The State Task Force (STF) for Improving Sex Ratio in Haryana announced that couples with one or two living female children seeking another child through IVF must get a prior permission from a District Appropriate Authority. The decision came in the backdrop of state's sex ratio, which has gone up to 904 girls for every 1,000 boys till July 5 this year, from 903 last year. But, does curtailing IVF right really make a difference? On the World IVF Day, Health and Me spoke to Dr Archana Dhawan Bajaj, a gynaecologist and IVF Expert at Nurture to know what she thinks about this recent decision.Can You Know Your Child's Sex In IVF?Dr Bajaj points out that when a couple conceives through IVF, a preimplantation genetic diagnostic (PGD) test is performed to screen the embryo for genetic abnormalities. However, it also determines its sex. While declaring a child's sex in India is illegal, she notes that, "activists and authorities claim that it is carried out discreetly in IVF clinics across the country."She also explains that despite the law banning sex determination at birth, IVF doctors in various parts of the nation receive inquiries every month about PGD for sex selection, with 90% of them wanting a son. Dr Bajaj says, "They literally beg: 'We won't tell anyone, so please do it'."Since sex determination is illegal in India, some wealthy couples avoid the laws entirely, by "opting for IVF treatment in countries where sex selection is legal, such as the UAE and Thailand", points out the doctor. The question arise, if IVF also does not let couples in India predetermine the child's sex, then does curtailing their right to go for an IVF baby then make any difference? "Policies such as that of Haryana, which obligates couples who have children of the gender that they do not want, such as daughters, to apply to have IVF, are supposed to negate this trend among sex selection," explains Dr Bajaj. While it’s understandable why such regulations have been introduced, this approach risks unfairly penalizing families and infringing on reproductive rights. "In India, laws prohibit sex selection in the context of IVF and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). However, many doctors report that requests for sex selection, primarily for male children, remain common in clinical practice," she says. So, What Should The Approach Be Like?"Instead of placing restrictions on patients, the focus should shift towards tighter regulation of fertility clinics and stronger legal action against violations," points out the doctor. She says that long-term solutions lie in gender sensitization and public education, which address the root of gender bias rather than simply punishing families for their reproductive choices.Imposing limitations based on the number of children or enforcing bans without broader reform can be counterproductive. "Such actions may breed fear and stigma, without actually changing the societal mindset. Real progress requires a balance—upholding ethical medical practices while respecting reproductive autonomy," she says. The views expressed in this article are those of the doctor and do not necessarily reflect the views of Health and Me.