Health and Me

Tanya Dutt

C-Section Births May Raise Odds Of Leukemia In Children, Study Finds

A new Swedish study has found that children born via planned Cesarean section (C-section) may face a modestly increased risk of developing acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common type of <span><a href="https://www.healthandme.com/health/cancer">cancer</a></span> in children. This revelation adds to growing concerns around the long-term health impacts of elective C-sections—especially those not medically necessary.

Researchers from Sweden's Karolinska Institutet analyzed the health records of nearly 2.5 million children born between 1982 and 1989 and again from 1999 to 2015. Among this massive cohort, about 376,000 children were born via C-section. Of those, nearly 1,500 were diagnosed with leukemia later in life.

The findings, published recently, show that the risk of developing ALL was 21% higher among children born via planned C-section compared to those born vaginally. Even more specifically, the risk of B-cell ALL—a subtype of the disease—was 29% higher in the planned C-section group.

It’s worth noting that this elevated risk was not observed in children born through emergency C-sections, suggesting that the timing and conditions of birth may play a significant role.

While the researchers were cautious about drawing definitive conclusions, they outlined several potential explanations. One key theory revolves around the lack of exposure to natural vaginal microbiota and birth canal stress during planned C-sections. Both of these factors are believed to play a role in shaping an infant’s immune system.

"C-sections are an important and often life-saving part of obstetric care. We don't want mothers to feel anxious about medically indicated C-sections," said study author Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi. "But there is reason to discuss non-medically necessary planned C-sections, especially in light of other findings linking them to increased risks of asthma, allergies, and type 1 diabetes."

Despite these findings, experts emphasize that the overall risk remains small. According to the researchers, the increased risk translates to approximately one additional case of B-cell ALL per year in Sweden. Still, in the realm of pediatric health, even a marginal uptick is worth examining—especially when linked to elective medical decisions.

Globally, C-section rates have been rising, particularly in high-income countries like the United States, where about 1 in 3 births now occur via C-section. Many of these are elective or scheduled for convenience rather than medical necessity.

<h2>What is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?</h2>

ALL is a fast-growing form of blood and bone marrow cancer that primarily affects white blood cells. According to the Mayo Clinic, while its exact causes remain unclear, genetic predispositions and immune system factors may play a role. The disease is most common in children, especially between the ages of 2 and 5.

Symptoms include fatigue, frequent infections, fever, bone pain, and easy bruising or bleeding. Fortunately, thanks to advances in treatment, survival rates for childhood ALL have significantly improved in recent decades, with many children achieving full remission.

<h2>Role of Microbiota and Immune Development</h2>

One of the more compelling areas of study focuses on the role of gut microbiota in immune system development. Babies born vaginally are exposed to beneficial bacteria from their mother's birth canal, which begin colonizing the infant's gut immediately.

Planned C-section deliveries bypass this process. Some experts theorize that this may lead to delayed immune development, leaving children more vulnerable to certain autoimmune diseases and, potentially, cancers like leukemia.

Stress exposure during birth may also be key. Emergency C-sections—often occurring after labor has begun—still subject infants to the hormonal and physiological stresses of labor, which might help "prime" the immune system in ways that scheduled C-sections do not.

Interestingly, the study noted that the increased risk of leukemia was more pronounced in boys than in girls. The reasons for this are not yet clear and warrant further investigation, but they hint at possible genetic or hormonal differences in how children respond to birth conditions.

It’s essential to emphasize that the vast majority of children born via planned C-section will not develop leukemia. The study does not advocate against C-sections when medically necessary; instead, it calls for more thoughtful consideration around elective procedures.

Healthcare providers and parents should have open conversations about the risks and benefits associated with different birth methods. As always, individual medical needs should guide delivery decisions.

Dr. Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi put it succinctly: “Fortunately, acute lymphoblastic leukemia is rare. But as our understanding of early-life exposures grows, so should our caution when it comes to non-essential medical interventions.”

Meanwhile, Dr. Mark Nordberg, a pediatric oncologist not involved in the study, says the research adds "an important piece to the puzzle" of understanding cancer risks in children. "This doesn’t mean we should panic about C-sections, but we should continue to refine how and when we use them."

Future research is expected to further explore the links between birth methods and immune-related diseases, including cancer. Larger studies across diverse populations and long-term health tracking may help isolate the variables at play.

Until then, parents and physicians should remain informed and cautious, using research like this as a tool to guide smarter, safer childbirth decisions for generations to come.

Health Conditions A-Z

health

cancer

c section leukemia risk

planned cesarean cancer link

childhood leukemia study

b cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

c section birth effects

cesarean section cancer risk

childhood cancer statistics

First UK Adult To Receive Treatment For Type 1 Diabetes Drug Undergoing Trials

Study Suggests Six Personality Traits That Make Us 'Cool' – Is It Genetic Or Acquired?

Why That Persistent Sore Throat Deserves A Second Look Before It Turns Into A Rare Medical Emergency

Parenting

Natural Ways To Increase Protein In Your Diet

Managing Excessive Daytime Sleepiness – Tips To Try

How Much Protein Is Too Much?

High Fiber Indian Foods You Should Try

10 Easy Ways To Boost Daily Fiber Intake

Adding Walnut Oil To Your Diet? Benefits You Should Know

Drinks That Soothe Headaches And Migraines

Waist Exercises For More Toned Belly

This Is How Stress Affects Your Heart

Does Digital ‘Brain Rot’ Really Affect Your Health?

Dishes With Fermented Foods To Eat For Your Gut Health

Yoga Poses That Stimulate Good Bowel Health

Weekend Warrior Exercises For Full Body Movement

Weekend Meal Prep Ideas That Will Last You A Weekend

Easy Homemade Healthy Dishes For Long Afternoons

Silent Walking: Mental Health Booster That Keeps You Fit

Dumbbell Exercises You Can Do At Home

These Foods Are Keeping You Awake At Night

Ways to Manage Sugar Cravings

Your Body Doesn’t Want You To Lose Weight – Here's It Resists

High-Protein No Cook Dishes You Should Try

Yoga Poses That Aid In Digestion

Low Calorie Dinner Options For Weight Loss

Cardiac Arrest Vs. Heart Attack: Difference Explained Under 60 Seconds

High Protein Low-Carb Snacks To Have On The Go

Knee Exercises Desk Workers Should Do For Joint Health

Why Do I Feel Sleepy During The Day?

High Protein Early Morning Meals To Keep You Full Till Lunch

International Yoga Day 2025: Benefits of Doing Tadasana Every Morning

High-Carb Foods That Are Really Healthy

Dementia Vs Alzheimer’s: Difference Explained Under 60 Seconds

Healthy Staple Foods To Make Eating Healthy Easier

Are You Dealing With Abandonment Issues? Signs And Risk Factors

Mid-Work Healthy Snacks You Can Eat Throughout The Day

Common Mistakes You May Be Making In The Gym

Strengthen Your Legs Muscles With These Exercises

Beat Anxiety With Books: How Reading Helps With Stress

Ghee For Health: Ayurvedic Health Benefits Of Clarified Butter

Common Mistakes You Are Making While Walking

Exercises You Should Do At Home When You Skip Gym

A new Swedish study has found that children born via planned Cesarean section (C-section) may face a modestly increased risk of developing acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common type of cancer in children. This revelation adds to growing concerns around the long-term health impacts of elective C-sections—especially those not medically necessary.Researchers from Sweden's Karolinska Institutet analyzed the health records of nearly 2.5 million children born between 1982 and 1989 and again from 1999 to 2015. Among this massive cohort, about 376,000 children were born via C-section. Of those, nearly 1,500 were diagnosed with leukemia later in life.The findings, published recently, show that the risk of developing ALL was 21% higher among children born via planned C-section compared to those born vaginally. Even more specifically, the risk of B-cell ALL—a subtype of the disease—was 29% higher in the planned C-section group.It’s worth noting that this elevated risk was not observed in children born through emergency C-sections, suggesting that the timing and conditions of birth may play a significant role.While the researchers were cautious about drawing definitive conclusions, they outlined several potential explanations. One key theory revolves around the lack of exposure to natural vaginal microbiota and birth canal stress during planned C-sections. Both of these factors are believed to play a role in shaping an infant’s immune system."C-sections are an important and often life-saving part of obstetric care. We don't want mothers to feel anxious about medically indicated C-sections," said study author Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi. "But there is reason to discuss non-medically necessary planned C-sections, especially in light of other findings linking them to increased risks of asthma, allergies, and type 1 diabetes."Despite these findings, experts emphasize that the overall risk remains small. According to the researchers, the increased risk translates to approximately one additional case of B-cell ALL per year in Sweden. Still, in the realm of pediatric health, even a marginal uptick is worth examining—especially when linked to elective medical decisions.Globally, C-section rates have been rising, particularly in high-income countries like the United States, where about 1 in 3 births now occur via C-section. Many of these are elective or scheduled for convenience rather than medical necessity.What is Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?ALL is a fast-growing form of blood and bone marrow cancer that primarily affects white blood cells. According to the Mayo Clinic, while its exact causes remain unclear, genetic predispositions and immune system factors may play a role. The disease is most common in children, especially between the ages of 2 and 5.Symptoms include fatigue, frequent infections, fever, bone pain, and easy bruising or bleeding. Fortunately, thanks to advances in treatment, survival rates for childhood ALL have significantly improved in recent decades, with many children achieving full remission.Role of Microbiota and Immune DevelopmentOne of the more compelling areas of study focuses on the role of gut microbiota in immune system development. Babies born vaginally are exposed to beneficial bacteria from their mother's birth canal, which begin colonizing the infant's gut immediately.Planned C-section deliveries bypass this process. Some experts theorize that this may lead to delayed immune development, leaving children more vulnerable to certain autoimmune diseases and, potentially, cancers like leukemia.Stress exposure during birth may also be key. Emergency C-sections—often occurring after labor has begun—still subject infants to the hormonal and physiological stresses of labor, which might help "prime" the immune system in ways that scheduled C-sections do not.Interestingly, the study noted that the increased risk of leukemia was more pronounced in boys than in girls. The reasons for this are not yet clear and warrant further investigation, but they hint at possible genetic or hormonal differences in how children respond to birth conditions.What This Means for Parents?It’s essential to emphasize that the vast majority of children born via planned C-section will not develop leukemia. The study does not advocate against C-sections when medically necessary; instead, it calls for more thoughtful consideration around elective procedures.Healthcare providers and parents should have open conversations about the risks and benefits associated with different birth methods. As always, individual medical needs should guide delivery decisions.Dr. Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi put it succinctly: “Fortunately, acute lymphoblastic leukemia is rare. But as our understanding of early-life exposures grows, so should our caution when it comes to non-essential medical interventions.”Meanwhile, Dr. Mark Nordberg, a pediatric oncologist not involved in the study, says the research adds "an important piece to the puzzle" of understanding cancer risks in children. "This doesn’t mean we should panic about C-sections, but we should continue to refine how and when we use them."Future research is expected to further explore the links between birth methods and immune-related diseases, including cancer. Larger studies across diverse populations and long-term health tracking may help isolate the variables at play.Until then, parents and physicians should remain informed and cautious, using research like this as a tool to guide smarter, safer childbirth decisions for generations to come.

c-section births may raise odds of leukemia in children, study finds

Expectant Parents Will Now Be Entitled To Bereavement Leave After Miscarriage In Britain—Why Is It Important?

Fitness

Should Women Try This 'Gym Bro' Supplement To Help Boost Focus, Mood And Memory?

should women try this 'gym bro' supplement to help boost focus, mood and memory?

Health & Wellness

Inner Child: Being Left Out And Rejected In Childhood Becomes A Social Seed For Deeper Connections

inner child: being left out and rejected in childhood becomes a social seed for deeper connections

Health News

1 In 8 Babies Born Premature In India, 17% Having Low Birth Weight— Health Survey Blames Air Pollution

1 in 8 babies born premature in india, 17% having low birth weight— health survey blames air pollution

Loneliness Is Linked To 100 Deaths Every Hour, Reveals WHO

loneliness is linked to 100 deaths every hour, reveals who

"We are so sorry for your loss." It's a phrase that is so often whispered with sympathy after a tragedy but when a miscarriage occurs—especially in the early stages of pregnancy—those words are too often absent. The sadness is genuine, but hidden. The loss is deep, but commonly minimized. That is set to alter in Britain.

In a major departure towards the support of such families, the government of Britain has reaffirmed that pregnant couples will now be able to claim <span>bereavement</span> leave in case of a miscarriage—an important recognition of the emotional strain <span>pregnancy</span> loss can place on people and families.

This historic move will alter the face of parental leave in Britain. As part of Labour's Employment Rights Bill making its way through its last stages in the House of Lords, parents will be entitled to at least one week of bereavement leave if they suffer a miscarriage prior to 24 weeks of pregnancy. Up to this amendment, bereavement leave was only available to parents who lost a child after 24 weeks or a child below the age of 18. This broadening of rights is a key aspect in developing a more empathetic workplace, giving grieving parents the crucial space they require in order to heal.

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner stated the reform will give parents the space and dignity to mourn. It's a small but meaningful step towards a more empathetic workplace—one that recognizes the silent, unspoken suffering that parents bear after a loss which society encourages them to endure alone.

<h2>What the New Legislation Promises?</h2>

Today, there is up to two weeks' bereavement leave provided by UK law for stillbirths after 24 weeks' pregnancy or the loss of a child under 18. But parents who lose a baby in a miscarriage before reaching that milestone have no automatic legal right to leave.

The new amendment will give parents—mothers and their partners—to a minimum of one week's bereavement leave after a miscarriage before 24 weeks. The precise period and details will be decided after a proper consultation process, but the intent is evident: this sorrow counts, and it is worth acknowledgement.

The measure is due to come into force in 2027 as part of Labour's wider reform of workers' rights in England, Wales, and Scotland. As well as reforms such as widening entitlement to sick pay and a review of the parental leave system, it is a sign of a wider reassessment of how the UK supports working families.

<h2>Emotional and Psychological Toll of Miscarriage</h2>

To realize why this change in legislation is so important, one needs to recognize the staggering figures around miscarriages in the UK. In excess of 250,000 expectant mothers experience a miscarriage each year, with the rate of confirmed pregnancy loss estimated at between 10%.20% during the first trimester. Miscarriage is still the most prevalent type of pregnancy loss, and yet this subject is usually shrouded in societal stigma, causing feelings of shame and silence for the women who have experienced it.

But the numbers don't reflect the psychological damage. Women say it's shattering. It's not merely losing the pregnancy—it's losing the future. The hope. The self. And with the trauma often comes a paralyzing silence. Women's mental health is frequently compromised as a consequence of miscarriage, and many build enduring emotional issues that can impact their subsequent pregnancies and overall health. The emotional terrain can encompass <span>grief</span>, rage, guilt, and feelings of loss. The value of compassionate workplace policies cannot be overemphasized, providing lifelines in the midst of chaotic bereavement following the loss of a child.

Partners also mourn. Research indicates that fathers and non-gestational partners may also suffer from similar emotional pain, such as anxiety, depression, and feelings of powerlessness. Many must, however, be back to work the following day, as if nothing out of the ordinary had occurred.

With bereavement leave laws, the UK is finally acknowledging grief doesn't need a birth certificate to exist.

Labour MP and Women and Equalities Committee Chair Sarah Owen has been a long-time campaigner for this change. In a report in January, the committee made one thing plain: the case for change was "overwhelming."

Vicki Robinson, the chief executive of the Miscarriage Association, also hailed the announcement as "a massively important step" which recognizes not only physical recovery but emotional healing too. "It's not only the individual who's losing the baby. Their partner loses it as well," she told The Times.

Although some enlightened employers already provide miscarriage leave as an in-work benefit, the new law makes it a right for all—not a company fringe benefit.

<h2>Stillbirths, Miscarriage, and Global Health Gaps</h2>

The shift in Britain is contrary to trends elsewhere. Across the world, miscarriage and stillbirth are taboo. An estimated 2 million babies die each year, the great majority in low- and middle-income nations. But many of these deaths can be avoided through improved prenatal care, treatment for infection, and better conditions at delivery.

Even in wealthy nations, stillbirths are more often caused by inadequate care. And even though the size of the issue is substantial, most countries don't routinely track early pregnancy loss, hiding the real burden.

Cultural stigma also pushes mourning parents further into isolation. Miscarriage, in some societies, is viewed as a consequence of bad behavior, bad fortune, or even demonic intervention. The outcome? Silence. Isolation. And no support when it's needed most.

<h2>How Miscarriage Affects Beyond Physical Pain?</h2>

Emotional impact of miscarriage can be multifaceted and unpredictable. Grief, guilt, emptiness, anger, anxiety, and depression are the usual reactions. For most, these emotions do not subside soon—and for some, they never do.

Individuals who have had a miscarriage frequently report:

<ol><li>Grief over what might have been</li><li>Shock at the suddenness of the loss</li><li>Guilt or blaming oneself, even when unjustified</li><li>A feeling of failure or betrayal by their body</li><li>Isolation, particularly when very few others were aware of the pregnancy</li><li>Fear of becoming pregnant again in the future</li><li>Jealousy or resentment when other women make a pregnancy announcement</li></ol>

These feelings impact not only the woman who birthed the baby, but their partners as well—who might feel helpless and not know how to provide support.

<h2>Importance of Paid Bereavement Leave for Parents?</h2>

Granting dedicated leave following a miscarriage is not only a sympathetic policy—it's also a mental health protector. Leave allows grieving parents to express their feelings, receive support, and start to heal without needing to suppress their emotions in the workplace.

It shatters the culture of silence. In placing miscarriage into official law, the UK is sending a strong message: this loss is real, and you are not alone.

And the policy shift could set in motion a wider change. In the United States, for instance, there is no federal law mandating any bereavement leave—never mind after a miscarriage. As international scrutiny grows on family well-being and the mental health of employees, Britain's action can lead to similar changes elsewhere.

The miscarriage bereavement leave is an extension of Labour's wider agenda to update the UK's family support infrastructure. Ministers have already recognised that the parental leave system doesn't cut it for modern families.

Reform plans include considering an overhaul of maternity, paternity, and shared parental leave systems. There is also an emphasis on supporting mental health after pregnancy loss more comprehensively through NHS and work policies.

With the consultations looming, campaigners are optimistic that the end result will be legislation which captures the varied experiences of bereavement—multiple miscarriages, IVF experiences, and non-conventional family arrangements.

It's more than a week off. It's about validation, dignity and creating a society in which humans are permitted to grieve freely, without shame or guilt.

pregnancy

uk miscarriage leave

bereavement leave after miscarriage

pregnancy loss uk law

early pregnancy loss rights

miscarriage grief support

labour employment rights bill

miscarriage mental health

bereavement

grief

"We are so sorry for your loss." It's a phrase that is so often whispered with sympathy after a tragedy but when a miscarriage occurs—especially in the early stages of pregnancy—those words are too often absent. The sadness is genuine, but hidden. The loss is deep, but commonly minimized. That is set to alter in Britain.In a major departure towards the support of such families, the government of Britain has reaffirmed that pregnant couples will now be able to claim bereavement leave in case of a miscarriage—an important recognition of the emotional strain pregnancy loss can place on people and families.This historic move will alter the face of parental leave in Britain. As part of Labour's Employment Rights Bill making its way through its last stages in the House of Lords, parents will be entitled to at least one week of bereavement leave if they suffer a miscarriage prior to 24 weeks of pregnancy. Up to this amendment, bereavement leave was only available to parents who lost a child after 24 weeks or a child below the age of 18. This broadening of rights is a key aspect in developing a more empathetic workplace, giving grieving parents the crucial space they require in order to heal.Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner stated the reform will give parents the space and dignity to mourn. It's a small but meaningful step towards a more empathetic workplace—one that recognizes the silent, unspoken suffering that parents bear after a loss which society encourages them to endure alone.What the New Legislation Promises?Today, there is up to two weeks' bereavement leave provided by UK law for stillbirths after 24 weeks' pregnancy or the loss of a child under 18. But parents who lose a baby in a miscarriage before reaching that milestone have no automatic legal right to leave.The new amendment will give parents—mothers and their partners—to a minimum of one week's bereavement leave after a miscarriage before 24 weeks. The precise period and details will be decided after a proper consultation process, but the intent is evident: this sorrow counts, and it is worth acknowledgement.The measure is due to come into force in 2027 as part of Labour's wider reform of workers' rights in England, Wales, and Scotland. As well as reforms such as widening entitlement to sick pay and a review of the parental leave system, it is a sign of a wider reassessment of how the UK supports working families.Emotional and Psychological Toll of MiscarriageTo realize why this change in legislation is so important, one needs to recognize the staggering figures around miscarriages in the UK. In excess of 250,000 expectant mothers experience a miscarriage each year, with the rate of confirmed pregnancy loss estimated at between 10%.20% during the first trimester. Miscarriage is still the most prevalent type of pregnancy loss, and yet this subject is usually shrouded in societal stigma, causing feelings of shame and silence for the women who have experienced it.But the numbers don't reflect the psychological damage. Women say it's shattering. It's not merely losing the pregnancy—it's losing the future. The hope. The self. And with the trauma often comes a paralyzing silence. Women's mental health is frequently compromised as a consequence of miscarriage, and many build enduring emotional issues that can impact their subsequent pregnancies and overall health. The emotional terrain can encompass grief, rage, guilt, and feelings of loss. The value of compassionate workplace policies cannot be overemphasized, providing lifelines in the midst of chaotic bereavement following the loss of a child.Partners also mourn. Research indicates that fathers and non-gestational partners may also suffer from similar emotional pain, such as anxiety, depression, and feelings of powerlessness. Many must, however, be back to work the following day, as if nothing out of the ordinary had occurred.With bereavement leave laws, the UK is finally acknowledging grief doesn't need a birth certificate to exist.Labour MP and Women and Equalities Committee Chair Sarah Owen has been a long-time campaigner for this change. In a report in January, the committee made one thing plain: the case for change was "overwhelming."Vicki Robinson, the chief executive of the Miscarriage Association, also hailed the announcement as "a massively important step" which recognizes not only physical recovery but emotional healing too. "It's not only the individual who's losing the baby. Their partner loses it as well," she told The Times.Although some enlightened employers already provide miscarriage leave as an in-work benefit, the new law makes it a right for all—not a company fringe benefit.Stillbirths, Miscarriage, and Global Health GapsThe shift in Britain is contrary to trends elsewhere. Across the world, miscarriage and stillbirth are taboo. An estimated 2 million babies die each year, the great majority in low- and middle-income nations. But many of these deaths can be avoided through improved prenatal care, treatment for infection, and better conditions at delivery.Even in wealthy nations, stillbirths are more often caused by inadequate care. And even though the size of the issue is substantial, most countries don't routinely track early pregnancy loss, hiding the real burden.Cultural stigma also pushes mourning parents further into isolation. Miscarriage, in some societies, is viewed as a consequence of bad behavior, bad fortune, or even demonic intervention. The outcome? Silence. Isolation. And no support when it's needed most.How Miscarriage Affects Beyond Physical Pain?Emotional impact of miscarriage can be multifaceted and unpredictable. Grief, guilt, emptiness, anger, anxiety, and depression are the usual reactions. For most, these emotions do not subside soon—and for some, they never do.Individuals who have had a miscarriage frequently report:Grief over what might have beenShock at the suddenness of the lossGuilt or blaming oneself, even when unjustifiedA feeling of failure or betrayal by their bodyIsolation, particularly when very few others were aware of the pregnancyFear of becoming pregnant again in the futureJealousy or resentment when other women make a pregnancy announcementThese feelings impact not only the woman who birthed the baby, but their partners as well—who might feel helpless and not know how to provide support.Importance of Paid Bereavement Leave for Parents?Granting dedicated leave following a miscarriage is not only a sympathetic policy—it's also a mental health protector. Leave allows grieving parents to express their feelings, receive support, and start to heal without needing to suppress their emotions in the workplace.It shatters the culture of silence. In placing miscarriage into official law, the UK is sending a strong message: this loss is real, and you are not alone.And the policy shift could set in motion a wider change. In the United States, for instance, there is no federal law mandating any bereavement leave—never mind after a miscarriage. As international scrutiny grows on family well-being and the mental health of employees, Britain's action can lead to similar changes elsewhere.The miscarriage bereavement leave is an extension of Labour's wider agenda to update the UK's family support infrastructure. Ministers have already recognised that the parental leave system doesn't cut it for modern families.Reform plans include considering an overhaul of maternity, paternity, and shared parental leave systems. There is also an emphasis on supporting mental health after pregnancy loss more comprehensively through NHS and work policies.With the consultations looming, campaigners are optimistic that the end result will be legislation which captures the varied experiences of bereavement—multiple miscarriages, IVF experiences, and non-conventional family arrangements.It's more than a week off. It's about validation, dignity and creating a society in which humans are permitted to grieve freely, without shame or guilt.

expectant parents will now be entitled to bereavement leave after miscarriage in britain—why is it important?

Ishita Roy

Screen Time Could Be Slowing Your Kids Down, Here's What The Study Says

American Kids Have Become Unhealthier In The Past Two Decades

over the last 2 decades, american kids have become unhealthier, reveals study

Early Dementia Sign That Becomes Apparent When You Are Reading

early dementia sign that becomes apparent when you are reading

30 Second Dementia Test That Can Reveal Early Symptoms - All You Need Is Pen, Paper And A Timer

30 second dementia test that can reveal early symptoms - all you need is pen, paper and a timer

In today's time, screens are nearly impossible to avoid. From smartphones and tablets to televisions and laptops, they all have become an important part of our lives. For many families, especially with young children, screens are a regular part of daily life. However, a new study is sounding the alarm on what too much screen time during the early years might cost: a child’s language development.

Researchers have found that excessive exposure to digital screens can hamper the way children learn to speak and understand language. Sarah Kucker, a developmental psychologist at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, explains that children learn best through hands-on, sensory-rich experiences — something screens simply can’t replicate, as reported in HealthDay News.

Also Read: <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/health-wellness/inner-child-being-left-out-and-rejected-in-childhood-becomes-a-social-seed-for-deeper-connections-article-152232982" data-type="tilCustomLink" target="_blank">Inner Child: Being Left Out And Rejected In Childhood Becomes A Social Seed For Deeper Connections</a>

<h2><span rel="noindex">Screen Time For Kids</span>: Real-World Play Matters</h2>

“When learning a new word like ‘banana,’ for instance, it is important that a child can feel its texture and see it from all angles to understand that it’s 3D and has a distinct smell,” said Kucker. “Just seeing a picture of a banana or a quick cartoon video doesn’t give the same information.”

In other words, children need to touch, explore, and play with real objects to understand the world around them. That interaction is a key driver of early language and cognitive development. When screen time replaces these experiences, it can dull the richness of their learning environment.

<h2>How Much Screen Time For Kids?</h2>Kucker stressed that the first few years of life are particularly important for building the brain’s language and social foundations. “This is a time when kiddos are forming meaningful brain and language connections that are best built through hands-on experiences,” she said.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends avoiding screens altogether for children under 18 months, except for video chatting. For toddlers aged 18 to 24 months, high-quality programming with a caregiver present is encouraged. Children aged 2 to 5 should be limited to one hour of screen time per day.

Also Read: <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/health-news/1-in-8-babies-born-premature-in-india-17-having-low-birth-weight-health-survey-blames-air-pollution-article-152231006" data-type="tilCustomLink" target="_blank">1 In 8 Babies Born Premature In India, 17% Having Low Birth Weight— Health Survey Blames Air Pollution</a>

<h2>Why Is Screen Time Bad For Kids?</h2>

Despite the warnings, Kucker doesn’t suggest banning screens entirely. In fact, certain kinds of screen time can support learning — especially when used socially.

“Video chatting with a grandparent, for example, helps kids learn back-and-forth conversations,” she said. “Two-person games like puzzles on a tablet can also promote listening, turn-taking, and language development.”

The key is how the screen is used. Passive watching — where children are just staring at a screen without engagement — offers little educational benefit. But interactive and social media can have positive outcomes when paired with real-life communication.

<h2>Recommended Screen Time For Kids</h2>To help parents navigate the digital world, Kucker offered four tips to make screen time more effective:

<strong>Know the why:</strong> Ask yourself why your child is using a screen. If it’s just to keep them quiet, try alternatives like sensory toys or calming techniques such as deep breathing.

<strong>Be social with screens: </strong>Engage in video calls or interactive games that require conversation and participation. Shared screen time encourages communication.

Also Read: <a href="https://www.healthandme.com/health-news/new-frankenstein-covid-variant-spreads-across-38-countries-unique-covid-symptom-surfaces-in-uk-outbreak-article-152225525" data-type="tilCustomLink" target="_blank">New 'Frankenstein' Covid Variant Spreads Across 38 Countries: Unique Covid Symptom Surfaces In UK Outbreak</a>

<strong>Choose interactive media: </strong>Look for apps and videos that ask questions or prompt your child to relate what they see to their real world.

<strong>Balance with real talk:</strong> Make sure your child hears a lot of words from real people. Even talking aloud while cooking, cleaning, or running errands can help build vocabulary and understanding.

As digital technology continues to shape our lives, it’s important for parents and caregivers to make mindful choices. While screens can’t be eliminated altogether, striking a balance is essential.

Children need more than passive visuals. They need conversations, textures, sounds, smells, and experiences to understand the world — and language — around them. And that kind of learning still happens best in the real world, not on a screen.

screen time for kids

parenting

screen time children

parenting advice

parenting tips

parenting lessons

screen time  of kids

In today's time, screens are nearly impossible to avoid. From smartphones and tablets to televisions and laptops, they all have become an important part of our lives. For many families, especially with young children, screens are a regular part of daily life. However, a new study is sounding the alarm on what too much screen time during the early years might cost: a child’s language development.Researchers have found that excessive exposure to digital screens can hamper the way children learn to speak and understand language. Sarah Kucker, a developmental psychologist at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, explains that children learn best through hands-on, sensory-rich experiences — something screens simply can’t replicate, as reported in HealthDay News.Also Read: Inner Child: Being Left Out And Rejected In Childhood Becomes A Social Seed For Deeper ConnectionsScreen Time For Kids: Real-World Play Matters“When learning a new word like ‘banana,’ for instance, it is important that a child can feel its texture and see it from all angles to understand that it’s 3D and has a distinct smell,” said Kucker. “Just seeing a picture of a banana or a quick cartoon video doesn’t give the same information.”In other words, children need to touch, explore, and play with real objects to understand the world around them. That interaction is a key driver of early language and cognitive development. When screen time replaces these experiences, it can dull the richness of their learning environment.How Much Screen Time For Kids?Kucker stressed that the first few years of life are particularly important for building the brain’s language and social foundations. “This is a time when kiddos are forming meaningful brain and language connections that are best built through hands-on experiences,” she said.The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends avoiding screens altogether for children under 18 months, except for video chatting. For toddlers aged 18 to 24 months, high-quality programming with a caregiver present is encouraged. Children aged 2 to 5 should be limited to one hour of screen time per day.Also Read: 1 In 8 Babies Born Premature In India, 17% Having Low Birth Weight— Health Survey Blames Air PollutionWhy Is Screen Time Bad For Kids?Despite the warnings, Kucker doesn’t suggest banning screens entirely. In fact, certain kinds of screen time can support learning — especially when used socially.“Video chatting with a grandparent, for example, helps kids learn back-and-forth conversations,” she said. “Two-person games like puzzles on a tablet can also promote listening, turn-taking, and language development.”The key is how the screen is used. Passive watching — where children are just staring at a screen without engagement — offers little educational benefit. But interactive and social media can have positive outcomes when paired with real-life communication.Recommended Screen Time For KidsTo help parents navigate the digital world, Kucker offered four tips to make screen time more effective:Know the why: Ask yourself why your child is using a screen. If it’s just to keep them quiet, try alternatives like sensory toys or calming techniques such as deep breathing.Be social with screens: Engage in video calls or interactive games that require conversation and participation. Shared screen time encourages communication.Also Read: New 'Frankenstein' Covid Variant Spreads Across 38 Countries: Unique Covid Symptom Surfaces In UK OutbreakChoose interactive media: Look for apps and videos that ask questions or prompt your child to relate what they see to their real world.Balance with real talk: Make sure your child hears a lot of words from real people. Even talking aloud while cooking, cleaning, or running errands can help build vocabulary and understanding.As digital technology continues to shape our lives, it’s important for parents and caregivers to make mindful choices. While screens can’t be eliminated altogether, striking a balance is essential.Children need more than passive visuals. They need conversations, textures, sounds, smells, and experiences to understand the world — and language — around them. And that kind of learning still happens best in the real world, not on a screen.

screen time could be slowing your kids down, here's what the study says

Aarushi Bhadury

Are Fathers Still Reluctant To Be Primary Caretakers Of Their Children? Study Finds Dads Take Shorter Parental Leaves

The first few months of a baby's development is a very important and stressful period of time for the parents. Having a newborn and tackling unfamiliar situations and problems while also worrying about the child’s well-being is a herculean task, too much to handle for a single person. That is why both mother and father must step up and support each other through this time and hence many parents take <span>paternity leaves</span>. These leaves allow parents to only focus on childcare and not work obligations. 

Taking time off work when a baby arrives benefits both fathers and their newborns. However, a new study reveals that most dads still don't take much parental leave, often because they simply can't afford to. The research, published in Pediatrics, found that only 36% of new fathers took more than two weeks of leave, while a significant 64% took two weeks or less. 

<h2>Financial Hurdles Prevent Longer Stays </h2>

This study, which tracked the health and behavior of fathers, surveyed 261 men in Georgia who had children in 2018 or 2019. Of the 240 employed fathers, roughly 73% took some parental leave. However, only about half of those had at least some paid time off, and 20% relied solely on unpaid leave. Nearly 43% of working fathers expressed a desire for more time off but couldn't take it, primarily due to financial concerns. Many cited the inability to afford unpaid leave, insufficient accrued time off, or the fear of losing their jobs. 

Experts agree that when fathers take time off after a baby is born, it's linked to better health for the infant and improved <span>parenting</span> skills for the dad. It's crucial for fathers to experience both the challenges and joys of being a parent. The best way for them to do this is to step away from work and spend time with their new baby without facing money worries or the stress of potentially losing their job. Supporting fathers in taking leave can have a significant positive impact on families.

<h2>Paternity Leaves Helps Father Adapt </h2>

According to Harvard Business Review, research confirms it helps fathers bond with their babies, aids in the baby's development, and strengthens the parents' relationship. But there's a powerful, lesser-known benefit emerging from new studies: it provides a unique form of brain training for fathers. 

Parenting isn't simply an innate ability. While we've long known about the amazing changes a mother's brain undergoes to prepare her for caring for a newborn, new research shows that fathers' brains also transform. These changes happen even without the physical experiences of pregnancy and childbirth or the associated hormonal shifts. This "parental instinct brain training" is possible for all parents. 

Over the past ten years, scientists have learned a lot about neuroplasticity, which is the brain's incredible ability to change its structure and how it works based on new experiences. Becoming a parent is a major time for the brain to adapt. Experts studying this shift emphasize that "fathers are made, not born," meaning spending time with infants is crucial for developing the fathering brain.

For dads, changes in their brains, triggered by their babies' cues, are directly linked to their connection with the infant. This suggests these brain changes actually prepare them for fatherhood. A key finding is that the most impactful brain changes come from active, engaged experience. No one is naturally perfect at being a parent from day one. It's the effort of fully engaging with the baby that drives these brain changes, giving dads the necessary tools to grow into their role over time. 

Quality one-on-one time with your baby is crucial. More time spent alone with an infant leads to bigger brain changes, helping dads become better, more natural caregivers. A study comparing dads in California and Spain showed differences. Spanish dads, who often have more generous paternity leave, showed more brain changes related to focused attention. This suggests dedicated time acts like a "brain workout," preparing dads for parenting. Paternity leave essentially gives you a free brain-training program. The more you engage, the more your brain adapts, making you a more responsive parent over time. 

Fathers role in caretaking

fathers role in babys life

how father impact babys life

Paternity leaves

Maternity leaves

The first few months of a baby's development is a very important and stressful period of time for the parents. Having a newborn and tackling unfamiliar situations and problems while also worrying about the child’s well-being is a herculean task, too much to handle for a single person. That is why both mother and father must step up and support each other through this time and hence many parents take paternity leaves. These leaves allow parents to only focus on childcare and not work obligations. Taking time off work when a baby arrives benefits both fathers and their newborns. However, a new study reveals that most dads still don't take much parental leave, often because they simply can't afford to. The research, published in Pediatrics, found that only 36% of new fathers took more than two weeks of leave, while a significant 64% took two weeks or less. Financial Hurdles Prevent Longer Stays This study, which tracked the health and behavior of fathers, surveyed 261 men in Georgia who had children in 2018 or 2019. Of the 240 employed fathers, roughly 73% took some parental leave. However, only about half of those had at least some paid time off, and 20% relied solely on unpaid leave. Nearly 43% of working fathers expressed a desire for more time off but couldn't take it, primarily due to financial concerns. Many cited the inability to afford unpaid leave, insufficient accrued time off, or the fear of losing their jobs. Why Paternity Leave Matters Experts agree that when fathers take time off after a baby is born, it's linked to better health for the infant and improved parenting skills for the dad. It's crucial for fathers to experience both the challenges and joys of being a parent. The best way for them to do this is to step away from work and spend time with their new baby without facing money worries or the stress of potentially losing their job. Supporting fathers in taking leave can have a significant positive impact on families. Paternity Leaves Helps Father Adapt According to Harvard Business Review, research confirms it helps fathers bond with their babies, aids in the baby's development, and strengthens the parents' relationship. But there's a powerful, lesser-known benefit emerging from new studies: it provides a unique form of brain training for fathers. Paternal Brain Training Parenting isn't simply an innate ability. While we've long known about the amazing changes a mother's brain undergoes to prepare her for caring for a newborn, new research shows that fathers' brains also transform. These changes happen even without the physical experiences of pregnancy and childbirth or the associated hormonal shifts. This "parental instinct brain training" is possible for all parents. Over the past ten years, scientists have learned a lot about neuroplasticity, which is the brain's incredible ability to change its structure and how it works based on new experiences. Becoming a parent is a major time for the brain to adapt. Experts studying this shift emphasize that "fathers are made, not born," meaning spending time with infants is crucial for developing the fathering brain.For dads, changes in their brains, triggered by their babies' cues, are directly linked to their connection with the infant. This suggests these brain changes actually prepare them for fatherhood. A key finding is that the most impactful brain changes come from active, engaged experience. No one is naturally perfect at being a parent from day one. It's the effort of fully engaging with the baby that drives these brain changes, giving dads the necessary tools to grow into their role over time. Why Time with Baby Matters Quality one-on-one time with your baby is crucial. More time spent alone with an infant leads to bigger brain changes, helping dads become better, more natural caregivers. A study comparing dads in California and Spain showed differences. Spanish dads, who often have more generous paternity leave, showed more brain changes related to focused attention. This suggests dedicated time acts like a "brain workout," preparing dads for parenting. Paternity leave essentially gives you a free brain-training program. The more you engage, the more your brain adapts, making you a more responsive parent over time. 

are fathers still reluctant to be primary caretakers of their children? study finds dads take shorter parental leaves

About Us

Contact Us

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Company

Health and Me is a premium website with content written and curated to function as a handbook for all Health concerns.