplies RejectedGlobal health organizations, including the United Nations Population Fund and MSI Reproductive Choices, offered to take the supplies at no cost to the US taxpayer. These offers were declined. French reproductive rights groups have urged their government to intervene, but officials say they have no legal authority to seize the goods.Sarah Shaw, advocacy director at MSI Reproductive Choices, called the decision “egregious,” adding, “Women are going to die because they’ve not had access to those contraceptives,” reports The New York Times.Strained Health Systems in Affected CountriesHealth advocates in the targeted countries say the loss of these supplies will have devastating effects. In Kenya, the Reproductive Health Network reports that long-term contraceptive stockpiles have already run out, leaving a 46% funding gap in the national family planning programme.Nelly Munyasia, the network’s executive director, told the Guardian, this shortage will worsen maternal mortality rates. “Nearly one in five girls aged 15 to 19 are already pregnant or have given birth. Unsafe abortions remain among the five leading causes of maternal deaths in Kenya,” she said.In Tanzania, the shortage is already limiting women’s choices for family planning. Dr. Bakari of Umati, an IPPF member organisation, warned that the cuts “directly impact clients’ options” and are likely to result in more unplanned pregnancies, as the Guardian reports.Political and Legal JustificationsThe State Department maintains the destruction is in line with US laws that prevent funding organizations providing abortion services or advocacy abroad. These rules were reinforced under the Trump administration and remain in place.Officials claim they avoided $34.1 million in additional taxpayer costs by cancelling other pending orders. However, critics argue that burning millions of dollars’ worth of usable, in-demand contraceptives is a waste of resources that undermines global health efforts.Uncertain Timeline for DestructionReports suggest the incineration was planned to begin in France by the end of July, but European governments, advocacy groups and an American congressional office have said it is unclear whether the process has started.The decision has raised alarms in Brussels and Paris, with officials seeking ways to prevent the loss. So far, no resolution has been found.A Setback for Women’s HealthFor nearly a decade, USAID has been a critical supplier of reproductive health products in more than 30 countries, spending over $600 million on global family planning. Its sudden withdrawal from these programmes has created gaps that poorer nations are struggling to fill.Siobhan Perkins, a former USAID procurement adviser, told to The New York Times, the contraceptives slated for destruction could have prevented hundreds of thousands of unintended pregnancies and saved more than 700 women’s lives.“The guiding principle of public health should be to save lives and improve access,” she said. “Destroying these supplies does the opposite.”

US To Destroy 9.7 Million In Birth Control, The Plan Could Trigger Spike in Unsafe Abortions, Say Experts

us to destroy $9.7 million in birth control, the plan could trigger spike in unsafe abortions, say experts

About Us

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Company

Health and Me is a premium website with content written and curated to function as a handbook for all Health concerns.

Colon Cancer Screenings Help Catch The Deadly Disease Earlier - Is Pencil Thin Stool A Sign Or Myth?

Quick Stories

New Study Finds Screen Time May Be Increasing Cardiovascular Risks In Kids’ Lives

Man Killed Eating Broccoli Sandwich, 9 More Rushed To Hospital, All Linked To One Street Vendor In Italy

US To Destroy $9.7 Million In Birth Control, The Plan Could Trigger Spike in Unsafe Abortions, Say Experts

Health Conditions A-Z

ADHD Could Be Setting Your Child Up For Failure - Study Reveals Factors That Lower The Quality Of Life In Children With ADHD

New Study Finds Screen Time May Be Increasing Cardiovascular Risks In Kids’ Lives

Landon Dickerson Suffers From A Right Leg Injury: What Are The Common Football Injuries And How Can You Prevent It?