Ishita Roy

When Is The Right Time To Cut The Umbilical Cord?

cord cutting

You must have seen reels going viral on cutting the <span>umbilical cord</span> after the baby is born. The videos show where the nurse or a healthcare professional asks a mother to let them cut the cord, whereas the mother denies. It is in one such video posted by @doctormyro, Myro Figura, who is an Anesthesiologist, based in Los Angeles, on his Instagram channel, where he reacts to it. The mother can be seen saying she does not want to cut the cord right away and wants to wait until it turns white. 

The doctor who is reacting to the video says, "You absolutely should wait because after the baby comes out, the cord is still pumping nutrient rich blood into the fetus and into your baby as much as 30 to 40% of its blood volume. Cutting that cord early does save a little bit of time for everybody but it robs the baby of critical nutrients in its first day of life." He further goes on to say that "as a patient, you absolutely must have to speak up, because most medical societies now recommend delayed cord clamping. But it is not routine (and) not always done."

The video brings about an important point which many new mothers do not know: the <span>right time to cut the cord</span>. 

As per the World Health Organization (WHO), at the time of birth, an infant is still attached to the mother with the help of the umbilical cord, which is part of the placenta. After birth, the child is separated by clamping the umbilical cord. 

WHO notes that early clamping is generally done within the first 60 seconds after birth, whereas later cord clamping is done more than one minute after birth or when the cord pulsation has ceased. These means the cord is no longer expanding and contracting to transfer blood and nutrients to your baby. 

WHO also note that delaying this allows blood flow to continue, which can be beneficial for the baby. It can improve their iron status for up to six months after the birth. This is especially helpful in babies born in low-resource settings with reduced access to iron-rich foods. WHO also recommends delayed umbilical cord clamping, which is not earlier than 1 minute after birth for improved maternal and infant health and nutrition outcomes. 

However, as per a 2022 study titled Differential effects of delayed cord clamping on bilirubin levels in normal and diabetic pregnancies, it was found that delayed cord clamping indeed led to neonatal hyperemia, erythrocytosis, and hyperbilirubinemia, which increases the risk of neonatal jaundice. It could also may be a risk factor for increase bilirubin levels in neonates of diabetic mothers. 

So, how long is not too long? While a mother does not have to wait for the cord to turn white, as WHO recommends, the cord should only be clamped after a minute and not within the first 60 seconds. 

This connects your baby to the placenta in the uterus. The placenta helps your baby breathe and grow before birth, while the umbilical cord has blood vessels that carry oxygen and food from placenta to your baby. It also carries wastes from your baby to the placenta.

Health Conditions A-Z

health

delayed cord cutting

umbilical cord

right time to cut the cord

when should you cut umbilical cord

WHO recommends delayed cord cutting

pregnancy

parenting

Veteran Actor Dheeraj Kumar Dies At 79 Due To Acute Pneumonia

After Jannik Sinner, Tara Moore Makes News Failing Her Doping Test, Resulting In A 4-Year Long Ban

Pablo Escobar And Ecuador's Most Wanted Criminal, All Had This One Disease In Common - Gastritis

Parenting

Savory And Smart Ways To Add Broccoli To Your Diet

Calorie Burning Habits That Can Help You Shed Extra Pounds

Yoga Poses That Can Help With Bloating

Fiber-Rich Oatmeal Dishes You Can Have For Breakfast

Signs You Must Visit A Doctor For Your Back Pain

Avocado Meal Prep Ideas To Increase Healthy Fat In Your Diet

Arm Exercises You Can Do At Home

Quick-Office Lunches That Can Keep You Full-Longer

How Increased Screen Time Affects Children's Health

Homemade Recipe To Make Protein-Rich Pancakes With Healthy Alternatives

Push-Up Variations You Can Do At Home

Common Mistakes Running Mistakes People Make

Low-Calorie Foods That Keep You Full For Long

Yoga Poses That Help You Get Rid Of Back Pain

Natural Ways To Increase Protein In Your Diet

Managing Excessive Daytime Sleepiness – Tips To Try

How Much Protein Is Too Much?

High Fiber Indian Foods You Should Try

10 Easy Ways To Boost Daily Fiber Intake

Adding Walnut Oil To Your Diet? Benefits You Should Know

Drinks That Soothe Headaches And Migraines

Waist Exercises For More Toned Belly

This Is How Stress Affects Your Heart

Does Digital ‘Brain Rot’ Really Affect Your Health?

Dishes With Fermented Foods To Eat For Your Gut Health

Yoga Poses That Stimulate Good Bowel Health

Weekend Warrior Exercises For Full Body Movement

Weekend Meal Prep Ideas That Will Last You A Weekend

Easy Homemade Healthy Dishes For Long Afternoons

Silent Walking: Mental Health Booster That Keeps You Fit

Dumbbell Exercises You Can Do At Home

These Foods Are Keeping You Awake At Night

Ways to Manage Sugar Cravings

Your Body Doesn’t Want You To Lose Weight – Here's It Resists

High-Protein No Cook Dishes You Should Try

Yoga Poses That Aid In Digestion

Low Calorie Dinner Options For Weight Loss

Cardiac Arrest Vs. Heart Attack: Difference Explained Under 60 Seconds

High Protein Low-Carb Snacks To Have On The Go

Knee Exercises Desk Workers Should Do For Joint Health

You must have seen reels going viral on cutting the umbilical cord after the baby is born. The videos show where the nurse or a healthcare professional asks a mother to let them cut the cord, whereas the mother denies. It is in one such video posted by @doctormyro, Myro Figura, who is an Anesthesiologist, based in Los Angeles, on his Instagram channel, where he reacts to it. The mother can be seen saying she does not want to cut the cord right away and wants to wait until it turns white. The doctor who is reacting to the video says, "You absolutely should wait because after the baby comes out, the cord is still pumping nutrient rich blood into the fetus and into your baby as much as 30 to 40% of its blood volume. Cutting that cord early does save a little bit of time for everybody but it robs the baby of critical nutrients in its first day of life." He further goes on to say that "as a patient, you absolutely must have to speak up, because most medical societies now recommend delayed cord clamping. But it is not routine (and) not always done."The video brings about an important point which many new mothers do not know: the right time to cut the cord. So, is there really a right time?As per the World Health Organization (WHO), at the time of birth, an infant is still attached to the mother with the help of the umbilical cord, which is part of the placenta. After birth, the child is separated by clamping the umbilical cord. WHO notes that early clamping is generally done within the first 60 seconds after birth, whereas later cord clamping is done more than one minute after birth or when the cord pulsation has ceased. These means the cord is no longer expanding and contracting to transfer blood and nutrients to your baby. WHO also note that delaying this allows blood flow to continue, which can be beneficial for the baby. It can improve their iron status for up to six months after the birth. This is especially helpful in babies born in low-resource settings with reduced access to iron-rich foods. WHO also recommends delayed umbilical cord clamping, which is not earlier than 1 minute after birth for improved maternal and infant health and nutrition outcomes. However, as per a 2022 study titled Differential effects of delayed cord clamping on bilirubin levels in normal and diabetic pregnancies, it was found that delayed cord clamping indeed led to neonatal hyperemia, erythrocytosis, and hyperbilirubinemia, which increases the risk of neonatal jaundice. It could also may be a risk factor for increase bilirubin levels in neonates of diabetic mothers. So, how long is not too long? While a mother does not have to wait for the cord to turn white, as WHO recommends, the cord should only be clamped after a minute and not within the first 60 seconds. What is the umbilical cord?This connects your baby to the placenta in the uterus. The placenta helps your baby breathe and grow before birth, while the umbilical cord has blood vessels that carry oxygen and food from placenta to your baby. It also carries wastes from your baby to the placenta.

when is the right time to cut the umbilical cord?

Health and Me

Aarushi Bhadury

Is It Safe To Let Teens Drive? Study Finds Teens Spend A Fifth Of Their Time Driving, On The Phone

Health & Wellness

Sugar And Sweeteners Linked To Early Puberty In Kids: Study

sugar and sweeteners linked to early puberty in kids: study

AIIMS Oncologist Reveals Why Oral Health Could Tip The Scale In Cancer Survival In Southeast Asia

lancet study reveals why oral health could tip the scale in cancer survival in southeast asia

Health News

Scientists Just Fixed A 'Faulty' Gene Behind Deafness And Hearing Loss In Children

scientists just fixed a 'faulty' gene behind deafness and hearing loss in children

Never In The Mood Anymore? Your Gut Issues Could Be Lowering Your Sex Drive

never in the mood anymore? your gut issues could be lowering your sex drive

Learning how to drive is a big step of independence for children. It marks a phase where they learn responsibility, how to manage the autonomy they have gained as well as their way around different situations. There are many dangers associated with driving, hence there is a level of trust a parent must have before they let their teens drive. Whether it is others driving recklessly, difficult roads to travel in or themselves being careless. As teens are very well known for their lack of well-thought out actions, many of them find using their phones while driving normal. 

A new study reveals a concerning trend: about one-fifth of the time, teenage drivers are looking at their smartphones instead of the road. This means they're not paying attention to what's in front of them or checking their mirrors. 

The study, published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention, found that teen drivers spend an average of 21% of each trip focused on their phone. What's more, these weren't just quick peeks. Nearly 27% of the time, drivers were looking at their phones for two seconds or longer. This amount of time dramatically increases the chance of a car crash. 

<h2>Why Teens Use Their Phones Behind the Wheel </h2>

So, what are teens doing on their phones while driving? The study showed:

<ul><li>Entertainment (like social media or videos) was the top reason, accounting for 65% of phone use.</li><li>Texting came in second at 40%.</li><li>About 30% of teens used their phone's GPS for navigation.</li></ul>

<h2>The Dangers of Distracted Driving </h2>

Distracted driving is a serious threat to public safety, especially among young drivers. When someone drives while distracted, they're not just putting themselves at risk of injury or death; they're endangering everyone else on the road. 

While 35 U.S. states have laws banning all phone use for young drivers, a previous national study found that nearly 92% of teens still regularly use their smartphones for texting, talking, or playing music while driving. 

<h2>What Teens Understand (and What They Don't) </h2>

For this new study, researchers asked over 1,100 teenagers about their habits and beliefs regarding smartphone use while driving. 

Many young drivers actually understand that bad things can happen when they're distracted. They also know that their parents and friends wouldn't want them using their phones while driving. Teens also strongly believe they can avoid distracted driving by using features like "Do Not Disturb," hands-free modes, or phone holders. They recognize the benefits of using phone features like GPS but also understand the higher risk of accidents when distracted. 

However, teens also said that their friends often drive while distracted by their phones. This suggests that more teens might be giving in to the temptation than they're willing to admit. 

Researchers suggest creating messages that challenge false beliefs about using phones while driving, such as the idea that you can still be productive on your phone while in transit. To help reduce this dangerous behavior, they recommend: 

<ul><li>Encouraging the use of "Do Not Disturb" mode on phones.</li><li>Keeping phones out of reach while driving.</li><li>Making sure teens get enough sleep, as tiredness can also increase distraction.</li></ul>

teens driving

teen driving safety

should teens be allowed to drive

teens using phone on the wheel

driving while using your phone

care safety for teens

Learning how to drive is a big step of independence for children. It marks a phase where they learn responsibility, how to manage the autonomy they have gained as well as their way around different situations. There are many dangers associated with driving, hence there is a level of trust a parent must have before they let their teens drive. Whether it is others driving recklessly, difficult roads to travel in or themselves being careless. As teens are very well known for their lack of well-thought out actions, many of them find using their phones while driving normal. A new study reveals a concerning trend: about one-fifth of the time, teenage drivers are looking at their smartphones instead of the road. This means they're not paying attention to what's in front of them or checking their mirrors. The study, published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention, found that teen drivers spend an average of 21% of each trip focused on their phone. What's more, these weren't just quick peeks. Nearly 27% of the time, drivers were looking at their phones for two seconds or longer. This amount of time dramatically increases the chance of a car crash. Why Teens Use Their Phones Behind the Wheel So, what are teens doing on their phones while driving? The study showed:Entertainment (like social media or videos) was the top reason, accounting for 65% of phone use.Texting came in second at 40%.About 30% of teens used their phone's GPS for navigation.The Dangers of Distracted Driving Distracted driving is a serious threat to public safety, especially among young drivers. When someone drives while distracted, they're not just putting themselves at risk of injury or death; they're endangering everyone else on the road. While 35 U.S. states have laws banning all phone use for young drivers, a previous national study found that nearly 92% of teens still regularly use their smartphones for texting, talking, or playing music while driving. What Teens Understand (and What They Don't) For this new study, researchers asked over 1,100 teenagers about their habits and beliefs regarding smartphone use while driving. Many young drivers actually understand that bad things can happen when they're distracted. They also know that their parents and friends wouldn't want them using their phones while driving. Teens also strongly believe they can avoid distracted driving by using features like "Do Not Disturb," hands-free modes, or phone holders. They recognize the benefits of using phone features like GPS but also understand the higher risk of accidents when distracted. However, teens also said that their friends often drive while distracted by their phones. This suggests that more teens might be giving in to the temptation than they're willing to admit. How to Encourage Safer Driving Researchers suggest creating messages that challenge false beliefs about using phones while driving, such as the idea that you can still be productive on your phone while in transit. To help reduce this dangerous behavior, they recommend: Encouraging the use of "Do Not Disturb" mode on phones.Keeping phones out of reach while driving.Making sure teens get enough sleep, as tiredness can also increase distraction.

is it safe to let teens drive? study finds teens spend a fifth of their time driving, on the phone

3 Medical Emergencies Schools Should Be Prepared For - Biggest Concerns For Paramedic Responses

New WHO Guidelines Reveal The Blueprint To Manage Dengue, Chikungunya, Yellow Fever And Zika

new who guidelines reveal the blueprint to manage dengue, chikungunya, yellow fever and zika

Air Pollution Is Doing More Than Clogging Your Lungs, It Is Now Linked To Brain Tumour

air pollution is doing more than clogging your lungs, it is now linked to brain tumour

Cancer Related Deaths Linked To Obesity Have Tripled In US - What Are The Reasons Behind This Spike?

cancer deaths linked to obesity have tripled in the us - what caused the weight gain epidemic in the us

Dementia Risk Has Been Associated With These 15 Lifestyle And Health Risks

dementia risk has been associated with these 15 lifestyle and health risks

Accidents can happen anytime and anywhere. Even if it is at school or at any other trust place. Health crisis may not seem like a big concern for school going children, however, understanding how unpredictable injuries and health concerns can be, it is important that emergency services are always ready. Many times, during these situations, a quick response is crucial, losing even moments could make or break the crisis. 

However, what are the most likely health situations that can arise and how much should a school be worried about? New research reveals that U.S. schools should prioritize preparedness for three common health emergencies: brain-related crises, psychiatric/substance abuse issues, and trauma-related injuries. These three categories collectively account for approximately half of all emergency medical services (EMS) responses to schools. 

A report published in the journal <span>Pediatrics</span> analyzed over 506,500 EMS calls to schools between 2018 and 2022, focusing on children aged 5 to 17. The study identified the following breakdown of emergency types: 

<ul><li>Neurologic problems (e.g., seizures): 19% of EMS calls.</li><li>Psychiatric conditions or substance abuse: Nearly 17% of calls.</li><li>Accidental injuries: Another 15% of calls.</li></ul>

The study also noted differences across age groups: <span>elementary school students</span> were more likely to require treatment for physical injuries (17%), while teenagers more frequently needed help for psychiatric conditions or substance abuse (18%). 

Researchers emphasized the need for schools to enhance their emergency preparedness. He highlighted that timely treatment is crucial and suggested specific areas for staff training. According to <span>US School Safety</span> guidelines planning for emergencies must involve actions and daily routines that help create a secure school environment. These efforts can stop bad things from happening or lessen their impact if they do. Good planning also helps schools find and fix any weaknesses in their procedures and helps school staff and local emergency teams understand and handle their duties. 

<h2>Creating a <span rel="noindex">School Emergency Plan</span> </h2>

A key part of emergency planning is putting together a complete school emergency operations plan (EOP). This is a document that explains what students, teachers, and school staff should do before, during, and after an emergency. 

Developing this plan should be a team effort. It needs a diverse group of people from the school, as well as local community partners. Schools should also plan to check, evaluate, and update their EOP regularly to keep it current and effective. 

Doing training, exercises, and drills that are right for different age groups can also help schools get ready for emergencies. These activities help everyone in the school community know their roles before, during, and after an emergency. They also give people a chance to practice the steps outlined in the EOP and improve how prepared they are. 

Exercises and drills should be customized to fit the specific school community, including students' ages and physical abilities. It's also important to balance these drills with the school's overall culture and atmosphere.

<h2>Planning for Recovery After an Incident </h2>

Schools and districts can also plan for how they'll recover from emergencies even before they happen. This can make the recovery process quicker and more effective. As part of this, school emergency management teams should have a general strategy and plan to help the school community recover academically, physically, emotionally, and financially after an emergency. 

Medical Emergencies at Schools

enhancing school preparedness researchers

us school safety

pediatrics

elementary school students

School Emergency Plan

Accidents can happen anytime and anywhere. Even if it is at school or at any other trust place. Health crisis may not seem like a big concern for school going children, however, understanding how unpredictable injuries and health concerns can be, it is important that emergency services are always ready. Many times, during these situations, a quick response is crucial, losing even moments could make or break the crisis. However, what are the most likely health situations that can arise and how much should a school be worried about? New research reveals that U.S. schools should prioritize preparedness for three common health emergencies: brain-related crises, psychiatric/substance abuse issues, and trauma-related injuries. These three categories collectively account for approximately half of all emergency medical services (EMS) responses to schools. Key Findings from the Study A report published in the journal Pediatrics analyzed over 506,500 EMS calls to schools between 2018 and 2022, focusing on children aged 5 to 17. The study identified the following breakdown of emergency types: Neurologic problems (e.g., seizures): 19% of EMS calls.Psychiatric conditions or substance abuse: Nearly 17% of calls.Accidental injuries: Another 15% of calls.The study also noted differences across age groups: elementary school students were more likely to require treatment for physical injuries (17%), while teenagers more frequently needed help for psychiatric conditions or substance abuse (18%). Enhancing School Preparedness Researchers emphasized the need for schools to enhance their emergency preparedness. He highlighted that timely treatment is crucial and suggested specific areas for staff training. According to US School Safety guidelines planning for emergencies must involve actions and daily routines that help create a secure school environment. These efforts can stop bad things from happening or lessen their impact if they do. Good planning also helps schools find and fix any weaknesses in their procedures and helps school staff and local emergency teams understand and handle their duties. Creating a School Emergency Plan A key part of emergency planning is putting together a complete school emergency operations plan (EOP). This is a document that explains what students, teachers, and school staff should do before, during, and after an emergency. Developing this plan should be a team effort. It needs a diverse group of people from the school, as well as local community partners. Schools should also plan to check, evaluate, and update their EOP regularly to keep it current and effective. Doing training, exercises, and drills that are right for different age groups can also help schools get ready for emergencies. These activities help everyone in the school community know their roles before, during, and after an emergency. They also give people a chance to practice the steps outlined in the EOP and improve how prepared they are. Exercises and drills should be customized to fit the specific school community, including students' ages and physical abilities. It's also important to balance these drills with the school's overall culture and atmosphere. Planning for Recovery After an Incident Schools and districts can also plan for how they'll recover from emergencies even before they happen. This can make the recovery process quicker and more effective. As part of this, school emergency management teams should have a general strategy and plan to help the school community recover academically, physically, emotionally, and financially after an emergency. 

3 medical emergencies schools should be prepared for - biggest concerns for paramedic responses

Tanya Dutt

C-Section Births May Raise Odds Of Leukemia In Children, Study Finds

Where Do Gluten Reactions Start In The Body?  Scientists Finally Found The Source

where do gluten reactions start in the body?  scientists finally found the source

A new Swedish study has found that children born via planned Cesarean section (C-section) may face a modestly increased risk of developing acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common type of <span>cancer</span> in children. This revelation adds to growing concerns around the long-term health impacts of elective C-sections—especially those not medically necessary.

Researchers from Sweden's Karolinska Institutet analyzed the health records of nearly 2.5 million children born between 1982 and 1989 and again from 1999 to 2015. Among this massive cohort, about 376,000 children were born via C-section. Of those, nearly 1,500 were diagnosed with leukemia later in life.

The findings, published recently, show that the risk of developing ALL was 21% higher among children born via planned C-section compared to those born vaginally. Even more specifically, the risk of B-cell ALL—a subtype of the disease—was 29% higher in the planned C-section group.

Also Read: <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/parenting/expectant-parents-will-now-be-entitled-to-bereavement-leave-after-miscarriage-in-britainwhy-is-it-important-article-152237559" data-type="tilCustomLink" target="_blank">Expectant Parents Will Now Be Entitled To Bereavement Leave After Miscarriage In Britain—Why Is It Important?</a>

It’s worth noting that this elevated risk was not observed in children born through emergency C-sections, suggesting that the timing and conditions of birth may play a significant role.

While the researchers were cautious about drawing definitive conclusions, they outlined several potential explanations. One key theory revolves around the lack of exposure to natural vaginal microbiota and birth canal stress during planned C-sections. Both of these factors are believed to play a role in shaping an infant’s immune system.

"C-sections are an important and often life-saving part of obstetric care. We don't want mothers to feel anxious about medically indicated C-sections," said study author Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi. "But there is reason to discuss non-medically necessary planned C-sections, especially in light of other findings linking them to increased risks of asthma, allergies, and type 1 diabetes."

Despite these findings, experts emphasize that the overall risk remains small. According to the researchers, the increased risk translates to approximately one additional case of B-cell ALL per year in Sweden. Still, in the realm of pediatric health, even a marginal uptick is worth examining—especially when linked to elective medical decisions.

Also Read: <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/parenting/screen-time-could-be-slowing-your-kids-down-heres-what-the-study-says-article-152234740" data-type="tilCustomLink" target="_blank">Screen Time Could Be Slowing Your Kids Down, Here's What The Study Says</a>

Globally, C-section rates have been rising, particularly in high-income countries like the United States, where about 1 in 3 births now occur via C-section. Many of these are elective or scheduled for convenience rather than medical necessity.

<h2>What is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?</h2>

ALL is a fast-growing form of blood and bone marrow cancer that primarily affects white blood cells. According to the Mayo Clinic, while its exact causes remain unclear, genetic predispositions and immune system factors may play a role. The disease is most common in children, especially between the ages of 2 and 5.

Symptoms include fatigue, frequent infections, fever, bone pain, and easy bruising or bleeding. Fortunately, thanks to advances in treatment, survival rates for childhood ALL have significantly improved in recent decades, with many children achieving full remission.

<h2>Role of Microbiota and Immune Development</h2>

One of the more compelling areas of study focuses on the role of gut microbiota in immune system development. Babies born vaginally are exposed to beneficial bacteria from their mother's birth canal, which begin colonizing the infant's gut immediately.

Planned C-section deliveries bypass this process. Some experts theorize that this may lead to delayed immune development, leaving children more vulnerable to certain autoimmune diseases and, potentially, cancers like leukemia.

Stress exposure during birth may also be key. Emergency C-sections—often occurring after labor has begun—still subject infants to the hormonal and physiological stresses of labor, which might help "prime" the immune system in ways that scheduled C-sections do not.

Interestingly, the study noted that the increased risk of leukemia was more pronounced in boys than in girls. The reasons for this are not yet clear and warrant further investigation, but they hint at possible genetic or hormonal differences in how children respond to birth conditions.

It’s essential to emphasize that the vast majority of children born via planned C-section will not develop leukemia. The study does not advocate against C-sections when medically necessary; instead, it calls for more thoughtful consideration around elective procedures.

Healthcare providers and parents should have open conversations about the risks and benefits associated with different birth methods. As always, individual medical needs should guide delivery decisions.

Dr. Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi put it succinctly: “Fortunately, acute lymphoblastic leukemia is rare. But as our understanding of early-life exposures grows, so should our caution when it comes to non-essential medical interventions.”

Meanwhile, Dr. Mark Nordberg, a pediatric oncologist not involved in the study, says the research adds "an important piece to the puzzle" of understanding cancer risks in children. "This doesn’t mean we should panic about C-sections, but we should continue to refine how and when we use them."

Future research is expected to further explore the links between birth methods and immune-related diseases, including cancer. Larger studies across diverse populations and long-term health tracking may help isolate the variables at play.

Until then, parents and physicians should remain informed and cautious, using research like this as a tool to guide smarter, safer childbirth decisions for generations to come.

cancer

c section leukemia risk

planned cesarean cancer link

childhood leukemia study

b cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

c section birth effects

cesarean section cancer risk

childhood cancer statistics

A new Swedish study has found that children born via planned Cesarean section (C-section) may face a modestly increased risk of developing acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common type of cancer in children. This revelation adds to growing concerns around the long-term health impacts of elective C-sections—especially those not medically necessary.Researchers from Sweden's Karolinska Institutet analyzed the health records of nearly 2.5 million children born between 1982 and 1989 and again from 1999 to 2015. Among this massive cohort, about 376,000 children were born via C-section. Of those, nearly 1,500 were diagnosed with leukemia later in life.The findings, published recently, show that the risk of developing ALL was 21% higher among children born via planned C-section compared to those born vaginally. Even more specifically, the risk of B-cell ALL—a subtype of the disease—was 29% higher in the planned C-section group.Also Read: Expectant Parents Will Now Be Entitled To Bereavement Leave After Miscarriage In Britain—Why Is It Important?It’s worth noting that this elevated risk was not observed in children born through emergency C-sections, suggesting that the timing and conditions of birth may play a significant role.While the researchers were cautious about drawing definitive conclusions, they outlined several potential explanations. One key theory revolves around the lack of exposure to natural vaginal microbiota and birth canal stress during planned C-sections. Both of these factors are believed to play a role in shaping an infant’s immune system."C-sections are an important and often life-saving part of obstetric care. We don't want mothers to feel anxious about medically indicated C-sections," said study author Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi. "But there is reason to discuss non-medically necessary planned C-sections, especially in light of other findings linking them to increased risks of asthma, allergies, and type 1 diabetes."Despite these findings, experts emphasize that the overall risk remains small. According to the researchers, the increased risk translates to approximately one additional case of B-cell ALL per year in Sweden. Still, in the realm of pediatric health, even a marginal uptick is worth examining—especially when linked to elective medical decisions.Also Read: Screen Time Could Be Slowing Your Kids Down, Here's What The Study SaysGlobally, C-section rates have been rising, particularly in high-income countries like the United States, where about 1 in 3 births now occur via C-section. Many of these are elective or scheduled for convenience rather than medical necessity.What is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?ALL is a fast-growing form of blood and bone marrow cancer that primarily affects white blood cells. According to the Mayo Clinic, while its exact causes remain unclear, genetic predispositions and immune system factors may play a role. The disease is most common in children, especially between the ages of 2 and 5.Symptoms include fatigue, frequent infections, fever, bone pain, and easy bruising or bleeding. Fortunately, thanks to advances in treatment, survival rates for childhood ALL have significantly improved in recent decades, with many children achieving full remission.Role of Microbiota and Immune DevelopmentOne of the more compelling areas of study focuses on the role of gut microbiota in immune system development. Babies born vaginally are exposed to beneficial bacteria from their mother's birth canal, which begin colonizing the infant's gut immediately.Planned C-section deliveries bypass this process. Some experts theorize that this may lead to delayed immune development, leaving children more vulnerable to certain autoimmune diseases and, potentially, cancers like leukemia.Stress exposure during birth may also be key. Emergency C-sections—often occurring after labor has begun—still subject infants to the hormonal and physiological stresses of labor, which might help "prime" the immune system in ways that scheduled C-sections do not.Interestingly, the study noted that the increased risk of leukemia was more pronounced in boys than in girls. The reasons for this are not yet clear and warrant further investigation, but they hint at possible genetic or hormonal differences in how children respond to birth conditions.What This Means for Parents?It’s essential to emphasize that the vast majority of children born via planned C-section will not develop leukemia. The study does not advocate against C-sections when medically necessary; instead, it calls for more thoughtful consideration around elective procedures.Healthcare providers and parents should have open conversations about the risks and benefits associated with different birth methods. As always, individual medical needs should guide delivery decisions.Dr. Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi put it succinctly: “Fortunately, acute lymphoblastic leukemia is rare. But as our understanding of early-life exposures grows, so should our caution when it comes to non-essential medical interventions.”Meanwhile, Dr. Mark Nordberg, a pediatric oncologist not involved in the study, says the research adds "an important piece to the puzzle" of understanding cancer risks in children. "This doesn’t mean we should panic about C-sections, but we should continue to refine how and when we use them."Future research is expected to further explore the links between birth methods and immune-related diseases, including cancer. Larger studies across diverse populations and long-term health tracking may help isolate the variables at play.Until then, parents and physicians should remain informed and cautious, using research like this as a tool to guide smarter, safer childbirth decisions for generations to come.

c-section births may raise odds of leukemia in children, study finds

About Us

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Company

Health and Me is a premium website with content written and curated to function as a handbook for all Health concerns.