Health and Me

Ishita Roy

What Counts: Calories Or Carbs?

what counts, calories or carbs?

Intermittent fasting is known for its role in weight loss, however, research has shown that its benefits could go beyond the scale. Even if your goal is not weight loss, you could still benefit from intermittent fasting, as it helps improving your gut and metabolic health. However, many people find it difficult to follow, especially the 5:2 version of the diet, which involves severely limiting calories for two days a week.

New findings suggest a simpler alternative: you may not need to drastically cut calories at all. Reducing carbohydrate intake twice a week could be just as effective in improving metabolic health.

Fasting changes the way our bodies use energy. After eating, the body enters the “postprandial” state, where it burns carbohydrates for energy and stores any excess. Several hours later, when in the “fasted” state, the body begins to burn fat instead. Alternating between these states helps the body become more flexible in how it uses fuel — a process known as improved metabolic flexibility.

This flexibility is closely linked to better heart and metabolic health, including a reduced risk of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

<h4>Fasting vs. <span rel="noindex">Calorie Restriction</span></h4>

In a previous study, researchers tested how the body reacts after a day of fasting or severe calorie restriction. The next day, participants consumed a high-fat breakfast. Those who had fasted or eaten very few calories the day before burned fat more efficiently. Their bodies had shifted from relying on carbs to using fat as a primary energy source — a change that lasted beyond the fasting period.

In another comparison, one group followed an intermittent fasting plan while another followed a calorie-restricted diet until both lost 5% of their body weight. Despite the same amount of weight loss, the fasting group showed better improvements in how their body processed <span>food</span>.

<h4>The Role of Carbohydrate Restriction</h4>

Researchers then looked into whether it was the calorie cut or the drop in carbohydrates that made the difference. In a recent study, 12 overweight and obese participants followed two separate diet days: one with severe calorie restriction, and another with a very low-carb intake. After each, they ate a high-fat, high-sugar meal.

The result? Both approaches led to similar improvements in fat burning. This suggests that limiting carbs may be just as effective as fasting when it comes to supporting metabolic health.

These findings may offer a more flexible approach to metabolic health. Severe calorie restriction can be difficult to sustain and may even lead to nutrient deficiencies or disordered eating. Likewise, long-term carb restriction can be hard to follow and might create an unhealthy relationship with food.

Researchers are now exploring a low-carb version of the 5:2 diet, where carbohydrate intake is reduced just two days a week. If successful, this method could provide the health benefits of intermittent fasting without the need for extreme calorie cuts.

Health Conditions A-Z

health

calorie vs carbs

nutrition

diet and nutrition

food

calorie restriction

Number Of Depressed Adults Increased In US During Pandemic

World Ovarian Cancer Day 2025: Theme, Significance, and History

Does Chemotherapy Cause Dementia?

Nutrition

Yoga Poses That Can Build Core Strength

Biotin-Rich Foods You Should Add To Your Diet

Unexpected Physical Signs Of Stress

Simple And Affective Guide To Stop A Panic Attack

Signs Of Heat Exhaustion In Children

10 Heart Symptoms You Shouldn't Ignore

Lower Your Cholesterol With These Foods

Food Myths You Should Stop Believing

Work Stressing You Out? Tips To Handle Toxic Workspaces

Looking To Gain Weight? High-Calorie Healthy Foods To Try

​Pomegranates Are A Must For Summer, Here’s Why​

​How Does Being A Night Owl Change Your Brain​

​Can Nightlights Affect Your Child’s Sleep​

How To Decide Whether You Should Do Cardio Or Strength Training?

Enjoying Hobbies As An Adult Is More Important Than You Realize

Screentime Matters For Parents Too, Here's How It Causes Issues

Why Should We Discard Expired Prescription Drugs?

Perks Of Having Home Plants For Your Health

Signs You Are Dealing With Depleted Mother Syndrome

Protein-Rich Fruit Smoothies You Must Try

Ways You Can Reach Out To Someone In A Mental Health Crisis

These Things Are Causing You To Lose Sleep

10 Healthy Soups That Support Weight Loss

Easy Lunch Ideas For People With Type 2 Diabetes

9 Bodyweight Exercises To Boost Strength Anytime, Anywhere

Iron-Rich Foods Every Woman Should Include in Her Diet

Ayurvedic Foods To Cool Your Body Naturally

10 Ways Fluctuating Cortisol Levels Can Affect You Physically

Unexpected Factors That Affect Your Blood Sugar

Foods People With PCOS Should Avoid

Do Sleep Trackers Actually Work? Things You Should Know About

Avoiding These Proteins Is Causing Your Health To Deteriorate

Not Sure Whether It Is Fatigue Or Burnout? Answer These 10 Questions

Experiencing Drained Energy Mid-Day? 10 Ways To Fix It

Common Hair Care Habits That Are Causing You Hair Damage

Signs You May Have Avoidant Personality Disorder

These Foods Seem Healthy But Add Unexpected Calories To Your Diet

Is It Safe To Exercise In This Heat? Risks And Precautions To Remember

Prepare For Severe Heatwave - Make These Changes To Your Diet

Heatwave Traveling: Health Safety Tips You Should Keep In Mind

Intermittent fasting is known for its role in weight loss, however, research has shown that its benefits could go beyond the scale. Even if your goal is not weight loss, you could still benefit from intermittent fasting, as it helps improving your gut and metabolic health. However, many people find it difficult to follow, especially the 5:2 version of the diet, which involves severely limiting calories for two days a week.New findings suggest a simpler alternative: you may not need to drastically cut calories at all. Reducing carbohydrate intake twice a week could be just as effective in improving metabolic health.How Fasting Impacts MetabolismFasting changes the way our bodies use energy. After eating, the body enters the “postprandial” state, where it burns carbohydrates for energy and stores any excess. Several hours later, when in the “fasted” state, the body begins to burn fat instead. Alternating between these states helps the body become more flexible in how it uses fuel — a process known as improved metabolic flexibility.This flexibility is closely linked to better heart and metabolic health, including a reduced risk of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.Fasting vs. Calorie RestrictionIn a previous study, researchers tested how the body reacts after a day of fasting or severe calorie restriction. The next day, participants consumed a high-fat breakfast. Those who had fasted or eaten very few calories the day before burned fat more efficiently. Their bodies had shifted from relying on carbs to using fat as a primary energy source — a change that lasted beyond the fasting period.In another comparison, one group followed an intermittent fasting plan while another followed a calorie-restricted diet until both lost 5% of their body weight. Despite the same amount of weight loss, the fasting group showed better improvements in how their body processed food.The Role of Carbohydrate RestrictionResearchers then looked into whether it was the calorie cut or the drop in carbohydrates that made the difference. In a recent study, 12 overweight and obese participants followed two separate diet days: one with severe calorie restriction, and another with a very low-carb intake. After each, they ate a high-fat, high-sugar meal.The result? Both approaches led to similar improvements in fat burning. This suggests that limiting carbs may be just as effective as fasting when it comes to supporting metabolic health.These findings may offer a more flexible approach to metabolic health. Severe calorie restriction can be difficult to sustain and may even lead to nutrient deficiencies or disordered eating. Likewise, long-term carb restriction can be hard to follow and might create an unhealthy relationship with food.Researchers are now exploring a low-carb version of the 5:2 diet, where carbohydrate intake is reduced just two days a week. If successful, this method could provide the health benefits of intermittent fasting without the need for extreme calorie cuts.

what counts: calories or carbs?

Riya Baibhawi

10 Egg Health Myths We Thought Were True—But Aren't

Health News

Recent US Salmonella Outbreak Is Linked With Backyard Poultry: CDC

recent us salmonella outbreak is linked with backyard poultry: cdc

Can You Get Cancer By Eating Chicken?

can you get cancer by eating chicken?

world ovarian cancer day 2025: theme, significance, and history

Health & Wellness

This Common Household Spice May Hinder How Medicine Reacts In Your Body

this common household spice may hinder how medicine reacts in your body

<span>Eggs</span> have been a dietary staple for centuries, celebrated for their versatility and nutritional profile. They’re a breakfast favourite and a key ingredient in countless baked goods, playing a crucial role in binding ingredients and providing structure. However, despite their popularity, eggs have also been at the center of numerous health debates, from cholesterol concerns to misconceptions about storage and preparation.

One common myth is that egg yolks are detrimental to heart health due to their high cholesterol content. According to Healthline, a large egg contains around 212 milligrams of cholesterol. Yet, research suggests that dietary cholesterol has less impact on blood cholesterol levels than previously believed. Harvard Health Publishing highlights that the liver produces the majority of bodily cholesterol based on saturated and trans fat intake rather than dietary cholesterol. Tony Castillo, an elite sports dietitian, affirms that eggs can be safely included in a heart-healthy diet for most individuals, referencing a Harvard study that found no link between egg consumption and heart disease risk.

Another prevalent misconception is that brown eggs are more nutritious than white eggs. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), egg color is determined solely by the breed of the hen. Nutritionally, white and brown eggs are nearly identical unless specified as nutritionally enhanced through fortified feed. Castillo further explains that the hen’s earlobe colour can indicate the egg color — white earlobes typically produce white eggs, while red or brown earlobes produce brown eggs.

Cage-free, free-range, and pasture-raised labels can also be misleading. While cage-free hens are not confined to small cages, they are usually kept indoors, with varying space and enrichment conditions. Free-range and organic labels, regulated by the USDA, require outdoor access for hens. However, pasture-raised eggs offer the most outdoor space, though these standards are not strictly regulated, urging consumers to research farm practices.

The myth that raw eggs are superior for protein intake gained traction in the 1970s and 1980s, thanks to movies like "Rocky." However, cooking eggs actually enhances protein absorption. A 2022 study published in the Journal of Nutrition found that protein levels were consistent regardless of whether eggs were consumed raw or cooked. Additionally, raw eggs pose a higher risk of salmonella infection.

Despite being considered a good source of iron, eggs are not particularly effective in boosting iron levels. Only 3.7% of the iron in eggs is absorbed by the body, and compounds in egg yolks can inhibit iron absorption. Experts recommend consuming eggs with vitamin C-rich foods to enhance iron bioavailability.

Many people also believe that floating eggs are unsafe to eat. While the float test can indicate an egg’s age, it is not a reliable indicator of bacterial contamination. Dr. Don Schaffner, a food safety expert, advises checking for spoilage through appearance and smell rather than relying solely on the float test.

Finally, misconceptions about egg storage and pregnancy persist. While store-bought eggs in the U.S. require refrigeration due to washing that removes the protective cuticle, unwashed eggs from local farms may be safely kept at room temperature for up to two weeks. Pregnant individuals can safely consume thoroughly cooked or pasteurized eggs, which are rich in essential nutrients like choline and vitamin B12, crucial for fetal brain development.

Diet & Nutrition

Eggs

Egg Health Myths

Egg protein

Egg health benefits

Eggs have been a dietary staple for centuries, celebrated for their versatility and nutritional profile. They’re a breakfast favourite and a key ingredient in countless baked goods, playing a crucial role in binding ingredients and providing structure. However, despite their popularity, eggs have also been at the center of numerous health debates, from cholesterol concerns to misconceptions about storage and preparation.One common myth is that egg yolks are detrimental to heart health due to their high cholesterol content. According to Healthline, a large egg contains around 212 milligrams of cholesterol. Yet, research suggests that dietary cholesterol has less impact on blood cholesterol levels than previously believed. Harvard Health Publishing highlights that the liver produces the majority of bodily cholesterol based on saturated and trans fat intake rather than dietary cholesterol. Tony Castillo, an elite sports dietitian, affirms that eggs can be safely included in a heart-healthy diet for most individuals, referencing a Harvard study that found no link between egg consumption and heart disease risk.Another prevalent misconception is that brown eggs are more nutritious than white eggs. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), egg color is determined solely by the breed of the hen. Nutritionally, white and brown eggs are nearly identical unless specified as nutritionally enhanced through fortified feed. Castillo further explains that the hen’s earlobe colour can indicate the egg color — white earlobes typically produce white eggs, while red or brown earlobes produce brown eggs.Cage-free, free-range, and pasture-raised labels can also be misleading. While cage-free hens are not confined to small cages, they are usually kept indoors, with varying space and enrichment conditions. Free-range and organic labels, regulated by the USDA, require outdoor access for hens. However, pasture-raised eggs offer the most outdoor space, though these standards are not strictly regulated, urging consumers to research farm practices.The myth that raw eggs are superior for protein intake gained traction in the 1970s and 1980s, thanks to movies like "Rocky." However, cooking eggs actually enhances protein absorption. A 2022 study published in the Journal of Nutrition found that protein levels were consistent regardless of whether eggs were consumed raw or cooked. Additionally, raw eggs pose a higher risk of salmonella infection.Despite being considered a good source of iron, eggs are not particularly effective in boosting iron levels. Only 3.7% of the iron in eggs is absorbed by the body, and compounds in egg yolks can inhibit iron absorption. Experts recommend consuming eggs with vitamin C-rich foods to enhance iron bioavailability.Many people also believe that floating eggs are unsafe to eat. While the float test can indicate an egg’s age, it is not a reliable indicator of bacterial contamination. Dr. Don Schaffner, a food safety expert, advises checking for spoilage through appearance and smell rather than relying solely on the float test.Finally, misconceptions about egg storage and pregnancy persist. While store-bought eggs in the U.S. require refrigeration due to washing that removes the protective cuticle, unwashed eggs from local farms may be safely kept at room temperature for up to two weeks. Pregnant individuals can safely consume thoroughly cooked or pasteurized eggs, which are rich in essential nutrients like choline and vitamin B12, crucial for fetal brain development.

10 egg health myths we thought were true—but aren't

Can you get cancer by eating chicken?

does chemotherapy cause dementia?

<span>Chicken</span> has long been hailed as a healthier alternative to red meat, often featured prominently in diet plans including the Mediterranean diet. However, a new study from southern Italy is challenging this perception, suggesting that higher poultry consumption may be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal cancers.

Researchers examined data from 4,869 middle-aged individuals in Castellana Grotte and Putignano in Apulia, Italy. The participants self-reported their meat consumption habits, focusing on both red and white meats. Surprisingly, the study found that consuming more than 300 grams (about 10.5 ounces) of poultry per week was linked to a 27% higher risk of death from any cause compared to those who consumed 100 grams (3.5 ounces) or less weekly.

The study also reported a 2.3% increase in the risk of gastrointestinal <span>cancer</span>s among those consuming higher levels of poultry. For men specifically, this risk rose to 2.6%. These findings are notable because poultry has typically not been associated with increased cancer risk, unlike red or processed meats, which have been well-documented in studies including those by the World Cancer Research Fund.

<h4>Study Limitations and Unanswered Questions</h4>

Despite its significant sample size, the study has some limitations. It did not account for factors such as physical activity, lifestyle habits, or cooking methods—each of which can influence health outcomes. It also did not distinguish between different types or sources of poultry, such as free-range vs. industrially farmed birds, or fresh vs. processed poultry products.

Cooking methods may also play a role. High-temperature techniques like grilling or frying can produce harmful compounds known as heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), both of which are linked to cancer. Additionally, processed poultry items—like deli meats and sausages—often contain curing agents and preservatives that have been associated with health risks.

<h4>A Shift in the Poultry Narrative</h4>

The U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans (2020–2025) recommend up to 26 ounces of protein foods per week, including poultry, without imposing strict limits on specific types. Until now, poultry has been favored over red meat due to its lower saturated fat content and reduced production of TMAO—a compound linked to heart disease and cancer.

This new study suggests that the quantity and quality of poultry consumed, as well as preparation methods, may be more important than previously recognized. Industrial farming practices, the use of antibiotics and hormones, and environmental factors like pesticide exposure could all contribute to potential health risks.

While the findings are concerning, they don’t necessarily call for eliminating poultry from your diet. Instead, moderation and mindfulness in preparation and portion size are key. Experts generally recommend limiting poultry intake to around 200 grams (7 ounces) per week and choosing healthier cooking methods like baking or steaming.

Additionally, balancing poultry with fiber-rich vegetables and whole grains may help reduce health risks. This study highlights the importance of viewing dietary choices as part of a broader pattern rather than focusing on individual foods in isolation.

cancer

chicken

gastrointestinal cancer

Chicken has long been hailed as a healthier alternative to red meat, often featured prominently in diet plans including the Mediterranean diet. However, a new study from southern Italy is challenging this perception, suggesting that higher poultry consumption may be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and gastrointestinal cancers.What the Study FoundResearchers examined data from 4,869 middle-aged individuals in Castellana Grotte and Putignano in Apulia, Italy. The participants self-reported their meat consumption habits, focusing on both red and white meats. Surprisingly, the study found that consuming more than 300 grams (about 10.5 ounces) of poultry per week was linked to a 27% higher risk of death from any cause compared to those who consumed 100 grams (3.5 ounces) or less weekly.The study also reported a 2.3% increase in the risk of gastrointestinal cancers among those consuming higher levels of poultry. For men specifically, this risk rose to 2.6%. These findings are notable because poultry has typically not been associated with increased cancer risk, unlike red or processed meats, which have been well-documented in studies including those by the World Cancer Research Fund.Study Limitations and Unanswered QuestionsDespite its significant sample size, the study has some limitations. It did not account for factors such as physical activity, lifestyle habits, or cooking methods—each of which can influence health outcomes. It also did not distinguish between different types or sources of poultry, such as free-range vs. industrially farmed birds, or fresh vs. processed poultry products.Cooking methods may also play a role. High-temperature techniques like grilling or frying can produce harmful compounds known as heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), both of which are linked to cancer. Additionally, processed poultry items—like deli meats and sausages—often contain curing agents and preservatives that have been associated with health risks.A Shift in the Poultry NarrativeThe U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans (2020–2025) recommend up to 26 ounces of protein foods per week, including poultry, without imposing strict limits on specific types. Until now, poultry has been favored over red meat due to its lower saturated fat content and reduced production of TMAO—a compound linked to heart disease and cancer.This new study suggests that the quantity and quality of poultry consumed, as well as preparation methods, may be more important than previously recognized. Industrial farming practices, the use of antibiotics and hormones, and environmental factors like pesticide exposure could all contribute to potential health risks.What Should You Do?While the findings are concerning, they don’t necessarily call for eliminating poultry from your diet. Instead, moderation and mindfulness in preparation and portion size are key. Experts generally recommend limiting poultry intake to around 200 grams (7 ounces) per week and choosing healthier cooking methods like baking or steaming.Additionally, balancing poultry with fiber-rich vegetables and whole grains may help reduce health risks. This study highlights the importance of viewing dietary choices as part of a broader pattern rather than focusing on individual foods in isolation.

Why Does RFK Want Whole Milk To Return To Schools?

why RFK Wants Whole Milk To Return To Schools?

These Are The 10 Most Obese States In US

these are the 10 most obese states in us

It has been over a decade ever since federal policy limited higher-fat- milk in schools. This step was taken to curb down <span>childhood obesity</span> in the US. As per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1 in 5 children and adolescents between age 2 to 19 have <span>obesity</span>. This means the prevalence of obesity among US children and adolescents was 19.7%, which means that 14.7 million US youths aged 2 to 19 have obesity. 

However, a new wave of lawmakers and health voices, including the Health Secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr., is calling for <span>whole milk</span>'s return. 

The Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Service, <span>RFK Jr</span>., recently criticized the current US Dietary Guidelines as "antiquated". He is advocating for Head Start programs, which will offer full-fat dairy, and also include whole milk, instead of low-fat versions. This stance, as per him, aligns with the views of promoting traditional, less processed foods. 

The US Senate’s Committee on Agriculture, <span>Nutrition</span> &amp; Forestry recently held a hearing on the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act, which would allow schools to serve whole and 2% milk alongside the already permitted skim and low-fat options. A companion bill in the House of Representatives has bipartisan support. Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas, who introduced the bill, said, “Whole milk is part of the ‘Make America Healthy Again’ movement — a return to whole foods.”

The National Milk Producers Federation has endorsed the legislation, stating it could encourage more children to drink milk again.

The federal government plays an important role in school meals through its National School Lunch Programs. This is bound by the US Dietary Guidelines, which are updated in every five years, by the Department of Agriculture and HHS. They recommended low or fat-free dairy for children over age 2, up to 40 years and above. 

In 2010, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act limited school milk offerings to skim and 1% options, flavored or unflavored, unless a student had a documented medical need for whole milk.

Amy Reed, a registered dietitian and spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, explained that while higher-fat milk has more calories, the nutrient profile — calcium, vitamin D, potassium, and magnesium — is largely consistent across milk types.

The main concern around whole milk is its saturated fat content, which has been linked to heart disease and obesity. However, experts say the picture is more nuanced.

Cardiologist Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian of Tufts University tells <em>CNN </em>that not all saturated fats are the same and that dairy fat, in particular, may offer benefits. “Some studies show dairy fat may lower the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease,” he said, adding that milk and yogurt have a neutral or even protective relationship with heart health.

The current dietary guidelines advisory committee, while reaffirming existing recommendations, acknowledged that there is limited but emerging evidence that whole milk may benefit growth and weight management in younger children. Still, the evidence wasn’t strong enough to warrant a policy shift.

health news US

us health news

RFK Jr

whole milk

whole milk benefit

childhood obesity

obesity

It has been over a decade ever since federal policy limited higher-fat- milk in schools. This step was taken to curb down childhood obesity in the US. As per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1 in 5 children and adolescents between age 2 to 19 have obesity. This means the prevalence of obesity among US children and adolescents was 19.7%, which means that 14.7 million US youths aged 2 to 19 have obesity. However, a new wave of lawmakers and health voices, including the Health Secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr., is calling for whole milk's return. Push For Full-Fat DairyThe Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Service, RFK Jr., recently criticized the current US Dietary Guidelines as "antiquated". He is advocating for Head Start programs, which will offer full-fat dairy, and also include whole milk, instead of low-fat versions. This stance, as per him, aligns with the views of promoting traditional, less processed foods. The US Senate’s Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry recently held a hearing on the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act, which would allow schools to serve whole and 2% milk alongside the already permitted skim and low-fat options. A companion bill in the House of Representatives has bipartisan support. Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas, who introduced the bill, said, “Whole milk is part of the ‘Make America Healthy Again’ movement — a return to whole foods.”The National Milk Producers Federation has endorsed the legislation, stating it could encourage more children to drink milk again.Why Does It Matter?The federal government plays an important role in school meals through its National School Lunch Programs. This is bound by the US Dietary Guidelines, which are updated in every five years, by the Department of Agriculture and HHS. They recommended low or fat-free dairy for children over age 2, up to 40 years and above. In 2010, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act limited school milk offerings to skim and 1% options, flavored or unflavored, unless a student had a documented medical need for whole milk.Amy Reed, a registered dietitian and spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, explained that while higher-fat milk has more calories, the nutrient profile — calcium, vitamin D, potassium, and magnesium — is largely consistent across milk types.The main concern around whole milk is its saturated fat content, which has been linked to heart disease and obesity. However, experts say the picture is more nuanced.Cardiologist Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian of Tufts University tells CNN that not all saturated fats are the same and that dairy fat, in particular, may offer benefits. “Some studies show dairy fat may lower the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease,” he said, adding that milk and yogurt have a neutral or even protective relationship with heart health.The current dietary guidelines advisory committee, while reaffirming existing recommendations, acknowledged that there is limited but emerging evidence that whole milk may benefit growth and weight management in younger children. Still, the evidence wasn’t strong enough to warrant a policy shift.

why does rfk want whole milk to return to schools?

About Us

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Company

Health and Me is a premium website with content written and curated to function as a handbook for all Health concerns.