Living past 100 isn’t just a milestone—it’s a biological mystery. For centuries, philosophers like Plato and Aristotle have speculated about aging, but only now, with modern science, are we beginning to decode the factors that separate the exceptionally long-lived from the rest of us.And while lifestyle advice like “eat healthy” or “exercise regularly” still holds, new evidence suggests your blood might already be telling the story of how long you'll live decades before you reach old age.A new study out of Sweden, published in GeroScience, has analyzed blood samples from over 44,000 people and tracked their health for more than three decades. The results? Those who lived past 100 shared subtle but consistent differences in certain biomarkers, particularly those tied to metabolism, inflammation, kidney and liver function, and nutritionHow Are Centenarians Biologically Distinct?Centenarians (people who live to 100 or beyond) used to be statistical outliers. Today, they're one of the fastest-growing age groups in the world, doubling roughly every ten years since the 1970s. This demographic shift is forcing researchers to examine what exactly allows some people to not only live longer, but to live well into their 90s and beyond—often with fewer chronic conditions.The Swedish study used data from the Amoris cohort, tracking people aged 64–99 for up to 35 years. Out of 44,000 participants, 1,224 (2.7%) lived to 100, and interestingly, 85% of them were women.Rather than focus on anecdotal habits or isolated lifestyle factors, the researchers went straight to the bloodstream—measuring 12 key blood-based biomarkers that reflect various physiological processes including inflammation, metabolism, kidney and liver health, and nutritional status.Subtle Signs That Set Centenarians ApartWhen comparing those who lived to 100 with those who didn’t, the differences weren’t necessarily dramatic—but they were meaningful. One of the findings- centenarians tended to have lower levels of glucose, creatinine, and uric acid from their 60s onward.While the median biomarker values weren’t always drastically different between groups, what stood out was that centenarians rarely had extremely high or low values. This biological "moderation" suggests that extreme metabolic fluctuations earlier in life may correlate with lower chances of exceptional longevity. For instance:Very few centenarians had glucose levels above 6.5 mmol/L.Likewise, only a small fraction had creatinine levels above 125 µmol/L.Even uric acid often overlooked had a surprisingly predictive role. People with the lowest uric acid levels had a 4% chance of reaching 100, compared to just 1.5% among those with the highest levels.What Exactly Biomarkers That Help You Live Longer?The biomarkers measured in the study covered a wide range of physiological systems:Inflammation: Uric acidMetabolism: Total cholesterol, glucoseLiver function: Alanine aminotransferase (Alat), aspartate aminotransferase (Asat), albumin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (Alp), lactate dehydrogenase (LD)Kidney function: CreatinineNutrition and anemia: Iron, total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), and albuminWhat’s striking is that 10 out of the 12 markers were linked to the likelihood of becoming a centenarian, even after adjusting for age, sex, and disease burden.Albumin and Alat were the only two that didn’t show a significant association—but the rest provided strong clues that biological aging begins much earlier than we think, and that it leaves a footprint in our blood.Is There a Connection Between Nutrition, Metabolic Health and Longevity?Although this study didn’t isolate specific lifestyle factors, the associations are suggestive. The fact that metabolic and nutritional biomarkers—like glucose, cholesterol, and iron, correlated with longer life spans aligns with broader research on the importance of diet, alcohol moderation, and weight stability in aging.It's worth noting that both low and high levels of certain markers were associated with poorer outcomes, reinforcing the idea that optimal, balanced ranges not extremes may be most important when it comes to aging well.This insight has practical implications: monitoring your metabolic and organ health in your 60s and beyond may provide an early-warning system for how your aging trajectory is shaping up.Genes vs. Lifestyle: How Much Control Do We Really Have?This study doesn't confirm whether genes or behavior drive the biomarker differences—it only shows that those who lived longest had more favorable profiles. According to Karin Modig, Associate Professor of Epidemiology at the Karolinska Institutet and lead author of the study, chance probably plays a role, but so do genes and lifestyle choices.In other words, some people may be genetically predisposed to age more slowly, but even among those individuals, metabolic moderation and good organ function seem to be common themes.You don't need to chase some mythical "perfect" blood profile but that small, cumulative differences in biological function across decades may matter more than we thought.Paying attention to your glucose, creatinine, and uric acid levels as you age could help you catch red flags early. Liver and kidney markers, often underappreciated, may hold secrets to long-term health. Nutrition appears to play a much more central role in aging than many assume.None of these factors guarantees you’ll live to 100—but they do suggest pathways worth preserving, monitoring, and optimizing.This is the largest, longest-running study of its kind, and it delivers something few others have: longitudinal data on real people, across decades, tied to actual life outcomes.Rather than rely on speculative theories or small anecdotal samples, the findings here provide a roadmap for future aging research, one that blends genetics, biology, lifestyle, and public health.As the global population continues to gray, understanding how to extend not just lifespan but healthspan—the years of life spent in good health—will be critical. And studies like this bring us one step closer to unlocking the biology of exceptional aging.