Health and Me

Tanya Dutt

Often Avoided, Could Your 'Low-Cal' Artificial Sweetener Help Fight Cancer?

Artificial sweeteners tend to be grouped in one category: chemical, controversial, and suspicious. But one botanical sweetener—stevia—is challenging that assumption. New studies out of Hiroshima University indicate that stevia, when fermented with a particular bacterium found on banana leaves, could do more than make your coffee taste better. It might fight one of the most lethal types of cancer—pancreatic cancer.

That's correct. Researchers have found that fermented stevia not only kills cancer cells but kills them selectively while sparing healthy cells largely intact. And it does this with powerful antioxidant effects to boot. The possibilities are staggering, not only for sweetener doubters but for the future of cancer treatment.

Pancreatic cancer boasts one of the lowest five-year survival rates of any major cancer—less than 10%. It's advanced, tends to be detected late, and is notoriously incurable with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. As co-author Narandalai Danshiitsoodol had it, "Pancreatic cancer is very invasive and metastatic in nature. There's a need for effective anticancer agents—particularly those isolated from safe, natural origins."

Long prized as a calorie-free sweetener derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, it can now potentially have a second life as a therapeutic agent.

<h2>What is The Role of Fermentation?</h2>

The innovation is in the processing of the stevia. Researchers took a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum—SN13T, to be specific, which is naturally found on banana leaves—to ferment stevia leaves. It's not your standard steeping process. The group optimized fermentation for 72 hours under oxygen-free conditions at 37°C.

They did this carefully. The fermented stevia leaf extract (FSLE) was then pitted against its non-fermented equivalent. The findings were extraordinary.

FSLE proved more lethal to pancreatic cancer cells (PANC-1) than plain stevia extract, but importantly, it caused very little damage to normal kidney cells—even at high concentrations. Such selectivity is unusual and much sought after in cancer studies, where most treatments find it difficult to distinguish between cancerous and normal tissue.

So what is so powerful about fermented stevia? The reason is chlorogenic acid methyl ester (CAME), a molecule formed through the fermentation process. While raw stevia includes chlorogenic acid, it's the microbial conversion—thanks to enzymes in the SN13T strain—that breaks it down into the much more potent CAME. Here's why CAME is so impressive:

Increased potency: It was more potent than chlorogenic acid having a lesser IC50 (concentration required to kill half the cancer cells)—119.1 µg/mL compared to 189.6 µg/mL.

Cell cycle arrest: CAME inhibited cancer cells from dividing by preventing them from progressing beyond the G0/G1 stage—the resting phase prior to cell division.

Apoptosis induction: It induced cell self-destruction, initiating a chain of signals that caused the cancer cells to die in a highly regulated process.

At the genetic level, CAME expressed "pro-death" genes such as Bax, Bad, Caspase-3, Caspase-9, and cytochrome c. It also increased expression of E-cadherin, a gene that prevents the spread of cancer cells, and suppressed Bcl-2, a gene that prevents cells from dying. That's not indiscriminate toxicity. It's a coordinated, targeted attack.

Cancer does not originate solely from renegade cells. Oxidative stress—a free radical imbalance in the body—contributes extensively to cancer development. Fermented stevia exhibited high antioxidant potential, with:

<ul><li>94% free radical scavenging against DPPH laboratory tests</li><li>75% scavenging against ABTS tests</li><li>Comprotection of normal cells against oxidative damage, such as hydrogen peroxide treatment</li></ul>

Through its capacity to lower oxidative stress, FSLE could potentially protect normal tissues against injury and disease, including inflammatory conditions.

Up to now, all these findings are the result of laboratory experiments with cultured cells. But the research group is already preparing the follow-up: animal trials. These will provide a solution to the larger question—can fermented stevia extract be effective within the human body, with its intricate immune functions, digestive system, and metabolic processes?

"The current work significantly deepened the knowledge on the mechanism of action of the Lactobacillus plantarum SN13T strain," said Danshiitsoodol. "It also sheds new light on new research avenues on the possible utilization of probiotics as natural anti-tumor compounds."

That is to say, this isn't solely about stevia. It's about what occurs when we tap the power of fermentation—utilizing microbes to strengthen natural plant chemical compounds and open up new therapy potential.

<h2>Is It Time To Rethink Natural Sweeteners?</h2>

The debate over artificial sweeteners has been polarized for decades. Detractors say non-nutritive sweeteners throw off the microbiome, stimulate cravings, and may even increase cancer risk. But this study presents a compelling counterargument—when processed correctly, at least one natural sweetener could potentially combat cancer.

It is important to mention that there's no fermented stevia on the shelves, and we're not close to recommending it as a substitute for medicine but what this study does highlight is the wonderful potential of nature, science, and microbes collaborating.

All sweeteners are not created equal. Stevia, and particularly fermented stevia, may become so much more than a sugar substitute. It might someday be used to target aggressive-to-treat cancers such as pancreatic cancer, providing a natural, selective, and potentially safer therapeutic agent.

Additional studies are required—especially in animal models and ultimately in humans—but preliminary results look encouraging. Stevia is, at least for now, still a favorite zero-calorie sweetener for coffee, tea, and desserts. It may have much more to offer in the future.

Health Conditions A-Z

health

diet & nutrition

Stevia sweetner

saccharin cancer study

artificial sweeteners safe

saccharin health benefits

cancer fighting sweetener

sweetener research cancer

artificial sugar cancer link

saccharin anti cancer enzyme

Coca-Cola To Launch Cane Sugar Version In US: Is It Really Healthier?

New Parkinson's Treatment Is Like A Pacemaker To The Brain

Rakesh Roshan Undergoes Angioplasty, Shares Health Update And Asks People Over 40 To Get Regular CT Scan

Nutrition

Stretches To Relieve Leg Pain And Numbness After Sitting For Too Long

No-Cook Healthy Meals For Lazy Days At Home

Easy Breakfast Options To Try During Calorie Deficit

How To Stop Muscle Cramps Immediately

Why You Should Go For An Anti-Inflammatory Diet

Foods To Lower Cortisol Levels In Your Body

High-Fiber Dips You Can Make At Home For The Week

Weekend Warrior Exercises To Makeup For Stressful Week

Experiencing Headaches At Word? Natural Remedies To Try

Yoga Poses That Enhance Digestion

Health Benefits of Walking Backwards

No Eggs? Egg-Alternatives You Can Add To Your Diet

Savory And Smart Ways To Add Broccoli To Your Diet

Calorie Burning Habits That Can Help You Shed Extra Pounds

Yoga Poses That Can Help With Bloating

Fiber-Rich Oatmeal Dishes You Can Have For Breakfast

Signs You Must Visit A Doctor For Your Back Pain

Avocado Meal Prep Ideas To Increase Healthy Fat In Your Diet

Arm Exercises You Can Do At Home

Quick-Office Lunches That Can Keep You Full-Longer

How Increased Screen Time Affects Children's Health

Homemade Recipe To Make Protein-Rich Pancakes With Healthy Alternatives

Push-Up Variations You Can Do At Home

Common Mistakes Running Mistakes People Make

Low-Calorie Foods That Keep You Full For Long

Yoga Poses That Help You Get Rid Of Back Pain

Natural Ways To Increase Protein In Your Diet

Managing Excessive Daytime Sleepiness – Tips To Try

How Much Protein Is Too Much?

High Fiber Indian Foods You Should Try

10 Easy Ways To Boost Daily Fiber Intake

Adding Walnut Oil To Your Diet? Benefits You Should Know

Drinks That Soothe Headaches And Migraines

Waist Exercises For More Toned Belly

This Is How Stress Affects Your Heart

Does Digital ‘Brain Rot’ Really Affect Your Health?

Dishes With Fermented Foods To Eat For Your Gut Health

Yoga Poses That Stimulate Good Bowel Health

Weekend Warrior Exercises For Full Body Movement

Weekend Meal Prep Ideas That Will Last You A Weekend

Artificial sweeteners tend to be grouped in one category: chemical, controversial, and suspicious. But one botanical sweetener—stevia—is challenging that assumption. New studies out of Hiroshima University indicate that stevia, when fermented with a particular bacterium found on banana leaves, could do more than make your coffee taste better. It might fight one of the most lethal types of cancer—pancreatic cancer.That's correct. Researchers have found that fermented stevia not only kills cancer cells but kills them selectively while sparing healthy cells largely intact. And it does this with powerful antioxidant effects to boot. The possibilities are staggering, not only for sweetener doubters but for the future of cancer treatment.Pancreatic cancer boasts one of the lowest five-year survival rates of any major cancer—less than 10%. It's advanced, tends to be detected late, and is notoriously incurable with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. As co-author Narandalai Danshiitsoodol had it, "Pancreatic cancer is very invasive and metastatic in nature. There's a need for effective anticancer agents—particularly those isolated from safe, natural origins."Long prized as a calorie-free sweetener derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, it can now potentially have a second life as a therapeutic agent.What is The Role of Fermentation?The innovation is in the processing of the stevia. Researchers took a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum—SN13T, to be specific, which is naturally found on banana leaves—to ferment stevia leaves. It's not your standard steeping process. The group optimized fermentation for 72 hours under oxygen-free conditions at 37°C.They did this carefully. The fermented stevia leaf extract (FSLE) was then pitted against its non-fermented equivalent. The findings were extraordinary.FSLE proved more lethal to pancreatic cancer cells (PANC-1) than plain stevia extract, but importantly, it caused very little damage to normal kidney cells—even at high concentrations. Such selectivity is unusual and much sought after in cancer studies, where most treatments find it difficult to distinguish between cancerous and normal tissue.Benefits of Fermented SteviaSo what is so powerful about fermented stevia? The reason is chlorogenic acid methyl ester (CAME), a molecule formed through the fermentation process. While raw stevia includes chlorogenic acid, it's the microbial conversion—thanks to enzymes in the SN13T strain—that breaks it down into the much more potent CAME. Here's why CAME is so impressive:Increased potency: It was more potent than chlorogenic acid having a lesser IC50 (concentration required to kill half the cancer cells)—119.1 µg/mL compared to 189.6 µg/mL.Cell cycle arrest: CAME inhibited cancer cells from dividing by preventing them from progressing beyond the G0/G1 stage—the resting phase prior to cell division.Apoptosis induction: It induced cell self-destruction, initiating a chain of signals that caused the cancer cells to die in a highly regulated process.At the genetic level, CAME expressed "pro-death" genes such as Bax, Bad, Caspase-3, Caspase-9, and cytochrome c. It also increased expression of E-cadherin, a gene that prevents the spread of cancer cells, and suppressed Bcl-2, a gene that prevents cells from dying. That's not indiscriminate toxicity. It's a coordinated, targeted attack.Cancer does not originate solely from renegade cells. Oxidative stress—a free radical imbalance in the body—contributes extensively to cancer development. Fermented stevia exhibited high antioxidant potential, with:94% free radical scavenging against DPPH laboratory tests75% scavenging against ABTS testsComprotection of normal cells against oxidative damage, such as hydrogen peroxide treatmentThrough its capacity to lower oxidative stress, FSLE could potentially protect normal tissues against injury and disease, including inflammatory conditions.Up to now, all these findings are the result of laboratory experiments with cultured cells. But the research group is already preparing the follow-up: animal trials. These will provide a solution to the larger question—can fermented stevia extract be effective within the human body, with its intricate immune functions, digestive system, and metabolic processes?"The current work significantly deepened the knowledge on the mechanism of action of the Lactobacillus plantarum SN13T strain," said Danshiitsoodol. "It also sheds new light on new research avenues on the possible utilization of probiotics as natural anti-tumor compounds."That is to say, this isn't solely about stevia. It's about what occurs when we tap the power of fermentation—utilizing microbes to strengthen natural plant chemical compounds and open up new therapy potential.Is It Time To Rethink Natural Sweeteners?The debate over artificial sweeteners has been polarized for decades. Detractors say non-nutritive sweeteners throw off the microbiome, stimulate cravings, and may even increase cancer risk. But this study presents a compelling counterargument—when processed correctly, at least one natural sweetener could potentially combat cancer.It is important to mention that there's no fermented stevia on the shelves, and we're not close to recommending it as a substitute for medicine but what this study does highlight is the wonderful potential of nature, science, and microbes collaborating.All sweeteners are not created equal. Stevia, and particularly fermented stevia, may become so much more than a sugar substitute. It might someday be used to target aggressive-to-treat cancers such as pancreatic cancer, providing a natural, selective, and potentially safer therapeutic agent.Additional studies are required—especially in animal models and ultimately in humans—but preliminary results look encouraging. Stevia is, at least for now, still a favorite zero-calorie sweetener for coffee, tea, and desserts. It may have much more to offer in the future.

often avoided, could your 'low-cal' artificial sweetener help fight cancer?

Ishita Roy

Sweet But Risky? Common Sugar Substitute May Harm Brain Cells, Study Finds

sweet but risky? common sugar substitute may harm brain cells, study finds

Health & Wellness

3 Foods That Can Increase Your Risk Of Life-Threatening Diseases - Even If You Have It Just Once A Day

3 foods that can increase your risk of life-threatening diseases - even if you have it just once a day

Sugar Can Have A Surprising Affect On Testosterone Levels - Does It Aid In Declining Sexual Health?

sugar can have a surprising affect on testosterone levels - does it aid in declining sexual health?

Coca-Cola has officially announced that it will introduce a cane sugar-sweetened version of its flagship soda in the United States this fall. The move has comes days after former President <span>Donald Trump</span>’s pre-emptive Truth Social post, has sparked both nostalgia and renewed debate about the health impacts of soda sweeteners.

The new cane sugar Coke will be sold alongside the existing version that uses high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), a formulation the company has used since 1984. Diet Coke and Coke Zero, which use artificial sweeteners such as aspartame, will remain unchanged, reports <em>Time</em>.

<h4>Cane Sugar Is Coming, But Why Now?</h4>

In a statement issued during its second-quarter update, Coca-Cola said the addition is part of its “ongoing innovation agenda” aimed at offering consumers more choices to match changing tastes and dietary preferences.

“This addition is designed to complement the company’s strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences,” said Coca-Cola on Tuesday. CEO James Quincey, speaking on a call with investors, acknowledged Trump’s recent involvement. 

“We appreciate the President’s enthusiasm for our Coca-Cola brand,” he said. “We are definitely looking to use the whole tool kit of available sweetening options.”

Coca-Cola with cane sugar isn’t new to American shelves. Mexican Coke, or MexiCoke, has long been popular for its glass bottle and “original recipe” using cane sugar. That version has gained a cult following since its U.S. import began in 2005.

<h4>Trump and the Push for “Real Sugar”</h4>

Trump, a well-known Diet Coke loyalist, reportedly drinking up to 12 a day during his presidency, surprised many by advocating for real cane sugar. 

“I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,” Trump posted on July 16. “This will be a very good move by them. You’ll see. It’s just better!”

While the company has not confirmed if Trump’s advocacy influenced the rollout, his comments have intensified public interest in the ingredient change.

<strong>ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/nutrition/donald-trump-says-cane-sugar-is-just-better-than-corn-syrup-but-is-it-really-healthier-article-152302856" data-type="tilCustomLink">Donald Trump Says Cane Sugar Is ‘Just Better’ Than Corn Syrup</a></strong>

<h4>The Health Debate: Is Cane Sugar Better Than Corn Syrup?</h4>

From a health standpoint, the switch has raised questions: Is cane sugar a healthier option than HFCS? According to experts, not really.

“For all practical purposes, they’re the same,” said Marion Nestle, nutritionist and professor emerita of food studies at New York University to <em>Time</em>. “They taste the same. They have the same number of calories. They do exactly the same things in the body. Everybody would be healthier eating less of both of them.”

High-fructose corn syrup became a staple sweetener in U.S. processed foods and beverages during the 1980s due to lower costs and a surplus of corn. But its use has declined over the past decade. According to the USDA, domestic production of corn syrup dropped nearly 20% from 2006 to 2016.

Despite the reduction, concerns about HFCS remain. 

In April, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called sugar “poison” and described high-fructose corn syrup as “a formula for making you obese and diabetic.” 

He praised food chains like Steak ’n Shake for switching to cane sugar Coca-Cola, saying it aligned with his campaign to “Make America Healthy Again.”

<h4>Consumer Choice or Clever Rebrand?</h4>

While the move might appeal to those who grew up drinking the pre-1984 formulation or prefer the taste of Mexican Coke, some nutritionists argue this is more of a branding play than a health initiative.

“There’s no nutritional upgrade happening here,” said a registered dietitian quoted in a recent AP report. “It’s just the same sugary drink, wearing a slightly more natural mask.”

Still, Coca-Cola’s introduction of cane sugar Coke reflects broader shifts in consumer preferences toward perceived “natural” ingredients, even when those ingredients carry the same health risks as their processed counterparts.

Whether cane sugar or HFCS, health professionals continue to stress moderation. Sugary drinks, regardless of sweetener type, have been linked to weight gain, metabolic issues, and increased risk of type 2 diabetes.

coca cola cane sugar

nutrition

coca cola launches cane sugar drink

trump loves coke

is cane sugar coca cola healthy

is cane sugar coca cola healthier

donald trump

health news USA

usa health nes

health news

Coca-Cola has officially announced that it will introduce a cane sugar-sweetened version of its flagship soda in the United States this fall. The move has comes days after former President Donald Trump’s pre-emptive Truth Social post, has sparked both nostalgia and renewed debate about the health impacts of soda sweeteners.The new cane sugar Coke will be sold alongside the existing version that uses high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), a formulation the company has used since 1984. Diet Coke and Coke Zero, which use artificial sweeteners such as aspartame, will remain unchanged, reports Time.Cane Sugar Is Coming, But Why Now?In a statement issued during its second-quarter update, Coca-Cola said the addition is part of its “ongoing innovation agenda” aimed at offering consumers more choices to match changing tastes and dietary preferences.“This addition is designed to complement the company’s strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences,” said Coca-Cola on Tuesday. CEO James Quincey, speaking on a call with investors, acknowledged Trump’s recent involvement. “We appreciate the President’s enthusiasm for our Coca-Cola brand,” he said. “We are definitely looking to use the whole tool kit of available sweetening options.”Coca-Cola with cane sugar isn’t new to American shelves. Mexican Coke, or MexiCoke, has long been popular for its glass bottle and “original recipe” using cane sugar. That version has gained a cult following since its U.S. import began in 2005.Trump and the Push for “Real Sugar”Trump, a well-known Diet Coke loyalist, reportedly drinking up to 12 a day during his presidency, surprised many by advocating for real cane sugar. “I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,” Trump posted on July 16. “This will be a very good move by them. You’ll see. It’s just better!”While the company has not confirmed if Trump’s advocacy influenced the rollout, his comments have intensified public interest in the ingredient change.ALSO READ: Donald Trump Says Cane Sugar Is ‘Just Better’ Than Corn SyrupThe Health Debate: Is Cane Sugar Better Than Corn Syrup?From a health standpoint, the switch has raised questions: Is cane sugar a healthier option than HFCS? According to experts, not really.“For all practical purposes, they’re the same,” said Marion Nestle, nutritionist and professor emerita of food studies at New York University to Time. “They taste the same. They have the same number of calories. They do exactly the same things in the body. Everybody would be healthier eating less of both of them.”High-fructose corn syrup became a staple sweetener in U.S. processed foods and beverages during the 1980s due to lower costs and a surplus of corn. But its use has declined over the past decade. According to the USDA, domestic production of corn syrup dropped nearly 20% from 2006 to 2016.Despite the reduction, concerns about HFCS remain. In April, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called sugar “poison” and described high-fructose corn syrup as “a formula for making you obese and diabetic.” He praised food chains like Steak ’n Shake for switching to cane sugar Coca-Cola, saying it aligned with his campaign to “Make America Healthy Again.”Consumer Choice or Clever Rebrand?While the move might appeal to those who grew up drinking the pre-1984 formulation or prefer the taste of Mexican Coke, some nutritionists argue this is more of a branding play than a health initiative.“There’s no nutritional upgrade happening here,” said a registered dietitian quoted in a recent AP report. “It’s just the same sugary drink, wearing a slightly more natural mask.”Still, Coca-Cola’s introduction of cane sugar Coke reflects broader shifts in consumer preferences toward perceived “natural” ingredients, even when those ingredients carry the same health risks as their processed counterparts.Whether cane sugar or HFCS, health professionals continue to stress moderation. Sugary drinks, regardless of sweetener type, have been linked to weight gain, metabolic issues, and increased risk of type 2 diabetes.

coca-cola to launch cane sugar version in us: is it really healthier?

Lifestyle Coach Shares Tips To Prevent Vitamin D3 Deficiency

Health News

rakesh roshan undergoes angioplasty, shares health update and asks people over 40 to get regular ct scan

Over-the-Counter Vitamin B6 Linked To Nerve Damage: Hundreds Join Class Action In Australia

over-the-counter vitamin b6 linked to nerve damage: hundreds join class action in australia

'Anxious Mondays' Can Lead To Stress That Lasts Biologically For Months; Tips To Destress A Day Before

'anxious mondays' can lead to stress that lasts biologically for months; tips to destress a day before

BPA in Lipsticks? Doctor Shares How Your Makeup Bag Could Be Full Of Endocrine Disruptors

bpa in lipsticks? doctor shares how your makeup bag could be full of endocrine disruptors

It’s easy to overlook the basics when it comes to health, especially when there’s so much buzz around new diets, superfoods, and supplements. However, lifestyle expert <span>Luke Coutinho</span> reminds us that one essential nutrient continues to be ignored at our own risk: <span>Vitamin D3</span>.

He calls it a silent epidemic, and with good reason. Whether you’re a child, teenager, adult, or older adult, low <span>Vitamin</span> D3 levels can affect your body in ways you might not expect.

Many people still associate Vitamin D3 only with bone strength or preventing rickets. However, as Coutinho points out, it does far more. It acts more like a hormone than a vitamin—interacting with nearly every cell in the body.

Low levels can disrupt hormone balance, including insulin sensitivity and the regulation of estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone. It can even impact the production of neurotransmitters, which play a role in your mood, stress response, and sleep cycles.

From hair fall and chronic fatigue to mood swings and fertility challenges, many of these concerns could be linked to poor D3 status. The signs may be subtle, but their impact is far-reaching.

<h4>Children, Teens, Adults; No One’s Exempt</h4>

The deficiency doesn’t discriminate. In children and teens, insufficient Vitamin D3 can slow down bone growth, trigger mood swings, and even interfere with height and hormone development. In adults, it’s tied to autoimmune conditions, metabolic disorders, and fatigue syndromes.

It’s particularly common in individuals with insulin resistance. Many of them show very low D3 levels, which can worsen their metabolic health if left unchecked.

We’ve all heard that sunlight is the best natural source of Vitamin D3. But is your morning stroll in the sun really doing the job? Not always.

Due to climate changes, air pollution, and ozone layer damage, the UVB rays necessary for <span>Vitamin D</span> synthesis don’t reach our skin as effectively anymore. This means relying solely on sunshine may not cut it.

Coutinho emphasizes that supplementation, food sources, and intentional exposure to sunlight are all necessary strategies to boost D3 levels safely.

Before diving into elaborate diets or expensive supplements, Coutinho suggests focusing on fundamentals. Apart from Vitamin D3, this includes Vitamin B12, iron, magnesium, thyroid function, and gut health markers.

He urges people to stop overcomplicating their health. Instead, he recommends consistency with the basics—because without a strong foundation, nothing else works well.

So how much is enough? Coutinho shares that the ideal range for Vitamin D3 is between 70–80 ng/mL, while the safe range is between 30–100 ng/mL. 

It’s essential, however, to get tested and follow a doctor’s guidance—because taking too much can cause toxicity, especially affecting the kidneys and other organs.

Patients who report extremely low levels (as low as 5 or 6 ng/mL) often see noticeable improvement in symptoms within just 10 to 15 days of starting the right supplementation plan.

It’s easy to take Vitamin D3 for granted, especially when the symptoms of deficiency can be subtle at first. But ignoring it can have long-term consequences on your hormones, energy, mental health, and metabolism.

As Coutinho puts it, “D3 is basic—but ignoring it is a big mistake.”

vitamin

luke coutinho

vitamin D3

vitamin d

It’s easy to overlook the basics when it comes to health, especially when there’s so much buzz around new diets, superfoods, and supplements. However, lifestyle expert Luke Coutinho reminds us that one essential nutrient continues to be ignored at our own risk: Vitamin D3.He calls it a silent epidemic, and with good reason. Whether you’re a child, teenager, adult, or older adult, low Vitamin D3 levels can affect your body in ways you might not expect.More Than Just Bone HealthMany people still associate Vitamin D3 only with bone strength or preventing rickets. However, as Coutinho points out, it does far more. It acts more like a hormone than a vitamin—interacting with nearly every cell in the body.Low levels can disrupt hormone balance, including insulin sensitivity and the regulation of estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone. It can even impact the production of neurotransmitters, which play a role in your mood, stress response, and sleep cycles.From hair fall and chronic fatigue to mood swings and fertility challenges, many of these concerns could be linked to poor D3 status. The signs may be subtle, but their impact is far-reaching.Children, Teens, Adults; No One’s Exempt        View this post on Instagram            A post shared by Luke Coutinho - Official (@luke_coutinho)]]>The deficiency doesn’t discriminate. In children and teens, insufficient Vitamin D3 can slow down bone growth, trigger mood swings, and even interfere with height and hormone development. In adults, it’s tied to autoimmune conditions, metabolic disorders, and fatigue syndromes.It’s particularly common in individuals with insulin resistance. Many of them show very low D3 levels, which can worsen their metabolic health if left unchecked.Sunlight Isn’t Always EnoughWe’ve all heard that sunlight is the best natural source of Vitamin D3. But is your morning stroll in the sun really doing the job? Not always.Due to climate changes, air pollution, and ozone layer damage, the UVB rays necessary for Vitamin D synthesis don’t reach our skin as effectively anymore. This means relying solely on sunshine may not cut it.Coutinho emphasizes that supplementation, food sources, and intentional exposure to sunlight are all necessary strategies to boost D3 levels safely.Start With the BasicsBefore diving into elaborate diets or expensive supplements, Coutinho suggests focusing on fundamentals. Apart from Vitamin D3, this includes Vitamin B12, iron, magnesium, thyroid function, and gut health markers.He urges people to stop overcomplicating their health. Instead, he recommends consistency with the basics—because without a strong foundation, nothing else works well.Getting Your Levels RightSo how much is enough? Coutinho shares that the ideal range for Vitamin D3 is between 70–80 ng/mL, while the safe range is between 30–100 ng/mL. It’s essential, however, to get tested and follow a doctor’s guidance—because taking too much can cause toxicity, especially affecting the kidneys and other organs.Patients who report extremely low levels (as low as 5 or 6 ng/mL) often see noticeable improvement in symptoms within just 10 to 15 days of starting the right supplementation plan.Don’t Ignore What’s SimpleIt’s easy to take Vitamin D3 for granted, especially when the symptoms of deficiency can be subtle at first. But ignoring it can have long-term consequences on your hormones, energy, mental health, and metabolism.As Coutinho puts it, “D3 is basic—but ignoring it is a big mistake.”

lifestyle coach shares tips to prevent vitamin d3 deficiency

Aarushi Bhadury

Eggs Are No Longer A Part Of 'Unhealthy Breakfast Club' - Study Finds Eggs Affect Us Differently Than What Was Believed

Ayurveda

From Brain to Heart Health: Here is Why Black Seed Oil is Ayurveda’s Favourite

from brain to heart health: here is why black seed oil is ayurveda’s favourite

Is Protein The Anti-Hero For Ozempic Muscle Loss?

is protein the anti-hero for ozempic muscle loss?

Heart Attacks And Strokes Can Now Be Predicted 10 Years Before They Happen, Through This AI Test

heart attacks and strokes can now be predicted 10 years before they happen, through this ai test

For a long time, eggs have been vilified as a part of an unhealthy diet that aids in our declining <span>heart health</span>. One of the biggest reasons why was said to be the amount of LDL in the egg yolk, which in turn increases the <span>risk of cardiovascular disease</span>. However, new research has debunked this myth and showed that eggs were never to blame for the decline. 

A new study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition brings great news for eggs, a breakfast food often blamed for health problems. While eggs are commonly thought to increase the risk of heart disease by raising cholesterol, this research suggests otherwise. 

Researchers discovered that people who ate two eggs daily actually experienced a decrease in their "bad" LDL cholesterol levels. This positive effect held true as long as the rest of their diet was low in saturated fat. The study, published in a medical journal, showed that it was the amount of saturated fat in someone's diet, not the cholesterol from the eggs, that led to higher LDL cholesterol levels. 

Researchers explained that we now have strong evidence supporting eggs. theye suggested that when enjoying a cooked breakfast, the real concern for heart health isn't the eggs, but rather extra servings of foods like bacon or sausage. Eggs are quite unique: they contain a lot of cholesterol but are low in saturated fat. Yet, it's their cholesterol content that has often caused people to question if they're a healthy food choice. 

The study involved a group of adults between 18 and 60 years old. On average, their "bad" LDL cholesterol levels were around 105. It's important to know that LDL cholesterol levels above 100 are considered a risk factor for heart disease. High LDL can lead to plaque buildup in arteries, which can cause heart attacks or strokes. Participants followed three different eating plans, each for five weeks: 

<strong>Diet 1: </strong>Included two eggs daily, making it high in cholesterol, but it was low in saturated fat.

<strong>Diet 2: </strong>Had no eggs, making it low in cholesterol, but it was high in saturated fat.

<strong>Diet 3: </strong>Included only one egg per week, and was high in both cholesterol and saturated fat. 

The researchers pointed out that this was the first study to directly compare these specific ways of eating. They wanted to see how a typical Western diet (often high in both cholesterol and saturated fat) compared to diets where these two components were separated. 

At the end of the study, blood samples were taken after each diet period. The results were clear. People's "bad" LDL cholesterol levels dropped when they were on the diet that included two eggs daily and was low in saturated fat. Their average LDL cholesterol on this diet was just under 104, which was lower than the 108 and 109 seen with the other two diets. 

Researchers emphasized that the study helped separate the effects of cholesterol from saturated fat. They found that eating eggs, which are high in cholesterol, as part of a low-saturated fat diet, does not raise "bad" cholesterol levels. Instead, it was the saturated fat that was the main reason for cholesterol increases. 

Specifically, the study showed that for every gram increase in saturated fat consumed, there was a slight rise in LDL cholesterol. However, there was no significant connection found between how much cholesterol a person ate and their LDL cholesterol levels. 

The researchers concluded that eggs have been unfairly judged for a long time based on outdated dietary advice. This research helps to clarify the situation, suggesting that eggs can indeed be a healthy part of a balanced diet, especially when saturated fat intake is kept in check. 

Eggs Nutrition

can we eat eggs everyday

Eggs and Cholesterol

risk of cardiovascular disease

Heart health

For a long time, eggs have been vilified as a part of an unhealthy diet that aids in our declining heart health. One of the biggest reasons why was said to be the amount of LDL in the egg yolk, which in turn increases the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, new research has debunked this myth and showed that eggs were never to blame for the decline. A new study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition brings great news for eggs, a breakfast food often blamed for health problems. While eggs are commonly thought to increase the risk of heart disease by raising cholesterol, this research suggests otherwise. Eggs and Your Cholesterol Researchers discovered that people who ate two eggs daily actually experienced a decrease in their "bad" LDL cholesterol levels. This positive effect held true as long as the rest of their diet was low in saturated fat. The study, published in a medical journal, showed that it was the amount of saturated fat in someone's diet, not the cholesterol from the eggs, that led to higher LDL cholesterol levels. Researchers explained that we now have strong evidence supporting eggs. theye suggested that when enjoying a cooked breakfast, the real concern for heart health isn't the eggs, but rather extra servings of foods like bacon or sausage. Eggs are quite unique: they contain a lot of cholesterol but are low in saturated fat. Yet, it's their cholesterol content that has often caused people to question if they're a healthy food choice. How the Study Was Done The study involved a group of adults between 18 and 60 years old. On average, their "bad" LDL cholesterol levels were around 105. It's important to know that LDL cholesterol levels above 100 are considered a risk factor for heart disease. High LDL can lead to plaque buildup in arteries, which can cause heart attacks or strokes. Participants followed three different eating plans, each for five weeks: Diet 1: Included two eggs daily, making it high in cholesterol, but it was low in saturated fat.Diet 2: Had no eggs, making it low in cholesterol, but it was high in saturated fat.Diet 3: Included only one egg per week, and was high in both cholesterol and saturated fat. The researchers pointed out that this was the first study to directly compare these specific ways of eating. They wanted to see how a typical Western diet (often high in both cholesterol and saturated fat) compared to diets where these two components were separated. Saturated Fat is the Culprit At the end of the study, blood samples were taken after each diet period. The results were clear. People's "bad" LDL cholesterol levels dropped when they were on the diet that included two eggs daily and was low in saturated fat. Their average LDL cholesterol on this diet was just under 104, which was lower than the 108 and 109 seen with the other two diets. Researchers emphasized that the study helped separate the effects of cholesterol from saturated fat. They found that eating eggs, which are high in cholesterol, as part of a low-saturated fat diet, does not raise "bad" cholesterol levels. Instead, it was the saturated fat that was the main reason for cholesterol increases. Specifically, the study showed that for every gram increase in saturated fat consumed, there was a slight rise in LDL cholesterol. However, there was no significant connection found between how much cholesterol a person ate and their LDL cholesterol levels. The researchers concluded that eggs have been unfairly judged for a long time based on outdated dietary advice. This research helps to clarify the situation, suggesting that eggs can indeed be a healthy part of a balanced diet, especially when saturated fat intake is kept in check. 

eggs are no longer a part of 'unhealthy breakfast club' - study finds eggs affect us differently than what was believed

About Us

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Company

Health and Me is a premium website with content written and curated to function as a handbook for all Health concerns.

Often Avoided, Could Your 'Low-Cal' Artificial Sweetener Help Fight Cancer?

Quick Stories

Coca-Cola To Launch Cane Sugar Version In US: Is It Really Healthier?

Lifestyle Coach Shares Tips To Prevent Vitamin D3 Deficiency

Eggs Are No Longer A Part Of 'Unhealthy Breakfast Club' - Study Finds Eggs Affect Us Differently Than What Was Believed

Health Conditions A-Z

Coca-Cola To Launch Cane Sugar Version In US: Is It Really Healthier?

New Parkinson's Treatment Is Like A Pacemaker To The Brain

Rakesh Roshan Undergoes Angioplasty, Shares Health Update And Asks People Over 40 To Get Regular CT Scan