The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have now begun a comprehensive review of the nutritional value of infant formula. This program by the agencies is dubbed as Operation Stork Speed.What Is Operation Stork Speed?This operation aims to review the nutrient content of infant formula. How will it be done? The agencies will increase testing for heavy metals and contaminants in the formula. The agencies will also encourage companies to develop new formulas, and clarify ways to better inform consumers about their ingredients. The individual nutrient requirements for infant formula are already reviewed at regular intervals, however, this will be the first comprehensive review since 1998. As part of Operation Stork Speed, the FDA has issued a Request for Information (RFI) to solicit public input on the nutritional composition of infant formula. The agency aims to assess whether existing nutrient requirements should be revised in accordance with the latest scientific evidence, including data from international sources. In particular, the FDA is seeking feedback on potential modifications to current minimum and maximum nutrient levels, as well as recommendations for the inclusion of additional nutrients. Stakeholders are also encouraged to provide information on how such changes may contribute to improved health outcomes for infants.Electronic or written comments and suggestions must be submitted by Sept. 11, 2025. In addition to the RFI issued this week, the FDA is enhancing its testing protocols to incorporate more stringent assessments for heavy metals and other potential contaminants in infant formula products. The agency is also urging manufacturers to engage in collaborative efforts aimed at increasing transparency and improving the clarity of product labeling for consumers."Protecting our most vulnerable is not just a moral duty -- it is our responsibility," FDA Commissioner Martin A. Makary, M.D., M.P.H., said in a statement. "For many children, infant formula is their only source of nutrition. That's why it's absolutely crucial to continually assess the nutrition standards and incorporate gold standard science to ensure we are providing the safest, most effective nutrition possible."In June of this year, the FDA will convene a panel of experts to further gather information and expertise. The meeting of the panel will be publicly accessible.Harmful Contaminants Found In Infant FormulaAs per a Consumer Reports (CR) investigation recently, nearly 20 infant formulas found to contain toxic lead, arsenic, or both. For the analysis, the CR tested 41 types of powdered formula. About half of these samples contained "potentially harmful levels" of at least one contaminant. However, testers also found it "reassuring" that the other half were safe. Heavy Metals Found In The FormulaThe CR investigation found that concerning levels of arsenic and lead were existing in infant formula, particularly in brands like EleCare Hypoallergenic and Similac Alimentum, both manufactured by Abbott Nutrition—the company behind multiple recalls during the 2022 formula shortage.Arsenic, a naturally occurring but carcinogenic heavy metal (especially in its inorganic form), was found at levels exceeding EPA safety limits for drinking water. Abbott, in response, questioned CR’s testing methods, stating that trace levels of such substances can appear in all formulas and even breast milk. But experts are alarmed. “Long-term arsenic exposure raises cancer risk,” said Dr. Mark R. Corkins of the University of Tennessee. Dr. David Carpenter of SUNY Albany added, “There is no excuse for arsenic in baby food or formula. None.”Lead, another naturally occurring toxin, was present in nearly all formulas tested, though levels were within FDA limits. Still, experts warn there's no safe level of exposure. “It can impair neurological development,” said Hannah Gardener of the University of Miami, urging manufacturers to conduct rigorous testing and disclose contamination levels.On a positive note, mercury was not detected in any formulas, and cadmium was found at levels too low to raise concern.